Archive | Hebrew RSS for this section

The Patron Saints

The cross of St Patrick is the symbol meant to celebrate St Patrick’s Day, just as the Cross of St George is meant to celebrate St George’s Day. However, as we reached March mainland England was bombarded with Green, White and Orange of the tricolour.

No animosity at all is felt towards the Irish people. However, the tricolour is the flag of Eire the Republic of Ireland and St Patrick is the Patron saint of the whole of Ireland. Therefore, the tricolour is not meant to celebrate this patron’s day.  One should see that this is a blatant political move in that in England St David was completely ignored on March 1st while tricoloured bunting was already on sale. Similar to the planned ‘Republican’ march through an English City there is a high level political agenda. Labour Marxists have united with their brother IRA and intend to split kin race and intensify sectarian violence.

Meanwhile, on St George’s Day, if the corporate Zionist remembers, the English are treated to a repeat of the George Gross plastered all over footballs. This is another political manoeuvre by Zionist media to belittle the English. In “Come on England” the Zionist is in fact implying that the only ‘heritage’ the English have is football. Ironically while White man did invent ‘the beautiful game’ he is now a spectator to the sport that is being populated by Africa’s excess.

When set against each other these displays of supposed ‘national’ celebration reveal the perfect opportunity for Zionism to play their divisive ‘games’. Elevating St Patrick over and above St George in the consumer market pushes it to the forefront of the mass mind. In this way the corporate Zionist is politicising St Patrick by using the tricolour and marginalising the English by ignoring St George or ‘relegating’ it to football. In reality while the tricolour is the flag of the Irish people or the Irish Republic, Zionism is trying to contaminate it with Marxist IRA connotations. Their intention in doing this is to stir up sectarian violence. Sectarianism is another means to distract the Gentile mass while Zionism makes a profit.

The crosses of the patron saints combine to form the Union Flag. Given the emblem of St Patrick is the heritage of the whole of Ireland, St Patrick’s Day is the perfect opportunity to call upon and celebrate the day in unity.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL

The Khazar Con

The Khazar theory argues that Ashkenazi Jews are the descendants of the Khazars a multi-ethnic collection of peoples who allegedly ‘converted’ to Judaism in the 8th-9th century AD. It is then claimed that it was these ‘Jewish converts’ that migrated into what is now Russia, Eastern Europe and later Northern and Western Europe. It is critical to highlight however, that the primary exponents of this theory are Jewish from the earliest alleged reference to a connection between Khazars and Ashkenazic Jews to Benjamin Freedman in a speech given before an audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C and Jewish Communist Arthur Koestler in The Thirteenth Tribe first published in Britain in 1976.

Initially the Khazars were believed to be a semi-nomadic people of mostly Turkic decent dominating the Asian steppe and the North Caucasus between the 5th and 10th centuries.  In the 7th century, they founded an independent Khaganate in the Northern Caucasus called Khazaria. This occupied the land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea now predominantly occupied by Georgia. The general theme of Koestler’s book is this trading empire that existed between the expanding power blocs of Christianity and Islam. He suggests that speculation exists about the origin of the word ‘Khazar’ and indicates that the Khazar was never ethnically homogenous but made up of tribes from various racial backgrounds, as steppe peoples traditionally absorbed those they conquered. Koestler also highlights modern ‘deviations’ for example the German Ketzer –heretic referring to the Jew thus inserting ‘reasonable’ doubt perhaps to add weight to his theory. Nevertheless, the term is most likely tied to the Turkic verb form meaning “wandering” and likely derived from the Turkic gaz-, meaning ‘to wander’ or ‘flee.’ Initially Tengri shamanists, between the 8th or 9th century under the instruction of the Khazarian King, Koestler asserts that the Khaganate adopted Judaism as the state religion. However, Koestler’s source for the ‘conversion’ are to be found in a work by the Hungarian Marxist historian, Dr Antal Bartha, supported by an article in the 1973 variant of Encyclopaedia Judaica and the curious choice of a comment from a Muslim envoy a staunch enemy of the Jew. Indeed a 2013 critique argued that “A careful examination of the sources shows that some of them are pseudepigraphic, and the rest are of questionable reliability.

The majority of the book is padded with an attempt at historical context but when the flimsiness of Koestler’s sources are revealed it is hard to judge fact from whimsical fantasy. In particular on matters of ethnicity it is clear that he desires to undermine European racial homogeneity thus providing the mixed race Jew with a greater status. Indeed in places Koestler’s writing seems to applaud the Khazars for their apparent ‘services’ to Europe remembering that his thesis makes them Jewish if only ‘converts’ and in keeping with Jewish chutzpah he cannot help infusing some self-congratulation. Nevertheless, producing a ‘pseudo-Jew’ does provide a suitable scapegoat onto which one can deflect ones crimes. In fact the so called ‘good Jew’ Benjamin Freedman laid the groundwork for this defence (33 mins) during his 1961 speech at the Willard Hotel in Washington D.C. However, the concept falls apart when one considers the extraordinary amount of evidence proving that the Jew has been a problem throughout gentile specifically European history well before the so-called ‘Khazar conversion’.

The vulgar Talmud written in 70 AD is a testament to the contempt that the Jew holds for the gentile and in its own words “To communicate to a Goy anything about our religious relations would be equal to killing all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.” Libbre David 37 This only confirms that the despicable religion originates from a despicable tribe and that the Jew is not a product of converting to a loathsome religion. The Roman historian Tacitus reinforces this notion of the Jewish religion in his most famous work Histories written 109 AD –

“…Moses prescribed for them a novel religion quite different from those of the rest of mankind. Among the Jews all things are profane that we hold sacred; on the other hand they regard as permissible what seems to us immoral…The other practices of the Jews are sinister and revolting, and have entrenched themselves by their very wickedness. Wretches of the most abandoned kind who had no use for the religion of their fathers took to contributing dues and free-will offerings to swell the Jewish exchequer; and other reasons for their increasing wealth may be found in their stubborn loyalty and ready benevolence towards brother Jews. But the rest of the world they confront with the hatred reserved for enemies. They will not feed or intermarry with gentiles… They have introduced the practice of circumcision to show that they are different from others.” (Tacitus, Histories, 5.2–5).

Indeed it was not long before the wicked activities of the Jews roused Roman public opinion against them following the establishment of the very first Jewish community outside the Middle East in Rome in 139 BC. During sittings of the Roman senate the famous orator Cicero, among others, frequently spoke against the Jewish presence in Rome. Equally there is historical evidence relating to their negative impact on Romans during the first century AD. The world’s first anti-Jewish riots broke out in the city of Alexandria in 38 AD, and re-occurred in 66 AD, 115 AD, 118 AD, and 411 AD. In that year Cyril, the archbishop of Alexandria ordered the expulsion of all Jews from the city. The Roman Emperor Tiberius formally expelled Jews from Rome in 19 AD. They returned shortly after, only to be expelled again in 49 AD. In 116 AD, Emperor Trajan ordered that all Jews in Mesopotamia should be killed on the grounds that they were the cause of continual uprisings in that region. One of the most famous emperors of the Eastern Roman Empire, Justinian (527–565 AD), adopted a comprehensive anti-Jewish policy which barred Jews from the civil service, military posts, and any other positions of influence in his government. All of these events that pre-date the supposed ‘Khazar conversion’ serve to highlight the devastating impact the Jew had on Roman life and provide substantial proof that the Jew displayed identical behavioural patterns centuries prior to the alleged ‘conversion’. Patently the Khazar theory has been produced to suggest an “Ashkenazi” problem rather than a “Jewish problem” yet it was the Middle Eastern Mizrahi bloodline that interfered with Roman life 900 years prior to the Khazars and the Sephardi are currently notoriously anti-Gentile easily proving that all Jews have been and remain a problem throughout history.

Logic would also dictate that if a massive conversion of substantially different racial stock took place after the 7th century the racial make-up of Jews in that area would alter dramatically compared to that of their Sephardi and Mizrahi (Middle Eastern) brethren. However, to date twelve DNA studies prove otherwise. Beginning in 1999 the studies all reached very similar conclusions that Jewish community’s whether Ashkenazi, Sephardi, or Mizrahi formed a clearly distinct cluster sharing a common lineage consistent with origins in the region of the Middle East. While the most recent involving Harry Ostrer, a professor of Pathology and Genetics at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University and the Jewish HapMap Project are a double edged sword in that they tend to compound the notion that the Jew is a race alone and not a tribal facet of a larger Semitic race that has long existed and continues to live in the Middle East. Nevertheless, there is conclusive DNA evidence against the reality of the so called ‘Khazar theory’ thus substantiating the notion that it is a mechanism to distract from the “Jewish problem”. Indeed by associating Zionism with only the Ashkenazi strain the Jew attempts to disassociate from his crimes against Europe and the globe.

So it remains only to explain why so called reasoned Nationalists would entertain this obviously weak hypothesis meant to distract. What is transparent from the substantial evidence presented is that those claiming that only the ‘Khazar/Ashkenazi’ pose a problem are verifiably wrong. The concept of only “some Jews” or “false Jews” has been addressed and exposed as black propaganda. Consequently those pushing the Khazar theory are shills participating in a Jewish construct designed to distract from the Jew regardless of what historical documentation records.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL

Ireland: A real perspective.

The Irish people have become victims of the IRA/Sinn Fein. The IRA/Sinn Fein call themselves Patriots but they have sold out the Irish people. What good did joining the European Union bring to Ireland-mass immigration, asset stripping and the total destruction of her economy under the Euro. It seems in the desperation to keep out their English Brother the Irish gave the IRA/Sinn Fein an open invitation to their Marxist comrades the Zionist EU who then brought the rest of the world to Ireland. The IRA/Sinn Fein meant to deliver the Irish to their Marxist Comrades in the Zionist EU the disaster was staged. For decades the Irish have been victims of an ideology that now sees its grip tighten on the whole of western civilization.

A most disturbing feature of Ireland’s troubles continues to be the sectarianism. Whilst this was more than merely religion (Protestant versus Catholic) it is inter-racial; at the basic level two differing White tribes the Celts and the Anglo-Saxons.  Given the length of time over which this factionalism has taken place from a nationalistic point of view there is no reason why there should not have been an adequate conclusion for both. Yet to all intents and purposes modern Ireland is the turbulent land that it has been for much of the previous century. There is an underlying connotation that there is a purpose in the ‘maintenance’ of these hostilities. Just as we seen with numerous conflicts in the Middle East Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and now threatening Syria and Iran the ‘West’ has been damn quick to ‘democratise’. This usually means throwing up a Rothschild Bank. Similarly there was a dramatic drive by the United Nations to envelope the newly declared sovereign lands that emerged following the break up of the Soviet Union and the former Yugoslavia. Chillingly the down fall of Slobodan Milošević President of Serbia has all the hallmarks of the deposition of the ill fated Gadaffi. “Milošević emerged in April 1987 as the leading force in Serbian politics. Some international journalists have stated that his political positions were nationalist, with elements of socialism …”  naturally, like Gadaffi what followed Milošević was an almost immediate ‘acquisition’ by the Zionists in the West of Serbian land. “Following the ousting of President Slobodan Milošević from office, [Serbia] applied for membership, and was admitted to the UN on 1 November 2000”.

The United Nations is set up as a global force and with it there is a suffocating desire to ‘compel’ member states to comply. This complicity is called democracy but not as the ancient Greeks the cradle of civilisation would recognise it. Today the word ‘democracy’ is applied to Zionist slavery delivered through Marxist dogma. This brutal ‘liberal’ totalitarianism will not suffer dissent disagree and you are a ‘racist’ an ‘anti-Semite’ or worse still a hater of Israel. War will no doubt be declared against the leader who attempts to protect his nation and this is the future into which the IRA has marched the Irish people.

Why else would a British Labour Council sanction a Republican march though an English city other than to stir up White sectarian violence again? Sinn Fein and the British Labour Party share the same agenda. Of course the buck stops with Bolshevik Labour council leader Joe Anderson. The Marxist Labour Party is the source of this volatile situation with White sectarianism. Let’s take a close up look at the Local Labour Party entrenched with the Marxist Unions Anderson himself is priming himself for local mayor. Trouble at this Labour sponsored IRA/Sinn Fein event is fuel for a Labour Marxist city clamp down. Has anyone bothered to count the Zionists on Liverpool Council, this is a prime example of their divide and conquer technique. Keep the gentile distracted while they self serve.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL

The Talmud

Originally, Jewish scholarship was oral. Rabbis expounded and debated the law and discussed the Tenakh (Hebrew Bible) without written works. This situation changed drastically, however, mainly as the result of the destruction of the Jewish commonwealth in year 70. A.D.  It seemed that the rabbis were to lose control over Jewish action so at this point it became necessary to commit the oral traditions to paper. Two bodies of analysis developed, one in Palestine and the other in Babylonia leading to two works of Talmud. The older compilation called the Jerusalem Talmud or the Talmud Yerushalmi has far less influence than that of the Babylonian Talmud. This is because the influence of the Jewish community in Israel steadily declined in contrast with the Babylonian community. Quite a ‘poetic’ happenstance given that the ‘wandering’ community would take “out of Zion…the Law and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem”. From the time it was completed the Talmud has been integral to Jewish scholarship. It forms the moral and social grounding for the entire Jewish community worldwide. For Jews the teachings of the Talmud supersede the teachings held in the Torah/Tenakh. It is the Talmud, and not the Tenakh (Hebrew Bible) that Orthodox (mainstream) men study at Yeshivot (Jewish colleges) to become rabbis. However, since its inception it has also been a source of contention between Jews and the non-Jewish Nations in which they lived.

In 1264 Pablo Christiani denounced the Talmud, which resulted in a papal bull against it and in the first censorship. This was undertaken at Barcelona by a commission of Dominicans, who ordered the cancellation of passages reprehensible from a Christian perspective. At the disputation of Tortosa in 1413, Geronimo de Santa Fé brought forward a number of accusations, including the assertion that the condemnations of pagans and apostates found in the Talmud referred in reality to Christians. Pope Martin V, who had convened this disputation, issued a bull two years later forbidding Jews to read the Talmud, and ordering the destruction of all copies of it. On September 9 1553 copies of the Talmud confiscated in compliance with a decree of the Inquisition were burned at Rome. Censorship of the Talmud was introduced by a papal bull issued in 1554 and in 1565 Pope Pius IV commanded that the Talmud be deprived of its very name. Pope Gregory XIII (1575-85) again denounced the Talmud and in 1593 Clement VIII renewed the old interdiction against reading or owning it. The last denouncement of the Talmud took place in Poland in 1757, when Bishop Dembowski, at the instigation of the Frankists, convened a public disputation at Kamenets-Podolsk. The Bishop a wanted all copies of the Talmud found in his bishopric confiscated and burned by the hangman. http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Talmud

Considering that one is ‘meant’ to believe that the Talmud is a holy book of a religious community the above would seem a bit harsh. Yet take the time to ask WHY this piece of work was so loathed and the answer is most enlightening. A fundamental issue to tackle is the notion of the Jewish Community as a purely religious community. They are not. They are a racial group masquerading as nothing more than a religious group. To that end this community views themselves very differently from those outside their community and it shows in their writings.    For example Gentile means Non Jew, but the Yiddish term Goy referring to Gentiles actually means cattle. One must also be aware that the Yiddish term for a non-Jewish female, Shiksa, actually means hoar.  Even Wikipedia had this to say-

“The word shiksa is etymologically partly derived from the Hebrew term שקץ, sheketz, which means “abomination”, “impure,” or “object of loathing”, depending on the translator. Several dictionaries define “shiksa” as a disparaging and offensive term applied to a non-Jewish girl or woman. In Polish “siksa” (pronounced “s’eeksa”) is a popular pejorative word for an immature young girl or teenage girl (or, in its masculine form, “sikus”, boy), as it is a conflation between the Yiddish term and usage of the Polish verb “sikać” (“to piss”, “to urinate”). It means “pisspants” and is roughly equivalent to the English terms “snot-nosed brat”, “little squirt”…”

 Naturally this contempt for the Gentile is rife throughout the Talmud.    

Jehovah created the Gentile in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The Gentile is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night.                                                              Midrash Talpioth p. 225-L

The Gentiles are not human they are beasts Baba Mazia 114b

 All children of Goyim are animals Yebamoth 98a

 Sexual intercourse between the Goyim is like intercourse between animals                                                              Sanhedrin 74b

 A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat.       Hadarine, 20, B, Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat

 A Jew may violate but not marry a non Jewish girl            Gad Shas 2:2  

             If you eat with a Goy it is the same as eating with a dog

                                                                           Tospoth, Jebamoth 84b

 A Jew is forbidden to drink from a glass of wine that a Gentile has touched because the touch has made the wine unclean.

                                                                      Schulchan Aruch, Johre Deah 122

 If a Jew finds an object lost by a Goy it does not have to be returned. Baba Mazia 24a

 What a Jew steals from a Goy he may keep Sanhedrin 57a

If a Jew kills a Goy there will be no death penalty Sanhedrin 57a

If a Goy hits a Jew he must be killed Sanhedrin 58b

Do not save the Goyim in danger of death. Show no mercy to the Goyim                                                                Hikkoth AkumX 1

Even the best of the Goyim should all be killed Soferim 15

A ‘prayer’ or ‘benediction’ to be said by a Jewish man every day: thank God for not making me a Gentile a woman or a slave.

Hikkoth Akum X1

A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them        Szaaloth-Utszabot, The book of Jore Dia 17

To communicate to a Goy anything about our religious relations would be equal to killing all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.                               Libbre David 37

In conclusion, as a general echo of the above passage, the Christian gentile of the past has in reality been rather mild in choosing to destroy the book or just expel the keepers. Clearly if the gentile had the mentality of the Zionist writers’ streets would run with Jewish blood.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL

Nationalism: Its nature and tools

Nationalism is organic. In a healthy society (and believe me we do not live in one of those!) nationalism would not be considered a political entity but a natural innate response. In fact in seeking the nature of nationalism one is on a spiritual discovery that uncovers a unique connection between the individual, his race and his heritage. The Nation is kin, that is like an extended family and the key here is ties of blood as the nation is all of one race. This extends backwards in terms of the nations history and is thrust forward in terms of the passing on of the nation’s traditions and culture. In this light the individual is born with a soulful duty or responsibility to the nation to maintain this continuity.

As such it is only once the tribal group extended way beyond multiple familial groups into towns and cities that as an entity the Nation and Nationalism took on a political form. The purpose of Government in this healthy society is to serve the nation-again still an extended racial family. The State would consist of people from within the nation not foreign elements. This is known as a Nation-State. If foreign elements run a State and not its people they serve their own interests and not that of the nation. A particularly good example of this is Zionism and usually involves wars for Israel. If at anytime the State ceased to serve would be seen as corrupting the life of the nation and would require dismantling.

Once Nationalism is installed as the political mechanism of government what follows are a series of tools to protect the nation. That Fascism is a technique employed by nationalists is somewhat of a misnomer. In actual fact the English word fascism derives from the Italian fascio (“league”) and suggests merely a group or movement. Although Fascism logically denotes only Italian fascism, the word is used to describe similar ideologies and political movements. That is not by chance, but because in 1935 Stalin ordered  the word Fascism be used for all national socialistic movements, to hide the word “socialistic”; Bolshevism or Jewish “socialism” wanted to keep that word for itself. In reality Nationalistic movements throughout Europe were as ideologically unique as the culture of the land in which they arose. Germany’s National Socialism would not manifest in Italy but could only become the Italian Fascism of Mussolini. All did learn from each other and this is highlighted in Britain’s Union of Fascists. Never the less the Anglo-Saxon allies gladly accepted the ‘wise’ resolution of Stalin, and their Zionist infested press has since used the same false naming for any national movement.

As a consequence of Stalin’s move Fascism is now pretty much synonymous with Nationalism and can be presumed as a tool in the service of the Nation. Just like Nationalism it rejects the values of Zionist democracyliberalismMarxism and internationalism/Globalism. Mussolini noted that “the first stage of Fascism should more properly be called Corporatism because it is the merger of State and corporate power.” As the state is run in the best interests of its nation a merger between state and corporate business is in the best interests of the nation because it encourages competition between native suppliers but protects from global takeovers. Good fences make good neighbours and this is why Nations have borders. Fundamental to Fascism is that it and its components are operated within a Nation-State. It is the ideology of protection and preservation of the Nation that conserves industry, business, media and domestic product for the good of the race. If the Nationalistic ideology was removed or subverted there would no longer be a restraint.

As stated in the beginning of this article this is not a healthy society and the current ruling ideology is in direct opposition to nationalistic thought. It is in favour of the ‘free’ movement of goods and people and in the form of the EU has dissolved sovereign country’s borders. Without borders this has effectively allowed huge multinationals to swoop in and swallow up small businesses. While the current ideology applauds this as globalism it has a 2 fold negative effect on a country destroying jobs and reducing choice. In wake of this a land’s mineral wealth, which in a Nationalist framework would serve its own people, has become a profit making scheme for private companies. A most absurd principle brought about by this ideology is the selling off of a country’s mineral wealth (Gas, Coal, Electricity etc) only to have its people buy it back at astronomical prices.

One must conclude that the ruling ideology in government/s is the mechanism by which society is controlled. The Nationalistic model is driven by the Nation-state that suffers no foreign self serving elements. Here the State serves the Nation basically by ‘capping’ business and industries ability to go ‘global’ and destroy the family business. The current model not a Nation-State and at the root of this Ideology is much self interest. The eradication of borders has destroyed jobs, encouraged immigration and asset stripped European Lands all in the name of ‘Globalisation’. This is what happens when a continent takes its eye off the ball and lets a foreign element sneak in. White Europeans did not win either of the world wars (Brothers Wars) Zionism did.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL

Nationalism: Its nature and tools

Nationalism is organic. In a healthy society (and believe me we do not live in one of those!) nationalism would not be considered a political entity but a natural innate response. In fact in seeking the nature of nationalism one is on a spiritual discovery that uncovers a unique connection between the individual, his race and his heritage. The Nation is kin, that is like an extended family and the key here is ties of blood as the nation is all of one race. This extends backwards in terms of the nations history and is thrust forward in terms of the passing on of the nation’s traditions and culture. In this light the individual is born with a soulful duty or responsibility to the nation to maintain this continuity.

As such it is only once the tribal group extended way beyond multiple familial groups into towns and cities that as an entity the Nation and Nationalism took on a political form. The purpose of Government in this healthy society is to serve the nation-again still an extended racial family. The State would consist of people from within the nation not foreign elements. This is known as a Nation-State. If foreign elements run a State and not its people they serve their own interests and not that of the nation. A particularly good example of this is Zionism and usually involves wars for Israel. If at anytime the State ceased to serve would be seen as corrupting the life of the nation and would require dismantling.

Once Nationalism is installed as the political mechanism of government what follows are a series of tools to protect the nation. That Fascism is a technique employed by nationalists is somewhat of a misnomer. In actual fact the English word fascism derives from the Italian fascio (“league”) and suggests merely a group or movement. Although Fascism logically denotes only Italian fascism, the word is used to describe similar ideologies and political movements. That is not by chance, but because in 1935 Stalin ordered  the word Fascism be used for all national socialistic movements, to hide the word “socialistic”; Bolshevism or Jewish “socialism” wanted to keep that word for itself. In reality Nationalistic movements throughout Europe were as ideologically unique as the culture of the land in which they arose. Germany’s National Socialism would not manifest in Italy but could only become the Italian Fascism of Mussolini. All did learn from each other and this is highlighted in Britain’s Union of Fascists. Never the less the Anglo-Saxon allies gladly accepted the ‘wise’ resolution of Stalin, and their Zionist infested press has since used the same false naming for any national movement.

As a consequence of Stalin’s move Fascism is now pretty much synonymous with Nationalism and can be presumed as a tool in the service of the Nation. Just like Nationalism it rejects the values of Zionist democracyliberalismMarxism and internationalism/Globalism. Mussolini noted that “the first stage of Fascism should more properly be called Corporatism because it is the merger of State and corporate power.” As the state is run in the best interests of its nation a merger between state and corporate business is in the best interests of the nation because it encourages competition between native suppliers but protects from global takeovers. Good fences make good neighbours and this is why Nations have borders. Fundamental to Fascism is that it and its components are operated within a Nation-State. It is the ideology of protection and preservation of the Nation that conserves industry, business, media and domestic product for the good of the race. If the Nationalistic ideology was removed or subverted there would no longer be a restraint.

As stated in the beginning of this article this is not a healthy society and the current ruling ideology is in direct opposition to nationalistic thought. It is in favour of the ‘free’ movement of goods and people and in the form of the EU has dissolved sovereign country’s borders. Without borders this has effectively allowed huge multinationals to swoop in and swallow up small businesses. While the current ideology applauds this as globalism it has a 2 fold negative effect on a country destroying jobs and reducing choice. In wake of this a land’s mineral wealth, which in a Nationalist framework would serve its own people, has become a profit making scheme for private companies. A most absurd principle brought about by this ideology is the selling off of a country’s mineral wealth (Gas, Coal, Electricity etc) only to have its people buy it back at astronomical prices.

One must conclude that the ruling ideology in government/s is the mechanism by which society is controlled. The Nationalistic model is driven by the Nation-state that suffers no foreign self serving elements. Here the State serves the Nation basically by ‘capping’ business and industries ability to go ‘global’ and destroy the family business. The current model not a Nation-State and at the root of this Ideology is much self interest. The eradication of borders has destroyed jobs, encouraged immigration and asset stripped European Lands all in the name of ‘Globalisation’. This is what happens when a continent takes its eye off the ball and lets a foreign element sneak in. White Europeans did not win either of the world wars (Brothers Wars) Zionism did.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL