‘German’ Jewish director Fritz Lang’s ‘classic’ thriller M is about a murderous child molester. Released in 1931, the film speaks for itself. Initially we see a city almost paralysed with fear; citizens dutifully protecting children become suspect merely for speaking to a lone child. In modern society this is all too familiar. Adults now steer clear of the unattended child for fear of the paedophile brand. In this light has advertisement really protected our children or made them all the more vulnerable.
Here the term ‘advertisement’ is used in the broadest sense of the word for we can ‘advertise’ in many different ways. While the horror in M was only implied, in the years since Lang’s thriller films containing content of shocking and brutal violence have hit our screens. Not only is this violence reserved for the picture house but its scenes are cascaded over billboards and TV screens in an effort to publicise. This brutality and violence also appears in the graphically realistic computer and video gaming media readily on view to children.
While this so called ‘entertainment’ is not supposed to be targeted at children its method of transmission is so invasive that it occupies the very social space. In this respect this repugnant phenomenon is what apathetic White man has allowed Western society’s ‘culture’ to become. Furthermore the explicit displays that haunt Western cinemas and creep onto the TV screens calling itself ‘entertainment’ appear as a sinister reflection of the constantly streaming news media. However, this begs the question ‘what came first the chicken or the egg?’ The insinuation is that reported news incites the fabrications of Hollywood. However, as early as 1931 a movie depicting child molestation when this perversion was not highlighted in the news paints a rather different picture. This type of film has promoted a mode or pattern of behaviour in the West that on the one hand desensitises but also extenuates what violent inclinations exists. Apparently life really does imitate ‘art’ or the Jewish Marxist rendition of art.
Unsurprisingly then other renditions of Marxist Jewish ‘art’ now pervade the West. Black is hailed as the ‘Hero’ in the Hollywood movie convincing the White female of the inadequacy of the White male. There is a significant difference inferred upon the notion of the White male-labelled thus since it saw fit to be adorned with external genitalia, and White Man-the builder of Civilisations that Jewish Marxism wishes to eradicate. Meanwhile the Zionists fill Europe with this. The true cost is ignored by stupid White Liberals who swallow the false guilt spoon fed by the Zionist media. Consequently these are the female White trash that mixes with the immigrant coloniser that bastardise and ultimately destroy the White race.
The overt miscegenation through immigration is cunningly augmented by Whites own altruism. Zionists registered charities bombard the West all year round with the ‘poor’ starving Third World. On a superficial level this turns the White outward against his own racial community and desiring the protection of another over your own is unnatural. This is sustained with the Marxist Zionist illusion that the White West built its Civilisation on the backs of the coloured Third World and thus ‘owes them’ a living. The Black slave trade is a prime example. Mainstream Zionist propaganda promotes the notion that the White European is wholly responsible. In reality of course Blacks sold each other into slavery and in Europe and America Black slavery has a far more Jewish flavour.
Charities or privatised pet projects of various celebrities or politicians step up their begging at Christmas time. Remember the most famous pet project from Band Aid-Feed the World. All those artists coming together to tell the ‘West’ about those ‘poor destitute (Black) Africans. A similar ‘feat’ was attempted in 2000 with Michael Jackson. Incidentally despite the accusations of paedophilia Jackson’s music is still played and he is hailed as some sort of hero. On the other hand the press has hung, draw and quartered Gary Glitter. Quite possibly playing his music would be perceived as a criminal act by the Marxist Zionist elite. Apparently ‘justice’ has a colour bias.
Whenever art or culture is presented in a Zionist Marxist forum it is discussed as a global phenomenon or a ‘human’ endeavour giving the impression of a single human animal without deviation. Yet dig a little deeper and see that the great civilisations to spawn such art and culture are White in origin. Archaeology and the sciences are uncovering genetic remnants of those cultures.
However, these are not the ‘facts’ exposed through Zionist means. These images the Zionist controlled media do NOT want White Europe to see. The White public will find that the breakthroughs made in the sciences will engender a Marxist twist prior to their consumption or merely disappear. So when a gentleman of Caucasoid appearance was discovered in North America there appeared to be something of a cover up! As with Governments in Britain and Europe, it seems North America has too been absorbed by this creeping political correctness. “There is nothing wrong with your television set. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. WE are controlling the transmissions…” Sound Familiar, while this may be the opening of American Si-Fi series The Outer Limits, this sentiment is far truer than you think. There is a subtle difference between the original 1963 intro and the re-make. Originally the public were to go on a ‘great adventure’ now ‘they’ threaten to subvert our minds by “deluding us with a thousand channels or expanding one single image…” Think about that and the parasites that control the Western media.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Jewish Zionist Jacob Rothschild recently took a £130m bet on the demise of the Euro. So it would seem that this ‘illustrious’ banking family finally tires of toying with White man and now seeks to hasten the Euro’s inevitable collapse. This is not the first time the Zionist Rothschild family have ‘gambled’ so loosely with Europe’s future.
There were vast fortunes to be made — and lost — on the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo. The Stock Exchange in London was at fever pitch as traders waited for this battles outcome. If Britain lost, English consuls would plummet to unprecedented depths. If Britain was victorious, the value of the consul would leap to dizzying new heights. It was here that by nefarious means Nathan Rothschild would multiply his already vast fortune.
As the battle took place Rothschild had agents working both sides of the line to gather the most accurate possible information and carry the intelligence to posts strategically located nearby. Dawn on June 16, 1815, a Rothschild representative, possessing a top secret report was met at Folkstone. Scanning highlights of the report Rothschild was speeding towards London and the Stock Exchange in no time.
At the Exchange, emotionless and expressionless Rothschild took up his usual position beside the famous ‘Rothschild Pillar. Meanwhile Rothschild agents began dumping consuls on the market and as hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of consuls poured onto the market their value started to slide. Then they began to plummet. Rothschild continued to lean against ‘his’ pillar, and to sell, and sell and sell. Consuls kept on falling. Word began to sweep through the Stock Exchange: “Rothschild knows.” “Rothschild knows.” “Wellington has lost at Waterloo.”
When the consul was selling for about five cents on the dollar Rothschild signalled and on cue dozens of Rothschild agents made their way to the order desks around the Exchange and bought every consul in sight! A short time later the ‘official’ news arrived in London. England was now the master of the European scene. Within seconds the consul skyrocketed to above its original value. As the significance of the British victory began to sink into the public consciousness, the value of consuls rose even higher. Napoleon had ‘met his Waterloo.’ However the REAL implication never has yet…
The Jew Nathan Rothschild had bought control of the British economy.
Since then the Rothschild family have continued to play high stakes business and finance not always managing to come off to squeaky ‘clean’. Financier Nathaniel Rothschild lost a libel case against newspaper the Daily Mail that depicted him as a “puppet master” who used his friendship with a European trade chief to impress a Russian oligarch and help close a business deal. The article stated Rothschild had sought to impress Oleg Deripaska by unexpectedly bringing homosexual Jewish Zionist Peter Mandelson to a dinner the Russian held with bosses from the U.S. aluminium company Alcoa Inc. The newspaper said Rothschild had “pulled a very unexpected and also rather useful rabbit out of his hat” as Alcoa was worried about EU tariffs on Russian aluminium exports. Obviously true yet the Rothschild’s do not like their sleight of hand and insider trading to see the light. Unfortunately for this Jew it seems not all journalists or judiciary are in Zionism’s pay.
Incidentally Peter Mandelson was a main player if not the main player in the creation of New Labour, however with such a close relationship with Rothschild it is far more likely that Mandelson is a frontman and Rothschild the real ‘brains’ behind the creation of New labour. With the neo-conservative movement in America created by the Jew Irving Kristol, this has a certain credible appeal. Capitalism and Communism are 2 sides of the same coin with Capitalist banking systems funding the exploits of global Communism. The nature of the game, for that’s all it is to the Zionist players, is to withhold a land’s wealth from its people. Consequently the Zionist parasites get immensely rich while the Nation’s conquered suffer crippling debt.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
The Khazar theory argues that Ashkenazi Jews are the descendants of the Khazars a multi-ethnic collection of peoples who allegedly ‘converted’ to Judaism in the 8th-9th century AD. It is then claimed that it was these ‘Jewish converts’ that migrated into what is now Russia, Eastern Europe and later Northern and Western Europe. It is critical to highlight however, that the primary exponents of this theory are Jewish from the earliest alleged reference to a connection between Khazars and Ashkenazic Jews to Benjamin Freedman in a speech given before an audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C and Jewish Communist Arthur Koestler in The Thirteenth Tribe first published in Britain in 1976.
Initially the Khazars were believed to be a semi-nomadic people of mostly Turkic decent dominating the Asian steppe and the North Caucasus between the 5th and 10th centuries. In the 7th century, they founded an independent Khaganate in the Northern Caucasus called Khazaria. This occupied the land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea now predominantly occupied by Georgia. The general theme of Koestler’s book is this trading empire that existed between the expanding power blocs of Christianity and Islam. He suggests that speculation exists about the origin of the word ‘Khazar’ and indicates that the Khazar was never ethnically homogenous but made up of tribes from various racial backgrounds, as steppe peoples traditionally absorbed those they conquered. Koestler also highlights modern ‘deviations’ for example the German Ketzer –heretic referring to the Jew thus inserting ‘reasonable’ doubt perhaps to add weight to his theory. Nevertheless, the term is most likely tied to the Turkic verb form meaning “wandering” and likely derived from the Turkic gaz-, meaning ‘to wander’ or ‘flee.’ Initially Tengri shamanists, between the 8th or 9th century under the instruction of the Khazarian King, Koestler asserts that the Khaganate adopted Judaism as the state religion. However, Koestler’s source for the ‘conversion’ are to be found in a work by the Hungarian Marxist historian, Dr Antal Bartha, supported by an article in the 1973 variant of Encyclopaedia Judaica and the curious choice of a comment from a Muslim envoy a staunch enemy of the Jew. Indeed a 2013 critique argued that “A careful examination of the sources shows that some of them are pseudepigraphic, and the rest are of questionable reliability.
The majority of the book is padded with an attempt at historical context but when the flimsiness of Koestler’s sources are revealed it is hard to judge fact from whimsical fantasy. In particular on matters of ethnicity it is clear that he desires to undermine European racial homogeneity thus providing the mixed race Jew with a greater status. Indeed in places Koestler’s writing seems to applaud the Khazars for their apparent ‘services’ to Europe remembering that his thesis makes them Jewish if only ‘converts’ and in keeping with Jewish chutzpah he cannot help infusing some self-congratulation. Nevertheless, producing a ‘pseudo-Jew’ does provide a suitable scapegoat onto which one can deflect ones crimes. In fact the so called ‘good Jew’ Benjamin Freedman laid the groundwork for this defence (33 mins) during his 1961 speech at the Willard Hotel in Washington D.C. However, the concept falls apart when one considers the extraordinary amount of evidence proving that the Jew has been a problem throughout gentile specifically European history well before the so-called ‘Khazar conversion’.
The vulgar Talmud written in 70 AD is a testament to the contempt that the Jew holds for the gentile and in its own words “To communicate to a Goy anything about our religious relations would be equal to killing all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.” Libbre David 37 This only confirms that the despicable religion originates from a despicable tribe and that the Jew is not a product of converting to a loathsome religion. The Roman historian Tacitus reinforces this notion of the Jewish religion in his most famous work Histories written 109 AD –
“…Moses prescribed for them a novel religion quite different from those of the rest of mankind. Among the Jews all things are profane that we hold sacred; on the other hand they regard as permissible what seems to us immoral…The other practices of the Jews are sinister and revolting, and have entrenched themselves by their very wickedness. Wretches of the most abandoned kind who had no use for the religion of their fathers took to contributing dues and free-will offerings to swell the Jewish exchequer; and other reasons for their increasing wealth may be found in their stubborn loyalty and ready benevolence towards brother Jews. But the rest of the world they confront with the hatred reserved for enemies. They will not feed or intermarry with gentiles… They have introduced the practice of circumcision to show that they are different from others.” (Tacitus, Histories, 5.2–5).
Indeed it was not long before the wicked activities of the Jews roused Roman public opinion against them following the establishment of the very first Jewish community outside the Middle East in Rome in 139 BC. During sittings of the Roman senate the famous orator Cicero, among others, frequently spoke against the Jewish presence in Rome. Equally there is historical evidence relating to their negative impact on Romans during the first century AD. The world’s first anti-Jewish riots broke out in the city of Alexandria in 38 AD, and re-occurred in 66 AD, 115 AD, 118 AD, and 411 AD. In that year Cyril, the archbishop of Alexandria ordered the expulsion of all Jews from the city. The Roman Emperor Tiberius formally expelled Jews from Rome in 19 AD. They returned shortly after, only to be expelled again in 49 AD. In 116 AD, Emperor Trajan ordered that all Jews in Mesopotamia should be killed on the grounds that they were the cause of continual uprisings in that region. One of the most famous emperors of the Eastern Roman Empire, Justinian (527–565 AD), adopted a comprehensive anti-Jewish policy which barred Jews from the civil service, military posts, and any other positions of influence in his government. All of these events that pre-date the supposed ‘Khazar conversion’ serve to highlight the devastating impact the Jew had on Roman life and provide substantial proof that the Jew displayed identical behavioural patterns centuries prior to the alleged ‘conversion’. Patently the Khazar theory has been produced to suggest an “Ashkenazi” problem rather than a “Jewish problem” yet it was the Middle Eastern Mizrahi bloodline that interfered with Roman life 900 years prior to the Khazars and the Sephardi are currently notoriously anti-Gentile easily proving that all Jews have been and remain a problem throughout history.
Logic would also dictate that if a massive conversion of substantially different racial stock took place after the 7th century the racial make-up of Jews in that area would alter dramatically compared to that of their Sephardi and Mizrahi (Middle Eastern) brethren. However, to date twelve DNA studies prove otherwise. Beginning in 1999 the studies all reached very similar conclusions that Jewish community’s whether Ashkenazi, Sephardi, or Mizrahi formed a clearly distinct cluster sharing a common lineage consistent with origins in the region of the Middle East. While the most recent involving Harry Ostrer, a professor of Pathology and Genetics at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University and the Jewish HapMap Project are a double edged sword in that they tend to compound the notion that the Jew is a race alone and not a tribal facet of a larger Semitic race that has long existed and continues to live in the Middle East. Nevertheless, there is conclusive DNA evidence against the reality of the so called ‘Khazar theory’ thus substantiating the notion that it is a mechanism to distract from the “Jewish problem”. Indeed by associating Zionism with only the Ashkenazi strain the Jew attempts to disassociate from his crimes against Europe and the globe.
So it remains only to explain why so called reasoned Nationalists would entertain this obviously weak hypothesis meant to distract. What is transparent from the substantial evidence presented is that those claiming that only the ‘Khazar/Ashkenazi’ pose a problem are verifiably wrong. The concept of only “some Jews” or “false Jews” has been addressed and exposed as black propaganda. Consequently those pushing the Khazar theory are shills participating in a Jewish construct designed to distract from the Jew regardless of what historical documentation records.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Originally, Jewish scholarship was oral. Rabbis expounded and debated the law and discussed the Tenakh (Hebrew Bible) without written works. This situation changed drastically, however, mainly as the result of the destruction of the Jewish commonwealth in year 70. A.D. It seemed that the rabbis were to lose control over Jewish action so at this point it became necessary to commit the oral traditions to paper. Two bodies of analysis developed, one in Palestine and the other in Babylonia leading to two works of Talmud. The older compilation called the Jerusalem Talmud or the Talmud Yerushalmi has far less influence than that of the Babylonian Talmud. This is because the influence of the Jewish community in Israel steadily declined in contrast with the Babylonian community. Quite a ‘poetic’ happenstance given that the ‘wandering’ community would take “out of Zion…the Law and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem”. From the time it was completed the Talmud has been integral to Jewish scholarship. It forms the moral and social grounding for the entire Jewish community worldwide. For Jews the teachings of the Talmud supersede the teachings held in the Torah/Tenakh. It is the Talmud, and not the Tenakh (Hebrew Bible) that Orthodox (mainstream) men study at Yeshivot (Jewish colleges) to become rabbis. However, since its inception it has also been a source of contention between Jews and the non-Jewish Nations in which they lived.
In 1264 Pablo Christiani denounced the Talmud, which resulted in a papal bull against it and in the first censorship. This was undertaken at Barcelona by a commission of Dominicans, who ordered the cancellation of passages reprehensible from a Christian perspective. At the disputation of Tortosa in 1413, Geronimo de Santa Fé brought forward a number of accusations, including the assertion that the condemnations of pagans and apostates found in the Talmud referred in reality to Christians. Pope Martin V, who had convened this disputation, issued a bull two years later forbidding Jews to read the Talmud, and ordering the destruction of all copies of it. On September 9 1553 copies of the Talmud confiscated in compliance with a decree of the Inquisition were burned at Rome. Censorship of the Talmud was introduced by a papal bull issued in 1554 and in 1565 Pope Pius IV commanded that the Talmud be deprived of its very name. Pope Gregory XIII (1575-85) again denounced the Talmud and in 1593 Clement VIII renewed the old interdiction against reading or owning it. The last denouncement of the Talmud took place in Poland in 1757, when Bishop Dembowski, at the instigation of the Frankists, convened a public disputation at Kamenets-Podolsk. The Bishop a wanted all copies of the Talmud found in his bishopric confiscated and burned by the hangman. http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Talmud
Considering that one is ‘meant’ to believe that the Talmud is a holy book of a religious community the above would seem a bit harsh. Yet take the time to ask WHY this piece of work was so loathed and the answer is most enlightening. A fundamental issue to tackle is the notion of the Jewish Community as a purely religious community. They are not. They are a racial group masquerading as nothing more than a religious group. To that end this community views themselves very differently from those outside their community and it shows in their writings. For example Gentile means Non Jew, but the Yiddish term Goy referring to Gentiles actually means cattle. One must also be aware that the Yiddish term for a non-Jewish female, Shiksa, actually means hoar. Even Wikipedia had this to say-
“The word shiksa is etymologically partly derived from the Hebrew term שקץ, sheketz, which means “abomination”, “impure,” or “object of loathing”, depending on the translator. Several dictionaries define “shiksa” as a disparaging and offensive term applied to a non-Jewish girl or woman. In Polish “siksa” (pronounced “s’eeksa”) is a popular pejorative word for an immature young girl or teenage girl (or, in its masculine form, “sikus”, boy), as it is a conflation between the Yiddish term and usage of the Polish verb “sikać” (“to piss”, “to urinate”). It means “pisspants” and is roughly equivalent to the English terms “snot-nosed brat”, “little squirt”…”
Naturally this contempt for the Gentile is rife throughout the Talmud.
Jehovah created the Gentile in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The Gentile is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night. Midrash Talpioth p. 225-L
The Gentiles are not human they are beasts Baba Mazia 114b
All children of Goyim are animals Yebamoth 98a
Sexual intercourse between the Goyim is like intercourse between animals Sanhedrin 74b
A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat. Hadarine, 20, B, Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat
A Jew may violate but not marry a non Jewish girl Gad Shas 2:2
If you eat with a Goy it is the same as eating with a dog
Tospoth, Jebamoth 84b
A Jew is forbidden to drink from a glass of wine that a Gentile has touched because the touch has made the wine unclean.
Schulchan Aruch, Johre Deah 122
If a Jew finds an object lost by a Goy it does not have to be returned. Baba Mazia 24a
What a Jew steals from a Goy he may keep Sanhedrin 57a
If a Jew kills a Goy there will be no death penalty Sanhedrin 57a
If a Goy hits a Jew he must be killed Sanhedrin 58b
Do not save the Goyim in danger of death. Show no mercy to the Goyim Hikkoth AkumX 1
Even the best of the Goyim should all be killed Soferim 15
A ‘prayer’ or ‘benediction’ to be said by a Jewish man every day: thank God for not making me a Gentile a woman or a slave.
Hikkoth Akum X1
A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them Szaaloth-Utszabot, The book of Jore Dia 17
To communicate to a Goy anything about our religious relations would be equal to killing all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly. Libbre David 37
In conclusion, as a general echo of the above passage, the Christian gentile of the past has in reality been rather mild in choosing to destroy the book or just expel the keepers. Clearly if the gentile had the mentality of the Zionist writers’ streets would run with Jewish blood.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
The location is Liverpool City Centre just opposite Tesco. Ahead stands a stall at which an apparently indiscriminate merchant sells flags. Now surely if one flies a flag then it implies that they are justifying the regime that flag symbolises. Certainly the Union Flag flies proud, the George and Dragon of Wales. Yet this is Britain and our Isle requires no justification for flying her own flags. However, the array of alternate flags on offer does require an awful lot to justify.
Clearly identifiable are the hammer and sickle of the USSR and the flag of Red China, both Communist regimes that have murdered millions. If this merchant is the indiscriminate seller he claims to be why does he not fly the flag of the Third Reich? Is it the nature of the proposed dead…Stalin starved millions of Russian people. Maybe killing gentiles isn’t meant to be as offensive as ‘killing’ Jews. Is the flag seller a coward? Absolutely, his position as an indiscriminate seller of flags is highly defensible. However, we know that if the Swastika was seen flying in Liverpool City Centre a certain community would immediately start yelling anti-Semitism. Inevitable this particular community would attempt to charge the flyer with a ‘hate crime’. Of course it is this merchant’s cowardice that will not allow him to risk offending Jews although he is quite happy being complicit in the downfall of his own people.
Communism was invented by the Jew Karl Marx whose teacher was Moses Hess the philosophical father of Zionism. The two political concepts work hand in hand. Communism has been a destructive force dividing sovereign Nationalities. Meanwhile, Zionism, a parasitic Jewish Nationalism, confirms the truth of Judaism-they are a race not just a religion. This ties the international community and supports the State of Israel. Here again we see the glaring hypocrisy. The State of Israel is segregated yet its people support ‘multiculturalism’ for Europe.
Again this flag seller is selling the flag of The State of Israel a people very close to genocide. Every piece of land settled by the Israelis is to the expense of ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL