Archive | Torah RSS for this section

The Talmud

Originally, Jewish scholarship was oral. Rabbis expounded and debated the law and discussed the Tenakh (Hebrew Bible) without written works. This situation changed drastically, however, mainly as the result of the destruction of the Jewish commonwealth in year 70. A.D.  It seemed that the rabbis were to lose control over Jewish action so at this point it became necessary to commit the oral traditions to paper. Two bodies of analysis developed, one in Palestine and the other in Babylonia leading to two works of Talmud. The older compilation called the Jerusalem Talmud or the Talmud Yerushalmi has far less influence than that of the Babylonian Talmud. This is because the influence of the Jewish community in Israel steadily declined in contrast with the Babylonian community. Quite a ‘poetic’ happenstance given that the ‘wandering’ community would take “out of Zion…the Law and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem”. From the time it was completed the Talmud has been integral to Jewish scholarship. It forms the moral and social grounding for the entire Jewish community worldwide. For Jews the teachings of the Talmud supersede the teachings held in the Torah/Tenakh. It is the Talmud, and not the Tenakh (Hebrew Bible) that Orthodox (mainstream) men study at Yeshivot (Jewish colleges) to become rabbis. However, since its inception it has also been a source of contention between Jews and the non-Jewish Nations in which they lived.

In 1264 Pablo Christiani denounced the Talmud, which resulted in a papal bull against it and in the first censorship. This was undertaken at Barcelona by a commission of Dominicans, who ordered the cancellation of passages reprehensible from a Christian perspective. At the disputation of Tortosa in 1413, Geronimo de Santa Fé brought forward a number of accusations, including the assertion that the condemnations of pagans and apostates found in the Talmud referred in reality to Christians. Pope Martin V, who had convened this disputation, issued a bull two years later forbidding Jews to read the Talmud, and ordering the destruction of all copies of it. On September 9 1553 copies of the Talmud confiscated in compliance with a decree of the Inquisition were burned at Rome. Censorship of the Talmud was introduced by a papal bull issued in 1554 and in 1565 Pope Pius IV commanded that the Talmud be deprived of its very name. Pope Gregory XIII (1575-85) again denounced the Talmud and in 1593 Clement VIII renewed the old interdiction against reading or owning it. The last denouncement of the Talmud took place in Poland in 1757, when Bishop Dembowski, at the instigation of the Frankists, convened a public disputation at Kamenets-Podolsk. The Bishop a wanted all copies of the Talmud found in his bishopric confiscated and burned by the hangman. http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Talmud

Considering that one is ‘meant’ to believe that the Talmud is a holy book of a religious community the above would seem a bit harsh. Yet take the time to ask WHY this piece of work was so loathed and the answer is most enlightening. A fundamental issue to tackle is the notion of the Jewish Community as a purely religious community. They are not. They are a racial group masquerading as nothing more than a religious group. To that end this community views themselves very differently from those outside their community and it shows in their writings.    For example Gentile means Non Jew, but the Yiddish term Goy referring to Gentiles actually means cattle. One must also be aware that the Yiddish term for a non-Jewish female, Shiksa, actually means hoar.  Even Wikipedia had this to say-

“The word shiksa is etymologically partly derived from the Hebrew term שקץ, sheketz, which means “abomination”, “impure,” or “object of loathing”, depending on the translator. Several dictionaries define “shiksa” as a disparaging and offensive term applied to a non-Jewish girl or woman. In Polish “siksa” (pronounced “s’eeksa”) is a popular pejorative word for an immature young girl or teenage girl (or, in its masculine form, “sikus”, boy), as it is a conflation between the Yiddish term and usage of the Polish verb “sikać” (“to piss”, “to urinate”). It means “pisspants” and is roughly equivalent to the English terms “snot-nosed brat”, “little squirt”…”

 Naturally this contempt for the Gentile is rife throughout the Talmud.    

Jehovah created the Gentile in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The Gentile is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night.                                                              Midrash Talpioth p. 225-L

The Gentiles are not human they are beasts Baba Mazia 114b

 All children of Goyim are animals Yebamoth 98a

 Sexual intercourse between the Goyim is like intercourse between animals                                                              Sanhedrin 74b

 A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat.       Hadarine, 20, B, Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat

 A Jew may violate but not marry a non Jewish girl            Gad Shas 2:2  

             If you eat with a Goy it is the same as eating with a dog

                                                                           Tospoth, Jebamoth 84b

 A Jew is forbidden to drink from a glass of wine that a Gentile has touched because the touch has made the wine unclean.

                                                                      Schulchan Aruch, Johre Deah 122

 If a Jew finds an object lost by a Goy it does not have to be returned. Baba Mazia 24a

 What a Jew steals from a Goy he may keep Sanhedrin 57a

If a Jew kills a Goy there will be no death penalty Sanhedrin 57a

If a Goy hits a Jew he must be killed Sanhedrin 58b

Do not save the Goyim in danger of death. Show no mercy to the Goyim                                                                Hikkoth AkumX 1

Even the best of the Goyim should all be killed Soferim 15

A ‘prayer’ or ‘benediction’ to be said by a Jewish man every day: thank God for not making me a Gentile a woman or a slave.

Hikkoth Akum X1

A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them        Szaaloth-Utszabot, The book of Jore Dia 17

To communicate to a Goy anything about our religious relations would be equal to killing all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.                               Libbre David 37

In conclusion, as a general echo of the above passage, the Christian gentile of the past has in reality been rather mild in choosing to destroy the book or just expel the keepers. Clearly if the gentile had the mentality of the Zionist writers’ streets would run with Jewish blood.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL

Nationalism: Its nature and tools

Nationalism is organic. In a healthy society (and believe me we do not live in one of those!) nationalism would not be considered a political entity but a natural innate response. In fact in seeking the nature of nationalism one is on a spiritual discovery that uncovers a unique connection between the individual, his race and his heritage. The Nation is kin, that is like an extended family and the key here is ties of blood as the nation is all of one race. This extends backwards in terms of the nations history and is thrust forward in terms of the passing on of the nation’s traditions and culture. In this light the individual is born with a soulful duty or responsibility to the nation to maintain this continuity.

As such it is only once the tribal group extended way beyond multiple familial groups into towns and cities that as an entity the Nation and Nationalism took on a political form. The purpose of Government in this healthy society is to serve the nation-again still an extended racial family. The State would consist of people from within the nation not foreign elements. This is known as a Nation-State. If foreign elements run a State and not its people they serve their own interests and not that of the nation. A particularly good example of this is Zionism and usually involves wars for Israel. If at anytime the State ceased to serve would be seen as corrupting the life of the nation and would require dismantling.

Once Nationalism is installed as the political mechanism of government what follows are a series of tools to protect the nation. That Fascism is a technique employed by nationalists is somewhat of a misnomer. In actual fact the English word fascism derives from the Italian fascio (“league”) and suggests merely a group or movement. Although Fascism logically denotes only Italian fascism, the word is used to describe similar ideologies and political movements. That is not by chance, but because in 1935 Stalin ordered  the word Fascism be used for all national socialistic movements, to hide the word “socialistic”; Bolshevism or Jewish “socialism” wanted to keep that word for itself. In reality Nationalistic movements throughout Europe were as ideologically unique as the culture of the land in which they arose. Germany’s National Socialism would not manifest in Italy but could only become the Italian Fascism of Mussolini. All did learn from each other and this is highlighted in Britain’s Union of Fascists. Never the less the Anglo-Saxon allies gladly accepted the ‘wise’ resolution of Stalin, and their Zionist infested press has since used the same false naming for any national movement.

As a consequence of Stalin’s move Fascism is now pretty much synonymous with Nationalism and can be presumed as a tool in the service of the Nation. Just like Nationalism it rejects the values of Zionist democracyliberalismMarxism and internationalism/Globalism. Mussolini noted that “the first stage of Fascism should more properly be called Corporatism because it is the merger of State and corporate power.” As the state is run in the best interests of its nation a merger between state and corporate business is in the best interests of the nation because it encourages competition between native suppliers but protects from global takeovers. Good fences make good neighbours and this is why Nations have borders. Fundamental to Fascism is that it and its components are operated within a Nation-State. It is the ideology of protection and preservation of the Nation that conserves industry, business, media and domestic product for the good of the race. If the Nationalistic ideology was removed or subverted there would no longer be a restraint.

As stated in the beginning of this article this is not a healthy society and the current ruling ideology is in direct opposition to nationalistic thought. It is in favour of the ‘free’ movement of goods and people and in the form of the EU has dissolved sovereign country’s borders. Without borders this has effectively allowed huge multinationals to swoop in and swallow up small businesses. While the current ideology applauds this as globalism it has a 2 fold negative effect on a country destroying jobs and reducing choice. In wake of this a land’s mineral wealth, which in a Nationalist framework would serve its own people, has become a profit making scheme for private companies. A most absurd principle brought about by this ideology is the selling off of a country’s mineral wealth (Gas, Coal, Electricity etc) only to have its people buy it back at astronomical prices.

One must conclude that the ruling ideology in government/s is the mechanism by which society is controlled. The Nationalistic model is driven by the Nation-state that suffers no foreign self serving elements. Here the State serves the Nation basically by ‘capping’ business and industries ability to go ‘global’ and destroy the family business. The current model not a Nation-State and at the root of this Ideology is much self interest. The eradication of borders has destroyed jobs, encouraged immigration and asset stripped European Lands all in the name of ‘Globalisation’. This is what happens when a continent takes its eye off the ball and lets a foreign element sneak in. White Europeans did not win either of the world wars (Brothers Wars) Zionism did.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL

Nationalism: Its nature and tools

Nationalism is organic. In a healthy society (and believe me we do not live in one of those!) nationalism would not be considered a political entity but a natural innate response. In fact in seeking the nature of nationalism one is on a spiritual discovery that uncovers a unique connection between the individual, his race and his heritage. The Nation is kin, that is like an extended family and the key here is ties of blood as the nation is all of one race. This extends backwards in terms of the nations history and is thrust forward in terms of the passing on of the nation’s traditions and culture. In this light the individual is born with a soulful duty or responsibility to the nation to maintain this continuity.

As such it is only once the tribal group extended way beyond multiple familial groups into towns and cities that as an entity the Nation and Nationalism took on a political form. The purpose of Government in this healthy society is to serve the nation-again still an extended racial family. The State would consist of people from within the nation not foreign elements. This is known as a Nation-State. If foreign elements run a State and not its people they serve their own interests and not that of the nation. A particularly good example of this is Zionism and usually involves wars for Israel. If at anytime the State ceased to serve would be seen as corrupting the life of the nation and would require dismantling.

Once Nationalism is installed as the political mechanism of government what follows are a series of tools to protect the nation. That Fascism is a technique employed by nationalists is somewhat of a misnomer. In actual fact the English word fascism derives from the Italian fascio (“league”) and suggests merely a group or movement. Although Fascism logically denotes only Italian fascism, the word is used to describe similar ideologies and political movements. That is not by chance, but because in 1935 Stalin ordered  the word Fascism be used for all national socialistic movements, to hide the word “socialistic”; Bolshevism or Jewish “socialism” wanted to keep that word for itself. In reality Nationalistic movements throughout Europe were as ideologically unique as the culture of the land in which they arose. Germany’s National Socialism would not manifest in Italy but could only become the Italian Fascism of Mussolini. All did learn from each other and this is highlighted in Britain’s Union of Fascists. Never the less the Anglo-Saxon allies gladly accepted the ‘wise’ resolution of Stalin, and their Zionist infested press has since used the same false naming for any national movement.

As a consequence of Stalin’s move Fascism is now pretty much synonymous with Nationalism and can be presumed as a tool in the service of the Nation. Just like Nationalism it rejects the values of Zionist democracyliberalismMarxism and internationalism/Globalism. Mussolini noted that “the first stage of Fascism should more properly be called Corporatism because it is the merger of State and corporate power.” As the state is run in the best interests of its nation a merger between state and corporate business is in the best interests of the nation because it encourages competition between native suppliers but protects from global takeovers. Good fences make good neighbours and this is why Nations have borders. Fundamental to Fascism is that it and its components are operated within a Nation-State. It is the ideology of protection and preservation of the Nation that conserves industry, business, media and domestic product for the good of the race. If the Nationalistic ideology was removed or subverted there would no longer be a restraint.

As stated in the beginning of this article this is not a healthy society and the current ruling ideology is in direct opposition to nationalistic thought. It is in favour of the ‘free’ movement of goods and people and in the form of the EU has dissolved sovereign country’s borders. Without borders this has effectively allowed huge multinationals to swoop in and swallow up small businesses. While the current ideology applauds this as globalism it has a 2 fold negative effect on a country destroying jobs and reducing choice. In wake of this a land’s mineral wealth, which in a Nationalist framework would serve its own people, has become a profit making scheme for private companies. A most absurd principle brought about by this ideology is the selling off of a country’s mineral wealth (Gas, Coal, Electricity etc) only to have its people buy it back at astronomical prices.

One must conclude that the ruling ideology in government/s is the mechanism by which society is controlled. The Nationalistic model is driven by the Nation-state that suffers no foreign self serving elements. Here the State serves the Nation basically by ‘capping’ business and industries ability to go ‘global’ and destroy the family business. The current model not a Nation-State and at the root of this Ideology is much self interest. The eradication of borders has destroyed jobs, encouraged immigration and asset stripped European Lands all in the name of ‘Globalisation’. This is what happens when a continent takes its eye off the ball and lets a foreign element sneak in. White Europeans did not win either of the world wars (Brothers Wars) Zionism did.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL

‘White Guilt’ and its Implementation

Jews are a ‘Diaspora’ people exiled from the land they claim was their own. Therefore, they are NOT a Western White tribe but a wandering Semitic interloper. Now White Western History is replete with Jewish ‘evictions’. That is at various points completely non-related Sovereign White Countries have removed Jewish peoples out of their lands. The key is that these ‘evictions’ were applied by non-related white peoples and at random periods throughout Europe’s History. It is far more suggestive that the White gentile populations simply got fed up with Jewish treachery than the well known Jewish cry of ‘victim’.

This is not to say that the White race themselves are entirely peaceful. Indeed European History sets the standard for inter-racial conflict. From the earliest times Europe has been marked with wars from differing White Germanic tribes. Eventually this lead to the formation of sovereign nations-Britain Germany France and Russia to name a few. Of course this never stopped the tendency to make war and some of the bloodiest were between kin for example Crecy, Poitiers, Agincourt and The Spanish Armada. These were decisive English victories and Nationalist history does not cast aspersions but perhaps a thought should be spared for the greatest profiteer from the ‘Victory at Waterloo’. A British victory against Napoleonic France. That is what ‘history’ records, but the cunning Rothschild family was playing both sides and what had really happened was that ‘Rothschild had bought control of the British economy’.

The First and Second World Wars or ‘Brothers Wars’ were also notorious profit making enterprises for Jewish entrepreneurs. So while approximately 90 million of our people died across 2 world wars the Hebrew happily toddles off to the bank. So it seems the Jewish community are most happy to watch the White man destroy himself as long as it makes a profit. Now in the past it seems that the White man retaliated, the expulsions from various European lands. So if Jewish Zionism is bad as history suggests… something in White Europe has changed.

Regardless of any religious or political motivations the ‘Troubles’ in Ireland still involve brother fighting brother. Meanwhile, as their backs are turned and focus is attuned on Ireland more good strong White ‘cattle’ are farmed out as cannon fodder in Zionist Wars for Israel. However, no Gentile dares voice an opinion in reference to the atrocities committed by that land the consequences are much to grave. The State of Israel is the Land of the eternal victim and collective guilt is the price White man must pay. So what worth is a Jewish life compared to that of a Gentile? The combined death toll across Europe in WWII was 55million. We are told that 6millon of those are Jewish from the German camps. One does not see any Jewish directed name calling or hand ringing for the other 49million Gentile deaths. Incidentally does this number include 1.7million of our German brothers (POW’s) that the “terrible Swedish Jew” Eisenhower murderedThere is no need to read the Talmud to see that the Zionist Jew regards Gentile life as disposable. If White man is capable of uniting in misplaced collective guilt then it is about time that we unite as a people to face the real enemy-ZIONISM.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL

The Zionist Interpretation of British History

Although written by left-wing Zionists Monty Python was and is genuine satire. Briton’s can take a joke. Had it stopped at this point there would be little complaint. Yet it didn’t. Monty Python’s the Life of Brian, the Meaning of Life and the Holy Grail seemed to declare open season not just on Christianity but British culture as a whole. This gave rise to such appalling travesties as the Blackadder cult that takes huge delight in assassinating our historical figures. Again these shows are written by the Zionist Jew Ben Elton and star predominantly Zionist Jews and their left-wing lackeys. Even this would be tolerable if we the indigenous could poke fun back, but dare and the White man is instantly labelled-a ‘racist’ a ‘hater’ an’ anti-Semite’- all manner of name calling.  Incidentally In June 2005, Rowan Atkinson, who co-wrote the first series of Blackadder, led a coalition of the UK’s most prominent actors and writers, including Nicholas Hytner a Zionist Jew, Stephen Fry a gay Zionist Jew, and Ian McEwan an Israel loving  Zionist sympathiser, to the British Parliament in an attempt to force a review of the controversial Racial and Religious Hatred Bill, which they felt would give overwhelming power to religious groups to impose ‘censorship’ on the arts. What they were really worried about is that they might have to curb their enthusiastic bastardisation of British culture.

It appears that what today passes for ‘the arts’ in fact the Zionist interpretation of ‘art’ has infiltrated the documentary. The last history series commissioned for the BBC was a mammoth task written and narrated by a Zionist Jew.

A HISTORY OF BRITAIN  not THE HISTORY OF BRITAIN, a title purposely chosen due to the producers agenda, ‘boasted’ Simon Schama as its writer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_History_of_Britain_(TV_series) The son of Jewish parents with roots in LithuaniaRomania, and Turkey, Schama was born in London. In the mid-1940s, the family moved to Southend-on-Sea in Essex before moving back to London. Incidentally this Zionist Jew has not lived in Britain for over 20 years. However, the BBC thought it right to commission this person with license payers money to write about our history. Schama is a supporter of the Labour Party, donating £2,000 to Oona King’s bid to become Labour’s candidate for the 2012 London Mayoral election.

However, as with most Jews his first allegiance is to Zionist Israel. He was critical of a call by British novelist John Berger for an academic boycott of Israel over its policies towards the Palestinians. Writing in The Guardian, in an article co-authored with lawyer Anthony Julius, Schama compared Berger’s academic boycott to policies adopted by Nazi Germany, noting “This is not the first boycott call directed at Jews. On 1 April 1933, a week after he came to power, Hitler ordered a boycott of Jewish shops, banks, offices and department stores.” However, Schama failed to mention that Zionist Israeli Jews have been responsible for the murder of an astronomical amount of Palestinians since 1948 https://sites.google.com/site/falastinel7ora/if-only-americans-knew The settling of the State of Israel lies over the ethnic cleansing the Palestinian people. little known but of major relevance is that Chancellor Hitler’s 1 day  boycott of Jewish businesses on April 1st 1933 was a responses to a prior attack by the Leaders of the Worldwide Jewish community before he even came to power- “The Jewish Declaration of War on National Socialist  Germany The Economic Boycott of 1933”  Read the whole report below     http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html  Yet again the Zionist Jew plays the ‘victim’ without telling the whole story.

In closing A HISTORY OF BRITAIN  Schama stated “… It’s our cultural bloodstream, the secret of who we are, and it tells us to let go of the past, even as we honour it. To lament what ought to be lamented and to celebrate what should be celebrated. And if in the end, that history turns out to reveal itself as a patriot, well then I think that neither Churchill nor Orwell would have minded that very much, and as a matter of fact, neither do I.” Typically Zionist inspired the bulk of this ‘chant’ seems to suggest Britons break away from our heritage, pick and choose what to remember unless it “ought to be lamented”.  Apart from the fact that HE is not ethnically British but a Jew so it is not HIS culture to question, patriotism is not measured by the acts of a nation’s past but the spirit of its native countrymen.

Then we have the less mammoth, less intellectual but equally ignorant TV series like Mongrel Nation narrated and presented by the perverted freak Eddie Izzard. Though not a Jew himself Izzard is well conversed in the Zionist agenda. The three programmes were titled: InvasionImmigration, and Innovation. Armed with the Zionist weapons of divide and conquer, Izzard endeavours to carve up our homogenous Isle into a series of segregated foreign invaders. Apparently setting “out to discover just how English the English are. Even though the last successful military take-over was 1066 he looks at the waves of immigration and influences that have made England a melting pot. He reminds everyone that the Royal Family have only been “Windsor” since 1917 when they adopted the new name.” thus indicating that the family is actually German. He calls us ancient Britons, Celts, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings and Normans. So far none of these so called invaders has black skin nor does Izzard divulge that actually prior to 1945 any major settlement in Britain has been of European Germanic origin. This renders his point about the Royal Family moot.

White Tribe narrated by Darcus Howe a Black immigrant is a vile piece of garbage.  Apparently he too seeks what it is to be English. A question often asked by the media in this so called multicultural society. The black immigrant then describes the waving of the Cross of Saint George, asking why we sing Hope and Glory and Rule Britannia. Of course this Third World coloniser has no right to critique our culture when we have no recourse. Naturally if we turned on his culture we would instantly be ‘racist’. The Zionist written hypocrisy screams loud as he states “no we will not rule the waves”. Howe even expresses how he could sue on grounds of ‘racism’ if he was “kicked out” even after suggesting these appalling ‘beliefs’. Apparently he would be “£25,000 richer”.  Neither does Howe appreciate that political correctness has made ‘equality’ pro Black, minority, ethnic. Can he really be this ignorant I doubt it Zionist porn’s must get paid well.

The conclusion is simple as it is short. With this Zionist infestation one can take nothing at face value.  All these programs have a political mission. The Zionist strategically places various writers and narrators to represent a certain view of our history or culture. Who knows what the Zionists were meaning to do with that particular documentary, however, their overall plan is always divide and conquer. Therefore, one must use reason and age old common sense because the Zionists make sure nothing on TV is left to chance.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL

Zionist Imperialism

In the year 2000 there were seven countries without a Rothschild-owned Central Bank. They were Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran.

Then along came the convenient terror of 9-11. Naturally the Zionist media immediately sprung into action blaming the series of attacks on New York’s Twin Towers on Islamic Militant group Al-Qaeda.  What followed was a profound assault on America’s domestic terrorist policy and its approach to Arab Nations.  Soon Iraq and Afghanistan had been added to the list of counties that had a Rothschild owned Central Bank. Now only five countries were left without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family: Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran.

Apparently ‘safe’ in the knowledge that Iraq and Afghanistan were suitably ‘quelled’ ‘America’s’ (Zionist) inquisition went after Gadhafi. No sooner had THEY and their media arbitrarily labelled him a monster he was brutally murdered by so called ‘rebels’Zionist Murder Of  Muammar Gaddafi.  Just prior to his death these still warring ‘rebels’ had enough time to establish a new Central Bank of Libya and form a new national oil company.

In 2011 the only countries left without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family are: Cuba, North Korea and Iran.

However, as we move into 2012 President Obama has signed Rothschild’s Want Iran's Banksinto ‘law’ a defence bill creating tough new sanctions against of all countries Iran.  Again just as with Iraq Iran is being accused of massing weapons. Another excuse for the Zionist inquisition in America to stage an attack and how long before Iran has a Rothschild owned Central Bank ?

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL

“Interesting Times”

As you are no doubt aware Norwegian Anders Behring Breivik killed about 77 in a double bombing and a gun rampage in the not to distant past. I make no remark about the dead itself. I believe enough comment has been made. What I do find fascinating, however, is the huge show of remorse for the dead and apparent empathy for those who have lost loved ones. It seems that a ‘Nation’ grieves for its fallen and yet Western societies death of spirit/soul and emerged ‘humanistic’ approach would deny this emotion.

 Current trends seek to refute but Western Civilisation is marked by a spiritual idealism. The stories of Homer inspired the early Greeks towards personal excellence. Their legacy is the Olympic Games.  It can also be seen across Britain and Europe in her remarkable architecture. Great Gothic Cathedrals adorned with spires enticing the visitor to look upwards. We still have the art of Michelangelo covering the ceilings of the Sistine chapel. The works of Shakespeare and the music of Wagner are known virtually the world over. It is as if our kinsmen always sought or gave the best or greatest part of themselves.  Wayne Macleod, in his book The Importance of Race in Civilisation suggests that “Religion and Culture are inseparable beyond all doubt” He purports that all great civilisations were born in an age of religion signifying that there is a spiritual desire in certain races.  Macleod believes that religion has a “psychological, value-giving importance” to a creative race. Once a race becomes essentially agnostic or atheistic it loses the idealistic sense and becomes self-centred/ egoistic.

In Western society of today we are seeing a dramatic decline in Western religious expression. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article3890080.ece Consequently we see Church buildings left derelict or converted into Mosques. Naturally if our land wasn’t swamped by immigrants Mosques wouldn’t be a problem. This rapid decline in Western religiosity and the possible increase in agnostic or atheistic tendencies in our currant White majority may have lead to the decay in Western Art. Modern ‘art’ is depraved and vulgar. No-longer do we see the best of mankind but possibly the worst. While it is true and we can see the deterioration in Western spirit one must not believe that this happened without help.

So what did it take to trample Western mans soul. It has been a long march but the grand watershed must be WWII. A generation of European blood soaking our land and newly Americanised alien blood demanding satisfaction from across the pond, can it be that War Crimes gave rise to liberalism. There is a seemingly eternal Hebrew cry of ‘Never again’ to the alleged Nazi killing of 6 million of their race. Yet the Western world never heard about the Hebrew Eisenhower’s special German DEF (“Disarmed Enemy Forces”) camps that tortured and killed 1.7 million missing German POW’s.  http://www.rense.com/general46/germ.htm  Western Gentiles are not aware that the Bolshevik Revolution was primarily a Hebrew concern consisting of 457 Jews out of a government of 556. “Probably 61,911,000 people, 54,769,000 of them citizens, have been murdered by the Communist Party–the government–of the Soviet Union.” http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/USSR.CHAP.1.HTM  Since its inception 1948 The State of Israel has and continues to committed ethnic genocide against the Palestinian race http://baltimorechronicle.com/2008/112608Lendman.shtml and virtually no-one makes a noise. The American and British Government use our own troops to fight Israel’s Wars. Also since 1948 Britain has seen a massive influx of third world immigration and a gradual change in our ‘law’ that has seen the emergence of ‘hate crime’. One cannot impress upon the reader how fascinating it is that ‘deformation’ of the holy Holocaust will earn on the title of Anti-Semite as will mentioning Israel’s crimes possibly even landing one in prison. Yet there is no such retribution against their race for the hideous decimation of White Western Gentiles. In fact in our altruistic desire to befriend we even allow their festivals of hate. Passover is a prime example being the ‘celebration’ of the slaughter of the Egyptian (gentile) first born, meanwhile at Purim Haman is vilified because as Gentile royalty he had the audacity to expect a Hebrew to bow down to him!     http://judaism.about.com/od/holidays/a/The-Story-Of-Purim.htm  The best is yet to come. Readers may have noticed a campaign to try and remove overt Christmas Decorations from public places. Christmas holidays being absurdly renamed ‘Winterval’ and the lack of Christmas Carols. All this in case it offends ethnic minorities! Yet while Christians try to celebrate the season of good will (even without decs!) curious eight branched candelabras are springing up. There has been one in place in front of Liverpool’s George Hall for a number of years. This is to celebrate the Hebrew festival of Channukah. Ironically this is a story about ‘multiculturalism’ and how Hebrews do not like to assimilate.  http://aradece.tripod.com/chanukah_story.htm It is odd then that the Hebrews appear to be the most “vociferous exponents of universalising trends” for example the ‘humane’ abortion laws and availability of contraception. The Jewess Emma Lazarus portrays the ‘humane’ way to destroy a nation, in her poem inscribed on the statue of Liberty.

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breath free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.

Ironically the poem is only a fairly modern addition to the statue. The Statue of Liberty was in actual fact a gift from France and faces Europe the land of her forefathers and her people’s birth place. It is interesting to note that this ‘mixing’ is good enough for gentiles but not for Jews as one only needs to take a look at Israeli law.

Macleod points out “humanism, pacifism, equalitarianism, liberalism, communism, universalism, all stem basically from the same man-centeredness of a high culture that has lost its soul, they can all be classified from the point-of-view of history, as decadent ideals”. So with much encouragement from our Cultural Marxist ‘friends’ we are taught to view children as a ‘blank slate’ onto which one etched. The human being is no more spiritual than a machine and so we enter the age of the automaton. If this be the case how can one empathise with another surely this is just show or are we being lied to…

Given the premise that “great civilisations are born in an age of religion” what we are now experiencing is the ‘death’ of soul or spirit not that Western man never had a soul. Is the answer to reclaim our religiosity, Macleod suggests not “a true rejuvenation of Western society must entail new religious motivations…To generate a lasting civilisation…it is necessary to forge a rational religion.” Of course first it would be practical to throw off the mantle of slavery.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL