Sexual Perversion encompasses a pattern of degenerate sexual behaviour that includes homosexualism, paedophilia, miscegenation, transsexualism and bestiality. The cultural norms of human societies all over the world have developed an evolutionary rejection of these social ills as a means of survival. In fact the term ‘homosexuality’ wasn’t coined until 1869, by Karl-Maria Kertbeny. The entire concept of two people of the same sex being exclusively attracted to each other as a ‘sexual identity’ was a product of the ‘liberal’ 19th century. Prior to the concept of ‘Uranian’ man formulated by Karl Heinrich Ulrichs, there were ‘acts’ of sodomy and such like but no concept of a ‘sexual orientation’ outside of man and woman. The same can be said for perversions such as paedophilia. In Greek antiquity there were instances of pederasty, but the metaphysics of this was not based on a concept of ‘orientation’, but domination and hierarchy.
While the term Sexual Bolshevism became popular in the 1920s, the political manipulation of aberrosexual behaviour pre-dates this by some time and grew out of freemasonic Jewish decadence in liberal capitalist urban centres in late 19th century Europe. The phrase Sexual Bolshevism in reference to the political nurturing of degenerate sexual behaviour seems to have been coined in Germany by Ludwig Hoppe, a Lutheran pastor from Berlin. In 1921 he wrote a pamphlet called Sexual Bolshevism and Defence against same (“Sexueller Bolshevwismus und seine Abwehr”). In this he blamed sexual agitators for spreading venereal diseases and dysgenic degeneracy. With the decline of Traditional Christianity in cities such as London, Paris, Berlin, and Vienna, concerns about morality were high in the Church. Elsewhere new ‘scientific’ and philosophical concepts were postulated in regards to the meaning of history. It was at this point that those of Jewish heritage such as Karl Marx✡ framed the so-called ‘class struggle’ and Sigmund Freud✡ postulated sex (libido) as the primary motivating force of history. A member of the Judeo-Masonic secret society B’nai B’rith, Freud authored Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality in 1905 and Beyond the Pleasure Principle in 1920. Hence references to ‘Bolshevism’ were related to Jewish Marxists being the force behind the normalisation of sexual perversion. Particular examples are Magnus Hirschfeld✡ and his Scientific-Humanitarian Committee and a decade later, Wilhelm Reich✡ who founded SEXPOL as an official wing of the Communist Party of Germany.
Following the failure of state-Communism and working-class ethnic Europeans largely rejecting the attempt by the Jewish Bolsheviks to enslave and destroy gentile society, radical Jewish supremacists began to mould Sexual Bolsheviks (i.e. radical sexual perverts) into a new proletariat. Now Sexual Bolsheviks feature as tools alongside other manipulated patrons in the field of identity politics such as third-world immigrants and radical feminists. Inspired by the cultural Marxism (Political Correctness) of the Frankfurt School, a group of US-based Judaics developed a variation on critical theory called “Queer theory” to enhance the homosexual agenda. Michael Warner✡, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick✡ and Judith Butler✡ are at the forefront of this. Along with third-world miscegenation and abortion, homosexuality is a primary perversion promoted in society, under the guise of ‘tolerance’, ‘equality’ and ‘diversity’ as part of a rival Jewish supremacist strategy to attack the indigenous White European demographics.
In Britain alone the marketing of sex as a past-time implies promiscuity and children are the direct targets. For example Channel 4’s Sex Education Show regularly provides explicit sexual information and live naked bodies to teenagers. The programme even goes as far as inviting parents to speak to their teenagers about their intimate sexual lives. The object is to have parents provide their children with contraception and allow promiscuity into their homes. The availability of free contraception, particularly condoms to teenagers only exacerbates the notion of a risk free ‘game’. The likes of Embarrassing Teenage Bodies flaunts the idea of teenage sex at music festivals and university ‘freshers’ fairs as if it is ‘normal’ for teenagers to ‘experiment’ when in fact it is irresponsible behaviour. It is also a smashing opportunity to warn about sexually transmitted diseases (STD’s) that maybe a nasty reminder of too much unprotected sex. Never mind just make sure you get yourself down to a sexual health clinic and use protection in future… Advertisements for Chlamydia screening commonly have smiling apparently sexually active White teens in them compounding the notion of promiscuity in the European rather than the imported African Negro. This is incredibly dehumanising as promiscuity really isn’t that far from prostitution and maybe that is the point; redefining, particularly the White European female as sexual meat, while emasculating the White European man. There is a substantial difference between the notion of the White male-labelled such merely because it saw fit to be born with external genitalia, and the White Man builder of civilisations and an ideal the Jewish Bolshevik wishes to eradicate. Thus when confronted with the fully awakened White Man the Judaised Marxist will see only the twisted world of Zionism’s creation and spout rhetoric of the knuckle dragging Authoritarian. In the modern Marxist regime this marginalises the true White Man leaving only the conformist white male. He being coy feminised and the quintessential nerd, according to Zionist propaganda, where does White Woman turn. The answer is Jewish Zionism’s Hollywood illusion. Here manifests the artificial ‘hero’, a pretender to the ideal of civilisation building White Man produced from the ‘impotent’ African Negro. Understand unlike Great White Man the negro male has never built anything only destroyed. The trick of the Jewish Bolshevik is to transmogrifying the impotent Negro male into the Great Civilisation Building White Man. This is achieved through the magic of the media (smoke and mirrors). Consequently the notion of miscegenation becomes ‘normalised’ thus heralding the demise of the White race.
The introduction of Sexual Bolshevism in all its perverse forms was meant to have a dramatic impact on the moral base of the White European. The availability of contraception incites promiscuity. Combine this with abortion and the ‘homosexual’ agenda White birth rates are well below replacement level. However, the use of immigration to ‘encourage’ miscegenation only confirms that the Jewish Zionist agenda is not merely to attack ethnic European demographics but to wipe the White race out completely.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
‘German’ Jewish director Fritz Lang’s ‘classic’ thriller M is about a murderous child molester. Released in 1931, the film speaks for itself. Initially we see a city almost paralysed with fear; citizens dutifully protecting children become suspect merely for speaking to a lone child. In modern society this is all too familiar. Adults now steer clear of the unattended child for fear of the paedophile brand. In this light has advertisement really protected our children or made them all the more vulnerable.
Here the term ‘advertisement’ is used in the broadest sense of the word for we can ‘advertise’ in many different ways. While the horror in M was only implied, in the years since Lang’s thriller films containing content of shocking and brutal violence have hit our screens. Not only is this violence reserved for the picture house but its scenes are cascaded over billboards and TV screens in an effort to publicise. This brutality and violence also appears in the graphically realistic computer and video gaming media readily on view to children.
While this so called ‘entertainment’ is not supposed to be targeted at children its method of transmission is so invasive that it occupies the very social space. In this respect this repugnant phenomenon is what apathetic White man has allowed Western society’s ‘culture’ to become. Furthermore the explicit displays that haunt Western cinemas and creep onto the TV screens calling itself ‘entertainment’ appear as a sinister reflection of the constantly streaming news media. However, this begs the question ‘what came first the chicken or the egg?’ The insinuation is that reported news incites the fabrications of Hollywood. However, as early as 1931 a movie depicting child molestation when this perversion was not highlighted in the news paints a rather different picture. This type of film has promoted a mode or pattern of behaviour in the West that on the one hand desensitises but also extenuates what violent inclinations exists. Apparently life really does imitate ‘art’ or the Jewish Marxist rendition of art.
Unsurprisingly then other renditions of Marxist Jewish ‘art’ now pervade the West. Black is hailed as the ‘Hero’ in the Hollywood movie convincing the White female of the inadequacy of the White male. There is a significant difference inferred upon the notion of the White male-labelled thus since it saw fit to be adorned with external genitalia, and White Man-the builder of Civilisations that Jewish Marxism wishes to eradicate. Meanwhile the Zionists fill Europe with this. The true cost is ignored by stupid White Liberals who swallow the false guilt spoon fed by the Zionist media. Consequently these are the female White trash that mixes with the immigrant coloniser that bastardise and ultimately destroy the White race.
The overt miscegenation through immigration is cunningly augmented by Whites own altruism. Zionists registered charities bombard the West all year round with the ‘poor’ starving Third World. On a superficial level this turns the White outward against his own racial community and desiring the protection of another over your own is unnatural. This is sustained with the Marxist Zionist illusion that the White West built its Civilisation on the backs of the coloured Third World and thus ‘owes them’ a living. The Black slave trade is a prime example. Mainstream Zionist propaganda promotes the notion that the White European is wholly responsible. In reality of course Blacks sold each other into slavery and in Europe and America Black slavery has a far more Jewish flavour.
Charities or privatised pet projects of various celebrities or politicians step up their begging at Christmas time. Remember the most famous pet project from Band Aid-Feed the World. All those artists coming together to tell the ‘West’ about those ‘poor destitute (Black) Africans. A similar ‘feat’ was attempted in 2000 with Michael Jackson. Incidentally despite the accusations of paedophilia Jackson’s music is still played and he is hailed as some sort of hero. On the other hand the press has hung, draw and quartered Gary Glitter. Quite possibly playing his music would be perceived as a criminal act by the Marxist Zionist elite. Apparently ‘justice’ has a colour bias.
Whenever art or culture is presented in a Zionist Marxist forum it is discussed as a global phenomenon or a ‘human’ endeavour giving the impression of a single human animal without deviation. Yet dig a little deeper and see that the great civilisations to spawn such art and culture are White in origin. Archaeology and the sciences are uncovering genetic remnants of those cultures.
However, these are not the ‘facts’ exposed through Zionist means. These images the Zionist controlled media do NOT want White Europe to see. The White public will find that the breakthroughs made in the sciences will engender a Marxist twist prior to their consumption or merely disappear. So when a gentleman of Caucasoid appearance was discovered in North America there appeared to be something of a cover up! As with Governments in Britain and Europe, it seems North America has too been absorbed by this creeping political correctness. “There is nothing wrong with your television set. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. WE are controlling the transmissions…” Sound Familiar, while this may be the opening of American Si-Fi series The Outer Limits, this sentiment is far truer than you think. There is a subtle difference between the original 1963 intro and the re-make. Originally the public were to go on a ‘great adventure’ now ‘they’ threaten to subvert our minds by “deluding us with a thousand channels or expanding one single image…” Think about that and the parasites that control the Western media.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Since approximately 2005 the Jewish State of Israel has had ‘problems’ with third world immigration. In fact reading through these witness statements and one begins to see a startling familiarity “…rampant crime by migrants and say that it has become “Soweto,” a reference to the site of a 1976 uprising in South Africa. At a recent protest fanned by Zionist politicians, one lawmaker described the Africans, known here as “infiltrators,” as “a cancer in our body.” Of course any self-respecting White European citing similar scenes inflicted on his land by citizens of the Jewish State would be labelled ‘racist’. However, in Israel when the Jew finds something distasteful he takes to the streets and attacks the Africans’ stores and apartments. In Europe the White man would no doubt face a prison sentence for a ‘hate crime’ against the protectant migrant. Yet in the Jewish state the Africans were rounded up and detained in Concentration Camps only to be deported a short time later.
More recently the Telegraph reported a Vatican official saying Israel is fostering intolerance of Christianity. Naturally reading between the lines what the article depicts is much more sinister. With graffiti, church burnings and defilement in the street the Jewish state is not turning a blind eye to violence against gentiles because the Talmud has always condoned it. In the past though Jewish acts of violence have always taken place through stealth and in secrecy. The theft of the land of Palestine has given the Jew a new arrogance and brought his evil into the light. In ‘his’ Jewish state of Israel the Jew does as he pleases and if that means spitting on Christian clergy or setting fire to their churches then he will. Naturally if in Europe the White man retaliates and burns a few synagogues or spits on a few Jews that’s anti-Semitism. It never occurs to the brainwashed Marxist liberals that ‘anti-Semitism’ is an invention of the Jew and would not exist without his sordid crimes.
These are just a couple of incidents that indicate the height of hypocrisy that issues forth from Jewish realms. However, a continuing saga in the arena of Jewish hypocrisy has to be the matter of race. Again the Jewish state features prominently in this ‘dilemma’. Stubbornly insisting on its status as an ethno state, whose primary interest is Jewish. Even down to the law of return that in expressing “born of a Jewish mother” testifies to the racial element of this tribe.
In Europe an accusation of ‘race hate’ was dropped because Jews so often claim that Judaism is only a religion. To prevent this occurring in future Jewish Zionist leaped into action and in 2006 the Religious Hatred Act in the United Kingdom was amended to the Racial and Religious Hatred Act. This is a clear case, not of ‘righteous’ ethno legislature but what is best for the Jews. In Europe what is best for the Jews is never good for the European and this is why the occupation of White lands must end. It is high time that the White male of Jewish Zionist propaganda crept back in the closet as Europe resurrects the Great White Man to tear down this Zionist house of cards.
As most avid followers of Jewish Zionist scams will be aware, Simon Wiesenthal is as bigger fraud as soap and lamp shades Therefore, how the centre that bears his name maintains ‘credibility’ accusing Nationalists of ‘war crimes’ in the face of brazen Jewish Communist brutality is a remarkable feat of propaganda. Maybe Wiesenthal is just part of the financial package necessary to maintain the Jewish Zionist in the manner to which he has become accustomed. Nevertheless just because ‘one’ calls the White male cattle (goyim) doesn’t mean he stands in a field and chews grass, we see the hypocrisy so thick it rests like a fog over Europe.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Jewish Zionist Jacob Rothschild recently took a £130m bet on the demise of the Euro. So it would seem that this ‘illustrious’ banking family finally tires of toying with White man and now seeks to hasten the Euro’s inevitable collapse. This is not the first time the Zionist Rothschild family have ‘gambled’ so loosely with Europe’s future.
There were vast fortunes to be made — and lost — on the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo. The Stock Exchange in London was at fever pitch as traders waited for this battles outcome. If Britain lost, English consuls would plummet to unprecedented depths. If Britain was victorious, the value of the consul would leap to dizzying new heights. It was here that by nefarious means Nathan Rothschild would multiply his already vast fortune.
As the battle took place Rothschild had agents working both sides of the line to gather the most accurate possible information and carry the intelligence to posts strategically located nearby. Dawn on June 16, 1815, a Rothschild representative, possessing a top secret report was met at Folkstone. Scanning highlights of the report Rothschild was speeding towards London and the Stock Exchange in no time.
At the Exchange, emotionless and expressionless Rothschild took up his usual position beside the famous ‘Rothschild Pillar. Meanwhile Rothschild agents began dumping consuls on the market and as hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of consuls poured onto the market their value started to slide. Then they began to plummet. Rothschild continued to lean against ‘his’ pillar, and to sell, and sell and sell. Consuls kept on falling. Word began to sweep through the Stock Exchange: “Rothschild knows.” “Rothschild knows.” “Wellington has lost at Waterloo.”
When the consul was selling for about five cents on the dollar Rothschild signalled and on cue dozens of Rothschild agents made their way to the order desks around the Exchange and bought every consul in sight! A short time later the ‘official’ news arrived in London. England was now the master of the European scene. Within seconds the consul skyrocketed to above its original value. As the significance of the British victory began to sink into the public consciousness, the value of consuls rose even higher. Napoleon had ‘met his Waterloo.’ However the REAL implication never has yet…
The Jew Nathan Rothschild had bought control of the British economy.
Since then the Rothschild family have continued to play high stakes business and finance not always managing to come off to squeaky ‘clean’. Financier Nathaniel Rothschild lost a libel case against newspaper the Daily Mail that depicted him as a “puppet master” who used his friendship with a European trade chief to impress a Russian oligarch and help close a business deal. The article stated Rothschild had sought to impress Oleg Deripaska by unexpectedly bringing homosexual Jewish Zionist Peter Mandelson to a dinner the Russian held with bosses from the U.S. aluminium company Alcoa Inc. The newspaper said Rothschild had “pulled a very unexpected and also rather useful rabbit out of his hat” as Alcoa was worried about EU tariffs on Russian aluminium exports. Obviously true yet the Rothschild’s do not like their sleight of hand and insider trading to see the light. Unfortunately for this Jew it seems not all journalists or judiciary are in Zionism’s pay.
Incidentally Peter Mandelson was a main player if not the main player in the creation of New Labour, however with such a close relationship with Rothschild it is far more likely that Mandelson is a frontman and Rothschild the real ‘brains’ behind the creation of New labour. With the neo-conservative movement in America created by the Jew Irving Kristol, this has a certain credible appeal. Capitalism and Communism are 2 sides of the same coin with Capitalist banking systems funding the exploits of global Communism. The nature of the game, for that’s all it is to the Zionist players, is to withhold a land’s wealth from its people. Consequently the Zionist parasites get immensely rich while the Nation’s conquered suffer crippling debt.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Art is the method the artist uses to lift the spirit. Art is a spiritual relief from materialism; a need or requirement similar to that which religion attempts to provide but fails by becoming dogmatic. Spirituality is the search for the best part of us and art is the physical manifestation of this search. Remnants of this can be viewed all over Europe. For much of his time the artist resides in a place that the mass cannot perceive. Part of the work of the artist is to allow the public to glimpse into his world. The true artist fishes raw from a dimension familiar to very few. These discoveries compel him to interpret within a more inclusive realm. However, what Marxism calls ‘art’ serves only to debase, corrupt and drag down he who participates in its space.
Case in point some things are universally disgusting: all cultures and nationalities are repelled by faeces and urine. Naturally this gives Marxist the excuse to slap it on a canvas, call it ‘art’ and stick it in the galleries of Europe. All at once the exalted place of the ‘artist’ as redeemer of the Aryan spirit is ‘condemned’ as he is replaced by comedians airing the Zionist ‘Europeans’ dirty laundry.
This is England, land of Green Mountains and pleasant pastures, but the landscape is also being changed. It is very subtle at first, a palm tree appearing in a neighbouring garden. Then next-door-but-one follows suit. This might sound somewhat innocuous. After all not all garden plants are indigenous to the British Isles’. The point is though it is usual for a garden plant to blend with its environment. The palm tree is an obvious interloper, a definite foreign element. In fact it has become a rather common sight so see a dead palm tree in English Gardens precisely because they are not ‘designed’ for the British weather!
Modern architectural design has also been affected. A dangerous ‘design’ fault to have landed on the British shore is the ‘Dome’ fetish. Rather than reflecting the religion of the land, new designs have seen fit to incorporate the faith of foreign imports. As stated this was subtle to begin with, but clearly our traditional forms-ancient gothic structures are no-longer ‘the fashion’. Instead modern structures are often stark mirrored or glass-utilitarian boxes. The gradual phasing out of great gothic arches, huge towers and spires in favour of a flat box or ever more ‘inverted’ design is suggestive of the purging of Christian heritage from Britain and the invasion of an architectural atheism.
The colour palate is also out of control. Hot Pinks, Vivid Limes, and Bright Purple are not traditionally associated with Britain and Europe. Colours such as these belong on a beach in the Caribbean. Yet traditionally BLACK hackney cabs parading around as if in an eternal Caribbean Carnival… and city council vans seeking ‘gay abandon’ in shocking pink. Of course White male emasculation is clearly one reason for a Marxist inspired politically correct council to paint their vans hot pink. Another is not content with importing a replacement population; the corrupt Zionist authorities need to introduce this import’s tastes along with them, thus eradicating any remnants of a British culture or identity. This is multiculturalism at work one of the various aspects of cultural Marxism (Communism). While the illusion of Cultural Marxism (Communism) promises utopia and ‘equality’ in reality it initiates chaos and destroys difference.
Liverpool’s 2008 City of Culture was a prime example of this. Billed as the “world in one city” evidence of indigenous Scouse culture was at best ‘hidden’ or worse eradicated. The canny Scouser saw the Liver Bird, an ancient symbol of Liverpool steeped in history, replaced with a lurid yellow Japanese invention with absolutely no connection to the City. This inane monstrosity, one mans apparent response to genetic engineering, was to be Liverpool’s new Global logo. The indigenous people of Liverpool have never been asked if they wanted their identity replaced by Japanese mass produced ‘plastic’. Never the less multicoloured reproductions of this freakish foreign import clutter OUR City.
2008 was also the year that the Liverpool Metro Newspaper ran an “alternative A to Z of Merseyside entitled A Great City with Culture to spare. No doubt this was to coincide with the “City of Culture” farce. This article featured a letter I for “in a parallel universe”. In this nightmare vision Liverpool’s dock region is barely recognisable. A lumpy mirrored ball called “The Cloud” but looking in reality far more like a crumpled crisp packet dominates the scene. In the passage that accompanies the picture we are told that Japanese-designed domed structures will house a Caribbean beach! Yes this is apparently a “parallel universe”. However, it was planned and designed, think about those palm trees. How long before we do see Caribbean beaches encroaching on our ‘pleasant pastures’. The Zionist does not like European culture and is seeking to destroy the Britain and Europe that we know by infecting it with foreign and Marxist influences. By stealth what the White man fails to see is the lowering of his standards of taste and decency. Only reflect on the rampant paedophilia displayed within the Labour Party http://labour25.com/ and consider if these are the ‘leaders’ that should be legislating over your children.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
The cross of St Patrick is the symbol meant to celebrate St Patrick’s Day, just as the Cross of St George is meant to celebrate St George’s Day. However, as we reached March mainland England was bombarded with Green, White and Orange of the tricolour.
No animosity at all is felt towards the Irish people. However, the tricolour is the flag of Eire the Republic of Ireland and St Patrick is the Patron saint of the whole of Ireland. Therefore, the tricolour is not meant to celebrate this patron’s day. One should see that this is a blatant political move in that in England St David was completely ignored on March 1st while tricoloured bunting was already on sale. Similar to the planned ‘Republican’ march through an English City there is a high level political agenda. Labour Marxists have united with their brother IRA and intend to split kin race and intensify sectarian violence.
Meanwhile, on St George’s Day, if the corporate Zionist remembers, the English are treated to a repeat of the George Gross plastered all over footballs. This is another political manoeuvre by Zionist media to belittle the English. In “Come on England” the Zionist is in fact implying that the only ‘heritage’ the English have is football. Ironically while White man did invent ‘the beautiful game’ he is now a spectator to the sport that is being populated by Africa’s excess.
When set against each other these displays of supposed ‘national’ celebration reveal the perfect opportunity for Zionism to play their divisive ‘games’. Elevating St Patrick over and above St George in the consumer market pushes it to the forefront of the mass mind. In this way the corporate Zionist is politicising St Patrick by using the tricolour and marginalising the English by ignoring St George or ‘relegating’ it to football. In reality while the tricolour is the flag of the Irish people or the Irish Republic, Zionism is trying to contaminate it with Marxist IRA connotations. Their intention in doing this is to stir up sectarian violence. Sectarianism is another means to distract the Gentile mass while Zionism makes a profit.
The crosses of the patron saints combine to form the Union Flag. Given the emblem of St Patrick is the heritage of the whole of Ireland, St Patrick’s Day is the perfect opportunity to call upon and celebrate the day in unity.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
The Khazar theory argues that Ashkenazi Jews are the descendants of the Khazars a multi-ethnic collection of peoples who allegedly ‘converted’ to Judaism in the 8th-9th century AD. It is then claimed that it was these ‘Jewish converts’ that migrated into what is now Russia, Eastern Europe and later Northern and Western Europe. It is critical to highlight however, that the primary exponents of this theory are Jewish from the earliest alleged reference to a connection between Khazars and Ashkenazic Jews to Benjamin Freedman in a speech given before an audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C and Jewish Communist Arthur Koestler in The Thirteenth Tribe first published in Britain in 1976.
Initially the Khazars were believed to be a semi-nomadic people of mostly Turkic decent dominating the Asian steppe and the North Caucasus between the 5th and 10th centuries. In the 7th century, they founded an independent Khaganate in the Northern Caucasus called Khazaria. This occupied the land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea now predominantly occupied by Georgia. The general theme of Koestler’s book is this trading empire that existed between the expanding power blocs of Christianity and Islam. He suggests that speculation exists about the origin of the word ‘Khazar’ and indicates that the Khazar was never ethnically homogenous but made up of tribes from various racial backgrounds, as steppe peoples traditionally absorbed those they conquered. Koestler also highlights modern ‘deviations’ for example the German Ketzer –heretic referring to the Jew thus inserting ‘reasonable’ doubt perhaps to add weight to his theory. Nevertheless, the term is most likely tied to the Turkic verb form meaning “wandering” and likely derived from the Turkic gaz-, meaning ‘to wander’ or ‘flee.’ Initially Tengri shamanists, between the 8th or 9th century under the instruction of the Khazarian King, Koestler asserts that the Khaganate adopted Judaism as the state religion. However, Koestler’s source for the ‘conversion’ are to be found in a work by the Hungarian Marxist historian, Dr Antal Bartha, supported by an article in the 1973 variant of Encyclopaedia Judaica and the curious choice of a comment from a Muslim envoy a staunch enemy of the Jew. Indeed a 2013 critique argued that “A careful examination of the sources shows that some of them are pseudepigraphic, and the rest are of questionable reliability.
The majority of the book is padded with an attempt at historical context but when the flimsiness of Koestler’s sources are revealed it is hard to judge fact from whimsical fantasy. In particular on matters of ethnicity it is clear that he desires to undermine European racial homogeneity thus providing the mixed race Jew with a greater status. Indeed in places Koestler’s writing seems to applaud the Khazars for their apparent ‘services’ to Europe remembering that his thesis makes them Jewish if only ‘converts’ and in keeping with Jewish chutzpah he cannot help infusing some self-congratulation. Nevertheless, producing a ‘pseudo-Jew’ does provide a suitable scapegoat onto which one can deflect ones crimes. In fact the so called ‘good Jew’ Benjamin Freedman laid the groundwork for this defence (33 mins) during his 1961 speech at the Willard Hotel in Washington D.C. However, the concept falls apart when one considers the extraordinary amount of evidence proving that the Jew has been a problem throughout gentile specifically European history well before the so-called ‘Khazar conversion’.
The vulgar Talmud written in 70 AD is a testament to the contempt that the Jew holds for the gentile and in its own words “To communicate to a Goy anything about our religious relations would be equal to killing all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.” Libbre David 37 This only confirms that the despicable religion originates from a despicable tribe and that the Jew is not a product of converting to a loathsome religion. The Roman historian Tacitus reinforces this notion of the Jewish religion in his most famous work Histories written 109 AD –
“…Moses prescribed for them a novel religion quite different from those of the rest of mankind. Among the Jews all things are profane that we hold sacred; on the other hand they regard as permissible what seems to us immoral…The other practices of the Jews are sinister and revolting, and have entrenched themselves by their very wickedness. Wretches of the most abandoned kind who had no use for the religion of their fathers took to contributing dues and free-will offerings to swell the Jewish exchequer; and other reasons for their increasing wealth may be found in their stubborn loyalty and ready benevolence towards brother Jews. But the rest of the world they confront with the hatred reserved for enemies. They will not feed or intermarry with gentiles… They have introduced the practice of circumcision to show that they are different from others.” (Tacitus, Histories, 5.2–5).
Indeed it was not long before the wicked activities of the Jews roused Roman public opinion against them following the establishment of the very first Jewish community outside the Middle East in Rome in 139 BC. During sittings of the Roman senate the famous orator Cicero, among others, frequently spoke against the Jewish presence in Rome. Equally there is historical evidence relating to their negative impact on Romans during the first century AD. The world’s first anti-Jewish riots broke out in the city of Alexandria in 38 AD, and re-occurred in 66 AD, 115 AD, 118 AD, and 411 AD. In that year Cyril, the archbishop of Alexandria ordered the expulsion of all Jews from the city. The Roman Emperor Tiberius formally expelled Jews from Rome in 19 AD. They returned shortly after, only to be expelled again in 49 AD. In 116 AD, Emperor Trajan ordered that all Jews in Mesopotamia should be killed on the grounds that they were the cause of continual uprisings in that region. One of the most famous emperors of the Eastern Roman Empire, Justinian (527–565 AD), adopted a comprehensive anti-Jewish policy which barred Jews from the civil service, military posts, and any other positions of influence in his government. All of these events that pre-date the supposed ‘Khazar conversion’ serve to highlight the devastating impact the Jew had on Roman life and provide substantial proof that the Jew displayed identical behavioural patterns centuries prior to the alleged ‘conversion’. Patently the Khazar theory has been produced to suggest an “Ashkenazi” problem rather than a “Jewish problem” yet it was the Middle Eastern Mizrahi bloodline that interfered with Roman life 900 years prior to the Khazars and the Sephardi are currently notoriously anti-Gentile easily proving that all Jews have been and remain a problem throughout history.
Logic would also dictate that if a massive conversion of substantially different racial stock took place after the 7th century the racial make-up of Jews in that area would alter dramatically compared to that of their Sephardi and Mizrahi (Middle Eastern) brethren. However, to date twelve DNA studies prove otherwise. Beginning in 1999 the studies all reached very similar conclusions that Jewish community’s whether Ashkenazi, Sephardi, or Mizrahi formed a clearly distinct cluster sharing a common lineage consistent with origins in the region of the Middle East. While the most recent involving Harry Ostrer, a professor of Pathology and Genetics at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University and the Jewish HapMap Project are a double edged sword in that they tend to compound the notion that the Jew is a race alone and not a tribal facet of a larger Semitic race that has long existed and continues to live in the Middle East. Nevertheless, there is conclusive DNA evidence against the reality of the so called ‘Khazar theory’ thus substantiating the notion that it is a mechanism to distract from the “Jewish problem”. Indeed by associating Zionism with only the Ashkenazi strain the Jew attempts to disassociate from his crimes against Europe and the globe.
So it remains only to explain why so called reasoned Nationalists would entertain this obviously weak hypothesis meant to distract. What is transparent from the substantial evidence presented is that those claiming that only the ‘Khazar/Ashkenazi’ pose a problem are verifiably wrong. The concept of only “some Jews” or “false Jews” has been addressed and exposed as black propaganda. Consequently those pushing the Khazar theory are shills participating in a Jewish construct designed to distract from the Jew regardless of what historical documentation records.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL