From the very beginning a referendum lead by Jewish Zio-Marxism was not going to have a desirable outcome for Europeans. The exit strategy itself was led by Jewish Prime Minister’s Cameron’s cousin Boris Johnson so even out of the Jewish construct (EU) we are still under the Jewish yoke. It is also vital to note that UKIP the party with apparent ‘nationalist’ leanings at the forefront of the Brexit farce is a product of the Jewish occupied Zio-Marxist Government. In a typical Jewish dialectic as the seemingly ‘lesser evil’ UKIP and Farage are paraded against the BNP, also a construct of the occupied government. In a further display of the dialectic Labour leader Corbyn, who not so long ago boasted a Jewish element in his family, opposed Brexit only proving that the Jew covers all sides of the debate. Thus, with the display for public and cameras all tied up this democratic ballot was nothing less than a false flag preordained by the Jews but how does it serve their agenda?
The initial response from the Jewish quarter is to blame the vote on Britain’s older generation. Already a plan exists to exterminate native Britain’s elderly via Pathways. With the help of a sobbing crypto-Jew now the tribe is fracturing ties between the old and young. Continuing along this vein Jews and criminals in Scotland are pushing for devolution and open negotiation with the Jewish construct (EU) leading to calls for the capital London to split from the British Union. While, this is hugely divisive for the European people as a whole in the short term it threatens to tear Great Britain apart part of the Jewish agenda since their agent the homosexual Winston Churchill destroyed Britain’s Empire in the Jewish engineered war.
In a wider context the mass echo Churchill’s quote “If Britain must choose between Europe and the open sea, she must always choose the open sea …” sadly confusing a Jewish structure with occupied European territory. This is a critical distinction for the European Union (EU) although labelled ‘European’ bears absolutely no relation to the European race. This situation has been deliberately engineered and is not new. The atmosphere that arose from Churchill’s quote was meant to drive Briton’s away from their European brethren and closer to America. While we have no wish to alienate our American European kin the notion that Brexit has placed in the European public consciousness i.e. that they are ‘out of Europe’ has the potential to create a monumental rift between European kinsfolk. It is also vital to note that Churchill met with mixed race Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, in 1939 and by 1946 was praising the man’s work in his speech. Known as the father of the EU and financed by Jewish bankers it was Kalergi who was striving to replace the nationalist German ideal of a European racial community with an ethnically heterogeneous (international miscegenation) society. This explains the Jewish Zio-Marxist importation of non-Europeans furthering the Kalergi plan the result being white genocide. Meanwhile, the ever more devolved and fractionalised as a people Europeans become the less likely they are to unite against the Jewish enemy.
It has also come to light that Brexit is being used as an excuse to impose further non-European imports on Britain by way of France. While this furthers the Kalergi plan it likewise fractures relationships between European Nations. Meanwhile, on the home front the Jewish Zio-Marxist media is reporting an upsurge in necessarily false flag ‘racist’ attacks that provide the Jewish occupied government a perfect excuse to execute a host of crippling new ‘hate crime’ laws against native Britons and cover for arrests and possible deaths of European Patriots fighting against Jewish terror and intimidation.
Therefore, while we are only in the early stages of Brexit no respite exists for the native Briton. He, just like his European brethren remains slated as ‘racists’ as the garden of England (Kent) is earmarked to become residence for Europeans tool of destruction. Those that complain about this fresh immigrant onslaught are sure to be criminalised in the newly introduced tightened ‘hate laws’ that the public are convinced Britain requires. If the truth be known it is impossible to predict the entire repercussions, but knowing that the enemy (Jew) holds all the cards why would they provide an open door (referendum) if the outcome no matter how complex that outcome appears was not predetermined? Consequently, there is one surety this move favours the Jew to the detriment of the European and to believe otherwise one would have to be a fool or a willing pawn.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
The Miliband brothers are David Wright Miliband born 15 July 1965 and Edward Samuel Miliband, born 24 December 1969. They are apparently the sons of ‘poor’ Jewish immigrants Ralph Miliband and Marion Kozak. Both parents are in fact notorious Jewish Bolsheviks and have given the Miliband children David and Ed a great advantage in politics in Britain as it turns a blind eye to Communist criminality. Nevertheless blatant militant-ism had to be toned down in favour of implementing Marxism through stealth and giving a veneer of ‘British’ respectability to Zionist methodology. Naturally this includes the sensibilities of those closest to Ed Miliband as he “will always be open to issues that concern the British Jewish community, whether they concern issues of the treatment of Jews in Britain or issues to do with relations with Israel. He intends to lead a Labour Party that remains a true friend to Israel.”
The father Adolphe (Ralph) Miliband was a Marxist academic born in Brussels on 7th January, 1924. In 1939, aged 15, he became a member of internationalist Marxist –Zionist group Hashomer Hatzair the same group that Jewish terrorist Abba Kovner, at the time 21 years of age, was an active member and leader of. These young Marxists idolised Bolshevism forced upon Russia post 1917. In fact it was on orders from Hashomer Hatzair that terrorist Kovner and his faction Nakam planned the genocide of 6 million Europeans post WWII. Kovner was arrested aboard a British destroyer with enough poison to murder the inhabitants of four major European cities through their water supplies. Bizarrely after only a year in custody the genocidal terrorist Kovner was quietly released into Jewish Israeli hands. It is critical to note that the Jew Victor Rothschild had a leading role in the British security services (MI5) at this time.
Meanwhile, the Socialist Worker testifies to the fact that Ralph arrived in Britain with father Samuel illegally on forged papers in 1940. It is interesting to note that “On January 13th, 1939, Mr. Dummett, the Bow Street Magistrate, said in Court: “This system by which Jews get sailors to smuggle them into this country, and then refuse to give the name of the ship or men who got them here, is a grave breach of the Aliens Act.” Mr. Metcalfe, the Old Street Magistrate, expressed himself on the subject in even stronger terms. “Most of the stipendiary magistrates know that the so-called aliens are Jewish criminals of the lowest and shiftiest type or, at the best, rapacious political nuisances.” In fact London, England has much experience with Jewish subversive political activity in that during the late 1800’s a surge of Jewish Communists migrated to the East end of London from Russia and Poland. Correspondingly in the same year that Ralph arrived in Britain 25000 Jews were arrested as potential security risks. Nevertheless Miliband won a place to study at the London School of Economics (LSE) with Jewish political scientist Harold Laski well placed to tutor him and Miliband was active in a variety of communist groups and in January 1943 was elected Vice President of the LSE Students’ Union. It was Harold Laski that Ralph Miliband asked for help to join the armed forces and it is miraculous that the son of a Jewish cotton merchant (Laski) had such government favour that he could produce for another Jewish immigrant “… a letter from A.V. Alexander, the First Lord of the Admiralty” advising him “that he was pleased to hear from Laski ….and advising …to go and see a vice-admiral at the Admiralty, who would fix it up. Which he did.” Yet in sharp contrast barely 5 years previous the Sunday Express of December 4th, 1938, reported on the conditions of some British people as follows: “The Hodgsons live in a basement flat in Pimlico, S. W. They pay no rent: their coal is provided free. But that is all there is to envy about them. Because they enjoy these things for nothing, Mr. Andrew George Hodgson, aged sixty-three, and Elizabeth, his sixty year-old wife, both almost cripples, have during the past three years been compelled to live on the borderline of starvation. Mr. and Mrs. Hodgson have to keep themselves on 5 s. a week. Officially they are not in want. Rent-free people cannot qualify for the dole or public assistance.” In the same issue of the Sunday Express this story appeared “A short time ago, one wet night, after the open market had finished, I saw an ill-clad, frail old lady picking up bruised fruit, cabbage leaves, and bits of wood. I collected some bits of firewood for her and tied them up for her. She told me she had found a few bones under the butchers’ stalls. She would wash them and cook them with the cabbage for Sunday’s dinner.” Perhaps the fact that Laski’s father Nathan was prominent in destroying the Lancashire cotton trade post WWI will shed some light for the reality of democracy is “buy in the cheapest market and sell in the dearest”. Thus the school of international finance developed in which the Rothschild’s and other Jewish money-lenders were very able teachers. This involved ignoring one’s own economically disenfranchised in favour of placating the cheap international supplier. In fact the mentality of England developed in such a direction as to enable the Jews to fashion Britain into one of their slave colonies.
Miliband was demobilized from the Navy in January, 1946. He returned to the LSE and he obtained a First Class degree in July 1947 also in this year Miliband was awarded a Leverhulme research studentship to work full-time under Laski’s supervision on his PhD thesis. It is significant that shortly after this Laski arranged some teaching for him at Roosevelt College (now Roosevelt University) in Chicago corresponding with Jewish Marxist subversive activity in various arenas. This was the early stages of Communist purges of the Hollywood film industry and on the political scene culminated in the eventual arrest and conviction of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Communist Jews spying for the Jewish Bolshevik regime. Miliband wrote to a friend: “I am horrified at the atmosphere here. Papers and the radio are just full of stuff about Reds, spies, loyalty and so on. The scare is really on and the Universities from what I read… are being manhandled as much or more as any other organisation, except of course the CP and allied groups.” With his military career facilitated by Jew Harold Laski and clearance by Special Branch, Ralph Miliband was granted British citizenship in August 1948 and in June 1949 he obtained the post of Assistant Lectureship in Political Science at London School of Economics. Ralph Miliband died in 1994, 7 years before his son’s had made any political mark yet was buried in the same graveyard as Karl Marx suggesting that the family was marked for success before they had become known to the public. Indeed the Miliband name and Communism are synonymous.
The grandfather Samuel Miliband is said to have left Poland after the First World War, which ended in November 1918. He supposedly became a leather worker in Belgium and then returned to Poland to join the Red Army under the command of Jewish Zionist Lev Davidovich Bronstein (Leon Trotsky) in 1920. At the time Jewish Bolsheviks were attacking Poland and the Ukraine beginning in February 1919 and it must be stressed that Miliband senior returned to the land that played host to him only to help in its Jewish Bolshevik seizure. A Russian Politician attests to this saying “Samuel, then Shimon, Miliband, a native of the Jewish ghetto in Warsaw, had fought under the command of Trotsky eliminating white Russians opposed to Communism.” Crucially 1919 onwards covers the Tambov massacre and the first of the Holodomor genocides in the Ukraine. Bolshevik atrocities towards the ethnic Polish were also rife. Sick and wounded from Red Cross hospitals were tortured and murdered and other horrific crimes were reported on a regular basis. However, uncovering the real extent of the devastations that befell Poland during the period that the Bolshevik terror committed the Tambov massacre and the first Holodomor in the Ukraine would reveal the true extent of Jewish subversion in Europe.
The Miliband relationship to Bolshevism deepens as long lost relative Sofia Miliband makes contact with David Miliband in Russia. It turns out that the Miliband’s great-great grandfather Abraham is the brother of Sofia’s grandfather Osip. Another supposedly ‘poor’ Jewish daughter the sole of David and Pearl Miliband, Sofia Davidovna by her own admission hero-worshipped Stalin and went to school in central Moscow, rubbing shoulders with the children of the Bolshevik elite. She studied at the same university as Svetlana Alliluyeva, Stalin’s daughter and has met with the Bolshevik dictator becoming a code breaker for the Bolsheviks during WWII. Sofia has also had a prestigious career as a top Bolshevik academic with more than 300 published works to her name. She proclaims just as all Jews that this “Life was hard”.
Meanwhile, Marion Kozak born in Czestochowa, Poland, is a Marxist campaigner with links to subversive Communist activists. The Kozak family were wealthy citizens in the Jewish community and among the wealthiest in Poland. Before the war David Kozak, married Bracha (Anglicised Bronislawa), daughter of Isaac Szloma Landau the owner of ISZABE (Spoons and Padlocks). Bracha Kozak née Landau, was a member of the board of directors and co-owner of this factory and retained the right to dispose of personal dowry (ISZABE shares), given back to her by Kozak. Consequently the Milliband’s maternal grandmother was significantly wealthy in her own right. Kozak ran ISZABE factories in Poland, Germany and England. Bracha’s task was to maintain foreign contacts. Bracha and Dawid had 2 daughters Dobra born in 1934, and Hadessa (Anglicised Hedwig) born in 1937. Meanwhile, the Landau family itself was recognised as a most famous Jewish family of industrialists and had several other factories, including the largest celluloid factory called Seweryn Landau now located in Silesia.
Recently on a visit to Poland’s Foreign Minister David Miliband thanked Poles for saving the life of his mother during WWII. Yet the mother’s fantastic story cannot be corroborated as she refuses to provide evidentiary proof. Marion’s fairy-tale begins in 1941 as her family’s factory is procured by the advancing German authorities and retooled for the production of ammunition. True to form the Jewess comes equipped with her own ‘Hollywood’ blockbuster backed up by another Jew. Sigmund Rolat claims that in May 1943 he was saved from Treblinka by a German factory owner “They rounded up the children left in the ghetto – about 35 of us – and we were going to be sent to Treblinka when the German director – Litt – stepped in. He lied to the German captain, saying he needed children to work in his factory because we had small hands. He saved us that day.” It is not clear whether Marion was in the group of children spared alongside Sigmund but it is thought she was. So we begin with a scene from Schindler’s List then having ‘bravely’ escaped the non-existent liquidation of the Ghetto Bracha and her daughters moved to Warsaw on illegal papers. Now using the name Mary Dobra or Marion claims to have attended a boarding school run by nuns very similar to the Sound of Music another movie and another blatant fraud. By May 1947 a transport of Jewish ‘orphans’ left Poland bound for London. It contained Bracha and her 2 daughters now called Mary (Dobra) and Hegwig (Hadessa). The international connections Bracha had through the Landau family business proved useful as she was welcomed and helped by a partner dealt with before the war.
All through Marion’s story only one name is sited that of Sitkowska. Suspiciously this family can only claim their title of “righteous Among the Nations” in 1995 as political correctness (cultural Marxism) swamps Europe. Ed Miliband is quite happy to continue this farce. As such he maintains that recently it has been discovered that his maternal grandfather died in a WWII German internment camp. Coincidentally this occurred six months before international holocaust remembrance day and naturally Miliband let this knowledge slip on radio BBC5 to boost his chances in the up and coming British elections.
Indeed election fever has brought all the senseless ‘B’ movie scripts to the forefront as The Telegraph picks up on the fantastical tale of how Ed Miliband’s aunt and grandmother survived the war. Like all Jewish propaganda such is designed in the best interest of that tribe in this case to wring the last ounce of compassion from a race falsely accused of genocide. In fact Jewish Bolshevism has been endeavouring to conceal their crime of genocide since the early 1920’s and the Miliband familial historical fiction is merely another chapter.
Before one bids the Milibands adjure it is also fascinating to note that an “Elie” Miliband, a 40-year-old “Hebrew” tailor from Warsaw (Russia) came to the United States on the S.S. Philadelphia sailing from Southampton and arriving in New York on January 28th, 1905 with a person who appears to be the Jewish terrorist known as “Leon Trotsky” traveling as ‘Irska’ Bronstein. Trotsky’s real name was Lev Davidovich Bronstein and while living in London he was principal editor of the Communist magazine Iskra (The Spark) with the likes of Vladimir Lenin. It is critical to note that the travel plans of “Elie” and Bronstein occur right in the middle of the Russo-Japanese War (8th February 1904 – 5th September 1905) Already Jacob Schiff located in New York is linked to Trotsky as the financer of the seizure of Russia in 1917. He also funded the Japanese against Russia. This site has secured the original travel documents for Miliband and asks the significance for his appearance in New York with Trotsky. Trotsky was arrested tried and convicted for involvement in terrorist activity surrounding the destabilisation and attempted Bolshevik seizure of Russia in 1905. 18 months later in January 1907 while on-route in to exile in Obdorsk, Siberia Trotsky escaped at Berezov and made his way to London now well established as a safe haven for those wishing to overthrow the old European social order. Here he attended the Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP) with Lenin and other top Jewish Bolsheviks and anarchists. His escape is described in the essay ‘There and Back’. This is the year Trotsky worked out his theory of permanent revolution.
Thus the Miliband’s have dragged themselves up from such humble beginnings the grandchildren of wealthy Jewish industrialists. That the maternal grandfather was interned during WWII can only mean political subversion that threatened German state security. Meanwhile, the paternal grandfather joins the Bolshevik red army to help consolidated the seizure of the European land that played host to him. Similarly long lost relative Sofia Miliband became a code breaker for the Bolsheviks during WWII the outcome of which would strengthen the Jewish Marxist hold on Europe. With this heritage it is inevitable that the father Ralph should join a Marxist-Zionist movement like Hashomer Hatzair that contained active terrorist youth leaders like Abba Kovner that aspired to murder millions of ethnic Europeans and that he himself would emerge as a Marxist academic subverting the political landscape of Britain. It is the spawn of this line born to hate Europe and the European that is posed against current Jewish Prime Minister David Cameron. Also the ‘poor’ child of a wealthy Jewish family this time financiers the false Conservative Cameron’s policy is political correctness (cultural Marxism). Consequently the only choice the ethnic Briton can make when he goes to the polls is Communism. Communism ushers in as part of its strategy a program to corrupt generation after generation of our young. First introduced into Hungarian schools by the Jew Bela Kun sexual bolshevism is now mainstream and teaching children that an orgasm is like being tickled! An instruction meant to confuse helps insure that children fail to distinguish the predatory child rapist. Thus the Jewish weapon of Communism protects sexual perversion and with the paedophile scandal unfolding rapidly we are left in no doubt that whichever Jew occupies 10 Downing Street sexual bolshevism will remain a genocidal ingredient in the Jewish strategy. This article only scratches the surface of Miliband’s story and clearly history has been subverted in their favour since WWII. Here the site reaches out to all our European brothers and sisters particularly our Polish brethren who know the truth and wish to correct this breach of European history. In particular the site seeks help in completing the Miliband family tree and evidence to challenging the Miliband historical farce.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
The tribe of Israel have been hideously mutilating its enemies and their children since the early 1920’s, although in Jewish Bolshevik controlled territories it was much easier to conceal their atrocities from the world at large. Now that the Internet can expose Israel’s atrocities in Gaza crying ‘Holocaust‘- The 70 year construct the tribe use to conceal their atrocities against ethnic Europeans, is loosing its effect now that even stalwart pro-Zionists have identified it as an excuse for Jewish ‘Israel’ to get away with murder. Yet even more significant is what the mainstream media choses to avoid.
This site has already pointed out the absurdity of the historic claim the Jewish tribe place on the land of Palestine. Although the same race it is like the Celts ‘demanding’ England back from the Saxon after 15 hundred years of occupation. In the Middle East one has Palestinians and Jews both share the same race that has existed in this territory since the second century, although if anything the Jew is now more of a mixed breed than that of the Palestinian. It is also noteworthy that the Jewish tribe have been expelled from Palestinian territories following victorious claims to the land by the Babylonians in 586 BC, and the Romans in 70 AD and 132 AD. As such the Jew has no claim to territory hereditary or otherwise. Even the tribal call that the land they call ‘Israel‘ is “God given” is based not on a fair fight but Jewish infiltration of the territory formally known as Canaan; occupation of the native Canaanite people and their eventual destruction. Chapter 15 of Genesis describes in detail the ‘eternal victim’s’ manifesto for procuring land and wealth whilst deferring blame or judgment for their actions elsewhere, in this case their ‘God’. History has seen this manifesto in action. The Jewish tribe slowly and quietly “immigrate” into a host nation. Once settled, the Jewish community work together as a single unit to buy up an entire industry, for example clothing, metals or manufacturing. With a monopoly the Jewish tribe jack up the prices to crippling heights and drop the worker’s wages to slave level. With profits from each conquest more industries fall into Jewish hands. Consequently Jews eventually have complete control of the nation’s economy and start draining off its wealth and moving it to foreign banks. The host populace starve in the streets as the Jewish interlopers get richer and richer. Historically they finally are evicted by that host nation. Of course by then the damage was done and the wealth spirited away.
There is a long list of nations destroyed in large part, due to Jewish subterfuge. This explains why the Jewish tribe have been evicted from 109 different locations since 250AD. This manoeuvre is used on America and Europe right now to prioritise Jewish interests and eliminate the White race. Yet not a single word of this is ever discussed in the so called mainstream media. Exactly the same tactic was used on the German people prior to 1933. The adoption of National Socialism in Germany represented an obstacle to the Jewish tribe who instigated war just as they had ignited war decades earlier.
Germany won the Great War outright in 1916 and was negotiating peace terms. Yet, should Europe return to the situation prior to war the Jews would have gained nothing. Hence in Germany Jewish Zionists whispered in the ears of war mongers in the British government explaining that there was no need for Britain to lose this war as America could be ‘encouraged’ to enter as a British ally. In ‘compensation’ for this endeavor the Jewish Zionists wanted Britain to give them Palestine. This Jewish manipulation lead to the instigation of the Balfour Declaration of 1917, an official letter from the British Foreign Office headed by Arthur Balfour, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (from July 1902 to December 1905) and later the UK’s Foreign Secretary (from December 1916 to October 1919), to Lord Rothschild, who was seen as a representative of the Jewish people. The letter stated that the British government “viewed with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country”. Once again a sovereign people-Palestinians-are usurped from their territory via infiltration and occupation. The establishment, in 1948, of a ‘state of Israel’ constitutes the genocide of the Palestinian people.
Thus it has been ascertained that the issue surrounding the Gaza atrocities is much wider than the mainstream media will allow. Nevertheless, the Palestinian issue has a life of its own and manifests in force on the internet and has instigated marches globally. Certainly the inhumanity visited upon the Palestinian people has captured the social conscience of the world. Already the international reach of Palestinian pain lends itself to corruption, and those that consider themselves to the left of the political spectrum due to their social conscience find themselves submerged by a deviant agenda. This is how International Marxism has hijacked the Palestinian course. All is viewed through the restricted bottle neck of Jewish Marxism that maintains the narrow focus to ensure that Jewish criminality is bypassed. Via the internet alone the Palestinian issue receives support from European and American Nationalists yet the discussion is governed by the gatekeepers of Jewish Marxism. Consequently, while the ongoing atrocities remain newsworthy, the malicious theft of land, occupation and the Jewish ‘right’ to settle is conveniently ignored. In essence the Jew has no right to claim any land, for his race has always had territory no matter the religious persuasion. What the Jew demands in Palestine today is no less than a physical division of the religions just like their invention of the Berlin Wall. This construct bears witness to Jewish interference in Northern Ireland with the appearance of ‘peace walls’ in 1969. Yet historical religious differences would have been solved amicably hundreds of years ago by indigenous Europeans had not the Jewish tribe continued to rub salt into old wounds.
To conclude the initial fiction in the Jewish tribes ‘victimhood’ is that he masquerades as a race without a home. This is meant to instil sympathy where none is needed, for the race of the Jew has always had land. Thus territory was offered in 1916 providing the Jew with opportunity to manipulate the situation. It is here that race and religion blur for Jewish convenience and gentile confusion as the land ‘God promised’ is demanded; a right to which the Jew has no claim. Further chutzpah in the Jewish cry of ‘holocaust‘ is meant to instill ‘false guilt’ in the West leaving the Jews of occupied Palestine free to murder their way through Gaza as they murdered ethnic Europeans. As always the Jew is blameless, for his construct renders his actions the fault of others or he absolves himself via his ‘God’.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Perhaps the quintessential ‘feral’ children are twin brothers Romulus and Remus who feature in Rome’s foundation myth. Their mother was Rhea Silvia, daughter to Numitor, king of Alba Longa and the story goes that prior to their conception, Numitor’s brother Amulius seized power, forced Rhea Silvia to become a Vesta Virgin, sworn to chastity and then kills Numitor’s male heirs. However, Rhea Silvia conceived the twins by the god Mars, or by the demi-god Hercules, although once the twins were born, Amulius had them abandoned to die in the river Tiber. Miraculously the babies were rescued from the water by a she-wolf. The she-wolf took care of them until the twins were taken in by a shepherd and his wife who reared them to manhood. Unfortunately, actual cases of human children apparently ‘raised’ by wild animals do not have such a happy ending.
In reality a feral child is a human child who has lived isolated from human contact from a very young age. Therefore it has no (or little) experience of human care, loving or social behaviour, and the most apparent, of human language. Some feral children are alleged to have been brought up by animals. Other feral children have been confined by people (usually their own parents). More than 100 cases of supposedly feral children are known.
One of the first documented case occurred in France in 1800 when naked and filthy 12-year-old boy was spotted scrabbling for potatoes in fields on the edge of Saint Sernin, a small farming village. This was ‘Victor’ the wild boy of Aveyron. Abbe Pierre-Joseph Bonnaterre described Victor as small for his age, about four and a half feet tall, deeply tanned and covered in scars and scratches. While he could not speak and did not react even if Bonnaterre shouted in his ear, his hearing was acute enough for a walnut cracked across the room to make him twist around with hungry attention. He could also make a full range of expressive noises, such as grunts, laughs, and murmurs. His gait was peculiar. He walked uncertainly and preferred to lollop along in a shuffling run. Occasionally he would revert to all fours as earlier he had been seen to do in the forests. However, it was Victor’s animal blankness and lack of interest in other humans that most unsettled Bonnaterre. Victor appeared to have no other thoughts than for food and sleep. The only time he showed any excitement was when he glimpsed the greenery outdoors and struggled to make an escape. The rest of the time he would spend long hours hunched on the floor, rocking slowly back and forth and staring off into space. In this position, he made a constant dull murmur and occasionally, small spasms and convulsions would twitch across his body and face.
It was Jean Itard, a 26-year-old doctor from Paris’s Deaf-Mute Institute who felt he could see a glimmer of hope in the damaged youngster. He believed the diagnosis of retardation was ridiculous because Victor could not have survived in the wilds so long if he truly was an imbecile. Itard also detected a wily intelligence in the way Victor stole and hid food. Itard devoted five long years to Victor and did make considerable strides, but the boy never became anything near approaching a normal adult and never properly learned to speak. Itard at least managed to bring about a marked change in Victor’s outward demeanour. Victor’s blankness towards his surroundings and other people gradually turned to interest and affection. He appeared to show simple human emotions such as gratitude and remorse. He was trained out of his unsuitable personal habits, learning to sleep in a bed, wear clothes, eat at a table and accept baths. His toilet habits and lack of modesty still could embarrass Itard in public, but generally Victor was brought under ‘control’.
On 26 May 1828, a teenage boy appeared in the streets of Nuremberg, Germany carrying a letter addressed to the captain of the 4th squadron of the 6th cavalry regiment, Captain von Wessenig. The anonymous author stated that the infant boy was given into his custody on 7 October 1812. A shorter letter enclosed purporting to be from his mother to his prior caretaker stated that his name was Kaspar, that he was born on 30 April 1812 and that his father, a cavalryman of the 6th regiment, was dead. In fact both letters had been written by the same hand. At first it was assumed that the boy had been raised half-wild in forests, but Hauser recalled a different version of his past life. For as long as he could remember he spent his life totally alone in a darkened cell about two metros long, one metre wide and one and a half high with only a straw bed to sleep on and a horse carved out of wood for a toy. He found bread and water next to his bed each morning. Periodically the water would taste bitter and drinking it would cause him to sleep more heavily than usual. On these occasions, when he woke, his straw was changed and his hair and nails had been cut. The first human being with whom Hauser ever had contact was a mysterious man who visited prior to his release and took great care not to reveal his face. This man, Hauser said, taught him to write his name by leading his hand. After learning to stand and walk, he was brought to Nuremberg. This stranger allegedly taught him to say the phrase “I want to be a cavalryman, as my father was” in Bavarian dialect but Hauser claimed that he did not understand what these words meant. Elements of Hauser’s later life and attempts at education in Nuremburg poignantly express a lack of complex reasoning that Friedrich Daumer, Hauser’s host and teacher, expressed through his tutoring. Following demonstrations Hauser revealed his profound inability to understand coincidence, and imbues inanimate objects with intelligence for avoiding obstacles. Indeed although the final report indicated no anomalies Dr. Heidenreich, one of the physicians present at Hauser’s autopsy, claimed that the brain of Kaspar Hauser was notable for small cortical size and few, non-distinct cortical gyri, signalling that he suffered from cortical atrophy.
Amala and Kamala, the so called Wolf Girls of Midnapore, India were thought to be about 3 and 7 years old on their discovery on 17th October 1920. Both little girls could run swiftly on all fours, but were unable to stand up. They could not talk or laugh and their only gestures were those of the wolf pups they had been reared with. Amala only lived a year in ‘captivity’ and although her sister was thought to have been around 16 nine years later when she died she had a mental age of 3.
With Oxana Malaya who was found as an 8-year-old in Ukraine in 1991, having lived most of her life in the company of dogs the issue moves into the area of child abandonment. While she too picked up a number of dog-like habits and found it difficult to master language today, Oxana can speak and many of her behavioural problems have been remedied. The key to this may be the age at which Oxana was evicted from her human home.
It was at three years of age that Oxana’s drug addicted parents exiled her from the family home. Wild dogs roaming the streets and Oxana took refuge in a shed inhabited by these dogs. She was cared for by them and learned their behaviours and mannerisms. She growled, barked, walked on all fours and crouched like a wild dog, sniffed at her food before she ate it, and was found to have acquired extremely acute senses of hearing, smell and sight. When rescued she only used the words “yes” and “no”. It was believed that having been deprived of intellectual and social stimulation, Oxana found it difficult to acquire normal human social and emotional skills. Oxana’s lack of exposure to language in a human social context made it very difficult for her to improve her language skills. Yet that she is now able to use simple grammar suggests that language development had already formulated prior to her abandonment at aged 3.
In the case of Genie, the pseudonym for a feral child who spent nearly all of the first thirteen years of her life locked inside a bedroom strapped to a potty chair, the victim of one of the most severe cases of abuse and neglect, compounded by social isolation, ever documented. Genie was discovered by Los Angeles authorities on November 4, 1970. After her rescue, attempts were made to help her speak and socialise, however, Genie never learned full grammatical English and only went so far as phrases like “Applesauce buy store”.
The reason ‘feral’ children remain such a fascination to psychologists and linguists are because they present such a unique opportunity to study a hotly contested debate about language development. Essentially, this is the age-old nature versus nurture debate. Does genetics or environment play a greater role in the development of language? Nativists believe that the capacity for language is innate, while empiricists suggest that it is environment that plays a key role.
Noam Chomsky Jewish nativist, argued that the acquisition of language could not be fully explained by learning alone. Instead, he proposed that children are born with a language acquisition device (LAD), an innate ability to understand the principles of language. Once exposed to language, the LAD allowed children to learn the language at a remarkable pace.
Eric Lenneberg Jewish linguist proposed that like many other human behaviors, the ability to acquire language is subject to what are known as critical periods. A critical period is a limited span of time during which an organism is sensitive to external stimuli and capable of acquiring certain skills. According to Lenneberg, the critical period for language acquisition lasts until around age 12. After the onset of puberty, he argued, the organization of the brain becomes set and no longer able to learn and utilize language in a fully functional manner. Incidentally it is rather curious that the Jewish tribe are so prevalent in this field of study, but not surprising as here they are well placed to funnel the ground breaking discoveries of ethnic Europeans through the corrupting filter of Jewish Zionism.
In Genie’s case she started putting three words together occasionally as in children going through normal language development. In the normally stimulated child this stage is followed by what is known as a language explosion. Children rapidly acquire new words and begin putting them together in novel ways. Unfortunately, this never happened for Genie and never did for any other ‘feral’ child documented earlier. Her language abilities remained stuck at this stage and she appeared unable to apply grammatical rules and use language in a meaningful way. At this point, her progress levelled off and her acquisition of new language halted. Oxana on the other hand, abandoned at aged 3, has progressed to simple language formation. In this light the linguist Lenneberg may have been far closer to the mark than first realised.
However, the neuro-scientific reality is far more brutal when it comes to the isolation and lack of nurture of a child. Formation of the human brain takes place in early infancy and a normally nurtured brain will formulate the constructs capable of performing complex skills like that of language acquisition. Yet, if a brain is deprived of human stimulation, parental nurturing it will be substantially deformed. It is highly significant that a brain scan of a child who has suffered extreme neglected compared to that of a normal 3 year old is shown to be quite substantially physically smaller and disfigured. What must also be taken into account is how a small injury to the brain can have a dramatic impact on an adult human therefore even a minor reduction in the physical size of the brain in infancy must have intense repercussions for learning acquisition in the child.
It is now known that many capacities thought to be fixed at birth are actually dependent on a sequence of experiences combined with heredity. Both factors are essential for optimum development of the human brain (Shonkoff and Phillips, 2000). It is now known that although genetics predisposes us to develop in certain ways our experiences, including our interactions with other ‘people’ have a significant impact on how our predispositions are expressed.
The process of development occurs from the more primitive towards the more sophisticated sections of the brain (Perry, 2000a). The first areas of the brain to fully develop are the brainstem and midbrain governing the bodily functions necessary for life. Consequently New-borns’ brains allow babies to do many things, including breathe, eat, sleep, see, hear, smell, make noise, feel sensations, and recognize the people close to them. However, the majority of brain growth and development takes place after birth, especially in the higher brain regions involved in regulating emotions, language, and abstract thought. Babies are born with more than 100 billion nerve cell or neurons, the brain’s raw material. During foetal development, neurons migrate to form the various parts of the brain. As neurons migrate, they also differentiate and “specialize” in response to chemical signals (Perry, 2002). Development in the growing baby’s brain is the process of creating, strengthening, and discarding synapses or connections among neurons. Synapsesorganize the brain by forming pathways that connect the parts of the brain and occur at an astounding rate during children’s early years, in response to the young child’s experiences. For example, human brains are “wired” to respond to the sound of speech; when babies hear people speaking, the neural systems in their brains responsible for speech and language receive the necessary stimulation to organize and function (Perry, 2006). The more babies are exposed to people speaking, the stronger their related synapses become. If a young child is deprived of this stimulation it will result in the pruning of synapses (neuronal connections) relevant to that stimulation and the loss of neuronal pathways. As children progress through each developmental stage, they will learn and master each step more easily if their brains have built an efficient network of pathways. If the appropriate exposure does not happen, the pathways developed in anticipation may be discarded and the area of brain abnormal. Therefore, a primary conclusion must be that some stimulation took place in the case of Oxana prior to her neglect to enable her brain to acquire the necessary rudiments to accommodate some language formulation.
Yet consider the very nature of stimulation and nurturing that the infant is supposed to receive from its mother. Primate studies show that a young monkey separated from its mother will choose a soft warm comforter without food over a metal food provider. Furthermore the isolated primate elicited behaviour consistent with one unable to socialise with fellow mates. This is highly reminiscent of human cases of neglect such as Oxana and Genie who will never be fully rehabilitated into human society. This is most relevant as since WWII the period that the young child spends bonding with its mother is becoming shorter and shorter as woman is forced out to work. A side effect of woman’s war-time work Jewish Zionist Governments saw an opportunity to increase profit by introducing woman into the economy on a mass scale. This was achieved by utilising woman’s vanity against her natural instinct to nurture, thus the Jewish Marxist derivative Feminism with its propaganda of ‘equality’ appealed. With this emphasis on the working mother the ‘latch key kid’ became a common feature of the 80’s now schools could be forced to open longer as society shifts towards the institutional care of ever younger children. Not surprisingly this concept was inspired by the British Labour Party whose current leader Ed Miliband’s family connection to Jewish Marxism would explain the desire to retard ethnic European’s.
During October 1919, the Jewish Bolshevik mass murderer Lenin secretly visited the laboratory of I. P. Pavlov, an ethnic European physiologist known chiefly for the concept of the conditioned reflex. Pavlov is best known for training hungry dogs to associate the sound of a bell with food salivating at the sound even in the absence of food. Lenin was intent on discovering if conditional reflexes of the brain would help the Bolsheviks control European behaviour. “I want the masses of Russia to follow a Communistic pattern of thinking and reacting,” Pavlov was appalled for Lenin had suggested that he do for ethnic Europeans what he had already done for dogs. “Do you mean that you would like to standardise the population of Russia? Make them all behave in the same way?” he asked. “Exactly” Lenin replied. “Man can be corrected. Man can be made what we want him to be.”… As a consequence Pavlov became an outspoken opponent of the Communist government publically stating that “If that which the Jewish Bolsheviks are doing with Russia is an experiment, for such an experiment I should regret giving even a frog.” As such a credible argument can be expressed that current methods of teaching are intentionally meant to under develop the child’s intellectual capacity. Primatologist Winthrop Kellogg, convinced nurture was the dominant role in development, introduced a baby chimpanzee into his family. Whilst the chimp did copy many human characteristics Kellogg was shocked to discover that his son was displaying the barks and yelps of the chimp rather than beginning to learn the rudiments of human speech. Almost by accident Kellogg had exposed the vulnerability of childhood and how the smallest change can have a lasting effect. Plasticity is the term now used to describe the brain’s ability to change in response to repeated stimulation. The extent of a brain’s plasticity is dependent on the stage of development and the particular brain system or region affected (Perry, 2006). For instance, the lower parts of the brain, which control basic functions such as breathing and heart rate, are far less flexible than the higher functioning cortex, which controls thoughts and feelings. This places the infant in a very vulnerable position as more and more parents leave their young for the work environment and institutions become the prime carer and the television is the ultimate stimulation. This is the construct the Frankfurt School desired as it provides a forum for Cultural Marxism to infiltrate the media and deconstruct its natural order with degradation.
The early years of children’s programming may have been somewhat crude but the likes of Watch with Mother did contain the rudiments of number and musical stimulation, plus the key was in the title. This was meant as an ideas forum for a stay at home mum. By 1968 children’s TV had become much more educationally savvy feeding teaching ideas into the fabric of the cartoon. However, as the effect of cultural Marxist doctrine began to filter into the mix the education value slipped. Most popular children’s TV characters today fail even to use proper words or articulate the vocabulary of any particular language. Speaking gibberish is highly reminiscent of Kellogg’s young son picking up the barks and yelps of the chimp he spent so much time with. This begs the question are human beings a global experiment reminiscent of that proposed by Lenin. Uniformity is the common factor of Communist Marxism loosely concealed under a quest for utopian ‘equality’. Lenin’s desire to ‘standardise the behaviour of the European people’ only highlights this. Of course equality is not a natural phenomenon and a perfect example of this lies with the creation of the sexes. Meant to complement one another Feminism’s Marxist propagation of ‘equality’ only negates the natural differences between the sexes. Frankly the only way to implement ‘equality’ is to eradicate difference, and that means an end to sexual, racial and cultural identity. Therefore, typical Marxist levelling sees Whites who now live in Black communities ‘encouraged’, like the child with the monkey or dog, to take on Negroid characteristics because the easiest way to impose uniformity is to reduce to the lowest common denominator.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
It now appears to be a fully endorsed ‘state’ sanctioned policy for Zionists to use every opportunity to propagandise for their ‘Holocaust’. Below is a recent article detailing how Euro 2012 taking place in Poland and the Ukraine will be ‘host’ to graphic displays of ‘Holo-memorobilia’.
Published June 10, 2012.
Israeli students have launched a social media campaign which uses the Euro 2012 soccer games to commemorate the Holocaust.
Over one million people will visit Ukraine and Poland this month to watch the Euro 2012 soccer games. The Israeli students wondered how many of them will remember the some six million Jews murdered in those two countries some 70 years ago. The campaign, titled Euro1945, consists of a website, smartphone applications and Facebook, Twitter and Instagram accounts.
“We’re basically riding Euro 2012,” the campaign’s designer, Omri Ariav, said. A law student at the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Israel, he designed the campaign along with seven students.
The graphics of Euro1945 echo the official advertising campaign of Euro2012. The welcome page of Euro1945 displays a map where each EUFA 2012 hosting city and stadium is marked with a Jewish tombstone. A click on the icon produces a summary about the Jewish community that existed there before the Holocaust. The Instagram account is updated daily with photos from before and during the Holocaust.
The text offers historical soccer-related anecdotes such as the Kiev Death Match, held in August 1942 at Zenit Stadium. A team of German soldiers lost the game 3:5 to local players. The Germans sent the victorious team to a concentration camp.
The text on Poznan notes that the first Jewish labor camp in the area was set up at the Poznan Municipal Stadium. “We decided this world event must also help commemorate the victims. Maybe it’s Israeli chutzpah but I don’t think we’re raining on anyone’s parade,” Ariav said.
This ploy is now obvious for we have already seen the mighty splendour and body beautiful of the Greek Olympia rendered a Marxist pulp fiction. This European sporting tournament is to be used as a focus for White European ‘Guilt’. The Zionist machine is at work again promoting its own brand of Hate. However, in its desperation to exploit Poland, the Ukraine and its apparent ‘Nazi crimes’ it completely erases the Communist crimes visited on the East by Bolshevism.
The Ukrainian people had suffered terribly through forced starvation policies of Stalin during the 1930s. When the German Army entered the Soviet Union in June 1941, they encountered deplorable conditions. In January 1942 a 60-page booklet titled German Soldiers in the Soviet Union: Letters from the East was published in WWII Germany. This consisted mostly of excerpts from letters from soldiers reporting on the conditions they encountered. Particularly harrowing are the accounts of atrocities visited upon the Ukrainian and Latvian Nationals by retreating Zionist Bolsheviks.
Soldier Fred Fallnbigl to his Parents in Salzburg, 17.7.41
I wrote in my last two letters about Russian atrocities, and could fill volumes more.
But a bit more from the Soviet Paradise. I’ll especially tell you about things that happened in Lemberg-Tarnopol and Tromborla. Tromborla is due south of Tarnopol. I saw the prisons in Lemberg, and saw things that struck me deeply. There were men with their ears and noses cut off, etc. They had nailed children alive by their hands and feet to the wall, butchering them. The blood was ankle deep. It didn’t make any difference if they were alive or dead. They doused the piles of bodies with gasoline and set them on fire. The stench was terrible. I saw similar things in Tarnopol and Tromborla. In T. seven Ukrainians were hauled out of their beds after the Germans had arrived. The next morning their bodies were found in the woods, beaten until they were unrecognizable. I have seen all of this myself, they are not matters I heard about. Feel free to tell them to others, particularly those who may still think well of the Soviet Union.
I always think how fortunate we are that this scourge of humanity never made it to our country. I don’t think that even years of preparation would make Germans capable of such atrocities.
Orphans Nailed to the Wall and Slaughtered
NCO K. Suffner, Military Post Number 08 070 to his work mates
There was a gray cloud over Lemberg as we arrived. The stench was scarcely tolerable. The Russians had been thrown out of the city after a hard battle. Two hours later I found the source of the stench. The Bolshevists and Jews bestially murdered 12,000 Germans and Ukrainians. I saw pregnant women hanging by their feet in the GPU’s prison. They had slit the noses, ears, eyes, fingers, hands and arms and legs of other women. Some even had their hearts cut out. 300 orphans between the ages of 2 and 17 had been nailed to the wall and butchered. After they were done with the torture, they threw the people, most of whom were still alive, into a 3 meter deep pile in the basement, doused them with gasoline, and lit them on fire. It was terrible! We could not believe that shave suffered if Bolshevism had reached us. The complainers and know-it-alls that we still have in the Reich should see this. Then they would know what pure Bolshevism looks like. They would fall to their knees and thank the Führer for saving Germany from such things. I and many other German soldiers have seen this. We all thank the Führer that he let us see the Bolshevist “paradise.” We swear to extirpate this plague root and branch.
Since I have some time today, I thought it my duty to write this so that my work mates at home can read it. We soldiers at the front have seen this with our own eyes. We will be able to tell a lot more later.
We are fighting until final victory.
German soldiers treated the entry into the Eastern Nations as giving freedom to Bolshevik occupied allies. After 25 years under Bolshevik Communism they were greeted as heroic saviours.
Staff Sergeant Kurt Hummel, Military Post Number L 31 605 Lg Pa. Paris, to his local group
Northern Russia, 12 August 1941
Bolshevist conditions are indescribable. I had never imagined that such misery was possible. People here know nothing about electric lights, radio, newspapers and the like. One can’t call what they live in houses. There are only shanties with rotten straw roofs. Huge neglected fields lay around. We haven’t yet found even a small shop. This is what people call the Soviet paradise. I wish the few outsiders who still remain in Germany could be shipped here. There is misery wherever one looks. One has to see it to realize how beautiful Germany is.
The Main Roads are like Paths
Soldier Heinrich Stähr tells his work mates at the Hamburg Hochbahn A. G. about conditions frequently mentioned in other letters as well:
The roads. We in the infantry are probably the best judge of good and bad roads, since we have to march for kilometer after kilometer on them. Here too the Soviets haven’t lifted a finger. The main roads are no better than field paths. Believe me, my dear comrades, the soldiers have had many a justifiable curse after marching 40 or 50 kilometers on such a road. Besides, it is 30-35 degrees C. in the shade, and huge clouds of dust make it almost impossible to breathe. Swamps, forests, and bad roads make military action unpleasant, but we keep moving forward.
The Bolshevik ‘utopia’ wasn’t all it was cracked up to be. It is about time that the crimes committed by the Soviet state by Zionist Bolsheviks stop being transposed onto the White German people. Already the cracks are starting to show. For approximately 50 years the German Army has been blamed for the Katyn Wood Massacre. The first news of a massacre at Katyn Wood came in April 1943 when the Germans found a mass grave of 4,500 Polish soldiers in German-occupied Russia. The discovery at Katyn Wood was to greatly embarrass the Russian government. Moscow announced its stance on April 14th 1943:
|“The Polish prisoners in question were interned in the vicinity of Smolensk in special camps and were employed in road construction. In was impossible to evacuate them at the time of the approach of the German troops and, as a result, they fell into their hands. If, therefore, they have been found murdered, it means that they have been murdered by the Germans who, for reasons of provocation, now claim that the crime was committed by Soviet authorities.”|
This remained the ‘official’ stance until 1990 when the Russian authorities admitted that it was the Russian Secret police (NKVD) who executed the Polish prisoners. This is a clear campaign hatched between the Soviet Bolsheviks and her war time allies to place all her hideous crimes on axis forces. One must maintain the illusion that one’s ally is a friend not the monster and already propaganda extoled the Soviet State as a Communist utopia. The public’s view of this must not be shaken and to preserve this one makes the enemy the monster. However, it is a house of cards and once one card topples the whole house starts crashing down.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Art is the method the artist uses to lift the spirit. Art is a spiritual relief from materialism; a need or requirement similar to that which religion attempts to provide but fails by becoming dogmatic. Spirituality is the search for the best part of us and art is the physical manifestation of this search. Remnants of this can be viewed all over Europe. For much of his time the artist resides in a place that the mass cannot perceive. Part of the work of the artist is to allow the public to glimpse into his world. The true artist fishes raw from a dimension familiar to very few. These discoveries compel him to interpret within a more inclusive realm. However, what Marxism calls ‘art’ serves only to debase, corrupt and drag down he who participates in its space.
Case in point some things are universally disgusting: all cultures and nationalities are repelled by faeces and urine. Naturally this gives Marxist the excuse to slap it on a canvas, call it ‘art’ and stick it in the galleries of Europe. All at once the exalted place of the ‘artist’ as redeemer of the Aryan spirit is ‘condemned’ as he is replaced by comedians airing the Zionist ‘Europeans’ dirty laundry.
This is England, land of Green Mountains and pleasant pastures, but the landscape is also being changed. It is very subtle at first, a palm tree appearing in a neighbouring garden. Then next-door-but-one follows suit. This might sound somewhat innocuous. After all not all garden plants are indigenous to the British Isles’. The point is though it is usual for a garden plant to blend with its environment. The palm tree is an obvious interloper, a definite foreign element. In fact it has become a rather common sight so see a dead palm tree in English Gardens precisely because they are not ‘designed’ for the British weather!
Modern architectural design has also been affected. A dangerous ‘design’ fault to have landed on the British shore is the ‘Dome’ fetish. Rather than reflecting the religion of the land, new designs have seen fit to incorporate the faith of foreign imports. As stated this was subtle to begin with, but clearly our traditional forms-ancient gothic structures are no-longer ‘the fashion’. Instead modern structures are often stark mirrored or glass-utilitarian boxes. The gradual phasing out of great gothic arches, huge towers and spires in favour of a flat box or ever more ‘inverted’ design is suggestive of the purging of Christian heritage from Britain and the invasion of an architectural atheism.
The colour palate is also out of control. Hot Pinks, Vivid Limes, and Bright Purple are not traditionally associated with Britain and Europe. Colours such as these belong on a beach in the Caribbean. Yet traditionally BLACK hackney cabs parading around as if in an eternal Caribbean Carnival… and city council vans seeking ‘gay abandon’ in shocking pink. Of course White male emasculation is clearly one reason for a Marxist inspired politically correct council to paint their vans hot pink. Another is not content with importing a replacement population; the corrupt Zionist authorities need to introduce this import’s tastes along with them, thus eradicating any remnants of a British culture or identity. This is multiculturalism at work one of the various aspects of cultural Marxism (Communism). While the illusion of Cultural Marxism (Communism) promises utopia and ‘equality’ in reality it initiates chaos and destroys difference.
Liverpool’s 2008 City of Culture was a prime example of this. Billed as the “world in one city” evidence of indigenous Scouse culture was at best ‘hidden’ or worse eradicated. The canny Scouser saw the Liver Bird, an ancient symbol of Liverpool steeped in history, replaced with a lurid yellow Japanese invention with absolutely no connection to the City. This inane monstrosity, one mans apparent response to genetic engineering, was to be Liverpool’s new Global logo. The indigenous people of Liverpool have never been asked if they wanted their identity replaced by Japanese mass produced ‘plastic’. Never the less multicoloured reproductions of this freakish foreign import clutter OUR City.
2008 was also the year that the Liverpool Metro Newspaper ran an “alternative A to Z of Merseyside entitled A Great City with Culture to spare. No doubt this was to coincide with the “City of Culture” farce. This article featured a letter I for “in a parallel universe”. In this nightmare vision Liverpool’s dock region is barely recognisable. A lumpy mirrored ball called “The Cloud” but looking in reality far more like a crumpled crisp packet dominates the scene. In the passage that accompanies the picture we are told that Japanese-designed domed structures will house a Caribbean beach! Yes this is apparently a “parallel universe”. However, it was planned and designed, think about those palm trees. How long before we do see Caribbean beaches encroaching on our ‘pleasant pastures’. The Zionist does not like European culture and is seeking to destroy the Britain and Europe that we know by infecting it with foreign and Marxist influences. By stealth what the White man fails to see is the lowering of his standards of taste and decency. Only reflect on the rampant paedophilia displayed within the Labour Party http://labour25.com/ and consider if these are the ‘leaders’ that should be legislating over your children.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Zionism markets itself as Jewish ‘Nationalism’. This is a perversion for Zionism is a parasite that pollutes and destroys. At the most fundamental level Zionist ideology must be understood as a community operating within another community for the good of the ‘guest’ nation not the host nation. Zionism has infected Europe for over 2,000 years though during the last 60 years it has been draining host country’s National wealth and funneling it into Israel. Without continual ‘support’ from external Nations Israel would not survive.
It was during the 19th century that Karl Marx developed Zionism’s most dangerous tool of deception-Communism. With considerable contribution from Moses Hess known as the philosophical father of Zionism Marx produced material that worked on 2 levels. On the face of it Das Capital promises the ‘worker’ a utopian equality through Communism. However, on a deeper level what he is offering is reduction to the lowest common denominator because only then can a mass be the same. Of course this comes at a price since true ‘equality’ does not exist in nature. Thus it was necessary for Communism to formulate mechanisms to enforce ‘equality’. For the Nationalist modern ‘multicult’ policy alive in Europe should provide some insight into the inner workings.
Traditionally, or more correctly idealistically, a Nation is organically grown from the families and communities indigenous to a particular land. The Nation state would be produced from these indigenous peoples and work for them. In modern Europe, however, our indigenous Nations, be that Britain, Germany, France etc have been colonised by innumerate foreign peoples. Even though these people no longer live in their own lands they remain a part of their own nations. We see this particularly at election times when the same face parties try to attract block votes from Muslims, Somali, and African voters. It is clear that these ‘newcomers’ have a solid community identity. They know what their community requires and use the community’s weight to achieve it. In a new land this all comes at the expense of the host community. Here we have a perfect example of the divide and conquer strategy used by Zionism. This is on a grand scale but history shows that the Zionist concept has been in use for centuries.
“The [Jewish] diaspora is commonly accepted to have begun with the 6th century BC conquest of the ancient Kingdom of Judah, destruction of the First Temple (c. 586 BC), and expulsion of the population…” Wikipedia
So the Jews are and have been a scattered people for a long time! To remain an identifiable people would suggest that they have learned to survive among ‘other’ nations without fully adapting to host cultures. This would mean that the ideology developed would have to be one of stealth and cunning. If one was working against the host one would not want to be found out. It may also be necessary to be some what unassuming, blend in. It is only once the underdog has gained a position of power that they can begin to show their true colours.
Though the term Zionism was actually coined by Nathan Birnbaum in 1890, it was Moses Hess who laid the foundation of what is considered as the philosophical base of Zionism with the book Rome and Jerusalem Published in 1862. However, it is clear that the parasitic communities have been by Zionist ideology for centuries prior to Birnbaum’s use of the term. In fact, while not wholly portrayed in the mainstream, it was William of Orange who gave Zionist Jews permission to set up their Bank of England. It was not until the late 1800’s that gentile’s become aware of Zionism. Perhaps now more confident of their power, this ideology is now less concerned of showing their true colours.
Stemming from Zionism Karl Marx, a student of Hess created Communism. His sole intention in producing this ideology was to dupe the masses. In essence Marx created the template for eternal upheaval. Again this can be seen in the original mass Jewish Bolshevik (Communist) revolution. The fundamental idea is to set each group against one another-the worker against employer, rich against poor, man against woman.
Following the initial success of the Bolshevik revolution the plan was to spread Marx’ Communism across Europe. The master plan was to dismantle and replace European culture with hollow, meaningless filth. Naturally the ideology behind this was Zionist as was the parasitic community that was to inherit power. However, Europe did not take to Communism as easily as Mother Russia so a different strategy had to be formed.
Generally speaking it was back to the academy. The Frankfurt School and its close associates the Fabian Socialists needed to redefine ‘Communism’ for a different audience. The politico-economic message of Marxism did not work in Europe so it was necessary to drive the divide and conquer method via European conduct. Thus Cultural Marxism was born and its allies political correctness and anti-Christianity. It is because of these dogmas that the divisive groups such as feminism and anti-Racism develop. The less cohesive White European society the more easily it is to corrupt and consequently control.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL