Moritz Steinschneider (30th March 1816 – 24th January 1907) was a Jewish bibliographer most infamous for inventing the phrase anti-Semite. Indeed while Leopold Zunz invented the concept of ‘Jewish Studies’ it was Steinschneider who inserted the Jews into the general history of Caucasian civilization. He received his early instruction in Hebrew from his father, Jacob Steinschneider (b. 1782; d. March 1856) and at the age of thirteen he became the pupil of Rabbi Nahum Trebitsch. By 1838 Steinschneider was a member of a proto-Zionist society called “Die Einheit” along with Rabbi Albert Lowry and Jew Abraham Benisch. Rabbi Lowry would infiltrate London under the guise of an ‘emissary’ of the Students’ Jewish National Society in 1841 with the Jew Benisch arriving in England shortly after. With ‘Semitic’ based on the ideological construct of race invented by the Gottingen School of History, in 1860 Steinschneider fabricated the word antisemitisch politicizing the term ‘Semite’ in order that it be a weapon that would shut down Caucasoid debate. Comparable to this is the current use of the term ‘Racism’ invented by Trotsky.
The Göttingen school of history was a group of historians associated with a particular style of historiography located at the University of Gottingen in the late 18th century. While it proposed a scientific basis for historic research its historians sought to write a universal history that effectively narrowed or limited the range and scope of academic study. In fact this school is notorious for producing Biblical terminology for race that is primarily unscientific; for one cannot subject the Bible to scientific method and therefore instantly shifts the field from fact seeking to the implementation of ideology. Consequently, with no proven scientific method Biblical terminology: Semitic, Hamitic and Japhetic is an ideological construct used as a politicised weapon for the Jew to incite dominion over the Caucasian.
Most commonly associated with the Gottingen School of History, monogenism or sometimes monogenesis, is the belief in a common decent for all human species. On one front it stems from Bible-based theory and while it is central to the 3 monotheistic religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam, the belief that all humans are descended from Adam is not conducive to scientific method. This instantly shifts the field of study from fact seeking to the implementation of ideology setting dogmatic limits on academic exploration in the scientific field. A perfect example is the use of biblical terminology in any anthropological field of study. Ham Shem and Japhet are the 3 sons of Noah. Genesis Chapter 5 relates an entire genealogy that connects Noah back to Adam. While an uninterrupted thread exists from Adam through Shem, following the flood Genesis 9:18-27 describes the possible sodomy by Ham of his father and an ensuing curse upon the Hamitic (Canaan) line from which the Hittite tribe descended. Recent archaeological evidence revealed that the Hittites were a Caucasian tribe and while the Jew insists that the Hittites of the Bible and those discovered in the same geographical region through archaeology are not the same the likelihood is astronomical and only exposes the mechanics of Jewish manipulation. Consequently, with no proven scientific method Biblical terminology: Semitic, Hamitic and Japhetic is an ideological construct used as a politicised weapon for the Jew to incite dominion over the Caucasian. It is also fascinating to note that Biblical monogenism played a decisive role in manufacturing an ‘African-American’ literature critical in supporting Afrocentrism as a legitimate concept.
The materialistic perspective is based on Evolutionary biology’s contention that the physical evolutionary processes produced diversity of life on Earth starting from a single common ancestor. Just as with Darwin’s theory of evolution from which this form of monogenism germinated, what is being proposed here is largely an infinite regression. Over a vast expanse of time this converges into one progenitor, which too winks out of existence leaving the ‘nothing’ from which materialists ‘something’ will come. Crucially unproven using scientific methodology the consequence of this particular piece of pseudo-science has left scientific enquiry bound by the intrinsically Afrocentric ‘out of Africa’ construct.
Again just as with the theory of evolution, only delivered as fact within the last 3 decades, it is remarkable just how far vocal ‘nationalists’ will allow Jewish Zio-Marxists to go with their pseudo-scientific claims without proven scientific methodology to secure their case. After all was it not these ‘scientists’ who condemn German science of the WWII period as pseudo-science in the same breath as informing the mass that they were 15 if not 30 years more advanced than the so called ‘allies’.
Erich Seligmann Fromm (March 23rd, 1900 – March 18th, 1980) was a Jewish social psychologist, psychoanalyst, sociologist, and Marxist associated with the Frankfurt School of critical theory. Fromm was born at Frankfurt am Main, the only child of Jewish parents. Fromm’s grandfather and two great grandfathers on his father’s side were rabbis, and a great uncle on his mother’s side was a noted Talmudic scholar. In 1930 he joined the Frankfurt Institute for Social Research and completed his psychoanalytical training. In 1933 Fromm moved first to Geneva and a year later to Columbia University in New York. Belonging to a Neo-Freudian school of psychoanalysis and reportedly an atheist, central to Fromm’s world view was his interpretation of the biblical story of Adam and Eve. Rather than just condemn European values under the term ‘authoritarian’ as is want for Marxist critical theory Fromm used the story of Adam and Eve as an instrument for inverting European development and instilling fictional ‘existential angst’. He asserts that when Adam and Eve ate from the Tree of Knowledge, they became aware of themselves as being separate from nature while still being part of it. This false antithesis to nature is Fromm’s foundation for European guilt and shame, the only solution to which according to Fromm can be found in the development of ‘love and reason’. It is fascinating to note that it is “the authoritarian personality” the main component of which “is susceptibility “to anti-Semitic ideology and anti-democratic political beliefs” that is the main impediment to ‘love and reason’. (also see Chutzpah)
Daniel J. Levinson (May 28th, 1920 – April 12th, 1994), a Jewish psychologist most well-known for his theory of stage-crisis view responsible for ‘normalising’ the concept of the ‘midlife crisis’. Levinson was born in New York City, New York. He began his studies at the University of California, Berkeley, whereat he completed his dissertation in 1947. Following this, Levinson conducted research on personality, specifically constructing the fiction of ‘authoritarian personalities’ at Berkeley and Western Reserve University. With collaboration from Theodor W. Adorno and Else Frenkel-Brunswik “The Authoritarian Personality,” was published in 1950. The main component of this hypothesises a personality type with a susceptibility “to anti-Semitic ideology and anti-democratic political beliefs.” Like all Jewish Marxist theories it must be able to label, file or define personality types by ranking and rating various individual traits in order to reduce it to a directed multiple choice form. This was achieved using the ‘F-scale personality test’ (also see Chutzpah).
Else Frenkel-Brunswik (August 18th, 1908 – March 31st, 1958) was a Jewish psychologist best known for her contributions to the Jewish Marxist construct known as “The Authoritarian Personality” in collaboration with Theodor W. Adorno and Daniel Levinson. Else Frenkel was born in Lemberg, the second of three daughters of Jewish department store owner Abraham Frenkel and his wife Helene Frenkel. In 1914, her family moved from Poland to Austria where Frenkel-Brunswik completed her Doctorate dissertation at the University of Vienna in 1930. She left Austria in 1938 moving to the United States where she became a citizen in the same year. Also in 1938 she married Egon Brunswik who had joined the faculty of Berkeley in 1937 and from 1939 to 1958 Else Frenkel-Brunswik worked as a research associate at the Institute of Child Welfare, Department of Psychology of the University of California at Berkeley. She initially studied personality. Then, working with Theodor W. Adorno and the Jewish psychiatrist and psychologist Daniel J. Levinson, who had been one of her students contributed significantly to the Jewish Marxist construct called ‘anti-Semitism’. This work was supported by the American Jewish Committee. In 1950 Frenkel-Brunswik collaborated with Theodor W. Adorno and Daniel Levinson to construct ‘The Authoritarian Personality’, the main component of which is a susceptibility “to anti-Semitic ideology and anti-democratic political beliefs” (also see Chutzpah)
Jews have been present in Vietnam only since the late 19th century. There are a handful of references to Jewish settlement in Saigon sprinkled through the pages of the Jewish Chronicle in the 1860s and 1870s. Adherents that remain today are those that claim to be of the ‘Semitic’ variety with few to no native Vietnamese converts. However, this is not for the want of trying. The Alliance Israélite Universelle, a Jewish terrorist organisation, appears to have had some activity in Haiphong during the 1920s, Then in the 1930’s the growth of communism was reported with the Dang Cong San Viet Nam (Vietnamese Communist Party), directed from Moscow and Canton. In 2006, Chabad opened a centre in Ho Chi Minh City, which is considered to be the economic centre of Vietnam. According to Rabbi Menachem Hartman of the Chabad Centre, about 10,000 to 15,000 Jewish business people and tourists visit Vietnam each year.
Jews have occupied Africa from the seventh century. They left Spain and moved to inland Africa and proselytized among the Caucasian Berber tribes. A number of tribes, including the Jarawa, Uled Jari, and some tribes of the Daggatun people, converted to the customs called ‘Judaism’ that the Jew practiced. Ibn Khaldun reported that Kahina, a female Berber who revolted against the Semitic Arab tribes practicing Islam of North Africa in the 680s and 690s, was a Jew of the Jarawa tribe. Thus even from its earliest occupation the Jew has planted its Trojan horse and fostered treachery between kin.
Contrary to popular belief the Jew is not a pure race for as specified there are three basic races-the Caucasoid or White Race, the Mongoloid and Negroid or Black race. It claims to be ‘Semitic’, a variant admixtures of the core racial types-Caucasoid (White Race), the Mongoloid and Negroid (Black race). This has been the strategy the Jew has used to legitimise territorial claim to Palestinian land for over 3000 years. Nevertheless, while it is true that a people of variant ‘Semitic’ admixture existed in the area of Palestine for over 2000 years the Jewish declaration is absurd it is like the Celts ‘demanding’ England back from the Saxon after 15 hundred years of occupation. Yet this is indicative of Jewish methodology. As an itinerant tribe without anything of substance expropriation or theft of money, property or territory from the host population is the Jewish staple. Their nomadic existence has spread them across the globe with further dispersals instituting global communication between Jewish communities added through their own private languages, while propaganda conceals their criminality with cries of persecution.
Shomrim/Shmira are organizations of uniformed Jewish civilian patrols which have been set up in Haredi communities in neighborhoods across the United States and Great Britain (and in many other countries) to terrorize the surrounding local indigenous communities. A particular strategy is to agitate neighboring gentiles then report a rise in ‘anti-Semitic’ attacks when neighbors complain of harassment. There is also a high correlation between missing children and active Shomrim patrols.