Today Jewish politicians constantly speak of achieving ‘transparency’ in Government yet ironically before she was devastated by war Europe’s maintenance was open and evident in its system of treaties. This was disrupted when in 1908 Count Alois Lexa von Aehrenthal a Jewish politician who occupied the Austrian Government secretly engineered an agreement between Austria and Russia to annex Bosnia. At the time Bosnia was Serbian territory so it was inevitable that this action would destabilise this region of Europe (Bosnian crisis). What followed was an inescapable domino effect that would collapse Europe’s delicate system of treaties eventually triggering the Great War. Curiously in 1903 only a few years prior to Aehrenthal’s interference Jewish journalist Theodor Herzl ‘forecast’ great world upheaval at the 6th Zionist Conference. The seed had been sown for a devastating Fratricidal war. However, by 1916 Germany had won this war out right and was negotiating for peace and it is interesting to note that had these negotiations gone well those that set the Great War in motion would not benefit and the consequences of 17 million of our finest lost, a European monarchy murdered and their country occupied for 75 years may never have been. Yet that is yet to come meanwhile it is 1914 and European nations are gearing up for war.
The Great War commenced on the 28th July 1914. Soldiers on both sides went into battle primed with vile ‘war propaganda’ no doubt heavily endorsed by Jewish elements with a vested interest in Herzl’s “great world upheaval”. As such troops were likely convinced of the others bestiality and therefore justified in their fight. By December the conflict had been waged for at least 5 months and Christmas was upon the troops. In the current crass commercialism of Jewish internationalism the real meaning of Christmas has been deposed but on Christmas Eve, 24 December 1914, all our European soldiers were far away from such mediocre distractions. It is only in such bleak times that the true Christmas message of peace and hope reveals not only a shared culture but the collective spirit of our race. Thus as German troops began decorating the area around their trenches in the region of Ypres, Belgium by placing candles on their trenches and on Christmas trees and continued the celebration by singing Christmas carols. British soldiers responded by singing back the carols they recognized. The troops continued by shouting Christmas greetings to each other. Soon thereafter, there were excursions across No Man’s Land, where small gifts were exchanged, such as food, tobacco and alcohol, and souvenirs such as buttons and hats. Bruce Bairnsfather, who served throughout the war, wrote: “I wouldn’t have missed that unique and weird Christmas Day for anything. … I spotted a German officer, some sort of lieutenant I should think, and being a bit of a collector, I intimated to him that I had taken a fancy to some of his buttons. … I brought out my wire clippers and, with a few deft snips, removed a couple of his buttons and put them in my pocket. I then gave him two of mine in exchange. …” The artillery in the region fell silent that night. The truce also allowed a breathing spell where recently fallen soldiers could be brought back behind their lines by burial parties. Joint services were held. Troops from both sides had also been so friendly as to play games of football with one another. In many sectors, the truce lasted through Christmas night, but it continued until New Year’s Day in others. Though there was no official truce, about 100,000 British and German troops were involved in unofficial cessations of fighting along the length of the Western Front.
Letters home from British troops relating the event suggest surprise that the so called ‘enemy’ was so like them and delight in being part of this encounter under such unlikely circumstances. Thus propaganda carefully designed to malign the other nation collapsed as it proved only a flimsy fabrication. The crux of the issue is that an unofficial truce could and would not take place under conditions of war among any other but those who share the ties of brotherhood. Nevertheless, this was a mere glitch in a 4 year long familial massacre. Indeed because the Christmas truce had uncovered the truth-that brother was fighting brother certainly in Britain the nature of war propaganda against Germany produced by the Government of War reached a new level of revulsion. While on the home front the public could still be convinced of their German brethren’s vile nature via the distribution of false Governmental propaganda the soldier returning from the front had been exposed to the truth-that these people were just like us. Therefore, in order that the British and particularly the army should conceive of the German as a threat rather than the familial branch propaganda reached levels of gruesome and sickening absurdity. In much bewilderment it is often expressed what evil men do; though in this case the most horrifying notion is that brotherhood, blood and race are being defiled by those we look to lead our peoples. Perhaps the Governments in Britain and Germany require scrutiny.
It has already been noted that Europe was manoeuvred into war by an entity alien to her and curiously elements of which had been terrorising Russia for decades culminating in 1881 with the assassination of Tsar Alexander II by Jewish terrorist Vera Figner. War is not an advantageous position for the public and therefore not in the national best interest. Nevertheless, when Germany began peace negotiating’s in 1916 Jewish Zionists in Germany turned to Arthur Balfour “Little as the general public may suspect it, the charming, gracious, and cultured Mr Balfour is the most egotistical of men, and a man who would make almost any sacrifice to remain in office.” Obviously he was more concerned about himself than the best interest of the British Nation and so not above back door deals with international Jewish criminals. If Germany had succeeded in negotiating peace Jewish machinations would have been for nothing. Indeed had the situation in Europe stabilised in 1916 the “great world upheaval” required for the Jewish Bolshevik seizure of Russia would not manifest. Thus it was in Jewish interest to maintain war disruption. So Jewish Zionists proposed that America be ‘encouraged’ to enter the war as a British ally. In ‘compensation’ for this endeavor the Jewish Zionists wanted Britain to give them Palestine, a sovereign land over which that Government should have no claim. This led to the formation of the Balfour Declaration of 1917 an official letter from the British Foreign Office headed by Arthur Balfour who was to become Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (from July 1902 to December 1905) and later the UK’s Foreign Secretary (from December 1916 to October 1919), to Lord Rothschild, who was seen as a representative of the Jewish people. The letter stated that the British government “viewed with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country”.
The legacy of this document is far-reaching to say the least. That Balfour sold the future of ethnic Europe with the signing of this document is not too presumptuous when one considers the current state of ethnic Europeans and their ancestral lands. The ‘state of Israel’ materialised in 1948 due in large part to the significance the Jewish tribe put in this document. Since then, through the manipulation of Western troops, the Middle East has been steadily ‘cleansed’ of its Arab population to make way for a greater ‘Israel’. However, the foundation was laid with the closing of WWI. Known as the “November Criminals” (German: Novemberverbrecher) government leaders of Germany had overthrown the monarchy (forcing the Kaiser into exile in Holland perhaps to escape another royal assassination) and replaced it with a Jewish run ‘republic’. Jewish born Rosa Luxemburg a Marxist theorist, Jewish Bolshevik and founder of the Red Flag newspaper supported the Communist Party of Germany’s (KPD) participation in the Weimar National Assembly that founded the Weimar Republic. In January 1919, a second Jewish Bolshevik wave swept Berlin in a violent attempt to seize power. The Red Flag encouraged the Jewish Bolsheviks to occupy editorial offices of the press. On November 11, 1918, the representatives of the newly formed Weimar Republic signed the armistice with the Allies and the subsequent Treaty of Versailles led to further territorial and financial losses for Germany. The ‘Peace Conference’ held in Paris during 1919 would expose the real reason behind Europe’s suffering. With the dramatic restructuring and division of territory a contingent of 117 Jews present and clutching the Balfour declaration submitted their draft resolutions for consideration by the Peace Conference on 3rd February 1919. Detailed in their submission were statements regarding recognition of the Jewish people’s historic title to Palestine and their right to reconstitute their National Home there. Such chutzpah could only be based on the Balfour declaration for besides having no racial claim the absurdity of pursuing such measures “is like the Celts ‘demanding’ England back from the Saxon after 15 hundred years of occupation.” Particularly since like the Aryan origin of the Saxon and Celt both the Arab and Jew are Semites.
The conclusion should be crystal clear. This catastrophic war was engineered by the Jewish tribe, condemning to death the best of Europe for their own profit. Initially to secure the seizure of Russia the Balfour Declaration presented a new land deal for Jewry for which Europe would again be driven to war. That the Jew was able to use a European-The German Nation- a member of our own brethren to scapegoat for his malevolent deeds set a new precedent. From this point on the Jew uses ‘sectarianism’ in various forms to disconnect white man from his racial community. Perfecting this divide and conquer strategy ensures that the white race does not unify as a productive collective with the ability and will to stop them perverting and plundering our ancestral home land. However, it is also critical to appreciate that the drive of the Jewish criminal and his self-interested collaborator is bolstered only by a false veneer. The ties of racial heritage and brotherhood are timeless and all it takes is to shine the light of truth the Christmas Truce stands testament to this.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
The tribe of Israel have been hideously mutilating its enemies and their children since the early 1920’s, although in Jewish Bolshevik controlled territories it was much easier to conceal their atrocities from the world at large. Now that the Internet can expose Israel’s atrocities in Gaza crying ‘Holocaust‘- The 70 year construct the tribe use to conceal their atrocities against ethnic Europeans, is loosing its effect now that even stalwart pro-Zionists have identified it as an excuse for Jewish ‘Israel’ to get away with murder. Yet even more significant is what the mainstream media choses to avoid.
This site has already pointed out the absurdity of the historic claim the Jewish tribe place on the land of Palestine. Although the same race it is like the Celts ‘demanding’ England back from the Saxon after 15 hundred years of occupation. In the Middle East one has Palestinians and Jews both share the same race that has existed in this territory since the second century, although if anything the Jew is now more of a mixed breed than that of the Palestinian. It is also noteworthy that the Jewish tribe have been expelled from Palestinian territories following victorious claims to the land by the Babylonians in 586 BC, and the Romans in 70 AD and 132 AD. As such the Jew has no claim to territory hereditary or otherwise. Even the tribal call that the land they call ‘Israel‘ is “God given” is based not on a fair fight but Jewish infiltration of the territory formally known as Canaan; occupation of the native Canaanite people and their eventual destruction. Chapter 15 of Genesis describes in detail the ‘eternal victim’s’ manifesto for procuring land and wealth whilst deferring blame or judgment for their actions elsewhere, in this case their ‘God’. History has seen this manifesto in action. The Jewish tribe slowly and quietly “immigrate” into a host nation. Once settled, the Jewish community work together as a single unit to buy up an entire industry, for example clothing, metals or manufacturing. With a monopoly the Jewish tribe jack up the prices to crippling heights and drop the worker’s wages to slave level. With profits from each conquest more industries fall into Jewish hands. Consequently Jews eventually have complete control of the nation’s economy and start draining off its wealth and moving it to foreign banks. The host populace starve in the streets as the Jewish interlopers get richer and richer. Historically they finally are evicted by that host nation. Of course by then the damage was done and the wealth spirited away.
There is a long list of nations destroyed in large part, due to Jewish subterfuge. This explains why the Jewish tribe have been evicted from 109 different locations since 250AD. This manoeuvre is used on America and Europe right now to prioritise Jewish interests and eliminate the White race. Yet not a single word of this is ever discussed in the so called mainstream media. Exactly the same tactic was used on the German people prior to 1933. The adoption of National Socialism in Germany represented an obstacle to the Jewish tribe who instigated war just as they had ignited war decades earlier.
Germany won the Great War outright in 1916 and was negotiating peace terms. Yet, should Europe return to the situation prior to war the Jews would have gained nothing. Hence in Germany Jewish Zionists whispered in the ears of war mongers in the British government explaining that there was no need for Britain to lose this war as America could be ‘encouraged’ to enter as a British ally. In ‘compensation’ for this endeavor the Jewish Zionists wanted Britain to give them Palestine. This Jewish manipulation lead to the instigation of the Balfour Declaration of 1917, an official letter from the British Foreign Office headed by Arthur Balfour, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (from July 1902 to December 1905) and later the UK’s Foreign Secretary (from December 1916 to October 1919), to Lord Rothschild, who was seen as a representative of the Jewish people. The letter stated that the British government “viewed with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country”. Once again a sovereign people-Palestinians-are usurped from their territory via infiltration and occupation. The establishment, in 1948, of a ‘state of Israel’ constitutes the genocide of the Palestinian people.
Thus it has been ascertained that the issue surrounding the Gaza atrocities is much wider than the mainstream media will allow. Nevertheless, the Palestinian issue has a life of its own and manifests in force on the internet and has instigated marches globally. Certainly the inhumanity visited upon the Palestinian people has captured the social conscience of the world. Already the international reach of Palestinian pain lends itself to corruption, and those that consider themselves to the left of the political spectrum due to their social conscience find themselves submerged by a deviant agenda. This is how International Marxism has hijacked the Palestinian course. All is viewed through the restricted bottle neck of Jewish Marxism that maintains the narrow focus to ensure that Jewish criminality is bypassed. Via the internet alone the Palestinian issue receives support from European and American Nationalists yet the discussion is governed by the gatekeepers of Jewish Marxism. Consequently, while the ongoing atrocities remain newsworthy, the malicious theft of land, occupation and the Jewish ‘right’ to settle is conveniently ignored. In essence the Jew has no right to claim any land, for his race has always had territory no matter the religious persuasion. What the Jew demands in Palestine today is no less than a physical division of the religions just like their invention of the Berlin Wall. This construct bears witness to Jewish interference in Northern Ireland with the appearance of ‘peace walls’ in 1969. Yet historical religious differences would have been solved amicably hundreds of years ago by indigenous Europeans had not the Jewish tribe continued to rub salt into old wounds.
To conclude the initial fiction in the Jewish tribes ‘victimhood’ is that he masquerades as a race without a home. This is meant to instil sympathy where none is needed, for the race of the Jew has always had land. Thus territory was offered in 1916 providing the Jew with opportunity to manipulate the situation. It is here that race and religion blur for Jewish convenience and gentile confusion as the land ‘God promised’ is demanded; a right to which the Jew has no claim. Further chutzpah in the Jewish cry of ‘holocaust‘ is meant to instill ‘false guilt’ in the West leaving the Jews of occupied Palestine free to murder their way through Gaza as they murdered ethnic Europeans. As always the Jew is blameless, for his construct renders his actions the fault of others or he absolves himself via his ‘God’.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
On the surface Zionism is a Jewish ‘nationalist’ movement created during the 1800´s. It aimed to establish a Jewish homeland in the Middle East. This cause found its realization in the creation of the state of Israel in 1948 after the end of British rule, realizing the promises of the Balfour declaration. However, this is only what the gentile is meant to see. Ideological ‘Zionism’ is a much more wily and illusive entity.
The origins of the term Zionism appeared in the early 1800’s and the work of one Moses Hess. Though Hess was never actually to use the word it was coined by Nathan Birnbaum in 1890, with the book Rome and Jerusalem Published in 1862 Hess laid the foundation of what is considered as the philosophical base of Zionism. Hess is described as a “Jewish socialist’” and worked closely with his student the Jew Karl Marx who barely 14 years before published The Communist Manifesto (1848). Following this a wave of revolutions broke out in Europe. Marx was a member of the Communist League an organization of émigré workers out of Germany with its centre in London of which Marx had became the major theoretician. It wasn’t until 1896 that Theodor Herzl published the book Judenstaat (The Jewish State) that argued for the creation of a Jewish state motivating Jewish Zionists to emigrate or make Aliyah (rise up) to Israel. Darkly ironic considering how the State of Israel, a land no bigger than Wales, did ‘rise up’ through lies and stealth to rule the world.
Herzl assembled the first Zionist congress in Basel, Switzerland, in 1897 of which it is alleged the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are the actual secret minutes. This document describes a purported plan for world domination by International Jewry and surfaced in Russia, where it is said to have arrived via France. The most famous public figures who have promoted knowledge of it; such as Henry Ford, have stated they are not interested in the documents ‘authenticity’ but rather urge a critical review of historical events that have unfolded, held up against the Protocols. Ford had a valid point more now as the European Union’s grip on the free world grows ever tighter. Why have questions never been asked “how did we get here and who is pulling the strings?”
Many answers lie with the manifestation, in 1948, of the rogue state called Israel. Now and then this has had massive support economically and politically from influences out of European and North American countries. Nevertheless, its installation was an unlawful act. The country of Palestine was sovereign land and never American or European to hand over to the Jewish people. Consequently, there is now a tribe of people calling itself ‘Israel’ occupying Palestinian land. Overtly this looks like an American/European protectorate. One only needs to ask who fights her wars. Yet just as in 1948 and other significant events (the Balfour Declaration) it is the Jewish lobby within White Western Governments that raise their voices the highest when it comes to “National” interests. Consequently the interests of host Nations such as Britain, Germany and America cease to matter in the face of the so called “Jewish State”.
The main rationale for the Iraq War offered by U.S. President George W. Bush, former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair, and their domestic and foreign supporters was that Iraq was developing weapons of mass destruction. Of course no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq and since the invasion it was learned that Jewish neo-conservatives pushed for the overthrow of Iraq before the Bush administration entered office. It is a very similar story in Afghanistan. Bruce Riedel is Barack Obama’s chief adviser on the war in Afghanistan. Riedel is employed in a Jewish Israeli secret service (Mossad)-funded think tank run by an Israeli friend of Ehud Barak and Shimon Peres. It is suggested that the war in Afghanistan, the war in which yet again our children are being used as cannon fodder, is Obama’s war for Israel.
Since WWII Jewish democracy has created ‘law’ and therefore sees its tribe as above its product. A perfect example of this occurred in 1975 when the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution that designated Zionism as “a form of racism and racial discrimination” Addressing the General Assembly. The same day, 10th November 1975, Israeli Ambassador Chaim Herzog stated that the resolution was:“Another manifestation of the bitter anti-Semitic, anti-Jewish hatred … For us, the Jewish people, this resolution based on hatred, falsehood and arrogance, is devoid of any moral or legal value. For us, the Jewish people, this is no more than a piece of paper and we shall treat it as such.” As he concluded his speech, Herzog tore the resolution in half thus proving that United Nations rulings do not apply to the eternal ‘victim’ Israel! This must be why the resolution was repealed in 1991. In the history of the UN this is the only resolution that has ever been revoked. History shows that if a gentile slights a Jew they are anti-Semitic. Slight Israel and you risk offending a Nation of ‘victims’. Even to point out the criminality of Jewish Israel risks the label ‘anti-Semite’.
Today Jewish Zionists play on a history replete with forced evictions, using it as a platform for their cries of ‘persecution’. The Gentile world never questions why this race was constantly moved on by the host Nations, and most fascinating is the unquestioned notion that the altruistic European would assume an unjustified hatred of another. When abroad (in diaspora) The Jewish tribe translate their bonding motif as merely a religious group and have one believe that this ‘difference’ is the basis of European hatred. Yet in reality it is racial identity that has kept their tribe so tight knit even spread across the world (diaspora), earning their race the moniker the international Jew from Henry Ford. Ford’s designation is quite fitting as history finds this tribe leeching from Nations at the most auspicious periods. A particularly good example lies with the Rothschild banking family. Here most relevant to British history is a huge criminal act of insider trading on the eve of Wellington’s victory. This not only robbed our land of her wealth and made Nathan Rothschild filthy rich but rendered Britain slaves to the Jewish Rothschild’s.
Hence though Zionism is marketed as ‘Jewish Nationalism’ this is an oxymoron. For Nationalism is an organic form that stands for the preservation and conservation of one’s own people (nation), however, born of nomads Zionism is the ideology of theft and manipulation to gain for oneself. White failure to question leads to complicity in Jewish Zionist illusion and ‘victim’ mentality particularly when it comes to the so called ‘Holocaust’.
In reality Jewish casualties during World War II formed a minority of those who died during the Second World War. The exact number of Jews who died directly as a consequence is difficult to ascertain and the subject has been heatedly debated since the late 20th century between different sets of historians. The causes of casualties were numerous; for instance some died in action fighting in all armies, others died in bombing raids. Also Jewish Communists posed a threat to German security and where interned in German administrated detention centres possibly dying due to starvation or disease (particularly typhus) as the allies cut off supply routes. The Jewish Zionist media constantly manipulates this last instance into an ‘untouchable’ mantra. According to ‘mainstream’ the ‘Holocaust’ was the genocide of approximately six million Jews during World War II. Of course even if one assumes the worst is true and accept the 6 million as undoubtedly correct, the number of victims of these so called German atrocities would still fall far short of the number of German, Japanese, and Italian non-combatants who perished at Allied hands as the result of mass population expulsions, saturation bombing of civilian centres and post war deprivation. The simple fact is that there is every reason to believe that a final accounting must exculpate Germany of any unique inhumanity in the waging of World War. Yet even when the plaque at Auschwitz, originally reading 4 million dead, was replaced with a smaller plaque with 1.5 million the ‘sacred’ 6 million did not decrease. Incredibly the ‘sacred’ 6 million has been used before at the end of the Great War. Perhaps the marketing didn’t catch on then. For the White man questioning the Jew seems to be a criminal act and it is labelled ‘anti-Semitism’. All though if White man got off his knees the simple answer to cries of ‘Holocaust’ is the Holodomor, an artificial famine instigated by Jewish Bolshevik butchers. It occurred during the years 1932 to 1933 of the Jewish Bolshevik regime. Loss of life has been listed as anywhere between 7 million to 7.5 million, although, figures have been as high as 10 Million deaths. Ukrainian grain filled massive silos to be sold internationally while the breadbasket of Europe starved to death. The Ukraine experienced 3 Holodomor type famines which took upwards of 16.5 million. The major contributing factor in each case was food ‘requisitions’ (seizures) by the Jewish Bolshevik authorities that left the population without enough to sustain it. Since the late 1980s the centrality of Jewish Bolshevik grain procurement policies has been established as the focus of the genocidal famines of 1921-3, 1932-3 and 1946-7. It is also vital to note that the Ukrainian famine of 1946-7 was contemporary with the Nuremburg trials. Here we have obscure, obnoxious and violent ‘War Crimes’ claims made against Germany. Meanwhile, Jewish Bolsheviks where committing mass slaughter against the White Ukraine. Neither where these Holodomor famines just murder by starvation, it was the practice of the Jewish Bolshevik regime to publicly torture community leaders. Instances include splitting the stomach, exposing the small intestines, attaching these to a tree and beating the victim around until the innards unwound; people hung from strips of flesh cut from the back, the bodies left to deter White revolution. Most remarkable is the similarity of Jewish Bolshevik cruelty to the so called abuses laid against Germany by Jewish Democracy making it all the more likely that German ‘War Crimes’ were invented to mask the atrocities committed under Jewish Bolshevism. What is even more fascinating is that the Ukrainian Jewish Committee has suggested that the “Holodomor Affair” materials are being used for political purposes. Ironic considering that their tribe have been politicising a Jewish Hollywood blockbuster for nigh on 70 years! and this is only a microcosm of the suffering and death that White Europeans endured under Jewish Bolshevik rule. Conservative estimates place the mass slaughter and forced labour in gulags of the Jewish Bolshevik regime at 40-50 million although it has been estimated as high as 60 million. Apparently White people are really meant to believe that 1 million (imaginary) Jews are worth 10 million Whites.
Right now each Nation is in a situation where by its army is being ‘hijacked’ by the Jewish organisations of the United Nations via America’s Jewish Lobby or the Jewish European Union. A country is no-longer supposed to have a sovereign army but be part of a vast super army. Yet no land is fighting for its own interests or survival. There is only one people whose war is constantly fought and unfortunately everyone’s son or daughter is cannon fodder in defence of the children of ‘Israel’.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Mainstream entertainment is never at a loss to concoct a documentary staring a famous figure from European history that will work to the regimes advantage. The latest to hit the small screen features Vlad the impaler a Romanian Prince around which the Dracula legend grew. Calling itself ‘true horror’ this show has aired on the history channel and various other ‘Western’ entertainment channels. Documentary makers barely stop short of accusing Vlad of the absurd fabrication of ‘soap and lamp shades’.
These things maybe fine in fiction but the European is not capable of such things. This is clearly the Hollywood Jewish mind working overtime. Marxists historians used throughout the documentary speculate about rape the young prince and his brother might of experienced while ‘sacrificed’ to Turks during balance of power negotiations and allege that this is from where his obsession for impaling arose. The focus of the documentary then falls on greasing of the stake which frankly says little about Vlad but reveals significantly the deviant pornographic content of Jewish Freudian sexual fantasies. Wallachia (Romania) was a small principality massively outnumbered by its enemies. A reputation as a bloodthirsty warlord with the odd profile piece from an ‘ex-prisoner’ would be a cunning way to keep out unwanted ‘guests’. .
Propaganda is a powerful tool and is at its best when the mass believes its influence is their choosing. Perhaps the most popular way to gage favour is to poll the media’s validation. Iranian President Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad’s position on the Palestinian issue has won him disfavour in the Zionist press not least because the Jewish cry of ‘Holocaust’ fails to leave the Arabs collapsed in false guilt. The irony is that the ‘Holocaust’ is still used by Jewish Israel to vindicate their treatment of the Palestinian while applying common sense National Socialist racial laws to protect their tribe No nationalist condemns purity laws to safeguard the health and wellbeing of the race preserve national diversity. However, it is contemptible hypocrisy to invent a systematic devaluation of all other peoples (holocaust) and apply to ‘equalise’ while installing laws to safeguard one’s own-one rule for one and another for everyone else. Controlled media is the key to systematic devaluation or ‘holocaust equality’. The mantra is ‘never again’ and Jewish democracy controls the White world by only allowing it to fight wars for Israel. For the beast in the Middle East the press has become the ultimate decoy.
Assad is not far wrong when he asserted that “Western minds falsify evidence to trigger wars”. Jewish Zionist assertions that Syria employs chemical weapons bear a striking resemblance to the Iraq War and ‘weapons of mass delusion’. It is interesting to note that the completion of that report in 2004 not only absolved Iraq of ownership of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) but also attested to its lack of ability to produce anything more than simple pesticides. Nevertheless Saddam_Hussein was a ‘beastly dictator’ who spearheaded Iraq’s nationalization of the ‘Western’-owned Iraq Petroleum Company, which had long held a monopoly on the country’s oil. His love of his people and interest in their welfare conflicted with the Jewish Zionist ‘divine right’ to globally dominate and therefore, necessitated his removal. Syria’s Bashar_al-Assad came to the attention of occupied governments in the West after successfully taking back much of the country and disinfecting the nation of the globalist-backed Salafist terrorists unleashed against the Syrian people in 2011, following a series of “colour revolutions” known as the so-called Arab Spring. Naturally this global terrorist threat was instigated by Jewish Israel and its Zionist stooges and as Assad stabilises his land accusations the he is stockpiling and making use of chemical weapons fly to maintain volatility and gain access to Syrian lands. It is a classic repeat of the situation in Iraq, and as of 2013 propaganda previously used to exonerate Iraq is exhumed, rehashed and highlighted to add credibility to Syrian chemical weapons allegations.
The Libyan ruler Muammar_al-Gaddafi was another Middle Eastern leader that ‘Western’ media took great pains to denigrate. The tirade against Gaddafi culminated in an air strike that Obama described as the work of a “broad coalition” to protect “a threatened people” against ruler Muammar Gadhafi’s forces. Gaddafi was captured alive on Thursday the 20 October 2011, beaten and killed soon after. Would this ‘broad coalition’ of Obama’s actually be an international conglomerate of Jewish financiers.
Propaganda in itself is value free. The root of the word means to propagate. What matters is the nature of the ‘information’ the source intends to spread. This determines its moral value. Therefore, it may be fortuitous to generate a legend of bloodthirsty tyranny when threatened by an enemy 10 fold in size. It is in the people’s interest to protect the country. However, “a propaganda that lies shows that it has a bad course” and as we have seen information surrounding the Middle East certainly is not clean cut. This is a simple situation in which a government is afraid to set forth its real agenda. The only explanation for this can be that it is not in the best interests of the land and people. So in whose best interests is it that European and American soldiers are injured and killed. That’s a question best left to AIPAC and Europe’s plethora of Jewish lobbies.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Given that 9/11 was a false flag operation performed by the Jewish State of Israel and traitors/criminals within the American Government, Zan Overall, The Wise Old Man, is perplexed as to why the Islamic Community is allowing the blame for such a horrendous crime to fall on them. In order to find out the answer this brave and intrepid man sought out an Arab/Jewish anti-Islamaphobia conference. Initially Zan approached the leader of the Jewish delegation with his assertion that Israel committed 9/11. Naturally the reply was that no evidence supported this. A far more troubling answer was received from the Muslims approached. When asking their groups position on 9/11 and Israel’s part in it they instantly stated that they took no position. Later at the question and answer section Zan posed the following to the Rabbi and Imam present:-
“Francesco Cossiga stated to prominent Italian newspaper that intelligence agencies worldwide were well aware that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Millions of people agree, myself included. Average American’s are enraged at Muslims, believing that Muslims attacked the US on 9/11. What better way is there for you to quell Islamaphobia than to put the blame for 9/11 on the truly guilty party Israel and absolve Muslims”
‘Conveniently’ the Rabbi took this question and evaded the answer completely with the word ‘Israel’ never leaving his mouth. Obviously a strategically placed Zionist spin doctor artfully placed to deflect the truth seeker. Zan was eventually able to approach the Imam without the Jewish entourage at which time he conferred upon him:-
“I don’t understand Muslims; they have been falsely accused of a dastardly deed-9/11. It is on the basis of that lie that Muslim countries have been attacked and destroyed. Millions of Muslims have been killed and wounded. Muslims are hated and feared by millions of Westerners because of those lies…they complain rightly about what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians but they don’t shout out about the one thing that could get Americans, Europeans and others on their side! They do not shout out Muslims did not do 9/11 Jewish Israel did”
Yet still he never got a satisfactory answer! As Zan clearly points out Muslims are neglecting their best weapon. Of course in this conference scenario it is blatantly obvious that the Imam is a Zionist puppet. If one is truly their on behalf of ones community/people they do not stand idly by while that people is denigrated. One like that is known as a traitor. This man did it twice. Once when he let a member of another tribe speak for him and a second time when he refused to provide an adequate answer to a question directly posed. So are Muslims really this meek and mild that they can be used as tools of the Zionist.
On the face of it not in Europe; in 2006 continental newspapers carrying caricatures of the prophet Muhammad sparked outraged among the Islamic Community. So much so that violent Islamic demonstrations were staged by Muslim communities in Europe. Granted this should prove that the Islamic community do have very strong feelings about their faith; however, the brutality with which they displayed this did not go down well in the West. Further clashes with the Muslim community have occurred during the return of British troops from Afghanistan. This was only amplified following the burning of poppies on Armistice Day. Indeed it can be seen that the Muslim does nothing to invite the indigenous population’s affections. Quite the contrary he appears to do all that will rub his host up the wrong way. Certainly Islam is a completely different culture and nationalists do not expect or want Muslims to adapt to Western values. A clash of culture was the Jewish Zionist imperative when they began the Islamic colonisation of Europe. Yet more than just a culture clash we are seeing deliberate provocation.
The source of the agitation grows from ‘so called’ extreme Muslim leaders such as Anjem Choudry. His calls for sharia law in Britain do not endear the Muslim as the demand clearly displaces the indigenous values. Nevertheless the British people can do nothing to remove these ‘hate preachers’ because making a move against them risks imprisonment. The protection for these ‘extremists’ comes from inside the British Government and its plethora of Zionist politicians. Working for Jewish Zionist ‘extreme Muslim Leaders’ like Choudry have a cushy life, meanwhile the Islamic communities attention is being diverted to inconsequential matters like ‘ignorant cartoons’ MEANT to wind one up or deliberate indigenous provocation like Sharia Law that does the Zionists job for them, when the REAL issue is that the International Muslim community is being defamed for an act committed by Jewish Israel-9/11.
Labour’s George Galloway is taking advantage of the situation and exploiting the Muslim community for his own ends. The ‘Respect’ party is just a cover to gain Islamic trust and steer Muslims in the wrong direction. Galloway has that cover and means it to be very convincing, so he can blind the hostile Muslim community to the long term Zionist goals. This identical tactic is being used on the White nationalists for instance with the parties in Britain that purport to be nationalist. Such parties psychologically bully one into not mentioning the word ‘Jew’. This is ‘British Nationalism’s’ version of Political Correctness or in reality nationalism controlled by Jewish Zionists. Zionism manoeuvres people into every position of authority within the organisation/community. There is only one enemy of mankind and that is Jewish Zionism.
As the Wise Old Man said initially it is time for the Muslim community to ask the difficult questions. Muslims are being blamed for 9/11 and their community leaders are doing nothing to quell that accusation. If necessary the Islamic community must bypass their leaders and put the message out themselves. It is the duty of Nationalist sites to publicize this message. We are all under the control of global Jewish Zionism and must work together to end their world manipulation.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Since approximately 2005 the Jewish State of Israel has had ‘problems’ with third world immigration. In fact reading through these witness statements and one begins to see a startling familiarity “…rampant crime by migrants and say that it has become “Soweto,” a reference to the site of a 1976 uprising in South Africa. At a recent protest fanned by Zionist politicians, one lawmaker described the Africans, known here as “infiltrators,” as “a cancer in our body.” Of course any self-respecting White European citing similar scenes inflicted on his land by citizens of the Jewish State would be labelled ‘racist’. However, in Israel when the Jew finds something distasteful he takes to the streets and attacks the Africans’ stores and apartments. In Europe the White man would no doubt face a prison sentence for a ‘hate crime’ against the protectant migrant. Yet in the Jewish state the Africans were rounded up and detained in Concentration Camps only to be deported a short time later.
More recently the Telegraph reported a Vatican official saying Israel is fostering intolerance of Christianity. Naturally reading between the lines what the article depicts is much more sinister. With graffiti, church burnings and defilement in the street the Jewish state is not turning a blind eye to violence against gentiles because the Talmud has always condoned it. In the past though Jewish acts of violence have always taken place through stealth and in secrecy. The theft of the land of Palestine has given the Jew a new arrogance and brought his evil into the light. In ‘his’ Jewish state of Israel the Jew does as he pleases and if that means spitting on Christian clergy or setting fire to their churches then he will. Naturally if in Europe the White man retaliates and burns a few synagogues or spits on a few Jews that’s anti-Semitism. It never occurs to the brainwashed Marxist liberals that ‘anti-Semitism’ is an invention of the Jew and would not exist without his sordid crimes.
These are just a couple of incidents that indicate the height of hypocrisy that issues forth from Jewish realms. However, a continuing saga in the arena of Jewish hypocrisy has to be the matter of race. Again the Jewish state features prominently in this ‘dilemma’. Stubbornly insisting on its status as an ethno state, whose primary interest is Jewish. Even down to the law of return that in expressing “born of a Jewish mother” testifies to the racial element of this tribe.
In Europe an accusation of ‘race hate’ was dropped because Jews so often claim that Judaism is only a religion. To prevent this occurring in future Jewish Zionist leaped into action and in 2006 the Religious Hatred Act in the United Kingdom was amended to the Racial and Religious Hatred Act. This is a clear case, not of ‘righteous’ ethno legislature but what is best for the Jews. In Europe what is best for the Jews is never good for the European and this is why the occupation of White lands must end. It is high time that the White male of Jewish Zionist propaganda crept back in the closet as Europe resurrects the Great White Man to tear down this Zionist house of cards.
As most avid followers of Jewish Zionist scams will be aware, Simon Wiesenthal is as bigger fraud as soap and lamp shades Therefore, how the centre that bears his name maintains ‘credibility’ accusing Nationalists of ‘war crimes’ in the face of brazen Jewish Communist brutality is a remarkable feat of propaganda. Maybe Wiesenthal is just part of the financial package necessary to maintain the Jewish Zionist in the manner to which he has become accustomed. Nevertheless just because ‘one’ calls the White male cattle (goyim) doesn’t mean he stands in a field and chews grass, we see the hypocrisy so thick it rests like a fog over Europe.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Jewish Zionist Jacob Rothschild recently took a £130m bet on the demise of the Euro. So it would seem that this ‘illustrious’ banking family finally tires of toying with White man and now seeks to hasten the Euro’s inevitable collapse. This is not the first time the Zionist Rothschild family have ‘gambled’ so loosely with Europe’s future.
There were vast fortunes to be made — and lost — on the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo. The Stock Exchange in London was at fever pitch as traders waited for this battles outcome. If Britain lost, English consuls would plummet to unprecedented depths. If Britain was victorious, the value of the consul would leap to dizzying new heights. It was here that by nefarious means Nathan Rothschild would multiply his already vast fortune.
As the battle took place Rothschild had agents working both sides of the line to gather the most accurate possible information and carry the intelligence to posts strategically located nearby. Dawn on June 16, 1815, a Rothschild representative, possessing a top secret report was met at Folkstone. Scanning highlights of the report Rothschild was speeding towards London and the Stock Exchange in no time.
At the Exchange, emotionless and expressionless Rothschild took up his usual position beside the famous ‘Rothschild Pillar. Meanwhile Rothschild agents began dumping consuls on the market and as hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of consuls poured onto the market their value started to slide. Then they began to plummet. Rothschild continued to lean against ‘his’ pillar, and to sell, and sell and sell. Consuls kept on falling. Word began to sweep through the Stock Exchange: “Rothschild knows.” “Rothschild knows.” “Wellington has lost at Waterloo.”
When the consul was selling for about five cents on the dollar Rothschild signalled and on cue dozens of Rothschild agents made their way to the order desks around the Exchange and bought every consul in sight! A short time later the ‘official’ news arrived in London. England was now the master of the European scene. Within seconds the consul skyrocketed to above its original value. As the significance of the British victory began to sink into the public consciousness, the value of consuls rose even higher. Napoleon had ‘met his Waterloo.’ However the REAL implication never has yet…
The Jew Nathan Rothschild had bought control of the British economy.
Since then the Rothschild family have continued to play high stakes business and finance not always managing to come off to squeaky ‘clean’. Financier Nathaniel Rothschild lost a libel case against newspaper the Daily Mail that depicted him as a “puppet master” who used his friendship with a European trade chief to impress a Russian oligarch and help close a business deal. The article stated Rothschild had sought to impress Oleg Deripaska by unexpectedly bringing homosexual Jewish Zionist Peter Mandelson to a dinner the Russian held with bosses from the U.S. aluminium company Alcoa Inc. The newspaper said Rothschild had “pulled a very unexpected and also rather useful rabbit out of his hat” as Alcoa was worried about EU tariffs on Russian aluminium exports. Obviously true yet the Rothschild’s do not like their sleight of hand and insider trading to see the light. Unfortunately for this Jew it seems not all journalists or judiciary are in Zionism’s pay.
Incidentally Peter Mandelson was a main player if not the main player in the creation of New Labour, however with such a close relationship with Rothschild it is far more likely that Mandelson is a frontman and Rothschild the real ‘brains’ behind the creation of New labour. With the neo-conservative movement in America created by the Jew Irving Kristol, this has a certain credible appeal. Capitalism and Communism are 2 sides of the same coin with Capitalist banking systems funding the exploits of global Communism. The nature of the game, for that’s all it is to the Zionist players, is to withhold a land’s wealth from its people. Consequently the Zionist parasites get immensely rich while the Nation’s conquered suffer crippling debt.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Zionism markets itself as Jewish ‘Nationalism’. This is a perversion for Zionism is a parasite that pollutes and destroys. At the most fundamental level Zionist ideology must be understood as a community operating within another community for the good of the ‘guest’ nation not the host nation. Zionism has infected Europe for over 2,000 years though during the last 60 years it has been draining host country’s National wealth and funneling it into Israel. Without continual ‘support’ from external Nations Israel would not survive.
It was during the 19th century that Karl Marx developed Zionism’s most dangerous tool of deception-Communism. With considerable contribution from Moses Hess known as the philosophical father of Zionism Marx produced material that worked on 2 levels. On the face of it Das Capital promises the ‘worker’ a utopian equality through Communism. However, on a deeper level what he is offering is reduction to the lowest common denominator because only then can a mass be the same. Of course this comes at a price since true ‘equality’ does not exist in nature. Thus it was necessary for Communism to formulate mechanisms to enforce ‘equality’. For the Nationalist modern ‘multicult’ policy alive in Europe should provide some insight into the inner workings.
Traditionally, or more correctly idealistically, a Nation is organically grown from the families and communities indigenous to a particular land. The Nation state would be produced from these indigenous peoples and work for them. In modern Europe, however, our indigenous Nations, be that Britain, Germany, France etc have been colonised by innumerate foreign peoples. Even though these people no longer live in their own lands they remain a part of their own nations. We see this particularly at election times when the same face parties try to attract block votes from Muslims, Somali, and African voters. It is clear that these ‘newcomers’ have a solid community identity. They know what their community requires and use the community’s weight to achieve it. In a new land this all comes at the expense of the host community. Here we have a perfect example of the divide and conquer strategy used by Zionism. This is on a grand scale but history shows that the Zionist concept has been in use for centuries.
“The [Jewish] diaspora is commonly accepted to have begun with the 6th century BC conquest of the ancient Kingdom of Judah, destruction of the First Temple (c. 586 BC), and expulsion of the population…” Wikipedia
So the Jews are and have been a scattered people for a long time! To remain an identifiable people would suggest that they have learned to survive among ‘other’ nations without fully adapting to host cultures. This would mean that the ideology developed would have to be one of stealth and cunning. If one was working against the host one would not want to be found out. It may also be necessary to be some what unassuming, blend in. It is only once the underdog has gained a position of power that they can begin to show their true colours.
Though the term Zionism was actually coined by Nathan Birnbaum in 1890, it was Moses Hess who laid the foundation of what is considered as the philosophical base of Zionism with the book Rome and Jerusalem Published in 1862. However, it is clear that the parasitic communities have been by Zionist ideology for centuries prior to Birnbaum’s use of the term. In fact, while not wholly portrayed in the mainstream, it was William of Orange who gave Zionist Jews permission to set up their Bank of England. It was not until the late 1800’s that gentile’s become aware of Zionism. Perhaps now more confident of their power, this ideology is now less concerned of showing their true colours.
Stemming from Zionism Karl Marx, a student of Hess created Communism. His sole intention in producing this ideology was to dupe the masses. In essence Marx created the template for eternal upheaval. Again this can be seen in the original mass Jewish Bolshevik (Communist) revolution. The fundamental idea is to set each group against one another-the worker against employer, rich against poor, man against woman.
Following the initial success of the Bolshevik revolution the plan was to spread Marx’ Communism across Europe. The master plan was to dismantle and replace European culture with hollow, meaningless filth. Naturally the ideology behind this was Zionist as was the parasitic community that was to inherit power. However, Europe did not take to Communism as easily as Mother Russia so a different strategy had to be formed.
Generally speaking it was back to the academy. The Frankfurt School and its close associates the Fabian Socialists needed to redefine ‘Communism’ for a different audience. The politico-economic message of Marxism did not work in Europe so it was necessary to drive the divide and conquer method via European conduct. Thus Cultural Marxism was born and its allies political correctness and anti-Christianity. It is because of these dogmas that the divisive groups such as feminism and anti-Racism develop. The less cohesive White European society the more easily it is to corrupt and consequently control.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
The cross of St Patrick is the symbol meant to celebrate St Patrick’s Day, just as the Cross of St George is meant to celebrate St George’s Day. However, as we reached March mainland England was bombarded with Green, White and Orange of the tricolour.
No animosity at all is felt towards the Irish people. However, the tricolour is the flag of Eire the Republic of Ireland and St Patrick is the Patron saint of the whole of Ireland. Therefore, the tricolour is not meant to celebrate this patron’s day. One should see that this is a blatant political move in that in England St David was completely ignored on March 1st while tricoloured bunting was already on sale. Similar to the planned ‘Republican’ march through an English City there is a high level political agenda. Labour Marxists have united with their brother IRA and intend to split kin race and intensify sectarian violence.
Meanwhile, on St George’s Day, if the corporate Zionist remembers, the English are treated to a repeat of the George Gross plastered all over footballs. This is another political manoeuvre by Zionist media to belittle the English. In “Come on England” the Zionist is in fact implying that the only ‘heritage’ the English have is football. Ironically while White man did invent ‘the beautiful game’ he is now a spectator to the sport that is being populated by Africa’s excess.
When set against each other these displays of supposed ‘national’ celebration reveal the perfect opportunity for Zionism to play their divisive ‘games’. Elevating St Patrick over and above St George in the consumer market pushes it to the forefront of the mass mind. In this way the corporate Zionist is politicising St Patrick by using the tricolour and marginalising the English by ignoring St George or ‘relegating’ it to football. In reality while the tricolour is the flag of the Irish people or the Irish Republic, Zionism is trying to contaminate it with Marxist IRA connotations. Their intention in doing this is to stir up sectarian violence. Sectarianism is another means to distract the Gentile mass while Zionism makes a profit.
The crosses of the patron saints combine to form the Union Flag. Given the emblem of St Patrick is the heritage of the whole of Ireland, St Patrick’s Day is the perfect opportunity to call upon and celebrate the day in unity.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
The Khazar theory argues that Ashkenazi Jews are the descendants of the Khazars a multi-ethnic collection of peoples who allegedly ‘converted’ to Judaism in the 8th-9th century AD. It is then claimed that it was these ‘Jewish converts’ that migrated into what is now Russia, Eastern Europe and later Northern and Western Europe. It is critical to highlight however, that the primary exponents of this theory are Jewish from the earliest alleged reference to a connection between Khazars and Ashkenazic Jews to Benjamin Freedman in a speech given before an audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C and Jewish Communist Arthur Koestler in The Thirteenth Tribe first published in Britain in 1976.
Initially the Khazars were believed to be a semi-nomadic people of mostly Turkic decent dominating the Asian steppe and the North Caucasus between the 5th and 10th centuries. In the 7th century, they founded an independent Khaganate in the Northern Caucasus called Khazaria. This occupied the land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea now predominantly occupied by Georgia. The general theme of Koestler’s book is this trading empire that existed between the expanding power blocs of Christianity and Islam. He suggests that speculation exists about the origin of the word ‘Khazar’ and indicates that the Khazar was never ethnically homogenous but made up of tribes from various racial backgrounds, as steppe peoples traditionally absorbed those they conquered. Koestler also highlights modern ‘deviations’ for example the German Ketzer –heretic referring to the Jew thus inserting ‘reasonable’ doubt perhaps to add weight to his theory. Nevertheless, the term is most likely tied to the Turkic verb form meaning “wandering” and likely derived from the Turkic gaz-, meaning ‘to wander’ or ‘flee.’ Initially Tengri shamanists, between the 8th or 9th century under the instruction of the Khazarian King, Koestler asserts that the Khaganate adopted Judaism as the state religion. However, Koestler’s source for the ‘conversion’ are to be found in a work by the Hungarian Marxist historian, Dr Antal Bartha, supported by an article in the 1973 variant of Encyclopaedia Judaica and the curious choice of a comment from a Muslim envoy a staunch enemy of the Jew. Indeed a 2013 critique argued that “A careful examination of the sources shows that some of them are pseudepigraphic, and the rest are of questionable reliability.
The majority of the book is padded with an attempt at historical context but when the flimsiness of Koestler’s sources are revealed it is hard to judge fact from whimsical fantasy. In particular on matters of ethnicity it is clear that he desires to undermine European racial homogeneity thus providing the mixed race Jew with a greater status. Indeed in places Koestler’s writing seems to applaud the Khazars for their apparent ‘services’ to Europe remembering that his thesis makes them Jewish if only ‘converts’ and in keeping with Jewish chutzpah he cannot help infusing some self-congratulation. Nevertheless, producing a ‘pseudo-Jew’ does provide a suitable scapegoat onto which one can deflect ones crimes. In fact the so called ‘good Jew’ Benjamin Freedman laid the groundwork for this defence (33 mins) during his 1961 speech at the Willard Hotel in Washington D.C. However, the concept falls apart when one considers the extraordinary amount of evidence proving that the Jew has been a problem throughout gentile specifically European history well before the so-called ‘Khazar conversion’.
The vulgar Talmud written in 70 AD is a testament to the contempt that the Jew holds for the gentile and in its own words “To communicate to a Goy anything about our religious relations would be equal to killing all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.” Libbre David 37 This only confirms that the despicable religion originates from a despicable tribe and that the Jew is not a product of converting to a loathsome religion. The Roman historian Tacitus reinforces this notion of the Jewish religion in his most famous work Histories written 109 AD –
“…Moses prescribed for them a novel religion quite different from those of the rest of mankind. Among the Jews all things are profane that we hold sacred; on the other hand they regard as permissible what seems to us immoral…The other practices of the Jews are sinister and revolting, and have entrenched themselves by their very wickedness. Wretches of the most abandoned kind who had no use for the religion of their fathers took to contributing dues and free-will offerings to swell the Jewish exchequer; and other reasons for their increasing wealth may be found in their stubborn loyalty and ready benevolence towards brother Jews. But the rest of the world they confront with the hatred reserved for enemies. They will not feed or intermarry with gentiles… They have introduced the practice of circumcision to show that they are different from others.” (Tacitus, Histories, 5.2–5).
Indeed it was not long before the wicked activities of the Jews roused Roman public opinion against them following the establishment of the very first Jewish community outside the Middle East in Rome in 139 BC. During sittings of the Roman senate the famous orator Cicero, among others, frequently spoke against the Jewish presence in Rome. Equally there is historical evidence relating to their negative impact on Romans during the first century AD. The world’s first anti-Jewish riots broke out in the city of Alexandria in 38 AD, and re-occurred in 66 AD, 115 AD, 118 AD, and 411 AD. In that year Cyril, the archbishop of Alexandria ordered the expulsion of all Jews from the city. The Roman Emperor Tiberius formally expelled Jews from Rome in 19 AD. They returned shortly after, only to be expelled again in 49 AD. In 116 AD, Emperor Trajan ordered that all Jews in Mesopotamia should be killed on the grounds that they were the cause of continual uprisings in that region. One of the most famous emperors of the Eastern Roman Empire, Justinian (527–565 AD), adopted a comprehensive anti-Jewish policy which barred Jews from the civil service, military posts, and any other positions of influence in his government. All of these events that pre-date the supposed ‘Khazar conversion’ serve to highlight the devastating impact the Jew had on Roman life and provide substantial proof that the Jew displayed identical behavioural patterns centuries prior to the alleged ‘conversion’. Patently the Khazar theory has been produced to suggest an “Ashkenazi” problem rather than a “Jewish problem” yet it was the Middle Eastern Mizrahi bloodline that interfered with Roman life 900 years prior to the Khazars and the Sephardi are currently notoriously anti-Gentile easily proving that all Jews have been and remain a problem throughout history.
Logic would also dictate that if a massive conversion of substantially different racial stock took place after the 7th century the racial make-up of Jews in that area would alter dramatically compared to that of their Sephardi and Mizrahi (Middle Eastern) brethren. However, to date twelve DNA studies prove otherwise. Beginning in 1999 the studies all reached very similar conclusions that Jewish community’s whether Ashkenazi, Sephardi, or Mizrahi formed a clearly distinct cluster sharing a common lineage consistent with origins in the region of the Middle East. While the most recent involving Harry Ostrer, a professor of Pathology and Genetics at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University and the Jewish HapMap Project are a double edged sword in that they tend to compound the notion that the Jew is a race alone and not a tribal facet of a larger Semitic race that has long existed and continues to live in the Middle East. Nevertheless, there is conclusive DNA evidence against the reality of the so called ‘Khazar theory’ thus substantiating the notion that it is a mechanism to distract from the “Jewish problem”. Indeed by associating Zionism with only the Ashkenazi strain the Jew attempts to disassociate from his crimes against Europe and the globe.
So it remains only to explain why so called reasoned Nationalists would entertain this obviously weak hypothesis meant to distract. What is transparent from the substantial evidence presented is that those claiming that only the ‘Khazar/Ashkenazi’ pose a problem are verifiably wrong. The concept of only “some Jews” or “false Jews” has been addressed and exposed as black propaganda. Consequently those pushing the Khazar theory are shills participating in a Jewish construct designed to distract from the Jew regardless of what historical documentation records.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL