From the 1880’s onwards British police were investigating subversive political activity specifically involving Jewish itinerants previously squatting in Poland and Russia. Mainstream has already admitted that the most vicious modern serial killer the Jew Aaron Kosminski AKA ‘Jack the Ripper’ likely arrived in London with his family during the Russian riots that broke out in response to Jewish terrorist activity in the early 1880’s culminating in the murder of a European monarch Tsars Alexander II. Significant international media control enabled the Jewish tribe to use their favourite cry of victimhood effectively (The fabricated Pogrom). Thus a new wave of Jews was dispersed far and wide re-infecting some of the most powerful European countries on earth with their now ideologically revised poisonous designs; amongst the immigrants leaving Eastern Europe for Britain such violent terrorist types were contained amongst them. Indeed close to Mitre Square in the City of London where the Ripper’s fourth victim Catharine Eddowes was murdered the Great Synagogue and the Imperial Club both just off Duke Street were both potential meeting places for these Jewish Communist agitators. The Hebrew Socialist Union had been formed in Gun Street; Spitalfields in 1876 and in 1889, following a march from Berner Street to the Great Synagogue, a riot would take place outside the International Workers’ Educational Club near where the Ripper’s third victim Elizabeth Stride’s body was found. Committed Jewish Communist Louis Diemschutz, a deceitful ‘witness’ to the Elizabeth Stride murder, was listed as speaking at a club in Manchester in 1891 on the theme of the Paris Commune, which was the first attempted Marxist seizure of a European land. He, along with the Jew Isaac Kozebrodsky also witness to the murder scene, were arrested in March 1889 during the riot at the International Working Men’s Club and charged with assaulting a police officer. Diemschutz was sentenced to three months’ imprisonment with hard labour, a £40 fine (around £15,000 in today’s money) and producing two sureties of £20 each, to be forfeited if he failed to be of good behaviour for twelve months; a rather substantial cost for a supposed ‘poor Jewish immigrant’.
Britain’s First Jewish Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli still had his seat in 1880 and his own policy on race condoned this influx of violent Jewish criminality that equally brought the monster Kosminski into Britain. In his book Endymion published in 1880 Disraeli wrote “no man will treat with indifference the principles of race. It is the key to history and why history is so often confused is that it has been written by men who were ignorant of this principle and all the knowledge it involves…Language and religion do not make a race-there is only one thing which makes a race, and that is blood” Disraeli (1804 – 1881) was contemporary with the Jew Karl Marx (1818 – 1883) and both times as Prime Minister (1868, 1874–80) shared the same city as the inventor of White man’s destruction (Communism). However, curiously this is not the first time this tribal pair’s path has crossed. The Great Potato Famine began in Ireland in 1845 coinciding with Karl Marx’s brief visit to England 4 years before his permanent residency in 1849. 11 years later Marx would echo his comrade twice the future Prime Minister of Britain, Disraeli, then MP for Shrewsbury as he collapsed the British government in order to sabotage the only remedy to the Irish potato famine. Almost as if instructed as part of some long term strategy by Marx, two years later in 1847 the earliest safe seat in the House of Commons was made available to a fellow tribesman knowing he was barred from sitting in the chamber. At this time non-Christians were not permitted to sit in Parliament. It is conspicuous that it was so called ‘converted’ Jew Disraeli who spoke in favour of amending the law to permit Jews. With the exception of Disraeli, every member of the future protectionist cabinet then in government voted against the measure. Nevertheless, following this elaborately engineered Marxian scheme in 1847 that forced the British establishment to display apparent ‘anti-Semitism’, a Jewish Disabilities Bill continued to be pushed through Parliament and on 26th July 1858, Lionel de Rothschild took his seat as the first professing alien parasitic Member of Parliament in line with the Jewish agenda. Fundamentally this can be explained through the Jewish strategy of the dialectic (problem, reaction, solution). Their tribe instigate a problem by letting a safe seat in Parliament to one barred from sitting. This creates a reaction, cries of anti-Semitism leading to the Jewish Disabilities Bill pushed through Parliament resulting in the Jewish solution the Jew Lionel de Rothschild taking his seat. This strategy is also at work during the potato famine.
To reiterate at this point at a critical juncture in European history there are 3 major Jews together in the most important capital in the world and within the space of a mere two years two of the most disastrous decisions ever in British history have been made. The loss of containment of a cancerous virus-the Jew is allowed to enter the halls of power-Parliament coursing pandemic across all European nations around the world leading to total Aryan subjugation; and the precursor to the Holodomor, the Irish Potato Famine that created a chasm between brethren so wide that it has existed for over 170 years. Of course this only echoes what Jews have done in other European counties. Examples are Basques set against Spanish, Russians against Ukrainians, Polish against Germans… Under the guidance of Marx, Disraeli and Rothschild’s manoeuvring the result is Jewish consolidation of power in, at that time the most formidable country on earth-Great Britain.
By early 1886 the anti-Home Rule (Ireland) Liberals had formed a ‘Committee for the Preservation of the Union’ (United Kingdom of Great Britain). This was soon joined by a smaller radical faction led by Joseph Chamberlain eventually breaking from Gladstone’s Liberal Party to form the Liberal Unionist Party. A coalition of the Conservative and Liberal Unionist parties took power in the United Kingdom following the general election of 1895. The Conservative leader, Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, the Marquess of Salisbury, took office as Prime Minister, and Arthur Balfour, was leader of the Commons. It is critical to recognise and no doubt surprising to some to hear that firearms were commonplace among the British people during this period and the government did not interfere. Prime Minister Lord Salisbury even stated in 1900 that he would “laud the day when there was a rifle in every cottage in England”. However, in only 2 years; 1902 the same year that Lenin along with Trotsky made their first visit to London and the first Zionist leader Theodor Herzl was in the capital, Salisbury had resigned to be succeeded by the infamous Balfour with the approval of the coalition government. Herzl would have multiple meetings with Nathanial Mayer ‘Lord’ Rothschild between 1902 and 1903. By 1903, the year Lenin paid his second visit, Britain had passed its first ever “gun control” law running parallel with current Jewish gun restrictions being enforced in America. Also at this time Winston Churchill alienated the Conservative Party by criticising the principles of Protectionism and military expenditure achieving a vote of no confidence from his Party on 23rd December 1903. The year before in 1902, he had been initiated into Freemasonry at Studholme Lodge, London (#1591) and raised to the Third Degree on 25th March. Although he continued to sit for Oldham until the next general election Churchill chose a critical moment to cross the floor to the Liberal Party. At the end of March 1904 just weeks prior to his departure the Conservatives had brought the Aliens Bill, the purpose of which was to curb Jewish immigration from East Europe, before the House of Commons. Promptly Churchill became an ardent opponent of the Bill busily wooing the electors of north-west Manchester, one-third of whose voters were Jewish, for whom he became Liberal MP in 1906, the year in which the Liberal party won a spectacular General Election victory. He was even accused in the press of acting under orders from Lord Rothschild, though he characterized the charge as a “foul slander”. Nevertheless, Churchill and a few allies continued to stonewall the bill. It was also incredibly convenient that in 1902 and 3 it was Theodor Herzl, Jewish Zionist and organiser of the World Zionist Organization of which the minutes are said to be the Protocols, who was invited to give evidence before the British Royal Commission on Alien (specifically Jewish) Immigration. Only a year later in 1904 during one of his electoral campaigns Balfour conferred with Chaim Weizmann, a leader among Jewish Zionists in Britain, who had recently taken a position as a chemistry lecturer in the area of Balfour’s Manchester constituency. Occurring in the same year that Churchill crossed the floor and became an ardent opponent of the Aliens Bill, vital is the fact that both these characters played a key role in the establishment of Israel. Meanwhile top Jewish Bolsheviks including Lenin and Trotsky have been meeting in London over the 3 years prior to the first attempted seizure of Russia in 1905. Balfour was Prime Minister until his resignation in December 1905 thus overseeing the Russo-Japanese War and playing host to the Jewish Bolshevik instigators of the first attempted seizure of Russia. Critically the Jewish anarchists involved in the attempted first violent seizure of Russia who escaped to England in 1905 were also the instigators of the Sidney Street Siege and a series of violent crimes involving several murders that preceded it, dealt with shortly in this article. Hence, as a consequence of Jewish political propaganda in the 1880’s Britain had an increasing influx of violent politically motivated alien parasites condoned by a strategically placed Jewish Prime Minister Disraeli who had twice cross paths with Karl Marx. Within years MP Churchill was accused in the press of acting under orders from Lord Rothschild as Prime Minister Balfour conferred with leading Jewish Zionist in Britain Chaim Weizmann and played host to the Jewish Bolshevik instigators of the first attempted seizure of Russia. Already in 1905 an examination of the British leadership was sharply indicating corruption and enemy infiltration.
The Aliens Act had been introduced by July 24th 1905. It ensured that leave to land could be withheld if the immigrant was judged to be ‘undesirable’ by falling into one of four categories: ‘a) if he cannot show that he has in his possession … the means of decently supporting himself and his dependents …’; ‘b) if he is a lunatic or an idiot or owing to any disease of infirmity liable to become a charge upon the public rates …’; c) ‘if he has been sentenced in a foreign country for a crime, not being an offence of a political character …’; or ‘d) if an expulsion order under this act has [already] been made’. What is highly significant is that racially driven ‘political’ intrigue against a former European government is not considered criminally damaging enough to restrict access into this land demonstrating that the interests of the British public are not being prioritised. Indeed there is clear evidence of National interests being relegated to pave the way for future global Jewish interests. Consequently even with the adoption of the Aliens Act the subversive political atmosphere remained. Although a bit late in the game this was acknowledged 34 years later on “January 13th, 1939 when Mr. Dummett, the Bow Street Magistrate, said in Court: “This system by which Jews get sailors to smuggle them into this country, and then refuse to give the name of the ship or men who got them here, is a grave breach of the Aliens Act.” Mr. Metcalfe, the Old Street Magistrate, expressed himself on the subject in even stronger terms. “Most of the stipendiary magistrates know that the so-called aliens are Jewish criminals of the lowest and shiftiest type or, at the best, rapacious political nuisances.”
Ramsay MacDonald played host to Lenin in the run up to the Tottenham outrage (1907). He would become the first Labour Prime Minister in the shadow of scandal implicating him in Jewish Bolshevik conspiracy. The 1924 scandal surrounded a document in letter form written by the Jew Zinoviev encouraging agitation “in the armed forces (including a loan to the Bolshevik government)”. Also during Lenin’s fourth and fifth visits to London in 1907 and 8 Trotsky, Stalin and other leading Bolshevik terrorists attended a congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party in an East London church. The Tottenham Outrage is the name given to an armed robbery and double murder which took place in Tottenham, Middlesex and Walthamstow, Essex, on January 23rd 1909, carried out by two Jewish anarchists, Paul Helfeld and Jacob Lepidus (sometimes spelt Lapidus). It is interesting to note that this occurred in the same year as the founding of MI1 through to MI19 the precursor to the well-known MI5 and MI6. Curiously its prime agent was the Jew Shlomo Rosenblum alias Sidney Reilly inserted as crucially Jewish anarchists plan to steal wages from Schnurmann’s Rubber Company in Chestnut Road Tottenham. The proceeds of this criminal activity were to be used to fuel unrest around Europe. In fact it was known that many of these Jewish protagonists had already received heavy sentences for this same criminal behaviour in other European countries. Situated in the shadow of Tottenham Police Station shots fired during the attempted robbery were heard by Constables Tyler and Newman. In their attempts to escape the two Jewish anarchists began a chase and shooting spree that resulted in two deaths – a brave unarmed pursuing police officer William Tyler and an innocent 10 year old baker’s delivery boy named Ralph Joscelyne. In all there were 25 casualties including massive head trauma and paralysis due to gunshot wounds demonstrating the escaping Jewish anarchist’s contempt for the innocent European public. The whole incident lasted more than two hours, covered a distance of six miles with an estimated 400 rounds fired by Helfeld and Lepidus. Inconveniently despite a restriction in public gun ownership it was partly due to an armed public that the violence was brought to an ‘early’ close. Consequently there is a direct correlation between Jewish Zio-Marxist street violence and occupied politicians need for public gun control; without means to defend himself against the criminal element the occupying Jew has a new way to exterminate the European. It was reported that both Jewish anarchists shot themselves, Lepidus successfully Helfeld later dying in hospital, rather than risk capture. However, given the extraordinary measures now taken to strip the European public of any means to defend themselves against the enemy, it is hard to imagine the Jew actually taking its own life. Constable Tyler was publicly buried on January 29th in Abney Park Cemetery with the route of the murdered policeman’s funeral cortège being lined by a crowd of half a million people. The event led to the creation of the King’s Police Medal, to reward the gallantry of the police officers involved and heightened public awareness of the Jewish problem; simultaneously increasing a hatred for this criminal race who would later ignite the 1911 Sidney Street Siege.
On December 16th 1910, members of the same Jewish gang including Yakov Peters, George Gardstein, Fritz Svaars, and Yourka Dubof attempted to break into the rear of Henry Harris’s jeweller’s shop in Houndsditch resulting in the murder of 3 police officers and injury to 2 others. The Daily Telegraph reported: “Some two or three weeks ago this particular house in Exchange Buildings was rented and there went to live there two men and a woman. They were little known by neighbours, and kept very quiet, as if, indeed, to escape observation. They are said to have been foreigners in appearance, and the whole neighbourhood of Houndsditch containing a great number of aliens, and removal being not infrequent, the arrival of this new household created no comment. The police, however, evidently had some cause to suspect their intentions. The neighbourhood is always well patrolled.”
An intense search for the murderers followed and a number of the gang or their associates were soon arrested including Karl Hoffman, Max Smoller, John Rosen, Sara Trassjonsky and Gardstein’s mistress Nina Vassilleva. When arrested the Jewess Trassjonsky was hastily burning incriminating documentation. Perhaps relating to other gang members the papers in question may have had links to official channels. She was questioned at the City Police headquarters in Old Jewry, off Cheapside though no significant information could be gotten from her. On January 2nd 1911 The Metropolitan Police received information that two more of the Gardstein gang were sheltering in the Jewess Betsy Gershon‘s flat at 100 Sidney Street, Stepney. The combined force of Met and City Police cordoned off the area and evacuated other residents. What is highly significant at this point is Winston Churchill’s massive over reaction in sending 200 police to surround the building, 800 Scots Guards and field artillery (cannon). The then unpopular Home Secretary made an appearance in person at the scene with audible booing from the gathering crowd as fire took hold of the building. The reason for the appearance of such an authoritative politician has yet to be explained although much palaver was created out of his being shot through the hat; a typical media distraction technique and frequently dismissed by historians who suggest that the bullets passed no were near the Home Secretary. Although the Fire Brigade arrived promptly they were forbidden by Churchill to extinguish the blaze which generally guarantees erasure of forensic evidence. Two bodies were discovered inside the burnt-out building. later identified as Fritz Svaars and William Sokolow. Churchill then appeared at the inquest held that January into the deaths at Houndsditch and Sidney Street. Here curiously, even though fire had meant it unlikely that forensic evidence was possible, it took the jury only fifteen minutes to reach the conclusion that the two bodies located were those of Svaars and Sokoloff, and that the police officers were murdered by Gardstein (now dead) and his gang in the course of a mere burglary attempt.
Although information the police received mentioned only two gang members at the Sidney Street residence and correspondingly two bodies were discovered inside the burnt-out house at this point a police hunt is activated for what we would suggest is a fictional third member of the gang named Peter Piaktow. Portrayed as a mystery ‘revelations’ about his identity are rife only lending the figure to Jewish Marxist misdirection as happened in 1960 when the criminal activities committed by these Jewish anarchists in the winter of 1910-11 were glorified in a movie. ‘Peter Piaktow’ was used as the central character in the film ‘The Siege of Sidney Street’ and the script has him escape providing the media with an ‘excuse’ to ignore facts. Thus in a similar fashion to the ‘Jack the Ripper’ saga were the public are distracted from the true Jewish murderers Aaron Kosminski and his Jewish helper George Chapman by various ‘red herrings’, one of them being the possibility that a member of the Royal family was the killer, there are several myths concentrating on ‘Peter the Painter’. Nevertheless, the trial of the Houndsditch murders opened at the Old Bailey on May 1st with Yakov Peters, a member of the British Labour Party and Yourka Dubof, who both took part in the 1905 attempted Jewish seizure of Russia, charged with murder. Yet James Melville barrister in the 1911 trial successfully defended both anarchists, also critical to note he would become a minister in Ramsay MacDonald’s 1929 Labour Government. According to the author Donald Rumbelow Peters was guilty but the prosecution’s case was a shambles. This was somewhat curious court work considering the number of ‘anarchists’ that his father, William Melville, had apprehended, and his father’s key emergent role in counter-intelligence. Clearly there is weight to the allegation that Melville Sr. was implemented to lift suspicion from Jewish Bolshevik anarchists. Indeed it was Melville Sr. who recruited the Jew Shlomo Rosenblum (Sidney Reilly) supported by Winston Churchill who advocated Reilly’s recruitment into MI6 even though it was known that he prostituted his ‘talents’ to other powers. There is also speculation that Reilly was a Bolshevik agent; his disappearance in Russia in 1925 only deepened these suspicions. That Melville Sr. was also to engage the Jewish trickster and locksmith Houdini around the same time period as Reilly suggests a tribal recruitment drive by the security services. Therefore, British security was heavily infiltrated and thus compromised from the very beginning. Peters escaped justice to return to Russia where he became deputy head of the Cheka secret police. He married May Freeman, the daughter of a Jewish banker in 1913. In December, 1917, Lenin appointed Felix Dzerzhinsky as Commissar for Internal Affairs and head of the All-Russian Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and Sabotage (Cheka). Soon afterwards Dzerzhinsky appointed Peters as his deputy. An American diplomat testified to Congress that Peters was, along with other Cheka leaders considered the “most blood-thirsty monster in Russia” almost as notorious as Dzerzhinsky himself. This only confirms complicity with the Jewish agenda in the British Government at a high level.
The dramatic Siege of Sidney Street was the opening to a series of highly politicised events. In that same year, September 1911, the Jew Mordecai Bogrov murdered the Russian Prime Minister Pyotr Stolypin and only months later Lenin embarked on his final visit to London. In all he visited England 6 times writing his first letter to the Director of the British Museum, dated April 22nd 1902, requesting permission to study in the Library. It bears the signature Jacob Richter; the pseudonym that he had adopted to throw the Tsarist police off his track. The reference required by the Museum authorities was supplied by the General Secretary of the General Federation of Trade Unions, I. H. Mitchell, but this did not satisfy the Admissions Office as Mitchell’s home address could not be found in the London street directories. Lenin wrote again enclosing another recommendation from Mitchell, who this time used the address of his union’s headquarters. On May 18th 1908 under his real name, Vladimir Oulyanoff, Lenin again wrote to the Director of the Museum requesting permission to study in the Library referring to an earlier donation of two of his books. His recommendation came from a certain J. J. Terrett, an English Social Democrat, but as in 1902 the authorities refused him admission. However, not only does this confirm that Lenin had considerable contacts among the so called socialist and Labour Unions but it also indicates that his insurgence into England was not entirely smooth. Two days later he wrote again enclosing a second reference, this time from his old friend, the manager of the Twentieth Century Press and founding member of the British Communist party, Harry Quelch. Lenin made use of the Library’s collections on only one more occasion; during his lecture-tour of 1911. The London reading of “Stolypin and Revolution“ took place on November 11th in the New King’s Hall, Commercial Road, Whitechapel and on the same day the Museum issued a temporary pass to Mr. Vladimir Oulianoff, making a note of his address:- 6 Oakley Square, N.W., in their Card Index of Readers. He visited several European cities to deliver his paper possibly making a stop in Liverpool during the Transport Strike.
Strike action began in Southampton on 14th June when the National Amalgamated Sailors’ and Firemen’s Union made demands for improved conditions for their members and action then spread to other ports, including Liverpool the home of the infamous New York times reporter Walter Duranty who provided the necessary obstacle that prevented the truth about the Holodomor genocides emerging. Demands were met in a few days and members returned to work, but in Liverpool the strike continued led by Tom Mann. Openly Communist and a member of the Fabian Society Mann was an early member of the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) formed in 1920. He supported measures being taken during 1921 in Russia and the Ukraine by the Jewish Bolsheviks (Holodomor Genocides) and published pamphlets stating such. The first Communists recruited from Britain to fight against European patriots in the 1936 Spanish civil war were named the Tom Mann Centuria led by the Jew Nat Cohen. In fact the first Marxist political group in Britain-Social Democratic Federation (SDF) – included trade unionist members Tom Mann and Eleanor Marx, Karl Marx’ youngest daughter.
The strike came to its climax on August 13th as police clashed violently with the public. In the police charges and subsequent unrest that carried on through the following night, over 350 people were injured. 3,500 British troops were stationed in the city by this time. Two days later, soldiers of the 18th Hussars opened fire on a crowd on Vauxhall Road, injuring fifteen, two fatally: John Sutcliffe and Michael Prendergast. Given the heightened tension already alive in the city Churchill’s decision to add troops, extra Police from other parts of the country and even sending a gunboat, HMS Antrim, up the Mersey with its guns facing Liverpool seems like a primer for civil war. However, this was clearly a dialectical move to create an even greater divide between the classes. Given the fact that Lenin had recently paid his last visit to Britain and was a master of the dialectic it is not hard to reason that sexually compromised Churchill had taken instruction directly from his Jewish handlers. Indeed to this day Liverpool is considered to be the most Trotskyite city in Britain. It is also critical to note that the position of the Home Secretary ensures measures be seen as acts of ‘national security’ while they actually favour the Jewish agenda. The Liverpool general transport strike, also known as the great transport workers’ strike, paralysed Liverpool commerce for most of the summer of 1911. Thus with a Marxist leadership the general trade unions had succeeded in fractionalising the whole city (rich versus poor) holding it to ransom through the use of their own working people. It is also interesting to note that although born in Liverpool and aged 27 at the time of the strike Duranty’s whereabouts is unknown at this point though later he would substantially contribute to Jewish Bolshevik propaganda.
Given Lenin’s close link with the union movement in Britain, for example his association with the General Secretary of the General Federation of Trade Unions, I. H. Mitchell, from a Jewish perspective this would warrant a piece of misdirection (in fact a smokescreen) leading directly to the fable of Hitler’s visit to Liverpool still perpetuated today through the Zio-Marxist media even though proven to be a blatant fabrication. Lenin even confirmed a connection following the national coal strike of 1912. The first national strike by coal miners in Britain it began at the end of February in Alfreton, Derbyshire and spread nationwide ending on April 6th after 37 days. Lenin stated that “since the miners’ strike the British proletariat is no longer the same. The workers have learned to fight…In Britain a change has taken place in the balance of social forces”. This only confirms that his appearance in Britain was to solicit disorder. Indeed it was well known that Lenin and his comrades were plotting to take over a European country by violent insurgency. The failed assassination attempt on the Tsar’s life by Lenin’s brother occurring on the sixth anniversary of Alexander II’s murder by Jewish Bolsheviks (1st March 1887) and the first attempted seizure of Russia in 1905 is proof of this. Therefore, while it is plain that between 1902 and 1911 Lenin and his entourage were able to hold their meetings, six in all, in England what is inconceivable is that a Government put in place to protect its people allowed it. Thus, based on the evidence provided, the only conclusion that can be reached is treachery and alien infiltration.
Furthermore, in a telegram from New York to London, dated March 22th, 1917, an MI5 agent warned “An important movement has been started here among Socialists (Jewish Bolsheviks), with a view to getting back Revolutionary Socialists into Russia … with [the] object of establishing a Republic and…promoting Socialistic Revolutions in other countries, including the United States”. Thus this same MI5 agent ordered a ship containing Trotsky to be detained when it stopped at Halifax in Canada. Trotsky was subsequently arrested with five Bolshevik terrorists and there he would have remained, had it not been for the intervention of another Jewish MI6 officer William Wiseman.
This is unmistakable evidence that the British Government allowed the Jew Trotsky back into Russia. This decision was absolutely bizarre given the fact that Britain and the rest of Europe were perfectly aware of Jewish Bolshevik policy to remain out of WWI. Also critical is that Lenin, based in Switzerland, was absent from the beginnings of the Bolshevik takeover of Russia. Yet in hast the German Government smuggled him back into Russia by train. Therefore, the only interests served with the return of two leading Jewish Bolshevik figures-Trotsky and Lenin is the destruction of the old European order marked by the Jewish seizure of Russia and the murder of an ancient European royal line. Indeed history always reveals that the Jew is always at the crucial point to oversee his scheme. Furthermore 3 months prior to Trotsky’s detention on the 17th December 1916 British security services executed a plot with Oswald Rayner (another possibly Jewish agent) and transvestite and likely homosexual Count Felix Yusupova to assassinate Jewish Hollywood’s favourite scapegoat Rasputin.
In a final summery during 1845 there were 3 major Jews Disraeli, Rothschild and Marx in London and within two years two of the most disastrous decisions ever in British history had been made. It is critical to note that the insertion of the Jewish parasite into Parliament has usurped European Security in favour of Jewish global interests. Also particularly significant is the fact that within a few years of Marx’ 1845 episode he writes 2 major Jewish ideological platforms-the Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital and becomes a permanent resident in London. As early as 1871 Marx work is used as a formula in an attempt to seize France and by 1902-4 Prime Minister Balfour plays host to Jewish Zionist leader Theodor Herzl and shares the same city with with first and future President of Israel Chaim Weizmann and Bolshevik leaders Lenin and Trotsky, laying the seed for the Jewish Bolshevik first attempted seizure of Russia, WWI and the capture of Palestine. Following Russia’s actual seizure in 1917 it is the Jew Lenin who will enforce Marx’s Communist ideology that murdered in excess of 66 million Europeans. The foundation for this was laid when; in 1909 Melville recruited Reilly to the fledgling British Secret Service with Churchill’s support. During this period Churchill’s behaviour, whose accusation of homosexuality in 1896 was covertly settled out of court, can only be considered as suspicious with regard to his favourable Jewish political manoeuvring and bizarre presence during Jewish terrorist activity. In 2002 Jewish media through a poll voted Churchill the “Greatest Briton” later followed by a statue in Jerusalem only cementing the fact that Churchill was actually the “Greatest” Jewish shill.
Consequently, Marx’s work was the blueprint for 150 years of European destabilisation culminating in the violent Jewish occupation of Eastern Europe. Even now Marx’s work has been reconstructed for a contrived ‘collapse’ of communism in the East. Now combined with Jewish psychology or ‘Freudianism’ it is delivered across the globe as cultural Marxism or Political Correctness a key dialectical tool driving us towards total subservience under a tyrannical Jewish One World Government. Therefore, it seems only fitting to remind Europe that by constantly submitting to alien Jewish manipulation she squandered a prime opportunity to fight this future. We now face the endgame and a final reckoning. When it arises it must be grasped with both hands for there will be no reprise for Europe.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
From the very beginning a referendum lead by Jewish Zio-Marxism was not going to have a desirable outcome for Europeans. The exit strategy itself was led by Jewish Prime Minister’s Cameron’s cousin Boris Johnson so even out of the Jewish construct (EU) we are still under the Jewish yoke. It is also vital to note that UKIP the party with apparent ‘nationalist’ leanings at the forefront of the Brexit farce is a product of the Jewish occupied Zio-Marxist Government. In a typical Jewish dialectic as the seemingly ‘lesser evil’ UKIP and Farage are paraded against the BNP, also a construct of the occupied government. In a further display of the dialectic Labour leader Corbyn, who not so long ago boasted a Jewish element in his family, opposed Brexit only proving that the Jew covers all sides of the debate. Thus, with the display for public and cameras all tied up this democratic ballot was nothing less than a false flag preordained by the Jews but how does it serve their agenda?
The initial response from the Jewish quarter is to blame the vote on Britain’s older generation. Already a plan exists to exterminate native Britain’s elderly via Pathways. With the help of a sobbing crypto-Jew now the tribe is fracturing ties between the old and young. Continuing along this vein Jews and criminals in Scotland are pushing for devolution and open negotiation with the Jewish construct (EU) leading to calls for the capital London to split from the British Union. While, this is hugely divisive for the European people as a whole in the short term it threatens to tear Great Britain apart part of the Jewish agenda since their agent Winston Churchill destroyed Britain’s Empire in the Jewish engineered war.
In a wider context the mass echo Churchill’s quote “If Britain must choose between Europe and the open sea, she must always choose the open sea …” sadly confusing a Jewish structure with occupied European territory. This is a critical distinction for the European Union (EU) although labelled ‘European’ bears absolutely no relation to the European race. This situation has been deliberately engineered and is not new. The atmosphere that arose from Churchill’s quote was meant to drive Briton’s away from their European brethren and closer to America. While we have no wish to alienate our American European kin the notion that Brexit has placed in the European public consciousness i.e. that they are ‘out of Europe’ has the potential to create a monumental rift between European kinsfolk. It is also vital to note that Churchill met with mixed race Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, in 1939 and by 1946 was praising the man’s work in his speech. Known as the father of the EU and financed by Jewish bankers it was Kalergi who was striving to replace the nationalist German ideal of a European racial community with an ethnically heterogeneous (international miscegenation) society. This explains the Jewish Zio-Marxist importation of non-Europeans furthering the Kalergi plan the result being white genocide. Meanwhile, the ever more devolved and fractionalised as a people Europeans become the less likely they are to unite against the Jewish enemy.
It has also come to light that Brexit is being used as an excuse to impose further non-European imports on Britain by way of France. While this furthers the Kalergi plan it likewise fractures relationships between European Nations. Meanwhile, on the home front the Jewish Zio-Marxist media is reporting an upsurge in necessarily false flag ‘racist’ attacks that provide the Jewish occupied government a perfect excuse to execute a host of crippling new ‘hate crime’ laws against native Britons and cover for arrests and possible deaths of European Patriots fighting against Jewish terror and intimidation.
Therefore, while we are only in the early stages of Brexit no respite exists for the native Briton. He, just like his European brethren remains slated as ‘racists’ as the garden of England (Kent) is earmarked to become residence for Europeans tool of destruction. Those that complain about this fresh immigrant onslaught are sure to be criminalised in the newly introduced tightened ‘hate laws’ that the public are convinced Britain requires. If the truth be known it is impossible to predict the entire repercussions, but knowing that the enemy (Jew) holds all the cards why would they provide an open door (referendum) if the outcome no matter how complex that outcome appears was not predetermined? Consequently, there is one surety this move favours the Jew to the detriment of the European and to believe otherwise one would have to be a fool or a willing pawn.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Jewish politician Greville Janner or Lord Janner of Braunstone is a prominent ex-barrister, who represented Leicester as a Labour MP for almost 30 years half as long as he has been raping European children. Janner served as president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews between 1978 and 1984. This is the main representative body for Jews squatting in Britain. He is also chairman of the Zionist Federation of Great Britain, served as a vice president of the ‘World Jewish Congress’ and of the ‘Jewish Leadership Council’. Janner played a leading role in extorting money from Swiss banks claiming it belonged to Jews and was ‘stolen’ during WWII. Ironic given that they are a foreign entity squatting on European land and living off a European economy so any wealth they have acquired is European. Janner is currently charged with 22 accounts of child rape spanning over 60 years. He is also a keen amateur magician; slightly more inventive than offering little children sweeties. One wonders how many of the 140,000 children a year in Britain alone he makes vanish.
The son of Barnett Janner and Elsie Sybil, née Cohen Jewish parents born in Lithuania, fluent Yiddish speaker Janner was born in Cardiff, Wales of the kohanim line. Notable others of this line include Bela Kun and Director of the BBC Danny Cohen, also strategically positioned to induce the greatest amount of corruption possible to the ethnic European. The mother, Elsie Sybil Cohen, a Labour party activist was already well placed as president of the Federation of Women Zionists, the British Council for Soviet Jewry, and vice-president of the Association for Jewish Youth. Her husband’s memorial occupies territory that she seized on the slopes of Mount Gilboa, in upper Galilee, which she ironically named Gan Ner, the Garden of Light. Perhaps it is a reference to the Jewish tribe’s constant fiery destruction of the Gentile. Janner’s father Barnett was equally favoured having spent a year as a student studying with notorious Jewish Communist Israel Cohen. Cohen is attributed with the following quote that appeared in a March 1957 letter to the editor of the Washington Star; “We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mould them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavour to instil in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause” While, the Star later apologised and claimed the quote to be a ‘forgery’ its authenticity is irrelevant for it would never have been printed in the first place had not on some level those involved in publication agreed with the sentiments contained therein. Like his son Barnett became President of the Board of Deputies of British Jews (1950 to 1970) a member of the World Zionist Organisation and the World Jewish Congress. However, Janner senior’s main scheme was a prelude to his son’s pseudo charities in that it helped compel the British Government into pursuing Jewish interests.
Evacuated to Canada during WWII at the age of 18 the son Greville Janner eagerly joined the British Army as part of the contrived ‘War Crimes’ Investigation Unit near a former Labour camp in Jewish occupied Germany. This unit also ran the notorious London Cage and as the work of the Cage wound down the interrogation of prisoners was switched to a number of allied prison camps in Germany. While many of the papers relating to these interrogation centres remain sealed at the Foreign Office, evidence does show that the treatment meted out in these places was much worse and it is clear that one camp in the British zone became particularly notorious. Most of the intelligence officers accompanying US and British forces into the Reich were Jewish and the most brutal of the interrogators, examiners and screeners and given Janner’s predilections the manner of depravity visited upon German prisoners of War (POW’s) can be deduced. George Patton even commented “I am frankly opposed to this war-criminal stuff. It is not cricket and it is Semitic… I can’t see how Americans can sink so low.” Indeed according to a court of inquiry German prisoners were starved to death, while others were tortured and shot for minor offenses. Further evidence points to the National Archives were a complaint made by a 27-year-old German journalist held at this camp somewhat vindicates the German State Police from Jewish propaganda. He stated that while he had spent two years as a prisoner of the Gestapo not once did they treat him as badly as the post WWII occupying forces.
Despite only being with the army unit 18 months until its closure in 1948 Janner rose swiftly to the rank of Sergeant. He became a barrister in 1954, proceeded his father as Labour MP for Leicester and married Myra Sheink the niece of Israel Brodie, former Chief Rabbi of Great Britain and the Commonwealth and Freemasonic ‘Grand Chaplain’ of the United Grand Lodge of England. Like his nephew-in-law Brodie has engineered a web that favours the Jews to the detriment of the European. He expanded his tribe’s business network (The United Synagogue) and his Conference of European Rabbis founded in 1956 is a lobby group that serves Jewish interests to the impairment of the Ethnic European. Janner himself has 3 children; Daniel as we shall see later positioned in an attempt to prevent his father’s prosecution, Marion following the Marxist agenda a mental health worker with apparent ‘issues’ of her own and no doubt directing her European patients toward the same sexual disease as her father, and Rabbi Laura Janner-Klausner. Married to David Klausner, local Government manipulator Laura Janner-Klauser who speaks fluent Hebrew and is Britain’s only female head of faith has quite evidently been placed to drive the perversion agenda in the religious arena. Studying Christian theology at Cambridge University under Dr Rowan Williams, who would later become the 104th and rather questionable Archbishop of Canterbury Janner-Klausner has a disturbing habit of forming ‘relationships’ with perverse figures in the Christian arena raising the issue of the root of the corruption. Her current liaison is with Justin Welby the Jewish 105th Archbishop of Canterbury. Maintaining an unsurmountable level of chutzpah she still receives a regular platform on Jewish run and paedophile riddled BBC and radio even as her father is prosecuted for child rape. Laura Janner-Klausner patently expresses that her corrosive program of feminism, sexual perversion and homosexual marriage is not for the Jewish tribe but solely directed towards the European by citing her strictly orthodox rabbi Great Uncle Israel Brodie as a ‘profound influence’.
Greville Janner is close friends with self-confessed Mossad agent Uri Geller the proof of which has been exposed by declassified documents. Like Savile the BBC provided Geller with a rather unique cover. Presenting him as an eccentric crank not to be taken seriously with talents as equally limited as Savile, Geller had the uncanny ability to move round freely in powerful circles. Nevertheless, following the police search of Janner’s Westminster offices in March 2014 Geller revealed that he was quitting his mansion of 34 years in the UK for a small apartment in Jewish occupied Palestine. One cannot help but view this sudden move in connection with Janner, Savile and the intensive paedophile investigations it has uncovered.
It was this Jewish Labour MP along with schoolmaster and former Labour Home Secretary Merlyn Rees that founded ‘The Holocaust Educational Trust’ in 1988. Following Hugh Gaitskell’s suspicious death, Rees stood successfully as the Labour candidate for Leeds South while Harold Wilson succeeded Gaitskell as Labour leader. Rees is at the centre of an investigation into whether Government money was used to fund the Paedophile Information Exchange group. The Holocaust Educational Trust is a registered charity in England, Wales and Scotland. The current Chief Executive is Karen Pollock, who was awarded an MBE for her services to ‘Holocaust’ construct indoctrination in 2012. Janner is Chairman and the President is Stephen Rubin. Honorary Patrons include Lord Carey, Lord Dholakia, Lord Mackay of Clashfern and compulsive liar Elie Wiesel. Jewish politician Janner has been raping little European children for 60 years. An MP said Janner had “raped and tortured” children in Parliament no doubt a sadistic proclivity he developed during his early years in the army. There are 22 counts of child rape against him yet Jewish Prime Minister David Cameron still condones the involvement of this fiends trust within the National Curriculum of schools across the United Kingdom. “Over quarter of a century we have come an enormous way in our efforts to ensure that the Holocaust is understood and commemorated throughout this country. Since 1991, the Holocaust has been part of our National Curriculum in schools.” – Greville Janner 2013. While Homosexuality was only decriminalised in the late 60’s in the UK it is a well-documented part of the ‘Holocaust’ agenda to suggest ‘persecution’ of the sexually perverted. By stealth children are taught that homosexuality and paedophilia are in their best interests.
Indeed Homosexuality and paedophilia were categorized as sexual disorders or mental diseases collectively known as paraphilias. Described in an article published in American Journal of Psychiatry in 1981 paraphilia is the “recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviours generally involving:
- Non-human objects
- The suffering or humiliation of oneself or one’s partner
- Non-consenting persons.
Homosexuality was removed from this list as recently as 1974 but a British Labour Government headed by Prime Minister Harold Wilson, accused by MI5 of being a KGB agent, legalized homosexuality as early as 1967 under the sexual offenses act. Also in 1974 homosexual Jew Michael Hanson formed the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) the sole purpose of which was to make child rape acceptable to the public. Homosexuals also immediately adopted the rainbow as their motif a symbol closely associated with childhood and children. The fact that Tom O’Carroll, a multiple child sex offender, long-time campaigner for the legalization of sex with children and former head of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) was an enthusiastic participant at a pseudo-academic conference held at the University of Cambridge; were it was put forward that paedophilia interest is “natural and normal for males”, and that “at least a sizable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children, and normal males are aroused by children” is horrific enough evidence of a Marxist paedophile ring operated at Westminster. Yet when Steven Adrian Smith, a man who had achieved notoriety as the chairman of PIE from 1979 onwards described how he had managed the Paedophile organisation PIE for almost four years, from a small room at the London headquarters of the Home Office. ‘PIE did actually have an office in Westminster,’ he stated can only confirm this. Nevertheless Jewish Prime Minister David Cameron had the chutzpah to state that claims of an Establishment paedophile cover-up was ‘conspiracy theory’ even though most of those accused are heavily involved in pederasty (Homosexual boy rape). This took place shortly after Cameron cautioned that the whole affair could turn into a homosexual ‘witch hunt’ only confirming the Jewish Prime Minister’s complicity in this perversion.
Labour MP Lord Janner was named in the 1991 trial of ex marine, former liberal councillor and Jewish serial child rapist Leicester children’s home manager Frank Beck by one witness as having abused him; Janner was not himself on trial and did not testify. Beck was a close friend of the Janner family and it was in fact Janner himself who enabled Beck to procure his position at the children’s home. The victim Winston was able to describe Janner’s home, the hotel rooms they had shared, and Janner’s habits and person in detail. Officers wanted to arrest the Leicester West Labour MP, which would have given them the power to search his home and offices as well as taking his fingerprints and other evidence. Legal advice was sought on taking the rare step of arresting an MP and it is understood that the advice from senior counsel was that it was an appropriate course of action. However, at the last minute the planned arrest was blocked and instead arrangements were made for Janner to attend a police station by appointment with his Jewish solicitor, Sir David Napley. The consequence was that the Jewish Director of Public Prosecutions, Alan Green, was able to state that “for lack of evidence,” Janner would not be prosecuted. Green was later arrested for kerb-crawling.
Beck died suddenly of a ‘heart attack’ in 1994 at the age of 52 shortly before his appeal was due to begin. His solicitor, Oliver D’Sa stated that “he was very impatient for the appeal to go ahead. His death came out of the blue” and rumours continue to circulate that amphetamines were introduced into his food to induce heart failure. Clearly expendable Beck had obviously played a key part in procuring young boys for the child sex ring yet though the press insists he continued to protest his innocence the solicitor’s remark and Beck’s sudden and rather mysterious death indicate that he had evidence on Janner that the court did not want brought to light. Indeed other than Janner the main abuser working alongside Beck was the Jew Colin Fiddaman. Despite being described by former children in care as having not only sexually abused them, but having run a torture regime in the homes following his supposed suicide in 1991 while on bail Fiddaman apparently disappears from trial details. It has also come to light that these multiple child torturers and rapists are child murders as well. Originally dismissed by the obliging press as ‘suicides’ evidence from other children living in the home attest that choking injuries are consistent with the method of torture used by the child rapists that of using a towel as a noose around a child’s neck to render him compliant. Beck himself was described as a “monster”, an irresistible personality, a manipulator who could abuse a child and then convince him that he had wanted it, a navy interrogator trained to torture without leaving marks. The kind of qualities Beck claimed MI6 had earlier sought in him. Also achieving the rank of sergeant the similarities to his paedophile comrade Jannar are striking.
Shortly after Janner was accused of child rape Jewish Labour MP Peter Mandelson lobbied Blair to give him a peerage. The child rape scandal has not left Mandelson untouched. Blair is known to have issued ‘D’ notices effectively terminating investigation of several senior members of his government and later Mandelson and his boyfriend’s name appeared in the ‘little black book’ when it was in the possession of Jewish child rapist Jeffery Epstein. Once belonging to Robert Maxwell’s daughter and known to be a list of names to which young children were supplied this would place Mandelson in the same Westminster child sex ring as Janner.
Thus Janner was made a peer six years after being accused of child rape in 1997 and in this same year he spear-headed the pseudo-conference entitled ‘Nazi Gold’. This event was basically used to convince European Governments to pay the Jewish parasites that have been plundering the wealth of Europe for centuries. The monies have been used to continue financing the Holocaust construct. Janner also works extensively to extort money from European Governments for his tribe’s organised criminal networks under the pretence of ‘Holocaust survival’. While Labour MP Simon Danczuk appointed to investigate the establishment paedophile case looks pretty convincing. His real job is damage limitation. A further revelation disclosed that in 1983, on separate occasions over a period of months, Jewish child rapist Lord Leon Brittan disposed of several dossiers that he had been handed connecting parliament with the notorious Marxist organisation PIE. Since then Jewish politician Sir Keith Joseph other MPs, MI5 and MI6 operatives and senior policemen have been linked to the dossiers. Thus, though Janner’s crimes against children were under investigation in 1991 not only was no action taken it was actively blocked and it patently relates to the dossiers conveniently removed from play by Jewish child rapist Brittan.
Eleven years later in 2002 the police re-investigated the case but again no action was taken. A third investigation took place in 2007 but yet again no action was taken. Two years later in 2009 the Jewish Labour peer Janner was conveniently diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. ‘Conveniently’ being the operative word for after being diagnosed with dementia life peer Jewish Lord Greville Janner voted 203 times in the House of Lords. The Labour peer attended the Lords on 634 days and claimed over £100,000 in expenses. Janner only stopped attending the House of Lords in late 2013 and has been on leave of absence since 2014 in fact only after the Labour Party suspended him due to public pressure. This obvious false ‘diagnosis’, a typical Jewish tactic, is only a visible cry for public sympathy and criminal lenience. The press are well aware of this and highly significant is their lack of sarcasm when it comes to Janner or in fact any of the ‘chosen’. The media also play a substantial role in supressing the true impact of the child rape scandal. Their insistence on ‘historic sexual abuse’ deliberately confines the public consciousness to the past-tense implying that the danger is over. This restricts a public outcry demanding a contemporary probe into the very real proof of existing child rape. This clearly highlights media complicity and its public manipulation in the current child rape scandal. Thus the contempt for the European is dazzling in its clarity as Janner himself declares how he feels about our people “I don’t care what bloody age they are. These ‘criminals’ should have been dealt with years ago.” (Jewish Chronicle 2012) The parasite condemns the host out right but the host will not receive justice for the crimes of the parasite.
A special trial called a “trial of the facts”, where a jury hears the evidence against an individual considered too ill for a full trial, will now be held into the Janner child rape case after it emerged that corrupt director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders consulted a barrister who had worked in the same chambers as Labour peer Janner’s son Daniel Janner before deciding that it was not in the public interest to prosecute despite there being enough evidence to proceed. Saunders announced in mid-April that, with “deep regret”, Janner should not be charged because he was unfit to stand trial. Incidentally there were cheers in the Commons when it was initially decided not to prosecute Janner. This is the nature of the paedophile cover-up. Saunders overruled one of the country’s leading experts in child abuse, Eleanor Laws, QC, who said he could be charged with 22 offences against nine victims from children’s care homes in Leicestershire. Clearly feigning illness has guaranteed a light sentence.
In the meantime Janner’s victims are preparing civil law suits totalling 2.5 million. Proof that Janner’s mental capacity is anything but ‘ailing’ in a typical act of Jewish guile he has signed his ‘wealth’ over to his children. The transfer happened after police raided Janner’s office in the House of Lords and the move will substantially affect potential victim pay-outs. When Janner failed to attend the initial hearing after his legal team claimed he was ‘too ill’ to do so rather than issue an arrest warrant as should happen in the case of a criminal particularly this sadistic monster, this Jewish fiend is treated with kid gloves. One is reminded of the trial of Charles following the victory of Cromwell and the reluctance of the people to treat their royalty as a common criminal. Creatures such as the Jewish ‘lord’ Janner now replace our sacred European caste and are an indication of just how far we have fallen.
Indeed there is something quite obviously deficient in a European public so willing to be fooled by the creature Janner and his entourage and abundantly clear is that this artifice has been in organisation since Janner was first mentioned during the trial of Jewish serial child rapist Beck in 1991. Apparently diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease in 2009 he was still making decisions that affect Great Britain until the Labour Party suspended him making the rapid degeneration of the dementia during this prosecution absurd. The complicity of the media is required to publish the necessary disheveled pictures on a loop to complete this ‘wonderful’ charade and the set can break for ‘ice cream’. In fact did not Janner himself say how we should really feel about creatures such as him “No concessions to age or the time that has passed can be made when it comes to justice for crimes of this magnitude…” How easily the pathetic, remedial mass forget, only to be mesmerised by the monstrous child torturer’s trickery. Yet again the public will fall for this Jewish farce.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Though the grand cities of Berlin and Dresden are much dissimilar in form and presence; Berlin a thriving industrial capital while Dresden is renowned as Germany’s city for culture both represent a pinnacle in European achievement and share a unique history of barbaric and sadistic destruction. Given the particular fields in which each city excelled it is credible to propose that both cities were specifically targeted to corrupt and eliminate that aspect of European creative endeavour.
Moreover substantial weight is provided to this theory when on a visit to the Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church situated on Kurfurstendamm in Berlin an exhibition of the destruction by allied bombing and restoration reveals the German death toll of WWII to be 8 million. This seems incredibly low given that as many as 56 German cities were bombed and burnt to a crisp during WWII and several of those cities including Hamburg and Berlin suffered almost the same losses as Dresden. Indeed the native death toll in Dresden alone was double that of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined and history has yet to confirm exactly how many ethnic Europeans were murdered at the hands of the brutal Jewish Bolshevik red army that raped its way through Berlin. Nevertheless, to this day the horrific atrocities visited upon our Nordic Brethren are still considered well deserved as revenge for first bombing British civilian cities. Yet “Hitler only undertook the bombing of British civilian targets reluctantly three months after the RAF had commenced bombing German civilian targets. Hitler would have been willing at any time to stop the slaughter. Hitler was genuinely anxious to reach with Britain an agreement confining the action of aircraft to battle zones.” – J.M. Spaight, CB, CBE, Principal Secretary to the Air Ministry. One reflects that 8 million only echoes the mythical figure of Jewish dead conjured up by Ilya Ehrenburg in 1944. Following the Jewish victory over Europe it was inevitable that Jewish propaganda would take precedence over the truth. As such this mythical figure has become media buzz overtly soaking up European remorse for imaginary dead Jews while covertly reminding Europe who rules over her. It is also vital to recall that this figure is not new to Jewish propaganda having appeared in a variety of newspaper articles from the early 1900’s onwards and curiously comparable to the current media saturation the 6 million number and gassing of civilians also appeared in H G Wells Cabalistic novel War of the Worlds written in 1898. There is clear evidence here that Jewish propaganda is a tool to strengthen the Jewish position and since WWII the tribe has had the upper hand.
However, the position of power does not ultimately satisfy the Jew for his chutzpah will not allow the achievements of those who he has enslaved to be recognised. Historically this can be documented as the Jewish Bolshevik scorched earth policy, the rape and butcher of Berlin and the firebombing of Dresden. A current parallel is ISIS (ISIL)-the pseudo ‘Islamic’ Jewish terrorist organisation- destroying Aryan cuneiform tablets. George Steiner, in his book In Bluebeard’s Castle: Some Notes towards a Re-definition of Culture, called this concept ‘burning the garden behind them’. Of Jewish blood what Steiner really proposed was an ontological ‘fiction’ of Western ‘anti-Semitism’ that transposed all of European history with a Jewish illusion and replaced European heroes with the Jewish victim. Therefore, while his term fits readily what the Jewish tribe are executing Steiner’s intention was to implicate the European as perpetrator of this obliteration. Jew Sigmund Freud accurately defined the nature of his tribe’s psychopathy when he conceptualised the mental condition of Projection. Freud considered that in projection thoughts, motivations, desires, and feelings that cannot be accepted as one’s own are dealt with by being placed in the outside world and attributed to someone else. What the ego repudiates is split off and placed in another. To some extent this explains the concealment of Jewish atrocities against Europeans under Jewish ‘holocaust’ propaganda. Nevertheless, the Jew clearly feels no guilt or remorse for his barbaric crimes against the European race European knowledge of his crimes would induce retribution therefore demanding that the Jew conceal his atrocities from Europe. However, it is Jewish chutzpah that accelerates concealment to full scale reversal of the truth facilitating a historical fiction in which the Jewish ‘victim’ is always celebrated.
The notion of ‘burning the garden behind them’ to eradicate historical truth has both physical and psychological manifestations. The destruction of the Aryan cuneiform tablets is one physical example and indeed man’s oldest symbol has been found in Europe specifically in the Ukraine. This motif-the Swastika acts as an enduring link to our heritage. Yet Jewish Bolsheviks attempted to shatter this connection when they seized this area in the early 1920’s unleashing unparalleled torment on Europeans during the Holodomor Genocides. The current situation in the Ukraine indicates a continued Jewish determination to sever us from our true past and fabricate a replacement. From a psychological perspective the reality is that a government in Europe declared war on our racial brethren in the interests of international Jewish finance winning a Jewish victory over Europe; but that the majority of ethnic Britons still believe a lie differing psychologies developed-Britain as the ‘victor’ and Germany the vanquished. The Jew used this surface psychology to his best advantage and it is never more discernible than on the streets of Germany.
20-21st April 2015
Situated far along the Unter Den Linden the Central Memorial that has been placed by the Jewish Federal Republic occupying Germany ironically ‘laments’ to the ever growing mass of victims that global Jewish terrorism creates. Declaring the Neue Wache “the place where we commemorate the victims of war and tyranny” it stands testament to the power of Jewish propaganda particularly in Germany were it continues to conceal Jewish atrocities against ethnic Europeans with the ‘holocaust mythos’.
Again the pathological reversal of Jewish Freudian psychology described earlier is dramatically revealed in the recitation of the memorials dedication. Ironically honoured is the ‘memory’ of all those persecuted and expelled; ‘remembered’ are the millions of mythical dead Jews and sexual perverts but it seems eradicated from recollection is the genocide of 16.5 million Europeans by Jewish Bolsheviks. If the truth were not shrouded in Jewish propaganda it would report the dead Jews that all lived to tell the fiction that concealed the multiple genocides of ethnic Europeans. Indeed even the Encyclopaedia Judaica concedes that 2.4million Jews squatted on German controlled land prior to WWII. Nevertheless 6 million died so the story goes yet with a feat only achievable in the Twilight Zone 3.8 million Jews still manage to claim reparation pensions after the War.
Thus with the close of WWII, declared in the interests of international Jewish finance and concluding with a Jewish Victory over Europe the truth of these flamboyant memorials to fantasy is to convince the mass that the ethnic German and wider European people are responsible for every Jewish atrocity past, present and future and worse still apologise for it! Indeed just as the big lie conceals the reality of untold millions of ethnic European victims to Jewish genocide the Jewish ‘memorial’ replaces the memory of Europa’s victims of Jewish atrocities.
22-23rd April 2015
Arrived in Dresden today. The hotel is called ‘Tryp’ and is situated in Neustadt. At first glance (particularly late at night!) this area is rather shocking. Covered in graffiti it looked like one was being driven into an American ghetto. Perhaps even more disarming was the fact that I had booked a hotel called Grand City! Nevertheless, the hotel proved to be lovely and by the light of day though somewhat rundown and covered in graffiti the streets of Neustadt are pretty much as pristine and litter free as the other parts of Germany visited. In fact by the cold light of day the juxtaposition between the well-kept streets and graffitied buildings is starkly unnatural and upon closer inspection of the graffiti adorning the walls of Neustadt the political motivation of this defamation is revealed. While unfortunately there remains a language gap and consequently the meaning of much of the German Graffiti is immediately nonsensical one cannot fail to perceive the anarchist and communist symbolism and one subversive group does encourage malignant behaviour in particularly the younger generation. There is also pervasive evidence of Jewish Marxist activity among the posters and stickers. One cannot move without bombardment with the Jewish Marxist message of corruption and white genocide.
However, in marked contrast to the filth that exudes from the Jewish mind the standard of cleanliness in Germany with regard to its public places-pavements, public buildings, transport and toilet facility’s is outstanding and watching the ethnic German folk one appreciates that there is a common sense of social responsibility to maintain their ancestral land. A small example occurred at breakfast. On the table is basically a very small swing bin with the title ‘fur den sauberen Tisch’ (for a clean table). Its function is to collect the wrappers from butter, mustered, sauce etc samples. Now if a tub is NOT on the table at the beginning of breakfast I saw a number of German guests get up and fetch one from another table. While German and Briton are National groups of the same race I concede that this standard of social responsibility to one’s own has been leached out of the majority of ethnic Britons. Indeed one would never see an ethnic German nip down to the shops in pyjamas and rollers! The salient point to make here is that in 1945 while the Jew provided the Briton a false victory he corrupted his spirit. Meanwhile somewhere I think the German will lives even if the Jew is overtly treading on it.
24th April 2015
Travelled into the Altstadt today, this involved a tram ride over the River Elbe into which apparently both Herr Wolf and the good Doctors ashes were scattered. While all the native architecture of Germany is astounding Dresden takes ones breathe away! Structural design can inspire, stimulate or alternatively stunt the spirit. In this manner Dresden truly is the city of real artists. Any creature that plotted to destroy such a place has no soul.
Incidentally while we are on the subject it is noteworthy to consider that though on the 3rd September 1939 the British Government declared war on Germany as MP Archibald Maule Ramsey pointed out “it very soon became apparent that no war was being conducted by Germany against this country. This was no surprise to those who knew the facts of the case. Hitler had again and again made it clear, that he never intended to attack or harm Great Britain or the British Empire…No one was quicker to perceive this than the pro-Jewish war mongers; and they and their friends inside and outside the House of Commons very soon began exerting pressure for…bombing of Germany to be started” and on the very evening of the day on which ‘the Great-Grand son of a plantation mulatto’ Winston Churchill became Prime Minister, May 11th, 1940 Britain’s Jewish occupied government started this ruthless form of war. In fact it was on Churchill’s orders that the RAF fired on any German aircraft. Even those specifically marked as medical relief were often shot down. However, nothing can compare to the saturation bombing Churchill–in collusion with Franklin Delano Roosevelt–had prepared for the city of Dresden between the night of February 13th and 14th 1945. Set up as a hospital city for wounded soldiers no military unit or anti-aircraft battery was deployed in the city. Together with the 600,000 refugees from Breslau, Dresden was filled with nearly 1.2 million people. No interest was shown in targeting military installations 60 miles outside of Dresden. The goal was the German injured and civilians. There was a three-hour pause between the first and second raids. The lull had been calculated to lure civilians from shelters into the open again. To escape the flames, tens of thousands of civilians had crowded into the Grosser Garten, a magnificent park nearly one and a half miles square. According to allied reports it was a complete “success.” Within a few minutes a sheet of flame ripped across the grass, uprooting trees and scattering branches of others with everything from bicycles to human limbs. More than 700.000 phosphorus bombs were dropped on the 1.2 million people in Dresden one bomb for every 2 people. The temperature in the centre of the city reached 1600 o centigrade. More than 260.000 bodies and residues of bodies were counted. Still, those who perished in the centre of the city cannot be traced. Approximately 500.000 children, women, elderly, wounded soldiers and the animals of the zoo were slaughtered in one night. The death toll of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined only amounted to 225,000 less than half the casualties of Dresden. Much greater emphasis must have been placed on slaying ethnic Europeans.
25th April 2015
I came across a leaflet called ‘Dresden 1945’ suggesting that the city was approaching the massacre in its own way. I was informed that it was a 360 degree panoramic that could be viewed from many levels. Being honest it sounded rather morbid but one must pay ones respects.
The ‘event’ is performed in a massive structure oddly well concealed and badly signed posted for the occasion. This should have given one a clue as to what was in store. In actuality an ‘artist’ or what passes for ‘art’ in Jewish post modernity Yadegar Asiai, apparently a ‘Persian’ born in Dresden and the son of a Communist has seemingly procured a monopoly on historical portrayal in Jewish controlled Germany and is now distorting the massacre of Dresden in favour of the Jews. Consequently immediately on entering the exhibition one is assaulted with the words the “internal destruction of Dresden had already started in 1933 on Hitler’s accession to power”. Thus this so called artist and his exhibition space provides no extension to the truth of the Dresden massacre but rather only serves as another instrument of twisted Jewish propaganda. The fundamental horrors of the massacre itself are concealed and the ostensibly Jewish plot to murder as many innocent ethnic Europeans as possible is suppressed as yet again the pretence that 1933 is made central so again the Jew can whine and wail about how many times he was gassed.
Fundamental to this Jewish charade is the forgone conclusion that he the Jew is the pinnacle of creation and therefore must occupy the ultimate place in every arena even if that arena or territory is the ancestral abode of another race. As such when the public are told that the “internal destruction of Dresden had already started in 1933” It was only the Jewish hold on Dresden that collapsed as a European leader removed the squatting alien parasite from power and put his ethnic people back to work. Nevertheless, as it ceased to be fashionable for the rich Jewish financier to step over the starving and dying ethnic German on his way to a fine dining restaurant the Jew started to squeal. The threat to the Jewish occupation of Europe from the indigenous European folk set in motion an international Jewish propaganda campaign that included the boycott German goods. Like their ‘pogrom’ propaganda used to demonise Russia the pretence was the usual Jewish fall back of ‘persecution’. Again the campaign covered America and much of Europe but this time it targeted Germany. Leslie Hore-Belisha Jewish Minister of War for the UK, and agitator for war with Germany propagated this as reason to introduce conscription. Moreover, the British Government heeded Jewish machinations rejecting pro-offered friendship of our racial brethren only to ally with Bolshevism that had seized Russia in 1917.
As such the British Government’s declaration of war against Germany, her own race on the basis of Jewish financial dealings and the lie of ‘persecution’ only confirms that Britain had become a weapon of the Jews. This is further compounded by the fact that a situation of stalemate existed from 3rd September 1939 when war was declared as Germany never intended to attack or harm Great Britain or the British Empire. Bombing of civilian populations was instigated by Churchill on the May 11th 1940 breaking the stalemate and forcing German retaliation. While it has also been noted that under Churchill’s orders German medical relief was often shot down, the concept of civilian bombing indicates the desire to extinguish life on a dramatic scale rather than any notion of ‘justice’. Therefore, as a weapon of the Jews Britain and her European allies were used to wipe out the cream of Europe. Indeed under the cover of war incited by this people the Jewish tribe committed genocide. In this light it is not hard to see the Jewish motive behind the desecration of Berlin and Dresden.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
The Miliband brothers are David Wright Miliband born 15 July 1965 and Edward Samuel Miliband, born 24 December 1969. They are apparently the sons of ‘poor’ Jewish immigrants Ralph Miliband and Marion Kozak. Both parents are in fact notorious Jewish Bolsheviks and have given the Miliband children David and Ed a great advantage in politics in Britain as it turns a blind eye to Communist criminality. Nevertheless blatant militant-ism had to be toned down in favour of implementing Marxism through stealth and giving a veneer of ‘British’ respectability to Zionist methodology. Naturally this includes the sensibilities of those closest to Ed Miliband as he “will always be open to issues that concern the British Jewish community, whether they concern issues of the treatment of Jews in Britain or issues to do with relations with Israel. He intends to lead a Labour Party that remains a true friend to Israel.”
The father Adolphe (Ralph) Miliband was a Marxist academic born in Brussels on 7th January, 1924. In 1939, aged 15, he became a member of internationalist Marxist –Zionist group Hashomer Hatzair the same group that Jewish terrorist Abba Kovner, at the time 21 years of age, was an active member and leader of. These young Marxists idolised Bolshevism forced upon Russia post 1917. In fact it was on orders from Hashomer Hatzair that terrorist Kovner and his faction Nakam planned the genocide of 6 million Europeans post WWII. Kovner was arrested aboard a British destroyer with enough poison to murder the inhabitants of four major European cities through their water supplies. Bizarrely after only a year in custody the genocidal terrorist Kovner was quietly released into Jewish Israeli hands. It is critical to note that the Jew Victor Rothschild had a leading role in the British security services (MI5) at this time.
Meanwhile, the Socialist Worker testifies to the fact that Ralph arrived in Britain with father Samuel illegally on forged papers in 1940. It is interesting to note that “On January 13th, 1939, Mr. Dummett, the Bow Street Magistrate, said in Court: “This system by which Jews get sailors to smuggle them into this country, and then refuse to give the name of the ship or men who got them here, is a grave breach of the Aliens Act.” Mr. Metcalfe, the Old Street Magistrate, expressed himself on the subject in even stronger terms. “Most of the stipendiary magistrates know that the so-called aliens are Jewish criminals of the lowest and shiftiest type or, at the best, rapacious political nuisances.” In fact London, England has much experience with Jewish subversive political activity in that during the late 1800’s a surge of Jewish Communists migrated to the East end of London from Russia and Poland. Correspondingly in the same year that Ralph arrived in Britain 25000 Jews were arrested as potential security risks. Nevertheless Miliband won a place to study at the London School of Economics (LSE) with Jewish political scientist Harold Laski well placed to tutor him and Miliband was active in a variety of communist groups and in January 1943 was elected Vice President of the LSE Students’ Union. It was Harold Laski that Ralph Miliband asked for help to join the armed forces and it is miraculous that the son of a Jewish cotton merchant (Laski) had such government favour that he could produce for another Jewish immigrant “… a letter from A.V. Alexander, the First Lord of the Admiralty” advising him “that he was pleased to hear from Laski ….and advising …to go and see a vice-admiral at the Admiralty, who would fix it up. Which he did.” Yet in sharp contrast barely 5 years previous the Sunday Express of December 4th, 1938, reported on the conditions of some British people as follows: “The Hodgsons live in a basement flat in Pimlico, S. W. They pay no rent: their coal is provided free. But that is all there is to envy about them. Because they enjoy these things for nothing, Mr. Andrew George Hodgson, aged sixty-three, and Elizabeth, his sixty year-old wife, both almost cripples, have during the past three years been compelled to live on the borderline of starvation. Mr. and Mrs. Hodgson have to keep themselves on 5 s. a week. Officially they are not in want. Rent-free people cannot qualify for the dole or public assistance.” In the same issue of the Sunday Express this story appeared “A short time ago, one wet night, after the open market had finished, I saw an ill-clad, frail old lady picking up bruised fruit, cabbage leaves, and bits of wood. I collected some bits of firewood for her and tied them up for her. She told me she had found a few bones under the butchers’ stalls. She would wash them and cook them with the cabbage for Sunday’s dinner.” Perhaps the fact that Laski’s father Nathan was prominent in destroying the Lancashire cotton trade post WWI will shed some light for the reality of democracy is “buy in the cheapest market and sell in the dearest”. Thus the school of international finance developed in which the Rothschild’s and other Jewish money-lenders were very able teachers. This involved ignoring one’s own economically disenfranchised in favour of placating the cheap international supplier. In fact the mentality of England developed in such a direction as to enable the Jews to fashion Britain into one of their slave colonies.
Miliband was demobilized from the Navy in January, 1946. He returned to the LSE and he obtained a First Class degree in July 1947 also in this year Miliband was awarded a Leverhulme research studentship to work full-time under Laski’s supervision on his PhD thesis. It is significant that shortly after this Laski arranged some teaching for him at Roosevelt College (now Roosevelt University) in Chicago corresponding with Jewish Marxist subversive activity in various arenas. This was the early stages of Communist purges of the Hollywood film industry and on the political scene culminated in the eventual arrest and conviction of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Communist Jews spying for the Jewish Bolshevik regime. Miliband wrote to a friend: “I am horrified at the atmosphere here. Papers and the radio are just full of stuff about Reds, spies, loyalty and so on. The scare is really on and the Universities from what I read… are being manhandled as much or more as any other organisation, except of course the CP and allied groups.” With his military career facilitated by Jew Harold Laski and clearance by Special Branch, Ralph Miliband was granted British citizenship in August 1948 and in June 1949 he obtained the post of Assistant Lectureship in Political Science at London School of Economics. Ralph Miliband died in 1994, 7 years before his son’s had made any political mark yet was buried in the same graveyard as Karl Marx suggesting that the family was marked for success before they had become known to the public. Indeed the Miliband name and Communism are synonymous.
The grandfather Samuel Miliband is said to have left Poland after the First World War, which ended in November 1918. He supposedly became a leather worker in Belgium and then returned to Poland to join the Red Army under the command of Jewish Zionist Lev Davidovich Bronstein (Leon Trotsky) in 1920. At the time Jewish Bolsheviks were attacking Poland and the Ukraine beginning in February 1919 and it must be stressed that Miliband senior returned to the land that played host to him only to help in its Jewish Bolshevik seizure. A Russian Politician attests to this saying “Samuel, then Shimon, Miliband, a native of the Jewish ghetto in Warsaw, had fought under the command of Trotsky eliminating white Russians opposed to Communism.” Crucially 1919 onwards covers the Tambov massacre and the first of the Holodomor genocides in the Ukraine. Bolshevik atrocities towards the ethnic Polish were also rife. Sick and wounded from Red Cross hospitals were tortured and murdered and other horrific crimes were reported on a regular basis. However, uncovering the real extent of the devastations that befell Poland during the period that the Bolshevik terror committed the Tambov massacre and the first Holodomor in the Ukraine would reveal the true extent of Jewish subversion in Europe.
The Miliband relationship to Bolshevism deepens as long lost relative Sofia Miliband makes contact with David Miliband in Russia. It turns out that the Miliband’s great-great grandfather Abraham is the brother of Sofia’s grandfather Osip. Another supposedly ‘poor’ Jewish daughter the sole of David and Pearl Miliband, Sofia Davidovna by her own admission hero-worshipped Stalin and went to school in central Moscow, rubbing shoulders with the children of the Bolshevik elite. She studied at the same university as Svetlana Alliluyeva, Stalin’s daughter and has met with the Bolshevik dictator becoming a code breaker for the Bolsheviks during WWII. Sofia has also had a prestigious career as a top Bolshevik academic with more than 300 published works to her name. She proclaims just as all Jews that this “Life was hard”.
Meanwhile, Marion Kozak born in Czestochowa, Poland, is a Marxist campaigner with links to subversive Communist activists. The Kozak family were wealthy citizens in the Jewish community and among the wealthiest in Poland. Before the war David Kozak, married Bracha (Anglicised Bronislawa), daughter of Isaac Szloma Landau the owner of ISZABE (Spoons and Padlocks). Bracha Kozak née Landau, was a member of the board of directors and co-owner of this factory and retained the right to dispose of personal dowry (ISZABE shares), given back to her by Kozak. Consequently the Milliband’s maternal grandmother was significantly wealthy in her own right. Kozak ran ISZABE factories in Poland, Germany and England. Bracha’s task was to maintain foreign contacts. Bracha and Dawid had 2 daughters Dobra born in 1934, and Hadessa (Anglicised Hedwig) born in 1937. Meanwhile, the Landau family itself was recognised as a most famous Jewish family of industrialists and had several other factories, including the largest celluloid factory called Seweryn Landau now located in Silesia.
Recently on a visit to Poland’s Foreign Minister David Miliband thanked Poles for saving the life of his mother during WWII. Yet the mother’s fantastic story cannot be corroborated as she refuses to provide evidentiary proof. Marion’s fairy-tale begins in 1941 as her family’s factory is procured by the advancing German authorities and retooled for the production of ammunition. True to form the Jewess comes equipped with her own ‘Hollywood’ blockbuster backed up by another Jew. Sigmund Rolat claims that in May 1943 he was saved from Treblinka by a German factory owner “They rounded up the children left in the ghetto – about 35 of us – and we were going to be sent to Treblinka when the German director – Litt – stepped in. He lied to the German captain, saying he needed children to work in his factory because we had small hands. He saved us that day.” It is not clear whether Marion was in the group of children spared alongside Sigmund but it is thought she was. So we begin with a scene from Schindler’s List then having ‘bravely’ escaped the non-existent liquidation of the Ghetto Bracha and her daughters moved to Warsaw on illegal papers. Now using the name Mary Dobra or Marion claims to have attended a boarding school run by nuns very similar to the Sound of Music another movie and another blatant fraud. By May 1947 a transport of Jewish ‘orphans’ left Poland bound for London. It contained Bracha and her 2 daughters now called Mary (Dobra) and Hegwig (Hadessa). The international connections Bracha had through the Landau family business proved useful as she was welcomed and helped by a partner dealt with before the war.
All through Marion’s story only one name is sited that of Sitkowska. Suspiciously this family can only claim their title of “righteous Among the Nations” in 1995 as political correctness (cultural Marxism) swamps Europe. Ed Miliband is quite happy to continue this farce. As such he maintains that recently it has been discovered that his maternal grandfather died in a WWII German internment camp. Coincidentally this occurred six months before international holocaust remembrance day and naturally Miliband let this knowledge slip on radio BBC5 to boost his chances in the up and coming British elections.
Indeed election fever has brought all the senseless ‘B’ movie scripts to the forefront as The Telegraph picks up on the fantastical tale of how Ed Miliband’s aunt and grandmother survived the war. Like all Jewish propaganda such is designed in the best interest of that tribe in this case to wring the last ounce of compassion from a race falsely accused of genocide. In fact Jewish Bolshevism has been endeavouring to conceal their crime of genocide since the early 1920’s and the Miliband familial historical fiction is merely another chapter.
Before one bids the Milibands adjure it is also fascinating to note that an “Elie” Miliband, a 40-year-old “Hebrew” tailor from Warsaw (Russia) came to the United States on the S.S. Philadelphia sailing from Southampton and arriving in New York on January 28th, 1905 with a person who appears to be the Jewish terrorist known as “Leon Trotsky” traveling as ‘Irska’ Bronstein. Trotsky’s real name was Lev Davidovich Bronstein and while living in London he was principal editor of the Communist magazine Iskra (The Spark) with the likes of Vladimir Lenin. It is critical to note that the travel plans of “Elie” and Bronstein occur right in the middle of the Russo-Japanese War (8th February 1904 – 5th September 1905) Already Jacob Schiff located in New York is linked to Trotsky as the financer of the seizure of Russia in 1917. He also funded the Japanese against Russia. This site has secured the original travel documents for Miliband and asks the significance for his appearance in New York with Trotsky. Trotsky was arrested tried and convicted for involvement in terrorist activity surrounding the destabilisation and attempted Bolshevik seizure of Russia in 1905. 18 months later in January 1907 while on-route in to exile in Obdorsk, Siberia Trotsky escaped at Berezov and made his way to London now well established as a safe haven for those wishing to overthrow the old European social order. Here he attended the Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP) with Lenin and other top Jewish Bolsheviks and anarchists. His escape is described in the essay ‘There and Back’. This is the year Trotsky worked out his theory of permanent revolution.
Thus the Miliband’s have dragged themselves up from such humble beginnings the grandchildren of wealthy Jewish industrialists. That the maternal grandfather was interned during WWII can only mean political subversion that threatened German state security. Meanwhile, the paternal grandfather joins the Bolshevik red army to help consolidated the seizure of the European land that played host to him. Similarly long lost relative Sofia Miliband became a code breaker for the Bolsheviks during WWII the outcome of which would strengthen the Jewish Marxist hold on Europe. With this heritage it is inevitable that the father Ralph should join a Marxist-Zionist movement like Hashomer Hatzair that contained active terrorist youth leaders like Abba Kovner that aspired to murder millions of ethnic Europeans and that he himself would emerge as a Marxist academic subverting the political landscape of Britain. It is the spawn of this line born to hate Europe and the European that is posed against current Jewish Prime Minister David Cameron. Also the ‘poor’ child of a wealthy Jewish family this time financiers the false Conservative Cameron’s policy is political correctness (cultural Marxism). Consequently the only choice the ethnic Briton can make when he goes to the polls is Communism. Communism ushers in as part of its strategy a program to corrupt generation after generation of our young. First introduced into Hungarian schools by the Jew Bela Kun sexual bolshevism is now mainstream and teaching children that an orgasm is like being tickled! An instruction meant to confuse helps insure that children fail to distinguish the predatory child rapist. Thus the Jewish weapon of Communism protects sexual perversion and with the paedophile scandal unfolding rapidly we are left in no doubt that whichever Jew occupies 10 Downing Street sexual bolshevism will remain a genocidal ingredient in the Jewish strategy. This article only scratches the surface of Miliband’s story and clearly history has been subverted in their favour since WWII. Here the site reaches out to all our European brothers and sisters particularly our Polish brethren who know the truth and wish to correct this breach of European history. In particular the site seeks help in completing the Miliband family tree and evidence to challenging the Miliband historical farce.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Today Jewish politicians constantly speak of achieving ‘transparency’ in Government yet ironically before she was devastated by war Europe’s maintenance was open and evident in its system of treaties. This was disrupted when in 1908 Count Alois Lexa von Aehrenthal a Jewish politician who occupied the Austrian Government secretly engineered an agreement between Austria and Russia to annex Bosnia. At the time Bosnia was Serbian territory so it was inevitable that this action would destabilise this region of Europe (Bosnian crisis). What followed was an inescapable domino effect that would collapse Europe’s delicate system of treaties eventually triggering the Great War. Curiously in 1903 only a few years prior to Aehrenthal’s interference Jewish journalist Theodor Herzl ‘forecast’ great world upheaval at the 6th Zionist Conference. The seed had been sown for a devastating Fratricidal war. However, by 1916 Germany had won this war out right and was negotiating for peace and it is interesting to note that had these negotiations gone well those that set the Great War in motion would not benefit and the consequences of 17 million of our finest lost, a European monarchy murdered and their country occupied for 75 years may never have been. Yet that is yet to come meanwhile it is 1914 and European nations are gearing up for war.
The Great War commenced on the 28th July 1914. Soldiers on both sides went into battle primed with vile ‘war propaganda’ no doubt heavily endorsed by Jewish elements with a vested interest in Herzl’s “great world upheaval”. As such troops were likely convinced of the others bestiality and therefore justified in their fight. By December the conflict had been waged for at least 5 months and Christmas was upon the troops. In the current crass commercialism of Jewish internationalism the real meaning of Christmas has been deposed but on Christmas Eve, 24 December 1914, all our European soldiers were far away from such mediocre distractions. It is only in such bleak times that the true Christmas message of peace and hope reveals not only a shared culture but the collective spirit of our race. Thus as German troops began decorating the area around their trenches in the region of Ypres, Belgium by placing candles on their trenches and on Christmas trees and continued the celebration by singing Christmas carols. British soldiers responded by singing back the carols they recognized. The troops continued by shouting Christmas greetings to each other. Soon thereafter, there were excursions across No Man’s Land, where small gifts were exchanged, such as food, tobacco and alcohol, and souvenirs such as buttons and hats. Bruce Bairnsfather, who served throughout the war, wrote: “I wouldn’t have missed that unique and weird Christmas Day for anything. … I spotted a German officer, some sort of lieutenant I should think, and being a bit of a collector, I intimated to him that I had taken a fancy to some of his buttons. … I brought out my wire clippers and, with a few deft snips, removed a couple of his buttons and put them in my pocket. I then gave him two of mine in exchange. …” The artillery in the region fell silent that night. The truce also allowed a breathing spell where recently fallen soldiers could be brought back behind their lines by burial parties. Joint services were held. Troops from both sides had also been so friendly as to play games of football with one another. In many sectors, the truce lasted through Christmas night, but it continued until New Year’s Day in others. Though there was no official truce, about 100,000 British and German troops were involved in unofficial cessations of fighting along the length of the Western Front.
Letters home from British troops relating the event suggest surprise that the so called ‘enemy’ was so like them and delight in being part of this encounter under such unlikely circumstances. Thus propaganda carefully designed to malign the other nation collapsed as it proved only a flimsy fabrication. The crux of the issue is that an unofficial truce could and would not take place under conditions of war among any other but those who share the ties of brotherhood. Nevertheless, this was a mere glitch in a 4 year long familial massacre. Indeed because the Christmas truce had uncovered the truth-that brother was fighting brother certainly in Britain the nature of war propaganda against Germany produced by the Government of War reached a new level of revulsion. While on the home front the public could still be convinced of their German brethren’s vile nature via the distribution of false Governmental propaganda the soldier returning from the front had been exposed to the truth-that these people were just like us. Therefore, in order that the British and particularly the army should conceive of the German as a threat rather than the familial branch propaganda reached levels of gruesome and sickening absurdity. In much bewilderment it is often expressed what evil men do; though in this case the most horrifying notion is that brotherhood, blood and race are being defiled by those we look to lead our peoples. Perhaps the Governments in Britain and Germany require scrutiny.
It has already been noted that Europe was manoeuvred into war by an entity alien to her and curiously elements of which had been terrorising Russia for decades culminating in 1881 with the assassination of Tsar Alexander II by Jewish terrorist Vera Figner. War is not an advantageous position for the public and therefore not in the national best interest. Nevertheless, when Germany began peace negotiating’s in 1916 Jewish Zionists in Germany turned to Arthur Balfour “Little as the general public may suspect it, the charming, gracious, and cultured Mr Balfour is the most egotistical of men, and a man who would make almost any sacrifice to remain in office.” Obviously he was more concerned about himself than the best interest of the British Nation and so not above back door deals with international Jewish criminals. If Germany had succeeded in negotiating peace Jewish machinations would have been for nothing. Indeed had the situation in Europe stabilised in 1916 the “great world upheaval” required for the Jewish Bolshevik seizure of Russia would not manifest. Thus it was in Jewish interest to maintain war disruption. So Jewish Zionists proposed that America be ‘encouraged’ to enter the war as a British ally. In ‘compensation’ for this endeavor the Jewish Zionists wanted Britain to give them Palestine, a sovereign land over which that Government should have no claim. This led to the formation of the Balfour Declaration of 1917 an official letter from the British Foreign Office headed by Arthur Balfour who was to become Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (from July 1902 to December 1905) and later the UK’s Foreign Secretary (from December 1916 to October 1919), to Lord Rothschild, who was seen as a representative of the Jewish people. The letter stated that the British government “viewed with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country”.
The legacy of this document is far-reaching to say the least. That Balfour sold the future of ethnic Europe with the signing of this document is not too presumptuous when one considers the current state of ethnic Europeans and their ancestral lands. The ‘state of Israel’ materialised in 1948 due in large part to the significance the Jewish tribe put in this document. Since then, through the manipulation of Western troops, the Middle East has been steadily ‘cleansed’ of its Arab population to make way for a greater ‘Israel’. However, the foundation was laid with the closing of WWI. Known as the “November Criminals” (German: Novemberverbrecher) government leaders of Germany had overthrown the monarchy (forcing the Kaiser into exile in Holland perhaps to escape another royal assassination) and replaced it with a Jewish run ‘republic’. Jewish born Rosa Luxemburg a Marxist theorist, Jewish Bolshevik and founder of the Red Flag newspaper supported the Communist Party of Germany’s (KPD) participation in the Weimar National Assembly that founded the Weimar Republic. In January 1919, a second Jewish Bolshevik wave swept Berlin in a violent attempt to seize power. The Red Flag encouraged the Jewish Bolsheviks to occupy editorial offices of the press. On November 11, 1918, the representatives of the newly formed Weimar Republic signed the armistice with the Allies and the subsequent Treaty of Versailles led to further territorial and financial losses for Germany. The ‘Peace Conference’ held in Paris during 1919 would expose the real reason behind Europe’s suffering. With the dramatic restructuring and division of territory a contingent of 117 Jews present and clutching the Balfour declaration submitted their draft resolutions for consideration by the Peace Conference on 3rd February 1919. Detailed in their submission were statements regarding recognition of the Jewish people’s historic title to Palestine and their right to reconstitute their National Home there. Such chutzpah could only be based on the Balfour declaration for besides having no racial claim the absurdity of pursuing such measures “is like the Celts ‘demanding’ England back from the Saxon after 15 hundred years of occupation.” Particularly since like the Aryan origin of the Saxon and Celt both the Arab and Jew are Semites.
The conclusion should be crystal clear. This catastrophic war was engineered by the Jewish tribe, condemning to death the best of Europe for their own profit. Initially to secure the seizure of Russia the Balfour Declaration presented a new land deal for Jewry for which Europe would again be driven to war. That the Jew was able to use a European-The German Nation- a member of our own brethren to scapegoat for his malevolent deeds set a new precedent. From this point on the Jew uses ‘sectarianism’ in various forms to disconnect white man from his racial community. Perfecting this divide and conquer strategy ensures that the white race does not unify as a productive collective with the ability and will to stop them perverting and plundering our ancestral home land. However, it is also critical to appreciate that the drive of the Jewish criminal and his self-interested collaborator is bolstered only by a false veneer. The ties of racial heritage and brotherhood are timeless and all it takes is to shine the light of truth the Christmas Truce stands testament to this.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Following a painstaking investigation conducted by businessman Russell Edwards the Jewish establishment has finally had to concede that the first known and most notorious modern serial killer ‘Jack the Ripper’ was in fact the Jewish immigrant from Poland Aaron Kosminski. What is noteworthy, however, is that this site has for some time held material dealing with the fact that the Jewish media and establishment had the power to trivialise the relevance of this particular suspect. This is of utmost relevance given the fact that a lot of the resources at the time of the murders were allocated to investigating specifically this Jewish suspect. A massive parallel can be made with Britain’s most notorious gangland criminals the Kray twins. Of Jewish heritage, mainstream has established that both twins were homosexual, in an incestuous relationship and heavily involved in the Paedophile scandal now being investigated. One had a boyfriend in prison and Reg was married for 8 weeks. The official story was that she committed suicide but Reg admitted on his death bed that Ronnie had murdered her through jealousy yet this debauched pair is glamorized for public consumption. Indeed the officer in charge had the Kosminski creature under 24 hour surveillance and was adamant all the way to his grave that he was the ripper. Nevertheless, decades of mainstream books, documentaries and even films sensationalising ‘Jack the Ripper’ and his horrific crimes, dismiss the Jew Kosminski or omit him altogether content to concentrate public opinion in another direction even at the British royal line.
The police actually had Kosminski in custody. He was identified in a police line-up by one of the most important witnesses, Israel Schwartz a Jewish immigrant from Hungary. Schwartz had seen and described the murderer. His statement is as follows-12.45 a.m. 30th. Israel Schwartz of 22 Helen Street, Backchurch Lane, stated that at this hour, on turning into Berner Street from Commercial Street and having got as far as the gateway where the murder was committed, he saw a man stop and speak to a woman, who was standing in the gateway. The man tried to pull the woman into the street, but he turned her round and threw her down on the footway and the woman screamed three times, but not loudly. On crossing to the opposite side of the street, he saw a second man standing lighting his pipe. The man who threw the woman down called out, apparently to the man on the opposite side of the road, ‘Lipski’, and then Schwartz walked away, but finding that he was followed by the second man, he ran so far as the railway arch, but the man did not follow so far. However, after discovering the man whom he identified in a police lineup was Jewish Schwartz refused to testify against him. He claimed because Kosminski was Jewish he wouldn’t have another Jew on his conscience. Yet he had no trouble knowing this creature was on the loose murdering European women.
Nevertheless, prior to his withdrawal Schwartz’ statement provided important information. The word ‘Lipski’ used here is not negligible. In 1887, a Jew named Israel Lipski was convicted and hanged for the murder of Miriam Angel at 22 Batty Street (parallel to Berner Street). The case was controversial due to the influx of Jewish immigrants to Britain during the 1880’s to the extent where it seems the term “Lipski” was used in the neighborhood to insult Jews. The police had hoped that perhaps “Lipski” was the name of the second man seen by Schwartz, so that he could be traced and questioned, but in the end both Anderson and Abberline agreed that the cry was more likely an insult than an appellation. Nevertheless, given that the police had issued via the media a pardon to a co-conspirator proving that they were convinced the ripper did not act alone, the cry of ‘Lipski’ could have been the killer indicating to his accomplice that another Jew was witness to their crimes. This utterance was more obscure than shouting ‘Jew’ and as hoped dismissed as a slight.
It must also be highlighted that during 1880’s British police were investigating subversive political activity specifically involving Jewish immigrants from Poland and Russia. Mainstream suggests that Kosminski immigrated to London with his family during Russian ‘pogroms’ in the early 1880’s. However, reports of ‘pogroms’ are greatly embellished and riots broke out due to unlawful Jewish terrorist activity cumulating in the assassination of Tsar Alexander II by a Jewish terrorist Vera Figner. Immigrants leaving Eastern Europe for Britain contained such terrorist types. Jewish Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli was still Prime Minister in 1880 and his own policy on race condoned this influx of Jewish terrorism and brought the monster Kosminski into Britain. In his book Endymion published in 1880 he wrote “no man will treat with indifference the principles of race. It is the key to history and why history is so often confused is that it has been written by men who were ignorant of this principle and all the knowledge it involves…Language and religion do not make a race-there is only one thing which makes a race, and that is blood” Disraeli (1804 – 1881) was contemporary with Karl Marx (1818 – 1883) and both times as Prime Minister shared the same city as the inventor of White man’s destruction-Communism. With regards to the investigation of political subversion the Great Synagogue and the Imperial Club were both just off Duke Street and were close to Mitre Square where Catharine Eddowes was murdered. Both these sites were potential meeting places for Jewish Communists. The Hebrew Socialist Union had been formed in Gun Street; Spitalfields in 1876 and in 1889, following a march from Berner Street to the Great Synagogue, a riot was to take place outside the International Workers’ Educational Club near where Elizabeth Stride’s body was found. Witness to the Elizabeth Stride murder another Jew Louis Diemschutz was a committed Communist and was listed as speaking at a club in Manchester in 1891, on the theme of the Paris Commune. In his witness testimony, Diemschutz claimed to have not noticed the position of Elizabeth’s hands and yet in a subsequent press interview, stated that “her hands were clenched, and when the doctor opened them I saw that she had been holding grapes in one hand and sweetmeats in the other” signifying a similar disregard for the truth established in his brethren Israel Schwartz. He, along with Isaac Kozebrodsky also witness to the murder scene, were arrested in March 1889 during the riot at the International Working Men’s Club and charged with assaulting a police officer. Diemschutz was sentenced to three months’ imprisonment with hard labour as well as paying £40 and producing two sureties of £20 each, to be forfeited if he failed to be of good behaviour for twelve months.
Now considering the subversive political atmosphere that Jewish immigrants had brought to Britain it is highly significant that the most infamous serial killer of all time, now known to be Jewish, was labelled Jack, the most popular English name. This instantly concealed the real origin of the atrocities and directed suspicion towards the Anglo community. The graffiti found at 108-119 Wentworth Model Dwellings, by PC Alfred Long on 30 Sunday 1888, shortly after the body of Catherine Eddowes, was located several streets away in Mitre Square has also been blamed on local people attempting to get the Jewish community in trouble. This is despite the fact that PC Long, the first officer on the scene, found a piece of Mrs Eddowes’s apron immediately below the cryptic message placing the murderer at the scene. Promoted in the modern mainstream press as a ‘misspelling’ it was obviously hoped that ill-educated natives would be blamed. Now knowing his heritage in actuality it was the Jewish killer Kosminski himself playing on our empathetic instinct. A modern parallel is the Jew who daubes the Swastika on his own property and capitalises on the effect. This chalk-written message, daubed “The Goulston Street Graffiti”, read “The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing.” In actual fact the graffiti is not a misspelling at all but a masonic reference and relates to a murder that took place in ancient times-the Jewish killers of the mason following the building of the temple. It is also intriguing that Met Police Commissioner Sir Charles Warren amidst protests from detectives ordered the message to be rubbed from the wall without any photographs being taken. The press of the time accused Warren of Masonry. Ironically not merely an enthusiastic Freemason, becoming the third District Grand Master of the Eastern Archipelago in Singapore and the founding Master of the Quatuor Coronati Lodge, Warren was one of the earliest European archaeologists of the Biblical Holy Land, and particularly of Temple Mount. The significance is that the killer obviously had connections with masonry and as a Freemason himself Warren’s instinct was to protect a brother Mason.
The constant exploitation of these horrific atrocities as the work of an Englishman despite the fact that the Jew Kosminski was always the most credible suspect castes the English people in a false light. In fact only a week or two after the solving of one of the most notorious cases in history the ostensibly Jewish regime in Europe now find the Ripper tours in London to be rather distasteful according to a report in The Telegraph. Indeed now that the identity of the first modern serial killer has been exposed the Jewish propaganda machine is a lot less vocal in its indictment of the killer even to the point of forgetting to mention that the case has been solved. It is within this vein that again one must question why it has taken 126 years to correctly identify the murderer. The evidence that eventually revealed the Jew Kominski was in police custody when the murder took place. The shawl was found next to the body of Catherine Eddowes, soaked in blood by the first police officer on scene and removed by him from that scene. Yet this shawl, though drenched with blood was dismissed as evidence for its lack of ‘provenance’. Despite the tremendous strides in technology and the media attention surrounding this particular case in 126 years only one forensic test was ever carried out. This was conducted in 2006 for a British Channel 5 documentary. Given the particulars surrounding this case that the results were ‘inconclusive’ indicates a conspiracy of silence that allowed media to continue their smear campaign against a European community.
While it was DNA from the victim’s blood and killer’s semen, isolated on the shawl that identified Kosminski as the ‘Ripper’ the shawl has a much wider implication. It is patterned with Michaelmas daisies. Today the Christian feast of Michaelmas is archaic, but in Victorian times it was familiar as a quarter day, when rents and debts were due. There were two dates for it: one, September 29th, in the Western Christian church and the other, November 8th, in the Eastern Orthodox Church. The two dates coincided precisely with the nights of the last two murder dates. September 29th was the night on which Elizabeth Stride and Catherine Eddowes were killed, and November 8th was the night of the final, most horrific of the murders, that of Mary Jane Kelly. Therefore, it cannot be coincidence that the murder of Annie Chapman on September 8th coincided with Nativity of the Theotokos one of the Twelve Great Feasts of the Eastern Orthodox liturgical year celebrating the birth of Mary and Mary “Polly” Ann Nichols murdered on the 31st August the Feast day of Saint Aidan of Lindisfarne, known as the Apostle of the English. Aidan has been proposed as a possible patron saint of the United Kingdom. Incidentally 31st August is also Mediatrix or intercession of the Virgin Mary. The sequence he killed in appears as Catholic – Orthodox – Catholic – Orthodox confirming a murderous ritual punishment schedule meted out towards European Christian woman. So here we have a case of a Jew specifically choosing ethnic European Christian woman on Christian religious dates for the sole purpose of sexual violation, mutilation and murder. It is difficult to dismiss the charge of ritual murder particularly when one considers the historical impact.
William of Norwich (2 February 1132 – 22 March 1144) was an English boy whose death is attributed to the Jewish community of Norwich. It is the first known medieval case of Jewish ritual murder. The Catholic Encyclopedia states the facts of the case, as accounted by Thomas of Monmouth:
…a boy’s corpse showing signs of a violent death was found in Thorpe Wood near Norwich. It was not touched until Easter Monday, where it was buried without any ceremony where it lay. In the meantime a number of young men and boys had visited the spot and the Jews were suspected of the murder on account of the nature of the wounds … The body was recognized as that of William, a tanner’s apprentice, who with his master had been in the habit of frequenting the houses of certain Jews. The grave was opened by William’s uncle, the priest Godwin Stuart, the body recognized, the burial Office read, and the grave recovered. A few days later the diocesan synod met under the presidence of Bishop Eborard, and Stuart accused the Jews of the murder, and offered to prove his accusation by ordeal. But the Jews of the Norwich Jewry were the king’s men and under the protection of the sheriff, who pointed out that the bishop had no jurisdiction in the case. The failure to secure a condemnation against the Jews seems to have been largely due to the presence of this strong official who held the castle of Norwich. The only result of Sturt’s action at this time was to secure the translation of the body from Thorpe Wood to the monks’ cemetery on 24 April.
Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (1246 – 27 August 1255) also an English boy died by the hands of the Jews in Lincoln. While out playing with his friends, Hugh went missing. His friends told his mother that they had last seen him by the house of a Jew named Copin. Hugh’s mother Beatrice went to Copin’s house and later discovered the body of her murdered son in Copin’s well. Accused of the murder by the courts, Copin confessed to the crime and stated that it was the custom of the Jews to crucify a Christian child every year. Copin and eighteen other Jews were put to death for the murder as a consequence. It is said that a number of Jews had gathered at Copin’s house and tortured the child, scourged and crowned him with thorns and crucified him in mock of death of Jesus Christ.
Simon of Trent (1472 – March 21, 1475) this time a 2-year-old boy from the city of Trento, Italy. His body was found on Easter Sunday 1475 in the cellar of a Jewish family’s house in Trent, Italy. Town magistrates arrested eighteen Jewish men and five Jewish women on the charge of ritual murder.
Saint Gavril Belostoksky (1684- April 11, 1690) a six-year-old Belarussian boy from the village of Zverki, 13 km from Zabłudów, Grodno Uezd (now in Poland). He was kidnapped from his home during the Jewish Passover. Shutko, a Jewish arendator (lease holder) took the boy to Białystok, poked him with sharp objects and drained his blood for nine days, then brought the dead body back to Zverki and dumped it in a local field. When one relates this to the current climate, the amount of missing and or defiled children and the Jewish nature of the Paedophile scandal links are undeniable. One must also point out that the sexual depravity of the ‘Ripper’ murders clearly disturbed the police and during the investigation into Annie Chapman’s murder, the CID wanted to question a male hairdresser going by the name “Mary”; a known sex offender.
To reiterate Kosminski was always the most credible suspect having been in police custody and under 24 hour surveillance during case investigation. Identified as a Barber living in Whitechapel Kosminski joined the ranks of at least four or five other police suspects and several others connected with the Whitechapel murders who were Barbers, or in some way connected with the trade. The cut-throat razor had always been considered a formidable weapon. Incidentally the knife called a chalef used by the Jewish kosher butcher (shochet) to ritually slaughter animals was also examined by police surgeon Dr Gordon Brown to identify if it could produce the wound pattern on murdered victims. PC John Johnson was on duty in the Minories during the early hours of Tuesday 18th September 1888 when he heard a cry of `Murder!’ coming from the direction of a yard called Three Kings Court. He found a man with a woman named Elizabeth Burns. The man said he had done nothing and was sent on his way, but Elizabeth pleaded to be escorted away from the scene by the policeman. She told PC Johnson that the man had threatened her with a big knife but had been too frightened to say anything whith the man on the scene. The culprit was later identified as a barber called Charles Ludwig and was subsequently arrested that same evening by PC Gallagher after an incident at a coffee stall in Whitechapel High Street. Ludwig was described as “well dressed in a frock coat and top hat Dark, slight build, about 5ft 6ins tall, supporting a grizzled moustache and beard”. He was taken to Leman Street Police Station and when searched was found to be carrying a long-bladed knife, scissors and a collection of razors. On the evening of his arrest he had been drinking at a hotel in Finsbury and became annoyed when asked to leave, producing a number of razors and frightening many of the hotel guests. The landlord described Ludwig as follows: “He is a most extraordinary man, is always in a bad temper, grinds his teeth with rage at any little thing that puts him out. I believe he has some knowledge of anatomy, as he was for some time an assistant to some doctors in the German Army, and helped to dissect bodies. He always carries razors and a pair of scissors with him…”
During the 19th Century, and especially in Eastern European countries, the barber-surgeon or ‘feldscher’, a junior or assistant surgeon, were the poor man’s doctor. One such feldscher was Ripper suspect and condemned wife poisoner, Severin Klosowski, alias George Chapman. With a partiality to the pseudonym, in fact over the course of his lifetime Klosowski had presented four names Klosowski, Ludwig, Chapman, and “Smith”. He was found guilty of murder by poison of three women and was hanged on 7th April 1903. Klosowski arrived in England in 1887 a year prior to the Ripper murders having qualified as a junior barber-surgeon, studying in Poland. 1880-85 he was a student at the Hospital of Praga, in Warsaw, and in 1885-86 acted as an assistant feldscher at the same establishment. Kosminski had also once been employed in a hospital in Poland. In England, Klosowski first worked as an assistant barber in the West India Dock Road for Abraham Radin, and 1888-91 was living and working at 126 Cable Street. It is interesting to note that in 1936 there was a plan to brutally attack British ‘black shirts’ (Nationalists) by Jewish organised crime on this very street. Entitled the ‘Battle of Cable Street’ what took place was a Jewish Communist riot that injured many British police. The Jewish element transposed the facts to incriminate Britons indeed much like the propaganda surrounding the multiple fake ripper suspects. During the early part of 1890 Klosowski also worked in a barber’s shop beneath the White Hart Public House which still stands at the corner of Whitechapel High Street and Gunthorpe Street (then George Yard). He was interviewed multiple times by police when 35-year-old prostitute Martha Tabram—sometimes referred to as the first victim of Jack the Ripper—was stabbed thirty nine times in the early hours of the morning on August 6, 1888 only a few weeks prior to the first official Ripper victim. This incident was daubed the ‘bank holiday murder’ because it took place on a bank holiday and it is curious that following the instillation of the Bank Holidays Act 1871 The English people were so thankful that some called the first Bank Holidays St Lubbock’s Days. The murder occurred within a stone’s throw of Klosowski’s place of employment, and it was later proven that at the time, the twenty-two year old had taken up solitary rooms in George Yard Dwellings—the very building in which Tabram was murdered. Kosminski was trading as a Barber in Baker Street during the same period and given their Jewish heritage and mutual careers it is most likely that they knew each other.
Inspector Abberline had questioned a Jewish barber salesman by the name of Wolf Levisohn who said he had spoken to Klosowski in Yiddish and knew him as Klosowski and also by the name Ludwig. He assured Abberline that Klosowski was not the Ripper and urged him to investigate a gentile by the name of Dr Alexander Pedachenko. The 5 victims: Mary Ann Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, Catherine Eddowes and Mary Jane Kelly, initially identified with the ‘Ripper’ where all murdered between 31st August and 9th November 1888 although murders not specifically linked to ‘Jack the Ripper’ continued to occur. Klosowski left for America specifically Jersey City, New Jersey with his then wife, Lucy Baderski, in 1891 the same year that Kosminski was committed to the Colney Hatch Lunatic Asylum and the murders seemed to stopped abruptly. At which point New York was to experience a vicious murder that of an elderly prostitute named Carrie Brown or “Old Shakespeare” because of her affinity for quoting the author when drunk. She was murdered in a common lodging house in Jersey City, New Jersey on St George’s day Patron Saint of England 23rd April her body was discovered on the 24th, 1891. Incidentally William Shakespeare was born and died on 23rd April. The body was first strangled, savagely gutted and the pathologist reports an “X” carved on her left buttock. However, after this site established the Christian significance of the date it is logical to assert that it is a cross, an insulting indicator of the English Saint’s coat of arms (Cross of Saint George). This is not the first time that the killers had left their calling card. Leaving the shawl imprinted with St Michaelmas daisies at the Eddowes murder and a piece of her apron at the site of “The Goulston Street Graffiti” was deliberate incitement to law enforcement when one considers that investigators were cognisant of the killers and even had Kominski in custody. The question that should be posed is why the police investigation was obstructed. Meanwhile, Klosowski had found work in another barber’s shop in Jersey City, New Jersey. It is a remarkable coincidence that the activities of Jewish barber Klosowski coincided so well with Jewish Ripper Kosminski giving weight to the notion of an accomplice. It is also suspicious that Klosowski reappeared in England in 1891 and lived with a woman called Annie Chapman (no relation) and subsequently took her surname, taking the name George Chapman. Chapman/ Klosowski became another well-known Jewish serial killer.
He was committed for trial in February 1902 charged with poisoning Mrs Spink, Maud Marsh, and Bessie Taylor. Abberline himself believed that Klosowski had the potential to be the accomplice. As Abberline stated upon the arrest and trial of Klosowski in 1902, “I have been so struck with the remarkable coincidences in the two series of murders…that I cannot help feeling that this is the man we struggled so hard to capture fifteen years ago” Some 20 years later Deputy Commissioner Anderson was to write his memoirs in which he confirmed that Kosminski was indeed the killer. This was further consolidated by a copy of the book owned by Detective Swanson who had annotated notes in the margins to the same effect. That all involved were convinced of an accomplice going to the lengths of issuing a pardon via the press indicates that the case was not closed until the rope dropped on Klosowski.
Another most disturbing aspect to the ‘Ripper’ murders that rendered Kosminski a prime suspect was the removal and consumption of body parts. A letter was received containing part of a human kidney. The letter described how the killer had cooked and eaten the other half indicating cannibalism. It is a Jewish tradition to eat food representing the flesh of their enemies. At the festival of Purim triangular-shaped pastries meant to represent Haman’s ears (Hamentaschen) and ‘Kreplach’ dough pockets filled with ground beef symbolizing the beaten flesh of Haman are consumed. The kidneys appear to hold a great symbolic significance. In the Pentateuch they are cited 11 times in the detailed instructions given for the sacrificial offering. In five instances, they are mentioned as the organs examined by God to judge an individual and also as mirrors of the psyche of the person examined. There is also reference to the kidneys as the site of divine punishment for misdemeanours, committed or perceived, particularly in the book of Job, whose suffering and ailments are legendary. In the current climate kidneys make up 75% of the global illicit trade in organ trafficking and with ritual murder exposed as a prime motivation for Kosminski modern kidney trafficking maybe more than what it seems. It is also noteworthy that in cases of ritual murder the body is drained of blood for use in Jewish festivals specifically “to bake matzah”.
It is certain now that Kosminski was not a member of the British Royal Family, an eminent surgeon, English actor or politician. Serial killers rarely are. Instead, he was a perverted creature, a sadistic Jew who achieved sexual satisfaction from brutally defiling European women, slashing them to death and mutilating their bodies. One must also consider that Vasili Mikhailovich Blokhin (January 7, 1895 – February 3, 1955) Jewish Bolshevik Major-General who served as the chief executioner of the NKVD under the administrations of Genrikh Yagoda, Nikolai Yezhov and Lavrentiy Beria, was the most prolific hands-on mass murderer in recorded history. A former kosher butcher Blokhin wore his old leather apron from his trade to keep from getting splattered as he fired the pistol into the brains of his victims. Over a period of 25 years Blokhin probably personally killed at least 50,000 people, including about 7,000 Polish prisoners of war during the Katyn massacre in spring 1940. It is pertinent to note the Jewish heritage of both the first modern serial killer and the most prolific mass murderer as no racial consideration is ever given to ethnic Europeans during their racial cleansing. Indeed the Jew has no regard at all for any life other than the Jew. Speaking to Lubavitch Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburgh in the Jewish Week established exactly how the ethnic European can be treated-“If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value. There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life.”
While White Nationalism upholds protection and conservation of the white race on its native land it also recognises the right of other races to maintain their racial heritage within their territory. It is the total disregard for all life inherent in the Jewish mantra irrespective of the environment in which he finds himself that renders the Jew the single greatest threat to individual humanoid races. The further research uncovered by this site using Russell Edwards methodology only scratches the surface. This research has led to obvious conclusions but not being Ripper enthusiasts our efforts end here with the hope that it will inspire more vigorous investigation.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
The tribe of Israel have been hideously mutilating its enemies and their children since the early 1920’s, although in Jewish Bolshevik controlled territories it was much easier to conceal their atrocities from the world at large. Now that the Internet can expose Israel’s atrocities in Gaza crying ‘Holocaust‘- The 70 year construct the tribe use to conceal their atrocities against ethnic Europeans, is loosing its effect now that even stalwart pro-Zionists have identified it as an excuse for Jewish ‘Israel’ to get away with murder. Yet even more significant is what the mainstream media choses to avoid.
This site has already pointed out the absurdity of the historic claim the Jewish tribe place on the land of Palestine. Although the same race it is like the Celts ‘demanding’ England back from the Saxon after 15 hundred years of occupation. In the Middle East one has Palestinians and Jews both share the same race that has existed in this territory since the second century, although if anything the Jew is now more of a mixed breed than that of the Palestinian. It is also noteworthy that the Jewish tribe have been expelled from Palestinian territories following victorious claims to the land by the Babylonians in 586 BC, and the Romans in 70 AD and 132 AD. As such the Jew has no claim to territory hereditary or otherwise. Even the tribal call that the land they call ‘Israel‘ is “God given” is based not on a fair fight but Jewish infiltration of the territory formally known as Canaan; occupation of the native Canaanite people and their eventual destruction. Chapter 15 of Genesis describes in detail the ‘eternal victim’s’ manifesto for procuring land and wealth whilst deferring blame or judgment for their actions elsewhere, in this case their ‘God’. History has seen this manifesto in action. The Jewish tribe slowly and quietly “immigrate” into a host nation. Once settled, the Jewish community work together as a single unit to buy up an entire industry, for example clothing, metals or manufacturing. With a monopoly the Jewish tribe jack up the prices to crippling heights and drop the worker’s wages to slave level. With profits from each conquest more industries fall into Jewish hands. Consequently Jews eventually have complete control of the nation’s economy and start draining off its wealth and moving it to foreign banks. The host populace starve in the streets as the Jewish interlopers get richer and richer. Historically they finally are evicted by that host nation. Of course by then the damage was done and the wealth spirited away.
There is a long list of nations destroyed in large part, due to Jewish subterfuge. This explains why the Jewish tribe have been evicted from 109 different locations since 250AD. This manoeuvre is used on America and Europe right now to prioritise Jewish interests and eliminate the White race. Yet not a single word of this is ever discussed in the so called mainstream media. Exactly the same tactic was used on the German people prior to 1933. The adoption of National Socialism in Germany represented an obstacle to the Jewish tribe who instigated war just as they had ignited war decades earlier.
Germany won the Great War outright in 1916 and was negotiating peace terms. Yet, should Europe return to the situation prior to war the Jews would have gained nothing. Hence in Germany Jewish Zionists whispered in the ears of war mongers in the British government explaining that there was no need for Britain to lose this war as America could be ‘encouraged’ to enter as a British ally. In ‘compensation’ for this endeavor the Jewish Zionists wanted Britain to give them Palestine. This Jewish manipulation lead to the instigation of the Balfour Declaration of 1917, an official letter from the British Foreign Office headed by Arthur Balfour, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (from July 1902 to December 1905) and later the UK’s Foreign Secretary (from December 1916 to October 1919), to Lord Rothschild, who was seen as a representative of the Jewish people. The letter stated that the British government “viewed with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country”. Once again a sovereign people-Palestinians-are usurped from their territory via infiltration and occupation. The establishment, in 1948, of a ‘state of Israel’ constitutes the genocide of the Palestinian people.
Thus it has been ascertained that the issue surrounding the Gaza atrocities is much wider than the mainstream media will allow. Nevertheless, the Palestinian issue has a life of its own and manifests in force on the internet and has instigated marches globally. Certainly the inhumanity visited upon the Palestinian people has captured the social conscience of the world. Already the international reach of Palestinian pain lends itself to corruption, and those that consider themselves to the left of the political spectrum due to their social conscience find themselves submerged by a deviant agenda. This is how International Marxism has hijacked the Palestinian course. All is viewed through the restricted bottle neck of Jewish Marxism that maintains the narrow focus to ensure that Jewish criminality is bypassed. Via the internet alone the Palestinian issue receives support from European and American Nationalists yet the discussion is governed by the gatekeepers of Jewish Marxism. Consequently, while the ongoing atrocities remain newsworthy, the malicious theft of land, occupation and the Jewish ‘right’ to settle is conveniently ignored. In essence the Jew has no right to claim any land, for his race has always had territory no matter the religious persuasion. What the Jew demands in Palestine today is no less than a physical division of the religions just like their invention of the Berlin Wall. This construct bears witness to Jewish interference in Northern Ireland with the appearance of ‘peace walls’ in 1969. Yet historical religious differences would have been solved amicably hundreds of years ago by indigenous Europeans had not the Jewish tribe continued to rub salt into old wounds.
To conclude the initial fiction in the Jewish tribes ‘victimhood’ is that he masquerades as a race without a home. This is meant to instil sympathy where none is needed, for the race of the Jew has always had land. Thus territory was offered in 1916 providing the Jew with opportunity to manipulate the situation. It is here that race and religion blur for Jewish convenience and gentile confusion as the land ‘God promised’ is demanded; a right to which the Jew has no claim. Further chutzpah in the Jewish cry of ‘holocaust‘ is meant to instill ‘false guilt’ in the West leaving the Jews of occupied Palestine free to murder their way through Gaza as they murdered ethnic Europeans. As always the Jew is blameless, for his construct renders his actions the fault of others or he absolves himself via his ‘God’.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Perhaps the quintessential ‘feral’ children are twin brothers Romulus and Remus who feature in Rome’s foundation myth. Their mother was Rhea Silvia, daughter to Numitor, king of Alba Longa and the story goes that prior to their conception, Numitor’s brother Amulius seized power, forced Rhea Silvia to become a Vesta Virgin, sworn to chastity and then kills Numitor’s male heirs. However, Rhea Silvia conceived the twins by the god Mars, or by the demi-god Hercules, although once the twins were born, Amulius had them abandoned to die in the river Tiber. Miraculously the babies were rescued from the water by a she-wolf. The she-wolf took care of them until the twins were taken in by a shepherd and his wife who reared them to manhood. Unfortunately, actual cases of human children apparently ‘raised’ by wild animals do not have such a happy ending.
In reality a feral child is a human child who has lived isolated from human contact from a very young age. Therefore it has no (or little) experience of human care, loving or social behaviour, and the most apparent, of human language. Some feral children are alleged to have been brought up by animals. Other feral children have been confined by people (usually their own parents). More than 100 cases of supposedly feral children are known.
One of the first documented case occurred in France in 1800 when naked and filthy 12-year-old boy was spotted scrabbling for potatoes in fields on the edge of Saint Sernin, a small farming village. This was ‘Victor’ the wild boy of Aveyron. Abbe Pierre-Joseph Bonnaterre described Victor as small for his age, about four and a half feet tall, deeply tanned and covered in scars and scratches. While he could not speak and did not react even if Bonnaterre shouted in his ear, his hearing was acute enough for a walnut cracked across the room to make him twist around with hungry attention. He could also make a full range of expressive noises, such as grunts, laughs, and murmurs. His gait was peculiar. He walked uncertainly and preferred to lollop along in a shuffling run. Occasionally he would revert to all fours as earlier he had been seen to do in the forests. However, it was Victor’s animal blankness and lack of interest in other humans that most unsettled Bonnaterre. Victor appeared to have no other thoughts than for food and sleep. The only time he showed any excitement was when he glimpsed the greenery outdoors and struggled to make an escape. The rest of the time he would spend long hours hunched on the floor, rocking slowly back and forth and staring off into space. In this position, he made a constant dull murmur and occasionally, small spasms and convulsions would twitch across his body and face.
It was Jean Itard, a 26-year-old doctor from Paris’s Deaf-Mute Institute who felt he could see a glimmer of hope in the damaged youngster. He believed the diagnosis of retardation was ridiculous because Victor could not have survived in the wilds so long if he truly was an imbecile. Itard also detected a wily intelligence in the way Victor stole and hid food. Itard devoted five long years to Victor and did make considerable strides, but the boy never became anything near approaching a normal adult and never properly learned to speak. Itard at least managed to bring about a marked change in Victor’s outward demeanour. Victor’s blankness towards his surroundings and other people gradually turned to interest and affection. He appeared to show simple human emotions such as gratitude and remorse. He was trained out of his unsuitable personal habits, learning to sleep in a bed, wear clothes, eat at a table and accept baths. His toilet habits and lack of modesty still could embarrass Itard in public, but generally Victor was brought under ‘control’.
On 26 May 1828, a teenage boy appeared in the streets of Nuremberg, Germany carrying a letter addressed to the captain of the 4th squadron of the 6th cavalry regiment, Captain von Wessenig. The anonymous author stated that the infant boy was given into his custody on 7 October 1812. A shorter letter enclosed purporting to be from his mother to his prior caretaker stated that his name was Kaspar, that he was born on 30 April 1812 and that his father, a cavalryman of the 6th regiment, was dead. In fact both letters had been written by the same hand. At first it was assumed that the boy had been raised half-wild in forests, but Hauser recalled a different version of his past life. For as long as he could remember he spent his life totally alone in a darkened cell about two metros long, one metre wide and one and a half high with only a straw bed to sleep on and a horse carved out of wood for a toy. He found bread and water next to his bed each morning. Periodically the water would taste bitter and drinking it would cause him to sleep more heavily than usual. On these occasions, when he woke, his straw was changed and his hair and nails had been cut. The first human being with whom Hauser ever had contact was a mysterious man who visited prior to his release and took great care not to reveal his face. This man, Hauser said, taught him to write his name by leading his hand. After learning to stand and walk, he was brought to Nuremberg. This stranger allegedly taught him to say the phrase “I want to be a cavalryman, as my father was” in Bavarian dialect but Hauser claimed that he did not understand what these words meant. Elements of Hauser’s later life and attempts at education in Nuremburg poignantly express a lack of complex reasoning that Friedrich Daumer, Hauser’s host and teacher, expressed through his tutoring. Following demonstrations Hauser revealed his profound inability to understand coincidence, and imbues inanimate objects with intelligence for avoiding obstacles. Indeed although the final report indicated no anomalies Dr. Heidenreich, one of the physicians present at Hauser’s autopsy, claimed that the brain of Kaspar Hauser was notable for small cortical size and few, non-distinct cortical gyri, signalling that he suffered from cortical atrophy.
Amala and Kamala, the so called Wolf Girls of Midnapore, India were thought to be about 3 and 7 years old on their discovery on 17th October 1920. Both little girls could run swiftly on all fours, but were unable to stand up. They could not talk or laugh and their only gestures were those of the wolf pups they had been reared with. Amala only lived a year in ‘captivity’ and although her sister was thought to have been around 16 nine years later when she died she had a mental age of 3.
With Oxana Malaya who was found as an 8-year-old in Ukraine in 1991, having lived most of her life in the company of dogs the issue moves into the area of child abandonment. While she too picked up a number of dog-like habits and found it difficult to master language today, Oxana can speak and many of her behavioural problems have been remedied. The key to this may be the age at which Oxana was evicted from her human home.
It was at three years of age that Oxana’s drug addicted parents exiled her from the family home. Wild dogs roaming the streets and Oxana took refuge in a shed inhabited by these dogs. She was cared for by them and learned their behaviours and mannerisms. She growled, barked, walked on all fours and crouched like a wild dog, sniffed at her food before she ate it, and was found to have acquired extremely acute senses of hearing, smell and sight. When rescued she only used the words “yes” and “no”. It was believed that having been deprived of intellectual and social stimulation, Oxana found it difficult to acquire normal human social and emotional skills. Oxana’s lack of exposure to language in a human social context made it very difficult for her to improve her language skills. Yet that she is now able to use simple grammar suggests that language development had already formulated prior to her abandonment at aged 3.
In the case of Genie, the pseudonym for a feral child who spent nearly all of the first thirteen years of her life locked inside a bedroom strapped to a potty chair, the victim of one of the most severe cases of abuse and neglect, compounded by social isolation, ever documented. Genie was discovered by Los Angeles authorities on November 4, 1970. After her rescue, attempts were made to help her speak and socialise, however, Genie never learned full grammatical English and only went so far as phrases like “Applesauce buy store”.
The reason ‘feral’ children remain such a fascination to psychologists and linguists are because they present such a unique opportunity to study a hotly contested debate about language development. Essentially, this is the age-old nature versus nurture debate. Does genetics or environment play a greater role in the development of language? Nativists believe that the capacity for language is innate, while empiricists suggest that it is environment that plays a key role.
Noam Chomsky Jewish nativist, argued that the acquisition of language could not be fully explained by learning alone. Instead, he proposed that children are born with a language acquisition device (LAD), an innate ability to understand the principles of language. Once exposed to language, the LAD allowed children to learn the language at a remarkable pace.
Eric Lenneberg Jewish linguist proposed that like many other human behaviors, the ability to acquire language is subject to what are known as critical periods. A critical period is a limited span of time during which an organism is sensitive to external stimuli and capable of acquiring certain skills. According to Lenneberg, the critical period for language acquisition lasts until around age 12. After the onset of puberty, he argued, the organization of the brain becomes set and no longer able to learn and utilize language in a fully functional manner. Incidentally it is rather curious that the Jewish tribe are so prevalent in this field of study, but not surprising as here they are well placed to funnel the ground breaking discoveries of ethnic Europeans through the corrupting filter of Jewish Zionism.
In Genie’s case she started putting three words together occasionally as in children going through normal language development. In the normally stimulated child this stage is followed by what is known as a language explosion. Children rapidly acquire new words and begin putting them together in novel ways. Unfortunately, this never happened for Genie and never did for any other ‘feral’ child documented earlier. Her language abilities remained stuck at this stage and she appeared unable to apply grammatical rules and use language in a meaningful way. At this point, her progress levelled off and her acquisition of new language halted. Oxana on the other hand, abandoned at aged 3, has progressed to simple language formation. In this light the linguist Lenneberg may have been far closer to the mark than first realised.