On the surface Zionism is a Jewish ‘nationalist’ movement created during the 1800´s. It aimed to establish a Jewish homeland in the Middle East. This cause found its realization in the creation of the state of Israel in 1948 after the end of British rule, realizing the promises of the Balfour declaration. However, this is only what the gentile is meant to see. Ideological ‘Zionism’ is a much more wily and illusive entity.
The origins of the term Zionism appeared in the early 1800’s and the work of one Moses Hess. Though Hess was never actually to use the word it was coined by Nathan Birnbaum in 1890, with the book Rome and Jerusalem Published in 1862 Hess laid the foundation of what is considered as the philosophical base of Zionism. Hess is described as a “Jewish socialist’” and worked closely with his student the Jew Karl Marx who barely 14 years before published The Communist Manifesto (1848). Following this a wave of revolutions broke out in Europe. Marx was a member of the Communist League an organization of émigré workers out of Germany with its centre in London of which Marx had became the major theoretician. It wasn’t until 1896 that Theodor Herzl published the book Judenstaat (The Jewish State) that argued for the creation of a Jewish state motivating Jewish Zionists to emigrate or make Aliyah (rise up) to Israel. Darkly ironic considering how the State of Israel, a land no bigger than Wales, did ‘rise up’ through lies and stealth to rule the world.
Herzl assembled the first Zionist congress in Basel, Switzerland, in 1897 of which it is alleged the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are the actual secret minutes. This document describes a purported plan for world domination by International Jewry and surfaced in Russia, where it is said to have arrived via France. The most famous public figures who have promoted knowledge of it; such as Henry Ford, have stated they are not interested in the documents ‘authenticity’ but rather urge a critical review of historical events that have unfolded, held up against the Protocols. Ford had a valid point more now as the European Union’s grip on the free world grows ever tighter. Why have questions never been asked “how did we get here and who is pulling the strings?”
Many answers lie with the manifestation, in 1948, of the rogue state called Israel. Now and then this has had massive support economically and politically from influences out of European and North American countries. Nevertheless, its installation was an unlawful act. The country of Palestine was sovereign land and never American or European to hand over to the Jewish people. Consequently, there is now a tribe of people calling itself ‘Israel’ occupying Palestinian land. Overtly this looks like an American/European protectorate. One only needs to ask who fights her wars. Yet just as in 1948 and other significant events (the Balfour Declaration) it is the Jewish lobby within White Western Governments that raise their voices the highest when it comes to “National” interests. Consequently the interests of host Nations such as Britain, Germany and America cease to matter in the face of the so called “Jewish State”.
The main rationale for the Iraq War offered by U.S. President George W. Bush, former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair, and their domestic and foreign supporters was that Iraq was developing weapons of mass destruction. Of course no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq and since the invasion it was learned that Jewish neo-conservatives pushed for the overthrow of Iraq before the Bush administration entered office. It is a very similar story in Afghanistan. Bruce Riedel is Barack Obama’s chief adviser on the war in Afghanistan. Riedel is employed in a Jewish Israeli secret service (Mossad)-funded think tank run by an Israeli friend of Ehud Barak and Shimon Peres. It is suggested that the war in Afghanistan, the war in which yet again our children are being used as cannon fodder, is Obama’s war for Israel.
Since WWII Jewish democracy has created ‘law’ and therefore sees its tribe as above its product. A perfect example of this occurred in 1975 when the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution that designated Zionism as “a form of racism and racial discrimination” Addressing the General Assembly. The same day, 10th November 1975, Israeli Ambassador Chaim Herzog stated that the resolution was:“Another manifestation of the bitter anti-Semitic, anti-Jewish hatred … For us, the Jewish people, this resolution based on hatred, falsehood and arrogance, is devoid of any moral or legal value. For us, the Jewish people, this is no more than a piece of paper and we shall treat it as such.” As he concluded his speech, Herzog tore the resolution in half thus proving that United Nations rulings do not apply to the eternal ‘victim’ Israel! This must be why the resolution was repealed in 1991. In the history of the UN this is the only resolution that has ever been revoked. History shows that if a gentile slights a Jew they are anti-Semitic. Slight Israel and you risk offending a Nation of ‘victims’. Even to point out the criminality of Jewish Israel risks the label ‘anti-Semite’.
Today Jewish Zionists play on a history replete with forced evictions, using it as a platform for their cries of ‘persecution’. The Gentile world never questions why this race was constantly moved on by the host Nations, and most fascinating is the unquestioned notion that the altruistic European would assume an unjustified hatred of another. When abroad (in diaspora) The Jewish tribe translate their bonding motif as merely a religious group and have one believe that this ‘difference’ is the basis of European hatred. Yet in reality it is racial identity that has kept their tribe so tight knit even spread across the world (diaspora), earning their race the moniker the international Jew from Henry Ford. Ford’s designation is quite fitting as history finds this tribe leeching from Nations at the most auspicious periods. A particularly good example lies with the Rothschild banking family. Here most relevant to British history is a huge criminal act of insider trading on the eve of Wellington’s victory. This not only robbed our land of her wealth and made Nathan Rothschild filthy rich but rendered Britain slaves to the Jewish Rothschild’s.
Hence though Zionism is marketed as ‘Jewish Nationalism’ this is an oxymoron. For Nationalism is an organic form that stands for the preservation and conservation of one’s own people (nation), however, born of nomads Zionism is the ideology of theft and manipulation to gain for oneself. White failure to question leads to complicity in Jewish Zionist illusion and ‘victim’ mentality particularly when it comes to the so called ‘Holocaust’.
In reality Jewish casualties during World War II formed a minority of those who died during the Second World War. The exact number of Jews who died directly as a consequence is difficult to ascertain and the subject has been heatedly debated since the late 20th century between different sets of historians. The causes of casualties were numerous; for instance some died in action fighting in all armies, others died in bombing raids. Also Jewish Communists posed a threat to German security and where interned in German administrated detention centres possibly dying due to starvation or disease (particularly typhus) as the allies cut off supply routes. The Jewish Zionist media constantly manipulates this last instance into an ‘untouchable’ mantra. According to ‘mainstream’ the ‘Holocaust’ was the genocide of approximately six million Jews during World War II. Of course even if one assumes the worst is true and accept the 6 million as undoubtedly correct, the number of victims of these so called German atrocities would still fall far short of the number of German, Japanese, and Italian non-combatants who perished at Allied hands as the result of mass population expulsions, saturation bombing of civilian centres and post war deprivation. The simple fact is that there is every reason to believe that a final accounting must exculpate Germany of any unique inhumanity in the waging of World War. Yet even when the plaque at Auschwitz, originally reading 4 million dead, was replaced with a smaller plaque with 1.5 million the ‘sacred’ 6 million did not decrease. Incredibly the ‘sacred’ 6 million has been used before at the end of the Great War. Perhaps the marketing didn’t catch on then. For the White man questioning the Jew seems to be a criminal act and it is labelled ‘anti-Semitism’. All though if White man got off his knees the simple answer to cries of ‘Holocaust’ is the Holodomor, an artificial famine instigated by Jewish Bolshevik butchers. It occurred during the years 1932 to 1933 of the Jewish Bolshevik regime. Loss of life has been listed as anywhere between 7 million to 7.5 million, although, figures have been as high as 10 Million deaths. Ukrainian grain filled massive silos to be sold internationally while the breadbasket of Europe starved to death. The Ukraine experienced 3 Holodomor type famines which took upwards of 16.5 million. The major contributing factor in each case was food ‘requisitions’ (seizures) by the Jewish Bolshevik authorities that left the population without enough to sustain it. Since the late 1980s the centrality of Jewish Bolshevik grain procurement policies has been established as the focus of the genocidal famines of 1921-3, 1932-3 and 1946-7. It is also vital to note that the Ukrainian famine of 1946-7 was contemporary with the Nuremburg trials. Here we have obscure, obnoxious and violent ‘War Crimes’ claims made against Germany. Meanwhile, Jewish Bolsheviks where committing mass slaughter against the White Ukraine. Neither where these Holodomor famines just murder by starvation, it was the practice of the Jewish Bolshevik regime to publicly torture community leaders. Instances include splitting the stomach, exposing the small intestines, attaching these to a tree and beating the victim around until the innards unwound; people hung from strips of flesh cut from the back, the bodies left to deter White revolution. Most remarkable is the similarity of Jewish Bolshevik cruelty to the so called abuses laid against Germany by Jewish Democracy making it all the more likely that German ‘War Crimes’ were invented to mask the atrocities committed under Jewish Bolshevism. What is even more fascinating is that the Ukrainian Jewish Committee has suggested that the “Holodomor Affair” materials are being used for political purposes. Ironic considering that their tribe have been politicising a Jewish Hollywood blockbuster for nigh on 70 years! and this is only a microcosm of the suffering and death that White Europeans endured under Jewish Bolshevik rule. Conservative estimates place the mass slaughter and forced labour in gulags of the Jewish Bolshevik regime at 40-50 million although it has been estimated as high as 60 million. Apparently White people are really meant to believe that 1 million (imaginary) Jews are worth 10 million Whites.
Right now each Nation is in a situation where by its army is being ‘hijacked’ by the Jewish organisations of the United Nations via America’s Jewish Lobby or the Jewish European Union. A country is no-longer supposed to have a sovereign army but be part of a vast super army. Yet no land is fighting for its own interests or survival. There is only one people whose war is constantly fought and unfortunately everyone’s son or daughter is cannon fodder in defence of the children of ‘Israel’.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Zionism markets itself as Jewish ‘Nationalism’. This is a perversion for Zionism is a parasite that pollutes and destroys. At the most fundamental level Zionist ideology must be understood as a community operating within another community for the good of the ‘guest’ nation not the host nation. Zionism has infected Europe for over 2,000 years though during the last 60 years it has been draining host country’s National wealth and funneling it into Israel. Without continual ‘support’ from external Nations Israel would not survive.
It was during the 19th century that Karl Marx developed Zionism’s most dangerous tool of deception-Communism. With considerable contribution from Moses Hess known as the philosophical father of Zionism Marx produced material that worked on 2 levels. On the face of it Das Capital promises the ‘worker’ a utopian equality through Communism. However, on a deeper level what he is offering is reduction to the lowest common denominator because only then can a mass be the same. Of course this comes at a price since true ‘equality’ does not exist in nature. Thus it was necessary for Communism to formulate mechanisms to enforce ‘equality’. For the Nationalist modern ‘multicult’ policy alive in Europe should provide some insight into the inner workings.
Traditionally, or more correctly idealistically, a Nation is organically grown from the families and communities indigenous to a particular land. The Nation state would be produced from these indigenous peoples and work for them. In modern Europe, however, our indigenous Nations, be that Britain, Germany, France etc have been colonised by innumerate foreign peoples. Even though these people no longer live in their own lands they remain a part of their own nations. We see this particularly at election times when the same face parties try to attract block votes from Muslims, Somali, and African voters. It is clear that these ‘newcomers’ have a solid community identity. They know what their community requires and use the community’s weight to achieve it. In a new land this all comes at the expense of the host community. Here we have a perfect example of the divide and conquer strategy used by Zionism. This is on a grand scale but history shows that the Zionist concept has been in use for centuries.
“The [Jewish] diaspora is commonly accepted to have begun with the 6th century BC conquest of the ancient Kingdom of Judah, destruction of the First Temple (c. 586 BC), and expulsion of the population…” Wikipedia
So the Jews are and have been a scattered people for a long time! To remain an identifiable people would suggest that they have learned to survive among ‘other’ nations without fully adapting to host cultures. This would mean that the ideology developed would have to be one of stealth and cunning. If one was working against the host one would not want to be found out. It may also be necessary to be some what unassuming, blend in. It is only once the underdog has gained a position of power that they can begin to show their true colours.
Though the term Zionism was actually coined by Nathan Birnbaum in 1890, it was Moses Hess who laid the foundation of what is considered as the philosophical base of Zionism with the book Rome and Jerusalem Published in 1862. However, it is clear that the parasitic communities have been by Zionist ideology for centuries prior to Birnbaum’s use of the term. In fact, while not wholly portrayed in the mainstream, it was William of Orange who gave Zionist Jews permission to set up their Bank of England. It was not until the late 1800’s that gentile’s become aware of Zionism. Perhaps now more confident of their power, this ideology is now less concerned of showing their true colours.
Stemming from Zionism Karl Marx, a student of Hess created Communism. His sole intention in producing this ideology was to dupe the masses. In essence Marx created the template for eternal upheaval. Again this can be seen in the original mass Jewish Bolshevik (Communist) revolution. The fundamental idea is to set each group against one another-the worker against employer, rich against poor, man against woman.
Following the initial success of the Bolshevik revolution the plan was to spread Marx’ Communism across Europe. The master plan was to dismantle and replace European culture with hollow, meaningless filth. Naturally the ideology behind this was Zionist as was the parasitic community that was to inherit power. However, Europe did not take to Communism as easily as Mother Russia so a different strategy had to be formed.
Generally speaking it was back to the academy. The Frankfurt School and its close associates the Fabian Socialists needed to redefine ‘Communism’ for a different audience. The politico-economic message of Marxism did not work in Europe so it was necessary to drive the divide and conquer method via European conduct. Thus Cultural Marxism was born and its allies political correctness and anti-Christianity. It is because of these dogmas that the divisive groups such as feminism and anti-Racism develop. The less cohesive White European society the more easily it is to corrupt and consequently control.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL