Tag Archive | Israel

The Talmud

Originally, Jewish scholarship was oral. Rabbis expounded and debated the law and discussed the Tenakh (Hebrew Bible) without written works. This situation changed drastically, however, mainly as the result of the destruction of the Jewish commonwealth in year 70. A.D.  It seemed that the rabbis were to lose control over Jewish action so at this point it became necessary to commit the oral traditions to paper. Two bodies of analysis developed, one in Palestine and the other in Babylonia leading to two works of Talmud. The older compilation called the Jerusalem Talmud or the Talmud Yerushalmi has far less influence than that of the Babylonian Talmud. This is because the influence of the Jewish community in Israel steadily declined in contrast with the Babylonian community. Quite a ‘poetic’ happenstance given that the ‘wandering’ community would take “out of Zion…the Law and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem”. From the time it was completed the Talmud has been integral to Jewish scholarship. It forms the moral and social grounding for the entire Jewish community worldwide. For Jews the teachings of the Talmud supersede the teachings held in the Torah/Tenakh. It is the Talmud, and not the Tenakh (Hebrew Bible) that Orthodox (mainstream) men study at Yeshivot (Jewish colleges) to become rabbis. However, since its inception it has also been a source of contention between Jews and the non-Jewish Nations in which they lived.

In 1264 Pablo Christiani denounced the Talmud, which resulted in a papal bull against it and in the first censorship. This was undertaken at Barcelona by a commission of Dominicans, who ordered the cancellation of passages reprehensible from a Christian perspective. At the disputation of Tortosa in 1413, Geronimo de Santa Fé brought forward a number of accusations, including the assertion that the condemnations of pagans and apostates found in the Talmud referred in reality to Christians. Pope Martin V, who had convened this disputation, issued a bull two years later forbidding Jews to read the Talmud, and ordering the destruction of all copies of it. On September 9 1553 copies of the Talmud confiscated in compliance with a decree of the Inquisition were burned at Rome. Censorship of the Talmud was introduced by a papal bull issued in 1554 and in 1565 Pope Pius IV commanded that the Talmud be deprived of its very name. Pope Gregory XIII (1575-85) again denounced the Talmud and in 1593 Clement VIII renewed the old interdiction against reading or owning it. The last denouncement of the Talmud took place in Poland in 1757, when Bishop Dembowski, at the instigation of the Frankists, convened a public disputation at Kamenets-Podolsk. The Bishop a wanted all copies of the Talmud found in his bishopric confiscated and burned by the hangman. http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Talmud

Considering that one is ‘meant’ to believe that the Talmud is a holy book of a religious community the above would seem a bit harsh. Yet take the time to ask WHY this piece of work was so loathed and the answer is most enlightening. A fundamental issue to tackle is the notion of the Jewish Community as a purely religious community. They are not. They are a racial group masquerading as nothing more than a religious group. To that end this community views themselves very differently from those outside their community and it shows in their writings.    For example Gentile means Non Jew, but the Yiddish term Goy referring to Gentiles actually means cattle. One must also be aware that the Yiddish term for a non-Jewish female, Shiksa, actually means hoar.  Even Wikipedia had this to say-

“The word shiksa is etymologically partly derived from the Hebrew term שקץ, sheketz, which means “abomination”, “impure,” or “object of loathing”, depending on the translator. Several dictionaries define “shiksa” as a disparaging and offensive term applied to a non-Jewish girl or woman. In Polish “siksa” (pronounced “s’eeksa”) is a popular pejorative word for an immature young girl or teenage girl (or, in its masculine form, “sikus”, boy), as it is a conflation between the Yiddish term and usage of the Polish verb “sikać” (“to piss”, “to urinate”). It means “pisspants” and is roughly equivalent to the English terms “snot-nosed brat”, “little squirt”…”

 Naturally this contempt for the Gentile is rife throughout the Talmud.    

Jehovah created the Gentile in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The Gentile is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night.                                                              Midrash Talpioth p. 225-L

The Gentiles are not human they are beasts Baba Mazia 114b

 All children of Goyim are animals Yebamoth 98a

 Sexual intercourse between the Goyim is like intercourse between animals                                                              Sanhedrin 74b

 A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat.       Hadarine, 20, B, Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat

 A Jew may violate but not marry a non Jewish girl            Gad Shas 2:2  

             If you eat with a Goy it is the same as eating with a dog

                                                                           Tospoth, Jebamoth 84b

 A Jew is forbidden to drink from a glass of wine that a Gentile has touched because the touch has made the wine unclean.

                                                                      Schulchan Aruch, Johre Deah 122

 If a Jew finds an object lost by a Goy it does not have to be returned. Baba Mazia 24a

 What a Jew steals from a Goy he may keep Sanhedrin 57a

If a Jew kills a Goy there will be no death penalty Sanhedrin 57a

If a Goy hits a Jew he must be killed Sanhedrin 58b

Do not save the Goyim in danger of death. Show no mercy to the Goyim                                                                Hikkoth AkumX 1

Even the best of the Goyim should all be killed Soferim 15

A ‘prayer’ or ‘benediction’ to be said by a Jewish man every day: thank God for not making me a Gentile a woman or a slave.

Hikkoth Akum X1

A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them        Szaaloth-Utszabot, The book of Jore Dia 17

To communicate to a Goy anything about our religious relations would be equal to killing all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.                               Libbre David 37

In conclusion, as a general echo of the above passage, the Christian gentile of the past has in reality been rather mild in choosing to destroy the book or just expel the keepers. Clearly if the gentile had the mentality of the Zionist writers’ streets would run with Jewish blood.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL

Nationalism: Its nature and tools

Nationalism is organic. In a healthy society (and believe me we do not live in one of those!) nationalism would not be considered a political entity but a natural innate response. In fact in seeking the nature of nationalism one is on a spiritual discovery that uncovers a unique connection between the individual, his race and his heritage. The Nation is kin, that is like an extended family and the key here is ties of blood as the nation is all of one race. This extends backwards in terms of the nations history and is thrust forward in terms of the passing on of the nation’s traditions and culture. In this light the individual is born with a soulful duty or responsibility to the nation to maintain this continuity.

As such it is only once the tribal group extended way beyond multiple familial groups into towns and cities that as an entity the Nation and Nationalism took on a political form. The purpose of Government in this healthy society is to serve the nation-again still an extended racial family. The State would consist of people from within the nation not foreign elements. This is known as a Nation-State. If foreign elements run a State and not its people they serve their own interests and not that of the nation. A particularly good example of this is Zionism and usually involves wars for Israel. If at anytime the State ceased to serve would be seen as corrupting the life of the nation and would require dismantling.

Once Nationalism is installed as the political mechanism of government what follows are a series of tools to protect the nation. That Fascism is a technique employed by nationalists is somewhat of a misnomer. In actual fact the English word fascism derives from the Italian fascio (“league”) and suggests merely a group or movement. Although Fascism logically denotes only Italian fascism, the word is used to describe similar ideologies and political movements. That is not by chance, but because in 1935 Stalin ordered  the word Fascism be used for all national socialistic movements, to hide the word “socialistic”; Bolshevism or Jewish “socialism” wanted to keep that word for itself. In reality Nationalistic movements throughout Europe were as ideologically unique as the culture of the land in which they arose. Germany’s National Socialism would not manifest in Italy but could only become the Italian Fascism of Mussolini. All did learn from each other and this is highlighted in Britain’s Union of Fascists. Never the less the Anglo-Saxon allies gladly accepted the ‘wise’ resolution of Stalin, and their Zionist infested press has since used the same false naming for any national movement.

As a consequence of Stalin’s move Fascism is now pretty much synonymous with Nationalism and can be presumed as a tool in the service of the Nation. Just like Nationalism it rejects the values of Zionist democracyliberalismMarxism and internationalism/Globalism. Mussolini noted that “the first stage of Fascism should more properly be called Corporatism because it is the merger of State and corporate power.” As the state is run in the best interests of its nation a merger between state and corporate business is in the best interests of the nation because it encourages competition between native suppliers but protects from global takeovers. Good fences make good neighbours and this is why Nations have borders. Fundamental to Fascism is that it and its components are operated within a Nation-State. It is the ideology of protection and preservation of the Nation that conserves industry, business, media and domestic product for the good of the race. If the Nationalistic ideology was removed or subverted there would no longer be a restraint.

As stated in the beginning of this article this is not a healthy society and the current ruling ideology is in direct opposition to nationalistic thought. It is in favour of the ‘free’ movement of goods and people and in the form of the EU has dissolved sovereign country’s borders. Without borders this has effectively allowed huge multinationals to swoop in and swallow up small businesses. While the current ideology applauds this as globalism it has a 2 fold negative effect on a country destroying jobs and reducing choice. In wake of this a land’s mineral wealth, which in a Nationalist framework would serve its own people, has become a profit making scheme for private companies. A most absurd principle brought about by this ideology is the selling off of a country’s mineral wealth (Gas, Coal, Electricity etc) only to have its people buy it back at astronomical prices.

One must conclude that the ruling ideology in government/s is the mechanism by which society is controlled. The Nationalistic model is driven by the Nation-state that suffers no foreign self serving elements. Here the State serves the Nation basically by ‘capping’ business and industries ability to go ‘global’ and destroy the family business. The current model not a Nation-State and at the root of this Ideology is much self interest. The eradication of borders has destroyed jobs, encouraged immigration and asset stripped European Lands all in the name of ‘Globalisation’. This is what happens when a continent takes its eye off the ball and lets a foreign element sneak in. White Europeans did not win either of the world wars (Brothers Wars) Zionism did.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL

Nationalism: Its nature and tools

Nationalism is organic. In a healthy society (and believe me we do not live in one of those!) nationalism would not be considered a political entity but a natural innate response. In fact in seeking the nature of nationalism one is on a spiritual discovery that uncovers a unique connection between the individual, his race and his heritage. The Nation is kin, that is like an extended family and the key here is ties of blood as the nation is all of one race. This extends backwards in terms of the nations history and is thrust forward in terms of the passing on of the nation’s traditions and culture. In this light the individual is born with a soulful duty or responsibility to the nation to maintain this continuity.

As such it is only once the tribal group extended way beyond multiple familial groups into towns and cities that as an entity the Nation and Nationalism took on a political form. The purpose of Government in this healthy society is to serve the nation-again still an extended racial family. The State would consist of people from within the nation not foreign elements. This is known as a Nation-State. If foreign elements run a State and not its people they serve their own interests and not that of the nation. A particularly good example of this is Zionism and usually involves wars for Israel. If at anytime the State ceased to serve would be seen as corrupting the life of the nation and would require dismantling.

Once Nationalism is installed as the political mechanism of government what follows are a series of tools to protect the nation. That Fascism is a technique employed by nationalists is somewhat of a misnomer. In actual fact the English word fascism derives from the Italian fascio (“league”) and suggests merely a group or movement. Although Fascism logically denotes only Italian fascism, the word is used to describe similar ideologies and political movements. That is not by chance, but because in 1935 Stalin ordered  the word Fascism be used for all national socialistic movements, to hide the word “socialistic”; Bolshevism or Jewish “socialism” wanted to keep that word for itself. In reality Nationalistic movements throughout Europe were as ideologically unique as the culture of the land in which they arose. Germany’s National Socialism would not manifest in Italy but could only become the Italian Fascism of Mussolini. All did learn from each other and this is highlighted in Britain’s Union of Fascists. Never the less the Anglo-Saxon allies gladly accepted the ‘wise’ resolution of Stalin, and their Zionist infested press has since used the same false naming for any national movement.

As a consequence of Stalin’s move Fascism is now pretty much synonymous with Nationalism and can be presumed as a tool in the service of the Nation. Just like Nationalism it rejects the values of Zionist democracyliberalismMarxism and internationalism/Globalism. Mussolini noted that “the first stage of Fascism should more properly be called Corporatism because it is the merger of State and corporate power.” As the state is run in the best interests of its nation a merger between state and corporate business is in the best interests of the nation because it encourages competition between native suppliers but protects from global takeovers. Good fences make good neighbours and this is why Nations have borders. Fundamental to Fascism is that it and its components are operated within a Nation-State. It is the ideology of protection and preservation of the Nation that conserves industry, business, media and domestic product for the good of the race. If the Nationalistic ideology was removed or subverted there would no longer be a restraint.

As stated in the beginning of this article this is not a healthy society and the current ruling ideology is in direct opposition to nationalistic thought. It is in favour of the ‘free’ movement of goods and people and in the form of the EU has dissolved sovereign country’s borders. Without borders this has effectively allowed huge multinationals to swoop in and swallow up small businesses. While the current ideology applauds this as globalism it has a 2 fold negative effect on a country destroying jobs and reducing choice. In wake of this a land’s mineral wealth, which in a Nationalist framework would serve its own people, has become a profit making scheme for private companies. A most absurd principle brought about by this ideology is the selling off of a country’s mineral wealth (Gas, Coal, Electricity etc) only to have its people buy it back at astronomical prices.

One must conclude that the ruling ideology in government/s is the mechanism by which society is controlled. The Nationalistic model is driven by the Nation-state that suffers no foreign self serving elements. Here the State serves the Nation basically by ‘capping’ business and industries ability to go ‘global’ and destroy the family business. The current model not a Nation-State and at the root of this Ideology is much self interest. The eradication of borders has destroyed jobs, encouraged immigration and asset stripped European Lands all in the name of ‘Globalisation’. This is what happens when a continent takes its eye off the ball and lets a foreign element sneak in. White Europeans did not win either of the world wars (Brothers Wars) Zionism did.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL

“Interesting Times”

As you are no doubt aware Norwegian Anders Behring Breivik killed about 77 in a double bombing and a gun rampage in the not to distant past. I make no remark about the dead itself. I believe enough comment has been made. What I do find fascinating, however, is the huge show of remorse for the dead and apparent empathy for those who have lost loved ones. It seems that a ‘Nation’ grieves for its fallen and yet Western societies death of spirit/soul and emerged ‘humanistic’ approach would deny this emotion.

 Current trends seek to refute but Western Civilisation is marked by a spiritual idealism. The stories of Homer inspired the early Greeks towards personal excellence. Their legacy is the Olympic Games.  It can also be seen across Britain and Europe in her remarkable architecture. Great Gothic Cathedrals adorned with spires enticing the visitor to look upwards. We still have the art of Michelangelo covering the ceilings of the Sistine chapel. The works of Shakespeare and the music of Wagner are known virtually the world over. It is as if our kinsmen always sought or gave the best or greatest part of themselves.  Wayne Macleod, in his book The Importance of Race in Civilisation suggests that “Religion and Culture are inseparable beyond all doubt” He purports that all great civilisations were born in an age of religion signifying that there is a spiritual desire in certain races.  Macleod believes that religion has a “psychological, value-giving importance” to a creative race. Once a race becomes essentially agnostic or atheistic it loses the idealistic sense and becomes self-centred/ egoistic.

In Western society of today we are seeing a dramatic decline in Western religious expression. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article3890080.ece Consequently we see Church buildings left derelict or converted into Mosques. Naturally if our land wasn’t swamped by immigrants Mosques wouldn’t be a problem. This rapid decline in Western religiosity and the possible increase in agnostic or atheistic tendencies in our currant White majority may have lead to the decay in Western Art. Modern ‘art’ is depraved and vulgar. No-longer do we see the best of mankind but possibly the worst. While it is true and we can see the deterioration in Western spirit one must not believe that this happened without help.

So what did it take to trample Western mans soul. It has been a long march but the grand watershed must be WWII. A generation of European blood soaking our land and newly Americanised alien blood demanding satisfaction from across the pond, can it be that War Crimes gave rise to liberalism. There is a seemingly eternal Hebrew cry of ‘Never again’ to the alleged Nazi killing of 6 million of their race. Yet the Western world never heard about the Hebrew Eisenhower’s special German DEF (“Disarmed Enemy Forces”) camps that tortured and killed 1.7 million missing German POW’s.  http://www.rense.com/general46/germ.htm  Western Gentiles are not aware that the Bolshevik Revolution was primarily a Hebrew concern consisting of 457 Jews out of a government of 556. “Probably 61,911,000 people, 54,769,000 of them citizens, have been murdered by the Communist Party–the government–of the Soviet Union.” http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/USSR.CHAP.1.HTM  Since its inception 1948 The State of Israel has and continues to committed ethnic genocide against the Palestinian race http://baltimorechronicle.com/2008/112608Lendman.shtml and virtually no-one makes a noise. The American and British Government use our own troops to fight Israel’s Wars. Also since 1948 Britain has seen a massive influx of third world immigration and a gradual change in our ‘law’ that has seen the emergence of ‘hate crime’. One cannot impress upon the reader how fascinating it is that ‘deformation’ of the holy Holocaust will earn on the title of Anti-Semite as will mentioning Israel’s crimes possibly even landing one in prison. Yet there is no such retribution against their race for the hideous decimation of White Western Gentiles. In fact in our altruistic desire to befriend we even allow their festivals of hate. Passover is a prime example being the ‘celebration’ of the slaughter of the Egyptian (gentile) first born, meanwhile at Purim Haman is vilified because as Gentile royalty he had the audacity to expect a Hebrew to bow down to him!     http://judaism.about.com/od/holidays/a/The-Story-Of-Purim.htm  The best is yet to come. Readers may have noticed a campaign to try and remove overt Christmas Decorations from public places. Christmas holidays being absurdly renamed ‘Winterval’ and the lack of Christmas Carols. All this in case it offends ethnic minorities! Yet while Christians try to celebrate the season of good will (even without decs!) curious eight branched candelabras are springing up. There has been one in place in front of Liverpool’s George Hall for a number of years. This is to celebrate the Hebrew festival of Channukah. Ironically this is a story about ‘multiculturalism’ and how Hebrews do not like to assimilate.  http://aradece.tripod.com/chanukah_story.htm It is odd then that the Hebrews appear to be the most “vociferous exponents of universalising trends” for example the ‘humane’ abortion laws and availability of contraception. The Jewess Emma Lazarus portrays the ‘humane’ way to destroy a nation, in her poem inscribed on the statue of Liberty.

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breath free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.

Ironically the poem is only a fairly modern addition to the statue. The Statue of Liberty was in actual fact a gift from France and faces Europe the land of her forefathers and her people’s birth place. It is interesting to note that this ‘mixing’ is good enough for gentiles but not for Jews as one only needs to take a look at Israeli law.

Macleod points out “humanism, pacifism, equalitarianism, liberalism, communism, universalism, all stem basically from the same man-centeredness of a high culture that has lost its soul, they can all be classified from the point-of-view of history, as decadent ideals”. So with much encouragement from our Cultural Marxist ‘friends’ we are taught to view children as a ‘blank slate’ onto which one etched. The human being is no more spiritual than a machine and so we enter the age of the automaton. If this be the case how can one empathise with another surely this is just show or are we being lied to…

Given the premise that “great civilisations are born in an age of religion” what we are now experiencing is the ‘death’ of soul or spirit not that Western man never had a soul. Is the answer to reclaim our religiosity, Macleod suggests not “a true rejuvenation of Western society must entail new religious motivations…To generate a lasting civilisation…it is necessary to forge a rational religion.” Of course first it would be practical to throw off the mantle of slavery.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL

The Flag Seller

The location is Liverpool City Centre just opposite Tesco. Ahead stands a stall at which an apparently indiscriminate merchant sells flags. Now surely if one flies a flag then it implies that they are justifying the regime that flag symbolises. Certainly the Union Flag flies proud, the George and Dragon of Wales. Yet this is Britain and our Isle requires no justification for flying her own flags. However, the array of alternate flags on offer does require an awful lot to justify.

 Clearly identifiable are the hammer and sickle of the USSR and the flag of Red China, both Communist regimes that have murdered millions. If this merchant is the indiscriminate seller he claims to be why does he not fly the flag of the Third Reich? Is it the nature of the proposed dead…Stalin starved millions of Russian people. Maybe killing gentiles isn’t meant to be as offensive as ‘killing’ Jews. Is the flag seller a coward? Absolutely, his position as an indiscriminate seller of flags is highly defensible.  However, we know that if the Swastika was seen flying in Liverpool City Centre a certain community would immediately start yelling anti-Semitism. Inevitable this particular community would attempt to charge the flyer with a ‘hate crime’. Of course it is this merchant’s cowardice that will not allow him to risk offending Jews although he is quite happy being complicit in the downfall of his own people.

 Communism was invented by the Jew Karl Marx whose teacher was Moses Hess the philosophical father of Zionism. The two political concepts work hand in hand. Communism has been a destructive force dividing sovereign Nationalities. Meanwhile, Zionism, a parasitic Jewish Nationalism, confirms the truth of Judaism-they are a race not just a religion. This ties the international community and supports the State of Israel. Here again we see the glaring hypocrisy. The State of Israel is segregated yet its people support ‘multiculturalism’ for Europe.

 Again this flag seller is selling the flag of The State of Israel a people very close to genocide. Every piece of land settled by the Israelis is to the expense of ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians.

Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL