Today Jewish politicians constantly speak of achieving ‘transparency’ in Government yet ironically before she was devastated by war Europe’s maintenance was open and evident in its system of treaties. This was disrupted when in 1908 Count Alois Lexa von Aehrenthal a Jewish politician who occupied the Austrian Government secretly engineered an agreement between Austria and Russia to annex Bosnia. At the time Bosnia was Serbian territory so it was inevitable that this action would destabilise this region of Europe (Bosnian crisis). What followed was an inescapable domino effect that would collapse Europe’s delicate system of treaties eventually triggering the Great War. Curiously in 1903 only a few years prior to Aehrenthal’s interference Jewish journalist Theodor Herzl ‘forecast’ great world upheaval at the 6th Zionist Conference. The seed had been sown for a devastating Fratricidal war. However, by 1916 Germany had won this war out right and was negotiating for peace and it is interesting to note that had these negotiations gone well those that set the Great War in motion would not benefit and the consequences of 17 million of our finest lost, a European monarchy murdered and their country occupied for 75 years may never have been. Yet that is yet to come meanwhile it is 1914 and European nations are gearing up for war.
The Great War commenced on the 28th July 1914. Soldiers on both sides went into battle primed with vile ‘war propaganda’ no doubt heavily endorsed by Jewish elements with a vested interest in Herzl’s “great world upheaval”. As such troops were likely convinced of the others bestiality and therefore justified in their fight. By December the conflict had been waged for at least 5 months and Christmas was upon the troops. In the current crass commercialism of Jewish internationalism the real meaning of Christmas has been deposed but on Christmas Eve, 24 December 1914, all our European soldiers were far away from such mediocre distractions. It is only in such bleak times that the true Christmas message of peace and hope reveals not only a shared culture but the collective spirit of our race. Thus as German troops began decorating the area around their trenches in the region of Ypres, Belgium by placing candles on their trenches and on Christmas trees and continued the celebration by singing Christmas carols. British soldiers responded by singing back the carols they recognized. The troops continued by shouting Christmas greetings to each other. Soon thereafter, there were excursions across No Man’s Land, where small gifts were exchanged, such as food, tobacco and alcohol, and souvenirs such as buttons and hats. Bruce Bairnsfather, who served throughout the war, wrote: “I wouldn’t have missed that unique and weird Christmas Day for anything. … I spotted a German officer, some sort of lieutenant I should think, and being a bit of a collector, I intimated to him that I had taken a fancy to some of his buttons. … I brought out my wire clippers and, with a few deft snips, removed a couple of his buttons and put them in my pocket. I then gave him two of mine in exchange. …” The artillery in the region fell silent that night. The truce also allowed a breathing spell where recently fallen soldiers could be brought back behind their lines by burial parties. Joint services were held. Troops from both sides had also been so friendly as to play games of football with one another. In many sectors, the truce lasted through Christmas night, but it continued until New Year’s Day in others. Though there was no official truce, about 100,000 British and German troops were involved in unofficial cessations of fighting along the length of the Western Front.
Letters home from British troops relating the event suggest surprise that the so called ‘enemy’ was so like them and delight in being part of this encounter under such unlikely circumstances. Thus propaganda carefully designed to malign the other nation collapsed as it proved only a flimsy fabrication. The crux of the issue is that an unofficial truce could and would not take place under conditions of war among any other but those who share the ties of brotherhood. Nevertheless, this was a mere glitch in a 4 year long familial massacre. Indeed because the Christmas truce had uncovered the truth-that brother was fighting brother certainly in Britain the nature of war propaganda against Germany produced by the Government of War reached a new level of revulsion. While on the home front the public could still be convinced of their German brethren’s vile nature via the distribution of false Governmental propaganda the soldier returning from the front had been exposed to the truth-that these people were just like us. Therefore, in order that the British and particularly the army should conceive of the German as a threat rather than the familial branch propaganda reached levels of gruesome and sickening absurdity. In much bewilderment it is often expressed what evil men do; though in this case the most horrifying notion is that brotherhood, blood and race are being defiled by those we look to lead our peoples. Perhaps the Governments in Britain and Germany require scrutiny.
It has already been noted that Europe was manoeuvred into war by an entity alien to her and curiously elements of which had been terrorising Russia for decades culminating in 1881 with the assassination of Tsar Alexander II by Jewish terrorist Vera Figner. War is not an advantageous position for the public and therefore not in the national best interest. Nevertheless, when Germany began peace negotiating’s in 1916 Jewish Zionists in Germany turned to Arthur Balfour “Little as the general public may suspect it, the charming, gracious, and cultured Mr Balfour is the most egotistical of men, and a man who would make almost any sacrifice to remain in office.” Obviously he was more concerned about himself than the best interest of the British Nation and so not above back door deals with international Jewish criminals. If Germany had succeeded in negotiating peace Jewish machinations would have been for nothing. Indeed had the situation in Europe stabilised in 1916 the “great world upheaval” required for the Jewish Bolshevik seizure of Russia would not manifest. Thus it was in Jewish interest to maintain war disruption. So Jewish Zionists proposed that America be ‘encouraged’ to enter the war as a British ally. In ‘compensation’ for this endeavor the Jewish Zionists wanted Britain to give them Palestine, a sovereign land over which that Government should have no claim. This led to the formation of the Balfour Declaration of 1917 an official letter from the British Foreign Office headed by Arthur Balfour who was to become Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (from July 1902 to December 1905) and later the UK’s Foreign Secretary (from December 1916 to October 1919), to Lord Rothschild, who was seen as a representative of the Jewish people. The letter stated that the British government “viewed with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country”.
The legacy of this document is far-reaching to say the least. That Balfour sold the future of ethnic Europe with the signing of this document is not too presumptuous when one considers the current state of ethnic Europeans and their ancestral lands. The ‘state of Israel’ materialised in 1948 due in large part to the significance the Jewish tribe put in this document. Since then, through the manipulation of Western troops, the Middle East has been steadily ‘cleansed’ of its Arab population to make way for a greater ‘Israel’. However, the foundation was laid with the closing of WWI. Known as the “November Criminals” (German: Novemberverbrecher) government leaders of Germany had overthrown the monarchy (forcing the Kaiser into exile in Holland perhaps to escape another royal assassination) and replaced it with a Jewish run ‘republic’. Jewish born Rosa Luxemburg a Marxist theorist, Jewish Bolshevik and founder of the Red Flag newspaper supported the Communist Party of Germany’s (KPD) participation in the Weimar National Assembly that founded the Weimar Republic. In January 1919, a second Jewish Bolshevik wave swept Berlin in a violent attempt to seize power. The Red Flag encouraged the Jewish Bolsheviks to occupy editorial offices of the press. On November 11, 1918, the representatives of the newly formed Weimar Republic signed the armistice with the Allies and the subsequent Treaty of Versailles led to further territorial and financial losses for Germany. The ‘Peace Conference’ held in Paris during 1919 would expose the real reason behind Europe’s suffering. With the dramatic restructuring and division of territory a contingent of 117 Jews present and clutching the Balfour declaration submitted their draft resolutions for consideration by the Peace Conference on 3rd February 1919. Detailed in their submission were statements regarding recognition of the Jewish people’s historic title to Palestine and their right to reconstitute their National Home there. Such chutzpah could only be based on the Balfour declaration for besides having no racial claim the absurdity of pursuing such measures “is like the Celts ‘demanding’ England back from the Saxon after 15 hundred years of occupation.” Particularly since like the Aryan origin of the Saxon and Celt both the Arab and Jew are Semites.
The conclusion should be crystal clear. This catastrophic war was engineered by the Jewish tribe, condemning to death the best of Europe for their own profit. Initially to secure the seizure of Russia the Balfour Declaration presented a new land deal for Jewry for which Europe would again be driven to war. That the Jew was able to use a European-The German Nation- a member of our own brethren to scapegoat for his malevolent deeds set a new precedent. From this point on the Jew uses ‘sectarianism’ in various forms to disconnect white man from his racial community. Perfecting this divide and conquer strategy ensures that the white race does not unify as a productive collective with the ability and will to stop them perverting and plundering our ancestral home land. However, it is also critical to appreciate that the drive of the Jewish criminal and his self-interested collaborator is bolstered only by a false veneer. The ties of racial heritage and brotherhood are timeless and all it takes is to shine the light of truth the Christmas Truce stands testament to this.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Perhaps the quintessential ‘feral’ children are twin brothers Romulus and Remus who feature in Rome’s foundation myth. Their mother was Rhea Silvia, daughter to Numitor, king of Alba Longa and the story goes that prior to their conception, Numitor’s brother Amulius seized power, forced Rhea Silvia to become a Vesta Virgin, sworn to chastity and then kills Numitor’s male heirs. However, Rhea Silvia conceived the twins by the god Mars, or by the demi-god Hercules, although once the twins were born, Amulius had them abandoned to die in the river Tiber. Miraculously the babies were rescued from the water by a she-wolf. The she-wolf took care of them until the twins were taken in by a shepherd and his wife who reared them to manhood. Unfortunately, actual cases of human children apparently ‘raised’ by wild animals do not have such a happy ending.
In reality a feral child is a human child who has lived isolated from human contact from a very young age. Therefore it has no (or little) experience of human care, loving or social behaviour, and the most apparent, of human language. Some feral children are alleged to have been brought up by animals. Other feral children have been confined by people (usually their own parents). More than 100 cases of supposedly feral children are known.
One of the first documented case occurred in France in 1800 when naked and filthy 12-year-old boy was spotted scrabbling for potatoes in fields on the edge of Saint Sernin, a small farming village. This was ‘Victor’ the wild boy of Aveyron. Abbe Pierre-Joseph Bonnaterre described Victor as small for his age, about four and a half feet tall, deeply tanned and covered in scars and scratches. While he could not speak and did not react even if Bonnaterre shouted in his ear, his hearing was acute enough for a walnut cracked across the room to make him twist around with hungry attention. He could also make a full range of expressive noises, such as grunts, laughs, and murmurs. His gait was peculiar. He walked uncertainly and preferred to lollop along in a shuffling run. Occasionally he would revert to all fours as earlier he had been seen to do in the forests. However, it was Victor’s animal blankness and lack of interest in other humans that most unsettled Bonnaterre. Victor appeared to have no other thoughts than for food and sleep. The only time he showed any excitement was when he glimpsed the greenery outdoors and struggled to make an escape. The rest of the time he would spend long hours hunched on the floor, rocking slowly back and forth and staring off into space. In this position, he made a constant dull murmur and occasionally, small spasms and convulsions would twitch across his body and face.
It was Jean Itard, a 26-year-old doctor from Paris’s Deaf-Mute Institute who felt he could see a glimmer of hope in the damaged youngster. He believed the diagnosis of retardation was ridiculous because Victor could not have survived in the wilds so long if he truly was an imbecile. Itard also detected a wily intelligence in the way Victor stole and hid food. Itard devoted five long years to Victor and did make considerable strides, but the boy never became anything near approaching a normal adult and never properly learned to speak. Itard at least managed to bring about a marked change in Victor’s outward demeanour. Victor’s blankness towards his surroundings and other people gradually turned to interest and affection. He appeared to show simple human emotions such as gratitude and remorse. He was trained out of his unsuitable personal habits, learning to sleep in a bed, wear clothes, eat at a table and accept baths. His toilet habits and lack of modesty still could embarrass Itard in public, but generally Victor was brought under ‘control’.
On 26 May 1828, a teenage boy appeared in the streets of Nuremberg, Germany carrying a letter addressed to the captain of the 4th squadron of the 6th cavalry regiment, Captain von Wessenig. The anonymous author stated that the infant boy was given into his custody on 7 October 1812. A shorter letter enclosed purporting to be from his mother to his prior caretaker stated that his name was Kaspar, that he was born on 30 April 1812 and that his father, a cavalryman of the 6th regiment, was dead. In fact both letters had been written by the same hand. At first it was assumed that the boy had been raised half-wild in forests, but Hauser recalled a different version of his past life. For as long as he could remember he spent his life totally alone in a darkened cell about two metros long, one metre wide and one and a half high with only a straw bed to sleep on and a horse carved out of wood for a toy. He found bread and water next to his bed each morning. Periodically the water would taste bitter and drinking it would cause him to sleep more heavily than usual. On these occasions, when he woke, his straw was changed and his hair and nails had been cut. The first human being with whom Hauser ever had contact was a mysterious man who visited prior to his release and took great care not to reveal his face. This man, Hauser said, taught him to write his name by leading his hand. After learning to stand and walk, he was brought to Nuremberg. This stranger allegedly taught him to say the phrase “I want to be a cavalryman, as my father was” in Bavarian dialect but Hauser claimed that he did not understand what these words meant. Elements of Hauser’s later life and attempts at education in Nuremburg poignantly express a lack of complex reasoning that Friedrich Daumer, Hauser’s host and teacher, expressed through his tutoring. Following demonstrations Hauser revealed his profound inability to understand coincidence, and imbues inanimate objects with intelligence for avoiding obstacles. Indeed although the final report indicated no anomalies Dr. Heidenreich, one of the physicians present at Hauser’s autopsy, claimed that the brain of Kaspar Hauser was notable for small cortical size and few, non-distinct cortical gyri, signalling that he suffered from cortical atrophy.
Amala and Kamala, the so called Wolf Girls of Midnapore, India were thought to be about 3 and 7 years old on their discovery on 17th October 1920. Both little girls could run swiftly on all fours, but were unable to stand up. They could not talk or laugh and their only gestures were those of the wolf pups they had been reared with. Amala only lived a year in ‘captivity’ and although her sister was thought to have been around 16 nine years later when she died she had a mental age of 3.
With Oxana Malaya who was found as an 8-year-old in Ukraine in 1991, having lived most of her life in the company of dogs the issue moves into the area of child abandonment. While she too picked up a number of dog-like habits and found it difficult to master language today, Oxana can speak and many of her behavioural problems have been remedied. The key to this may be the age at which Oxana was evicted from her human home.
It was at three years of age that Oxana’s drug addicted parents exiled her from the family home. Wild dogs roaming the streets and Oxana took refuge in a shed inhabited by these dogs. She was cared for by them and learned their behaviours and mannerisms. She growled, barked, walked on all fours and crouched like a wild dog, sniffed at her food before she ate it, and was found to have acquired extremely acute senses of hearing, smell and sight. When rescued she only used the words “yes” and “no”. It was believed that having been deprived of intellectual and social stimulation, Oxana found it difficult to acquire normal human social and emotional skills. Oxana’s lack of exposure to language in a human social context made it very difficult for her to improve her language skills. Yet that she is now able to use simple grammar suggests that language development had already formulated prior to her abandonment at aged 3.
In the case of Genie, the pseudonym for a feral child who spent nearly all of the first thirteen years of her life locked inside a bedroom strapped to a potty chair, the victim of one of the most severe cases of abuse and neglect, compounded by social isolation, ever documented. Genie was discovered by Los Angeles authorities on November 4, 1970. After her rescue, attempts were made to help her speak and socialise, however, Genie never learned full grammatical English and only went so far as phrases like “Applesauce buy store”.
The reason ‘feral’ children remain such a fascination to psychologists and linguists are because they present such a unique opportunity to study a hotly contested debate about language development. Essentially, this is the age-old nature versus nurture debate. Does genetics or environment play a greater role in the development of language? Nativists believe that the capacity for language is innate, while empiricists suggest that it is environment that plays a key role.
Noam Chomsky Jewish nativist, argued that the acquisition of language could not be fully explained by learning alone. Instead, he proposed that children are born with a language acquisition device (LAD), an innate ability to understand the principles of language. Once exposed to language, the LAD allowed children to learn the language at a remarkable pace.
Eric Lenneberg Jewish linguist proposed that like many other human behaviors, the ability to acquire language is subject to what are known as critical periods. A critical period is a limited span of time during which an organism is sensitive to external stimuli and capable of acquiring certain skills. According to Lenneberg, the critical period for language acquisition lasts until around age 12. After the onset of puberty, he argued, the organization of the brain becomes set and no longer able to learn and utilize language in a fully functional manner. Incidentally it is rather curious that the Jewish tribe are so prevalent in this field of study, but not surprising as here they are well placed to funnel the ground breaking discoveries of ethnic Europeans through the corrupting filter of Jewish Zionism.
In Genie’s case she started putting three words together occasionally as in children going through normal language development. In the normally stimulated child this stage is followed by what is known as a language explosion. Children rapidly acquire new words and begin putting them together in novel ways. Unfortunately, this never happened for Genie and never did for any other ‘feral’ child documented earlier. Her language abilities remained stuck at this stage and she appeared unable to apply grammatical rules and use language in a meaningful way. At this point, her progress levelled off and her acquisition of new language halted. Oxana on the other hand, abandoned at aged 3, has progressed to simple language formation. In this light the linguist Lenneberg may have been far closer to the mark than first realised.
However, the neuro-scientific reality is far more brutal when it comes to the isolation and lack of nurture of a child. Formation of the human brain takes place in early infancy and a normally nurtured brain will formulate the constructs capable of performing complex skills like that of language acquisition. Yet, if a brain is deprived of human stimulation, parental nurturing it will be substantially deformed. It is highly significant that a brain scan of a child who has suffered extreme neglected compared to that of a normal 3 year old is shown to be quite substantially physically smaller and disfigured. What must also be taken into account is how a small injury to the brain can have a dramatic impact on an adult human therefore even a minor reduction in the physical size of the brain in infancy must have intense repercussions for learning acquisition in the child.
It is now known that many capacities thought to be fixed at birth are actually dependent on a sequence of experiences combined with heredity. Both factors are essential for optimum development of the human brain (Shonkoff and Phillips, 2000). It is now known that although genetics predisposes us to develop in certain ways our experiences, including our interactions with other ‘people’ have a significant impact on how our predispositions are expressed.
The process of development occurs from the more primitive towards the more sophisticated sections of the brain (Perry, 2000a). The first areas of the brain to fully develop are the brainstem and midbrain governing the bodily functions necessary for life. Consequently New-borns’ brains allow babies to do many things, including breathe, eat, sleep, see, hear, smell, make noise, feel sensations, and recognize the people close to them. However, the majority of brain growth and development takes place after birth, especially in the higher brain regions involved in regulating emotions, language, and abstract thought. Babies are born with more than 100 billion nerve cell or neurons, the brain’s raw material. During foetal development, neurons migrate to form the various parts of the brain. As neurons migrate, they also differentiate and “specialize” in response to chemical signals (Perry, 2002). Development in the growing baby’s brain is the process of creating, strengthening, and discarding synapses or connections among neurons. Synapsesorganize the brain by forming pathways that connect the parts of the brain and occur at an astounding rate during children’s early years, in response to the young child’s experiences. For example, human brains are “wired” to respond to the sound of speech; when babies hear people speaking, the neural systems in their brains responsible for speech and language receive the necessary stimulation to organize and function (Perry, 2006). The more babies are exposed to people speaking, the stronger their related synapses become. If a young child is deprived of this stimulation it will result in the pruning of synapses (neuronal connections) relevant to that stimulation and the loss of neuronal pathways. As children progress through each developmental stage, they will learn and master each step more easily if their brains have built an efficient network of pathways. If the appropriate exposure does not happen, the pathways developed in anticipation may be discarded and the area of brain abnormal. Therefore, a primary conclusion must be that some stimulation took place in the case of Oxana prior to her neglect to enable her brain to acquire the necessary rudiments to accommodate some language formulation.
Yet consider the very nature of stimulation and nurturing that the infant is supposed to receive from its mother. Primate studies show that a young monkey separated from its mother will choose a soft warm comforter without food over a metal food provider. Furthermore the isolated primate elicited behaviour consistent with one unable to socialise with fellow mates. This is highly reminiscent of human cases of neglect such as Oxana and Genie who will never be fully rehabilitated into human society. This is most relevant as since WWII the period that the young child spends bonding with its mother is becoming shorter and shorter as woman is forced out to work. A side effect of woman’s war-time work Jewish Zionist Governments saw an opportunity to increase profit by introducing woman into the economy on a mass scale. This was achieved by utilising woman’s vanity against her natural instinct to nurture, thus the Jewish Marxist derivative Feminism with its propaganda of ‘equality’ appealed. With this emphasis on the working mother the ‘latch key kid’ became a common feature of the 80’s now schools could be forced to open longer as society shifts towards the institutional care of ever younger children. Not surprisingly this concept was inspired by the British Labour Party whose current leader Ed Miliband’s family connection to Jewish Marxism would explain the desire to retard ethnic European’s.
During October 1919, the Jewish Bolshevik mass murderer Lenin secretly visited the laboratory of I. P. Pavlov, an ethnic European physiologist known chiefly for the concept of the conditioned reflex. Pavlov is best known for training hungry dogs to associate the sound of a bell with food salivating at the sound even in the absence of food. Lenin was intent on discovering if conditional reflexes of the brain would help the Bolsheviks control European behaviour. “I want the masses of Russia to follow a Communistic pattern of thinking and reacting,” Pavlov was appalled for Lenin had suggested that he do for ethnic Europeans what he had already done for dogs. “Do you mean that you would like to standardise the population of Russia? Make them all behave in the same way?” he asked. “Exactly” Lenin replied. “Man can be corrected. Man can be made what we want him to be.”… As a consequence Pavlov became an outspoken opponent of the Communist government publically stating that “If that which the Jewish Bolsheviks are doing with Russia is an experiment, for such an experiment I should regret giving even a frog.” As such a credible argument can be expressed that current methods of teaching are intentionally meant to under develop the child’s intellectual capacity. Primatologist Winthrop Kellogg, convinced nurture was the dominant role in development, introduced a baby chimpanzee into his family. Whilst the chimp did copy many human characteristics Kellogg was shocked to discover that his son was displaying the barks and yelps of the chimp rather than beginning to learn the rudiments of human speech. Almost by accident Kellogg had exposed the vulnerability of childhood and how the smallest change can have a lasting effect. Plasticity is the term now used to describe the brain’s ability to change in response to repeated stimulation. The extent of a brain’s plasticity is dependent on the stage of development and the particular brain system or region affected (Perry, 2006). For instance, the lower parts of the brain, which control basic functions such as breathing and heart rate, are far less flexible than the higher functioning cortex, which controls thoughts and feelings. This places the infant in a very vulnerable position as more and more parents leave their young for the work environment and institutions become the prime carer and the television is the ultimate stimulation. This is the construct the Frankfurt School desired as it provides a forum for Cultural Marxism to infiltrate the media and deconstruct its natural order with degradation.
The early years of children’s programming may have been somewhat crude but the likes of Watch with Mother did contain the rudiments of number and musical stimulation, plus the key was in the title. This was meant as an ideas forum for a stay at home mum. By 1968 children’s TV had become much more educationally savvy feeding teaching ideas into the fabric of the cartoon. However, as the effect of cultural Marxist doctrine began to filter into the mix the education value slipped. Most popular children’s TV characters today fail even to use proper words or articulate the vocabulary of any particular language. Speaking gibberish is highly reminiscent of Kellogg’s young son picking up the barks and yelps of the chimp he spent so much time with. This begs the question are human beings a global experiment reminiscent of that proposed by Lenin. Uniformity is the common factor of Communist Marxism loosely concealed under a quest for utopian ‘equality’. Lenin’s desire to ‘standardise the behaviour of the European people’ only highlights this. Of course equality is not a natural phenomenon and a perfect example of this lies with the creation of the sexes. Meant to complement one another Feminism’s Marxist propagation of ‘equality’ only negates the natural differences between the sexes. Frankly the only way to implement ‘equality’ is to eradicate difference, and that means an end to sexual, racial and cultural identity. Therefore, typical Marxist levelling sees Whites who now live in Black communities ‘encouraged’, like the child with the monkey or dog, to take on Negroid characteristics because the easiest way to impose uniformity is to reduce to the lowest common denominator.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Since approximately 2005 the Jewish State of Israel has had ‘problems’ with third world immigration. In fact reading through these witness statements and one begins to see a startling familiarity “…rampant crime by migrants and say that it has become “Soweto,” a reference to the site of a 1976 uprising in South Africa. At a recent protest fanned by Zionist politicians, one lawmaker described the Africans, known here as “infiltrators,” as “a cancer in our body.” Of course any self-respecting White European citing similar scenes inflicted on his land by citizens of the Jewish State would be labelled ‘racist’. However, in Israel when the Jew finds something distasteful he takes to the streets and attacks the Africans’ stores and apartments. In Europe the White man would no doubt face a prison sentence for a ‘hate crime’ against the protectant migrant. Yet in the Jewish state the Africans were rounded up and detained in Concentration Camps only to be deported a short time later.
More recently the Telegraph reported a Vatican official saying Israel is fostering intolerance of Christianity. Naturally reading between the lines what the article depicts is much more sinister. With graffiti, church burnings and defilement in the street the Jewish state is not turning a blind eye to violence against gentiles because the Talmud has always condoned it. In the past though Jewish acts of violence have always taken place through stealth and in secrecy. The theft of the land of Palestine has given the Jew a new arrogance and brought his evil into the light. In ‘his’ Jewish state of Israel the Jew does as he pleases and if that means spitting on Christian clergy or setting fire to their churches then he will. Naturally if in Europe the White man retaliates and burns a few synagogues or spits on a few Jews that’s anti-Semitism. It never occurs to the brainwashed Marxist liberals that ‘anti-Semitism’ is an invention of the Jew and would not exist without his sordid crimes.
These are just a couple of incidents that indicate the height of hypocrisy that issues forth from Jewish realms. However, a continuing saga in the arena of Jewish hypocrisy has to be the matter of race. Again the Jewish state features prominently in this ‘dilemma’. Stubbornly insisting on its status as an ethno state, whose primary interest is Jewish. Even down to the law of return that in expressing “born of a Jewish mother” testifies to the racial element of this tribe.
In Europe an accusation of ‘race hate’ was dropped because Jews so often claim that Judaism is only a religion. To prevent this occurring in future Jewish Zionist leaped into action and in 2006 the Religious Hatred Act in the United Kingdom was amended to the Racial and Religious Hatred Act. This is a clear case, not of ‘righteous’ ethno legislature but what is best for the Jews. In Europe what is best for the Jews is never good for the European and this is why the occupation of White lands must end. It is high time that the White male of Jewish Zionist propaganda crept back in the closet as Europe resurrects the Great White Man to tear down this Zionist house of cards.
As most avid followers of Jewish Zionist scams will be aware, Simon Wiesenthal is as bigger fraud as soap and lamp shades Therefore, how the centre that bears his name maintains ‘credibility’ accusing Nationalists of ‘war crimes’ in the face of brazen Jewish Communist brutality is a remarkable feat of propaganda. Maybe Wiesenthal is just part of the financial package necessary to maintain the Jewish Zionist in the manner to which he has become accustomed. Nevertheless just because ‘one’ calls the White male cattle (goyim) doesn’t mean he stands in a field and chews grass, we see the hypocrisy so thick it rests like a fog over Europe.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Jewish Zionist Jacob Rothschild recently took a £130m bet on the demise of the Euro. So it would seem that this ‘illustrious’ banking family finally tires of toying with White man and now seeks to hasten the Euro’s inevitable collapse. This is not the first time the Zionist Rothschild family have ‘gambled’ so loosely with Europe’s future.
There were vast fortunes to be made — and lost — on the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo. The Stock Exchange in London was at fever pitch as traders waited for this battles outcome. If Britain lost, English consuls would plummet to unprecedented depths. If Britain was victorious, the value of the consul would leap to dizzying new heights. It was here that by nefarious means Nathan Rothschild would multiply his already vast fortune.
As the battle took place Rothschild had agents working both sides of the line to gather the most accurate possible information and carry the intelligence to posts strategically located nearby. Dawn on June 16, 1815, a Rothschild representative, possessing a top secret report was met at Folkstone. Scanning highlights of the report Rothschild was speeding towards London and the Stock Exchange in no time.
At the Exchange, emotionless and expressionless Rothschild took up his usual position beside the famous ‘Rothschild Pillar. Meanwhile Rothschild agents began dumping consuls on the market and as hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of consuls poured onto the market their value started to slide. Then they began to plummet. Rothschild continued to lean against ‘his’ pillar, and to sell, and sell and sell. Consuls kept on falling. Word began to sweep through the Stock Exchange: “Rothschild knows.” “Rothschild knows.” “Wellington has lost at Waterloo.”
When the consul was selling for about five cents on the dollar Rothschild signalled and on cue dozens of Rothschild agents made their way to the order desks around the Exchange and bought every consul in sight! A short time later the ‘official’ news arrived in London. England was now the master of the European scene. Within seconds the consul skyrocketed to above its original value. As the significance of the British victory began to sink into the public consciousness, the value of consuls rose even higher. Napoleon had ‘met his Waterloo.’ However the REAL implication never has yet…
The Jew Nathan Rothschild had bought control of the British economy.
Since then the Rothschild family have continued to play high stakes business and finance not always managing to come off to squeaky ‘clean’. Financier Nathaniel Rothschild lost a libel case against newspaper the Daily Mail that depicted him as a “puppet master” who used his friendship with a European trade chief to impress a Russian oligarch and help close a business deal. The article stated Rothschild had sought to impress Oleg Deripaska by unexpectedly bringing homosexual Jewish Zionist Peter Mandelson to a dinner the Russian held with bosses from the U.S. aluminium company Alcoa Inc. The newspaper said Rothschild had “pulled a very unexpected and also rather useful rabbit out of his hat” as Alcoa was worried about EU tariffs on Russian aluminium exports. Obviously true yet the Rothschild’s do not like their sleight of hand and insider trading to see the light. Unfortunately for this Jew it seems not all journalists or judiciary are in Zionism’s pay.
Incidentally Peter Mandelson was a main player if not the main player in the creation of New Labour, however with such a close relationship with Rothschild it is far more likely that Mandelson is a frontman and Rothschild the real ‘brains’ behind the creation of New labour. With the neo-conservative movement in America created by the Jew Irving Kristol, this has a certain credible appeal. Capitalism and Communism are 2 sides of the same coin with Capitalist banking systems funding the exploits of global Communism. The nature of the game, for that’s all it is to the Zionist players, is to withhold a land’s wealth from its people. Consequently the Zionist parasites get immensely rich while the Nation’s conquered suffer crippling debt.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
It now appears to be a fully endorsed ‘state’ sanctioned policy for Zionists to use every opportunity to propagandise for their ‘Holocaust’. Below is a recent article detailing how Euro 2012 taking place in Poland and the Ukraine will be ‘host’ to graphic displays of ‘Holo-memorobilia’.
Published June 10, 2012.
Israeli students have launched a social media campaign which uses the Euro 2012 soccer games to commemorate the Holocaust.
Over one million people will visit Ukraine and Poland this month to watch the Euro 2012 soccer games. The Israeli students wondered how many of them will remember the some six million Jews murdered in those two countries some 70 years ago. The campaign, titled Euro1945, consists of a website, smartphone applications and Facebook, Twitter and Instagram accounts.
“We’re basically riding Euro 2012,” the campaign’s designer, Omri Ariav, said. A law student at the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Israel, he designed the campaign along with seven students.
The graphics of Euro1945 echo the official advertising campaign of Euro2012. The welcome page of Euro1945 displays a map where each EUFA 2012 hosting city and stadium is marked with a Jewish tombstone. A click on the icon produces a summary about the Jewish community that existed there before the Holocaust. The Instagram account is updated daily with photos from before and during the Holocaust.
The text offers historical soccer-related anecdotes such as the Kiev Death Match, held in August 1942 at Zenit Stadium. A team of German soldiers lost the game 3:5 to local players. The Germans sent the victorious team to a concentration camp.
The text on Poznan notes that the first Jewish labor camp in the area was set up at the Poznan Municipal Stadium. “We decided this world event must also help commemorate the victims. Maybe it’s Israeli chutzpah but I don’t think we’re raining on anyone’s parade,” Ariav said.
This ploy is now obvious for we have already seen the mighty splendour and body beautiful of the Greek Olympia rendered a Marxist pulp fiction. This European sporting tournament is to be used as a focus for White European ‘Guilt’. The Zionist machine is at work again promoting its own brand of Hate. However, in its desperation to exploit Poland, the Ukraine and its apparent ‘Nazi crimes’ it completely erases the Communist crimes visited on the East by Bolshevism.
The Ukrainian people had suffered terribly through forced starvation policies of Stalin during the 1930s. When the German Army entered the Soviet Union in June 1941, they encountered deplorable conditions. In January 1942 a 60-page booklet titled German Soldiers in the Soviet Union: Letters from the East was published in WWII Germany. This consisted mostly of excerpts from letters from soldiers reporting on the conditions they encountered. Particularly harrowing are the accounts of atrocities visited upon the Ukrainian and Latvian Nationals by retreating Zionist Bolsheviks.
Soldier Fred Fallnbigl to his Parents in Salzburg, 17.7.41
I wrote in my last two letters about Russian atrocities, and could fill volumes more.
But a bit more from the Soviet Paradise. I’ll especially tell you about things that happened in Lemberg-Tarnopol and Tromborla. Tromborla is due south of Tarnopol. I saw the prisons in Lemberg, and saw things that struck me deeply. There were men with their ears and noses cut off, etc. They had nailed children alive by their hands and feet to the wall, butchering them. The blood was ankle deep. It didn’t make any difference if they were alive or dead. They doused the piles of bodies with gasoline and set them on fire. The stench was terrible. I saw similar things in Tarnopol and Tromborla. In T. seven Ukrainians were hauled out of their beds after the Germans had arrived. The next morning their bodies were found in the woods, beaten until they were unrecognizable. I have seen all of this myself, they are not matters I heard about. Feel free to tell them to others, particularly those who may still think well of the Soviet Union.
I always think how fortunate we are that this scourge of humanity never made it to our country. I don’t think that even years of preparation would make Germans capable of such atrocities.
Orphans Nailed to the Wall and Slaughtered
NCO K. Suffner, Military Post Number 08 070 to his work mates
There was a gray cloud over Lemberg as we arrived. The stench was scarcely tolerable. The Russians had been thrown out of the city after a hard battle. Two hours later I found the source of the stench. The Bolshevists and Jews bestially murdered 12,000 Germans and Ukrainians. I saw pregnant women hanging by their feet in the GPU’s prison. They had slit the noses, ears, eyes, fingers, hands and arms and legs of other women. Some even had their hearts cut out. 300 orphans between the ages of 2 and 17 had been nailed to the wall and butchered. After they were done with the torture, they threw the people, most of whom were still alive, into a 3 meter deep pile in the basement, doused them with gasoline, and lit them on fire. It was terrible! We could not believe that shave suffered if Bolshevism had reached us. The complainers and know-it-alls that we still have in the Reich should see this. Then they would know what pure Bolshevism looks like. They would fall to their knees and thank the Führer for saving Germany from such things. I and many other German soldiers have seen this. We all thank the Führer that he let us see the Bolshevist “paradise.” We swear to extirpate this plague root and branch.
Since I have some time today, I thought it my duty to write this so that my work mates at home can read it. We soldiers at the front have seen this with our own eyes. We will be able to tell a lot more later.
We are fighting until final victory.
German soldiers treated the entry into the Eastern Nations as giving freedom to Bolshevik occupied allies. After 25 years under Bolshevik Communism they were greeted as heroic saviours.
Staff Sergeant Kurt Hummel, Military Post Number L 31 605 Lg Pa. Paris, to his local group
Northern Russia, 12 August 1941
Bolshevist conditions are indescribable. I had never imagined that such misery was possible. People here know nothing about electric lights, radio, newspapers and the like. One can’t call what they live in houses. There are only shanties with rotten straw roofs. Huge neglected fields lay around. We haven’t yet found even a small shop. This is what people call the Soviet paradise. I wish the few outsiders who still remain in Germany could be shipped here. There is misery wherever one looks. One has to see it to realize how beautiful Germany is.
The Main Roads are like Paths
Soldier Heinrich Stähr tells his work mates at the Hamburg Hochbahn A. G. about conditions frequently mentioned in other letters as well:
The roads. We in the infantry are probably the best judge of good and bad roads, since we have to march for kilometer after kilometer on them. Here too the Soviets haven’t lifted a finger. The main roads are no better than field paths. Believe me, my dear comrades, the soldiers have had many a justifiable curse after marching 40 or 50 kilometers on such a road. Besides, it is 30-35 degrees C. in the shade, and huge clouds of dust make it almost impossible to breathe. Swamps, forests, and bad roads make military action unpleasant, but we keep moving forward.
The Bolshevik ‘utopia’ wasn’t all it was cracked up to be. It is about time that the crimes committed by the Soviet state by Zionist Bolsheviks stop being transposed onto the White German people. Already the cracks are starting to show. For approximately 50 years the German Army has been blamed for the Katyn Wood Massacre. The first news of a massacre at Katyn Wood came in April 1943 when the Germans found a mass grave of 4,500 Polish soldiers in German-occupied Russia. The discovery at Katyn Wood was to greatly embarrass the Russian government. Moscow announced its stance on April 14th 1943:
|“The Polish prisoners in question were interned in the vicinity of Smolensk in special camps and were employed in road construction. In was impossible to evacuate them at the time of the approach of the German troops and, as a result, they fell into their hands. If, therefore, they have been found murdered, it means that they have been murdered by the Germans who, for reasons of provocation, now claim that the crime was committed by Soviet authorities.”|
This remained the ‘official’ stance until 1990 when the Russian authorities admitted that it was the Russian Secret police (NKVD) who executed the Polish prisoners. This is a clear campaign hatched between the Soviet Bolsheviks and her war time allies to place all her hideous crimes on axis forces. One must maintain the illusion that one’s ally is a friend not the monster and already propaganda extoled the Soviet State as a Communist utopia. The public’s view of this must not be shaken and to preserve this one makes the enemy the monster. However, it is a house of cards and once one card topples the whole house starts crashing down.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL