Jewish Perversion and Hollywood Zionism
In the current climate Europe faces a problem distinguishing truth from fiction. This is particularly real when it comes to the arena of historicity. With Zionist control of media, Hollywood and their ‘liberal’ bias pervading mainstream psycho-social and scientific spheres of study information is not always reliable. The modern Nationalist is required to be something of a detective to see his way through the Zionist propaganda as they can twist our past just as they warp our future.
There is a proposal circulating that suggests the notion of ‘romantic love’ only arising in the Victorian era. This could problematise the relationship of sex and the family. While it is suggested, and probably factually sound that royal marriages were conducted as political strategy rather than emotional content, what of the masses. If then ‘romantic love’ did not exist prior to the Victorians is it to be proposed that all marriages were arranged? Would this not suppose that those to be betrothed were strangers. From a Nationalist perspective with family being the cornerstone of the Nation this sounds profoundly unstable. It suggests that like the Marxists purport there is no emotional content to the sexual act therefore throw any couple together. This is no basis for the building blocks of a stable Nation. The common theme with Marxism is the emphasis on taught response. The child is a blank slate upon which the desired mechanism is programmed. In the more organic reality of the Western Nation the concept of the arranged marriage probably stemmed from the notion of parental introduction and extended courtship. In the past the lives of the sexes were most likely far more separated and required a literal bringing together. It is as the lifestyles became more ‘liberal’ that literal introduction were required less and less and so the notion of romantic love sets in because man and woman appear to meet without ‘help’. This does not negate that emotional content existed at the introduction stage but that it was less publicised.
This is an example of the nature of Europe’s growing confusion about her past. The Jewish Zionist has coursed this uncertainty by inserting themselves into her media and film industry and subjecting Western sensibilities to Marxist dogma. As early as 1931 the Jewish Zionist media have been pushing their perverted concepts into film. ‘German’ Jewish director Fritz Lang’s ‘classic’ thriller M is about a murderous child molester played by the jewish actor Peter Lorre. This film speaks for itself. This fiend is so despicable to the community that even the criminal underworld set out to catch him. The ending of the film features the city’s rouges and vagabonds holding their court over the paedophile. At first it seems justice will be served and the child molester will die until he claims himself a ‘victim’ and ‘sick’. Are we seeing the early installation of ‘diminished responsibility’ and its promotion or more to the point ‘it’s not my fault I have a disease’ mentality.
The Committee on Un-American Activities investigated Communist infiltration of the motion picture industry in 1947. Actor Larry Parks confessed that he had been a member of a secret Communist Party Cell in Hollywood whose task was to insert Marxist themes into the movies. He revealed that Jewish actor John Garfield was also a member of this cell. Communism or Bolshevism is the Jewish weapon developed to destroy the White race. It has already been used to great effect in Mother Russia. The Jewish Post And Opinion of December 6, 1974 stated:
“Jews dominate Hollywood today as they did in its infancy, The Jewish presence in Hollywood is a historic fact, A majority of the producers and directors are Jewish while the Writers Guild is practically 70% to 100% Jewish!”
Their infiltration of Hollywood is a ‘monument’ to subversive, self-serving tribalism at the expense of the host/ a central theme of Dr Kevin MacDonald’s book The Culture of Critique. The Jewish Zionist uses its parasitic grip on Hollywood to ‘great’ effect. A particular scene in The Stepfather (1987) addresses the whole psychopathy of the Jewish Communist as a permanent presence in Hollywood. The scene encompasses the killer stepfather and the stepchild’s psychologist who has ‘accosted’ the killer at an empty house under the guise of wanting to buy. Still believing the psychologist to be a client the killer precedes to show the house. His apparent ‘pathology’ begins to display itself as he describes the house as a ‘perfect family home’ and asks if the client has children. It is at this point that the liberal psychologist describing himself as the confirmed bachelor begins to question the killer. The most revealing question from a Nationalist stance was ‘sound like you had a very strict up bringing’. The implication is that the traditional family model will produce an authoritative sociopathological killer.
The conclusion of The Stepfather (1987) is a given. The two ‘feminists’ (Wife and Stepdaughter) successfully ‘emasculate’ the authoritarian male (Stepfather) leaving space for the free entry of mythological ‘equality’ or more correctly ‘intellectual’ Communism (Cultural Marxism). There has never been any basis for psychopathy and the authoritarian personality. The Authoritarian Personality was in fact a book by the Jewish authors ” Theodor Adorno , Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Nevitt Sanford, and Daniel J. Levinson, first published in 1950. It claims that fascism , in contrast to the anti-fascist forces can be explained by the fact that people who potentially would like to support fascism share a pattern of personality traits. Fundamentally the book is a critic of the traditional European and White American family structure and was conveniently funded and initiated by the American Jewish Committee , who also holds the copyright. Despite being heavily quoted in the sociological arena it has never appeared as a credible standalone school text. Equally there has never been any proof of Freud’s psychoanalysis other than that he was a Semite and therefore untouchable. His work centred on the ‘apparent’ psychosexual relationship existing between parent and child. Frankly Freud was nothing more than others of his race-a degenerate pervert desperate to reduce Europe to their level of sexual depravity. Nowhere in the psychoanalysis of Sweden’s Carl Gustav Jung will you find this obsessive need to reduce everything to sex.
Reduction or levelling is a reoccurring theme in the regime of Jewish Zionism. This is wrapped up in the illusion of ‘equality’. Equality is an artificial property none existent in nature. However, early in the 19th century Jewish Zionists Karl Marx and Moses Hess formerly introduced Marxist Socialism more widely known as Communism. This extorts a purely intellectual formula for equalising primarily white man. This has since been transformed into cultural Marxism and rebranded as Political Correctness. Call it what you will Zionists have used Communism to bring the European peoples to their knees. Its main achievements have been the miscegenation or mixing of the White race through mass immigration. The other major form of global levelling or equalisation is mass poverty. The situation in Greece cannot be ignored and it is undeniable that the ‘transfer’ of the National wealth of Greece to the Zionist European Union is responsible. What we are seeing is an action replay of Soviet Bolshevism only on a mass European scale.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL