From the 1880’s onwards British police were investigating subversive political activity specifically involving Jewish itinerants previously squatting in Poland and Russia. Mainstream has already admitted that the most vicious modern serial killer the Jew Aaron Kosminski AKA ‘Jack the Ripper’ likely arrived in London with his family during the Russian riots that broke out in response to Jewish terrorist activity in the early 1880’s culminating in the murder of a European monarch Tsars Alexander II. Significant international media control enabled the Jewish tribe to use their favourite cry of victimhood effectively (The fabricated Pogrom). Thus a new wave of Jews was dispersed far and wide re-infecting some of the most powerful European countries on earth with their now ideologically revised poisonous designs; amongst the immigrants leaving Eastern Europe for Britain such violent terrorist types were contained amongst them. Indeed close to Mitre Square in the City of London where the Ripper’s fourth victim Catharine Eddowes was murdered the Great Synagogue and the Imperial Club both just off Duke Street were both potential meeting places for these Jewish Communist agitators. The Hebrew Socialist Union had been formed in Gun Street; Spitalfields in 1876 and in 1889, following a march from Berner Street to the Great Synagogue, a riot would take place outside the International Workers’ Educational Club near where the Ripper’s third victim Elizabeth Stride’s body was found. Committed Jewish Communist Louis Diemschutz, a deceitful ‘witness’ to the Elizabeth Stride murder, was listed as speaking at a club in Manchester in 1891 on the theme of the Paris Commune, which was the first attempted Marxist seizure of a European land. He, along with the Jew Isaac Kozebrodsky also witness to the murder scene, were arrested in March 1889 during the riot at the International Working Men’s Club and charged with assaulting a police officer. Diemschutz was sentenced to three months’ imprisonment with hard labour, a £40 fine (around £15,000 in today’s money) and producing two sureties of £20 each, to be forfeited if he failed to be of good behaviour for twelve months; a rather substantial cost for a supposed ‘poor Jewish immigrant’.
Britain’s First Jewish Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli still had his seat in 1880 and his own policy on race condoned this influx of violent Jewish criminality that equally brought the monster Kosminski into Britain. In his book Endymion published in 1880 Disraeli wrote “no man will treat with indifference the principles of race. It is the key to history and why history is so often confused is that it has been written by men who were ignorant of this principle and all the knowledge it involves…Language and religion do not make a race-there is only one thing which makes a race, and that is blood” Disraeli (1804 – 1881) was contemporary with the Jew Karl Marx (1818 – 1883) and both times as Prime Minister (1868, 1874–80) shared the same city as the inventor of White man’s destruction (Communism). However, curiously this is not the first time this tribal pair’s path has crossed. The Great Potato Famine began in Ireland in 1845 coinciding with Karl Marx’s brief visit to England 4 years before his permanent residency in 1849. 11 years later Marx would echo his comrade twice the future Prime Minister of Britain, Disraeli, then MP for Shrewsbury as he collapsed the British government in order to sabotage the only remedy to the Irish potato famine. Almost as if instructed as part of some long term strategy by Marx, two years later in 1847 the earliest safe seat in the House of Commons was made available to a fellow tribesman knowing he was barred from sitting in the chamber. At this time non-Christians were not permitted to sit in Parliament. It is conspicuous that it was so called ‘converted’ Jew Disraeli who spoke in favour of amending the law to permit Jews. With the exception of Disraeli, every member of the future protectionist cabinet then in government voted against the measure. Nevertheless, following this elaborately engineered Marxian scheme in 1847 that forced the British establishment to display apparent ‘anti-Semitism’, a Jewish Disabilities Bill continued to be pushed through Parliament and on 26th July 1858, Lionel de Rothschild took his seat as the first professing alien parasitic Member of Parliament in line with the Jewish agenda. Fundamentally this can be explained through the Jewish strategy of the dialectic (problem, reaction, solution). Their tribe instigate a problem by letting a safe seat in Parliament to one barred from sitting. This creates a reaction, cries of anti-Semitism leading to the Jewish Disabilities Bill pushed through Parliament resulting in the Jewish solution the Jew Lionel de Rothschild taking his seat. This strategy is also at work during the potato famine.
To reiterate at this point at a critical juncture in European history there are 3 major Jews together in the most important capital in the world and within the space of a mere two years two of the most disastrous decisions ever in British history have been made. The loss of containment of a cancerous virus-the Jew is allowed to enter the halls of power-Parliament coursing pandemic across all European nations around the world leading to total Aryan subjugation; and the precursor to the Holodomor, the Irish Potato Famine that created a chasm between brethren so wide that it has existed for over 170 years. Of course this only echoes what Jews have done in other European counties. Examples are Basques set against Spanish, Russians against Ukrainians, Polish against Germans… Under the guidance of Marx, Disraeli and Rothschild’s manoeuvring the result is Jewish consolidation of power in, at that time the most formidable country on earth-Great Britain.
By early 1886 the anti-Home Rule (Ireland) Liberals had formed a ‘Committee for the Preservation of the Union’ (United Kingdom of Great Britain). This was soon joined by a smaller radical faction led by Joseph Chamberlain eventually breaking from Gladstone’s Liberal Party to form the Liberal Unionist Party. A coalition of the Conservative and Liberal Unionist parties took power in the United Kingdom following the general election of 1895. The Conservative leader, Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, the Marquess of Salisbury, took office as Prime Minister, and Arthur Balfour, was leader of the Commons. It is critical to recognise and no doubt surprising to some to hear that firearms were commonplace among the British people during this period and the government did not interfere. Prime Minister Lord Salisbury even stated in 1900 that he would “laud the day when there was a rifle in every cottage in England”. However, in only 2 years; 1902 the same year that Lenin along with Trotsky made their first visit to London and the first Zionist leader Theodor Herzl was in the capital, Salisbury had resigned to be succeeded by the infamous Balfour with the approval of the coalition government. Herzl would have multiple meetings with Nathanial Mayer ‘Lord’ Rothschild between 1902 and 1903. By 1903, the year Lenin paid his second visit, Britain had passed its first ever “gun control” law running parallel with current Jewish gun restrictions being enforced in America. Also at this time Winston Churchill alienated the Conservative Party by criticising the principles of Protectionism and military expenditure achieving a vote of no confidence from his Party on 23rd December 1903. The year before in 1902, he had been initiated into Freemasonry at Studholme Lodge, London (#1591) and raised to the Third Degree on 25th March. Although he continued to sit for Oldham until the next general election Churchill chose a critical moment to cross the floor to the Liberal Party. At the end of March 1904 just weeks prior to his departure the Conservatives had brought the Aliens Bill, the purpose of which was to curb Jewish immigration from East Europe, before the House of Commons. Promptly Churchill became an ardent opponent of the Bill busily wooing the electors of north-west Manchester, one-third of whose voters were Jewish, for whom he became Liberal MP in 1906, the year in which the Liberal party won a spectacular General Election victory. He was even accused in the press of acting under orders from Lord Rothschild, though he characterized the charge as a “foul slander”. Nevertheless, Churchill and a few allies continued to stonewall the bill. It was also incredibly convenient that in 1902 and 3 it was Theodor Herzl, Jewish Zionist and organiser of the World Zionist Organization of which the minutes are said to be the Protocols, who was invited to give evidence before the British Royal Commission on Alien (specifically Jewish) Immigration. Only a year later in 1904 during one of his electoral campaigns Balfour conferred with Chaim Weizmann, a leader among Jewish Zionists in Britain, who had recently taken a position as a chemistry lecturer in the area of Balfour’s Manchester constituency. Occurring in the same year that Churchill crossed the floor and became an ardent opponent of the Aliens Bill, vital is the fact that both these characters played a key role in the establishment of Israel. Meanwhile top Jewish Bolsheviks including Lenin and Trotsky have been meeting in London over the 3 years prior to the first attempted seizure of Russia in 1905. Balfour was Prime Minister until his resignation in December 1905 thus overseeing the Russo-Japanese War and playing host to the Jewish Bolshevik instigators of the first attempted seizure of Russia. Critically the Jewish anarchists involved in the attempted first violent seizure of Russia who escaped to England in 1905 were also the instigators of the Sidney Street Siege and a series of violent crimes involving several murders that preceded it, dealt with shortly in this article. Hence, as a consequence of Jewish political propaganda in the 1880’s Britain had an increasing influx of violent politically motivated alien parasites condoned by a strategically placed Jewish Prime Minister Disraeli who had twice cross paths with Karl Marx. Within years MP Churchill was accused in the press of acting under orders from Lord Rothschild as Prime Minister Balfour conferred with leading Jewish Zionist in Britain Chaim Weizmann and played host to the Jewish Bolshevik instigators of the first attempted seizure of Russia. Already in 1905 an examination of the British leadership was sharply indicating corruption and enemy infiltration.
The Aliens Act had been introduced by July 24th 1905. It ensured that leave to land could be withheld if the immigrant was judged to be ‘undesirable’ by falling into one of four categories: ‘a) if he cannot show that he has in his possession … the means of decently supporting himself and his dependents …’; ‘b) if he is a lunatic or an idiot or owing to any disease of infirmity liable to become a charge upon the public rates …’; c) ‘if he has been sentenced in a foreign country for a crime, not being an offence of a political character …’; or ‘d) if an expulsion order under this act has [already] been made’. What is highly significant is that racially driven ‘political’ intrigue against a former European government is not considered criminally damaging enough to restrict access into this land demonstrating that the interests of the British public are not being prioritised. Indeed there is clear evidence of National interests being relegated to pave the way for future global Jewish interests. Consequently even with the adoption of the Aliens Act the subversive political atmosphere remained. Although a bit late in the game this was acknowledged 34 years later on “January 13th, 1939 when Mr. Dummett, the Bow Street Magistrate, said in Court: “This system by which Jews get sailors to smuggle them into this country, and then refuse to give the name of the ship or men who got them here, is a grave breach of the Aliens Act.” Mr. Metcalfe, the Old Street Magistrate, expressed himself on the subject in even stronger terms. “Most of the stipendiary magistrates know that the so-called aliens are Jewish criminals of the lowest and shiftiest type or, at the best, rapacious political nuisances.”
Ramsay MacDonald played host to Lenin in the run up to the Tottenham outrage (1907). He would become the first Labour Prime Minister in the shadow of scandal implicating him in Jewish Bolshevik conspiracy. The 1924 scandal surrounded a document in letter form written by the Jew Zinoviev encouraging agitation “in the armed forces (including a loan to the Bolshevik government)”. Also during Lenin’s fourth and fifth visits to London in 1907 and 8 Trotsky, Stalin and other leading Bolshevik terrorists attended a congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party in an East London church. The Tottenham Outrage is the name given to an armed robbery and double murder which took place in Tottenham, Middlesex and Walthamstow, Essex, on January 23rd 1909, carried out by two Jewish anarchists, Paul Helfeld and Jacob Lepidus (sometimes spelt Lapidus). It is interesting to note that this occurred in the same year as the founding of MI1 through to MI19 the precursor to the well-known MI5 and MI6. Curiously its prime agent was the Jew Shlomo Rosenblum alias Sidney Reilly inserted as crucially Jewish anarchists plan to steal wages from Schnurmann’s Rubber Company in Chestnut Road Tottenham. The proceeds of this criminal activity were to be used to fuel unrest around Europe. In fact it was known that many of these Jewish protagonists had already received heavy sentences for this same criminal behaviour in other European countries. Situated in the shadow of Tottenham Police Station shots fired during the attempted robbery were heard by Constables Tyler and Newman. In their attempts to escape the two Jewish anarchists began a chase and shooting spree that resulted in two deaths – a brave unarmed pursuing police officer William Tyler and an innocent 10 year old baker’s delivery boy named Ralph Joscelyne. In all there were 25 casualties including massive head trauma and paralysis due to gunshot wounds demonstrating the escaping Jewish anarchist’s contempt for the innocent European public. The whole incident lasted more than two hours, covered a distance of six miles with an estimated 400 rounds fired by Helfeld and Lepidus. Inconveniently despite a restriction in public gun ownership it was partly due to an armed public that the violence was brought to an ‘early’ close. Consequently there is a direct correlation between Jewish Zio-Marxist street violence and occupied politicians need for public gun control; without means to defend himself against the criminal element the occupying Jew has a new way to exterminate the European. It was reported that both Jewish anarchists shot themselves, Lepidus successfully Helfeld later dying in hospital, rather than risk capture. However, given the extraordinary measures now taken to strip the European public of any means to defend themselves against the enemy, it is hard to imagine the Jew actually taking its own life. Constable Tyler was publicly buried on January 29th in Abney Park Cemetery with the route of the murdered policeman’s funeral cortège being lined by a crowd of half a million people. The event led to the creation of the King’s Police Medal, to reward the gallantry of the police officers involved and heightened public awareness of the Jewish problem; simultaneously increasing a hatred for this criminal race who would later ignite the 1911 Sidney Street Siege.
On December 16th 1910, members of the same Jewish gang including Yakov Peters, George Gardstein, Fritz Svaars, and Yourka Dubof attempted to break into the rear of Henry Harris’s jeweller’s shop in Houndsditch resulting in the murder of 3 police officers and injury to 2 others. The Daily Telegraph reported: “Some two or three weeks ago this particular house in Exchange Buildings was rented and there went to live there two men and a woman. They were little known by neighbours, and kept very quiet, as if, indeed, to escape observation. They are said to have been foreigners in appearance, and the whole neighbourhood of Houndsditch containing a great number of aliens, and removal being not infrequent, the arrival of this new household created no comment. The police, however, evidently had some cause to suspect their intentions. The neighbourhood is always well patrolled.”
An intense search for the murderers followed and a number of the gang or their associates were soon arrested including Karl Hoffman, Max Smoller, John Rosen, Sara Trassjonsky and Gardstein’s mistress Nina Vassilleva. When arrested the Jewess Trassjonsky was hastily burning incriminating documentation. Perhaps relating to other gang members the papers in question may have had links to official channels. She was questioned at the City Police headquarters in Old Jewry, off Cheapside though no significant information could be gotten from her. On January 2nd 1911 The Metropolitan Police received information that two more of the Gardstein gang were sheltering in the Jewess Betsy Gershon‘s flat at 100 Sidney Street, Stepney. The combined force of Met and City Police cordoned off the area and evacuated other residents. What is highly significant at this point is Winston Churchill’s massive over reaction in sending 200 police to surround the building, 800 Scots Guards and field artillery (cannon). The then unpopular Home Secretary made an appearance in person at the scene with audible booing from the gathering crowd as fire took hold of the building. The reason for the appearance of such an authoritative politician has yet to be explained although much palaver was created out of his being shot through the hat; a typical media distraction technique and frequently dismissed by historians who suggest that the bullets passed no were near the Home Secretary. Although the Fire Brigade arrived promptly they were forbidden by Churchill to extinguish the blaze which generally guarantees erasure of forensic evidence. Two bodies were discovered inside the burnt-out building. later identified as Fritz Svaars and William Sokolow. Churchill then appeared at the inquest held that January into the deaths at Houndsditch and Sidney Street. Here curiously, even though fire had meant it unlikely that forensic evidence was possible, it took the jury only fifteen minutes to reach the conclusion that the two bodies located were those of Svaars and Sokoloff, and that the police officers were murdered by Gardstein (now dead) and his gang in the course of a mere burglary attempt.
Although information the police received mentioned only two gang members at the Sidney Street residence and correspondingly two bodies were discovered inside the burnt-out house at this point a police hunt is activated for what we would suggest is a fictional third member of the gang named Peter Piaktow. Portrayed as a mystery ‘revelations’ about his identity are rife only lending the figure to Jewish Marxist misdirection as happened in 1960 when the criminal activities committed by these Jewish anarchists in the winter of 1910-11 were glorified in a movie. ‘Peter Piaktow’ was used as the central character in the film ‘The Siege of Sidney Street’ and the script has him escape providing the media with an ‘excuse’ to ignore facts. Thus in a similar fashion to the ‘Jack the Ripper’ saga were the public are distracted from the true Jewish murderers Aaron Kosminski and his Jewish helper George Chapman by various ‘red herrings’, one of them being the possibility that a member of the Royal family was the killer, there are several myths concentrating on ‘Peter the Painter’. Nevertheless, the trial of the Houndsditch murders opened at the Old Bailey on May 1st with Yakov Peters, a member of the British Labour Party and Yourka Dubof, who both took part in the 1905 attempted Jewish seizure of Russia, charged with murder. Yet James Melville barrister in the 1911 trial successfully defended both anarchists, also critical to note he would become a minister in Ramsay MacDonald’s 1929 Labour Government. According to the author Donald Rumbelow Peters was guilty but the prosecution’s case was a shambles. This was somewhat curious court work considering the number of ‘anarchists’ that his father, William Melville, had apprehended, and his father’s key emergent role in counter-intelligence. Clearly there is weight to the allegation that Melville Sr. was implemented to lift suspicion from Jewish Bolshevik anarchists. Indeed it was Melville Sr. who recruited the Jew Shlomo Rosenblum (Sidney Reilly) supported by Winston Churchill who advocated Reilly’s recruitment into MI6 even though it was known that he prostituted his ‘talents’ to other powers. There is also speculation that Reilly was a Bolshevik agent; his disappearance in Russia in 1925 only deepened these suspicions. That Melville Sr. was also to engage the Jewish trickster and locksmith Houdini around the same time period as Reilly suggests a tribal recruitment drive by the security services. Therefore, British security was heavily infiltrated and thus compromised from the very beginning. Peters escaped justice to return to Russia where he became deputy head of the Cheka secret police. He married May Freeman, the daughter of a Jewish banker in 1913. In December, 1917, Lenin appointed Felix Dzerzhinsky as Commissar for Internal Affairs and head of the All-Russian Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and Sabotage (Cheka). Soon afterwards Dzerzhinsky appointed Peters as his deputy. An American diplomat testified to Congress that Peters was, along with other Cheka leaders considered the “most blood-thirsty monster in Russia” almost as notorious as Dzerzhinsky himself. This only confirms complicity with the Jewish agenda in the British Government at a high level.
The dramatic Siege of Sidney Street was the opening to a series of highly politicised events. In that same year, September 1911, the Jew Mordecai Bogrov murdered the Russian Prime Minister Pyotr Stolypin and only months later Lenin embarked on his final visit to London. In all he visited England 6 times writing his first letter to the Director of the British Museum, dated April 22nd 1902, requesting permission to study in the Library. It bears the signature Jacob Richter; the pseudonym that he had adopted to throw the Tsarist police off his track. The reference required by the Museum authorities was supplied by the General Secretary of the General Federation of Trade Unions, I. H. Mitchell, but this did not satisfy the Admissions Office as Mitchell’s home address could not be found in the London street directories. Lenin wrote again enclosing another recommendation from Mitchell, who this time used the address of his union’s headquarters. On May 18th 1908 under his real name, Vladimir Oulyanoff, Lenin again wrote to the Director of the Museum requesting permission to study in the Library referring to an earlier donation of two of his books. His recommendation came from a certain J. J. Terrett, an English Social Democrat, but as in 1902 the authorities refused him admission. However, not only does this confirm that Lenin had considerable contacts among the so called socialist and Labour Unions but it also indicates that his insurgence into England was not entirely smooth. Two days later he wrote again enclosing a second reference, this time from his old friend, the manager of the Twentieth Century Press and founding member of the British Communist party, Harry Quelch. Lenin made use of the Library’s collections on only one more occasion; during his lecture-tour of 1911. The London reading of “Stolypin and Revolution“ took place on November 11th in the New King’s Hall, Commercial Road, Whitechapel and on the same day the Museum issued a temporary pass to Mr. Vladimir Oulianoff, making a note of his address:- 6 Oakley Square, N.W., in their Card Index of Readers. He visited several European cities to deliver his paper possibly making a stop in Liverpool during the Transport Strike.
Strike action began in Southampton on 14th June when the National Amalgamated Sailors’ and Firemen’s Union made demands for improved conditions for their members and action then spread to other ports, including Liverpool the home of the infamous New York times reporter Walter Duranty who provided the necessary obstacle that prevented the truth about the Holodomor genocides emerging. Demands were met in a few days and members returned to work, but in Liverpool the strike continued led by Tom Mann. Openly Communist and a member of the Fabian Society Mann was an early member of the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) formed in 1920. He supported measures being taken during 1921 in Russia and the Ukraine by the Jewish Bolsheviks (Holodomor Genocides) and published pamphlets stating such. The first Communists recruited from Britain to fight against European patriots in the 1936 Spanish civil war were named the Tom Mann Centuria led by the Jew Nat Cohen. In fact the first Marxist political group in Britain-Social Democratic Federation (SDF) – included trade unionist members Tom Mann and Eleanor Marx, Karl Marx’ youngest daughter.
The strike came to its climax on August 13th as police clashed violently with the public. In the police charges and subsequent unrest that carried on through the following night, over 350 people were injured. 3,500 British troops were stationed in the city by this time. Two days later, soldiers of the 18th Hussars opened fire on a crowd on Vauxhall Road, injuring fifteen, two fatally: John Sutcliffe and Michael Prendergast. Given the heightened tension already alive in the city Churchill’s decision to add troops, extra Police from other parts of the country and even sending a gunboat, HMS Antrim, up the Mersey with its guns facing Liverpool seems like a primer for civil war. However, this was clearly a dialectical move to create an even greater divide between the classes. Given the fact that Lenin had recently paid his last visit to Britain and was a master of the dialectic it is not hard to reason that sexually compromised Churchill had taken instruction directly from his Jewish handlers. Indeed to this day Liverpool is considered to be the most Trotskyite city in Britain. It is also critical to note that the position of the Home Secretary ensures measures be seen as acts of ‘national security’ while they actually favour the Jewish agenda. The Liverpool general transport strike, also known as the great transport workers’ strike, paralysed Liverpool commerce for most of the summer of 1911. Thus with a Marxist leadership the general trade unions had succeeded in fractionalising the whole city (rich versus poor) holding it to ransom through the use of their own working people. It is also interesting to note that although born in Liverpool and aged 27 at the time of the strike Duranty’s whereabouts is unknown at this point though later he would substantially contribute to Jewish Bolshevik propaganda.
Given Lenin’s close link with the union movement in Britain, for example his association with the General Secretary of the General Federation of Trade Unions, I. H. Mitchell, from a Jewish perspective this would warrant a piece of misdirection (in fact a smokescreen) leading directly to the fable of Hitler’s visit to Liverpool still perpetuated today through the Zio-Marxist media even though proven to be a blatant fabrication. Lenin even confirmed a connection following the national coal strike of 1912. The first national strike by coal miners in Britain it began at the end of February in Alfreton, Derbyshire and spread nationwide ending on April 6th after 37 days. Lenin stated that “since the miners’ strike the British proletariat is no longer the same. The workers have learned to fight…In Britain a change has taken place in the balance of social forces”. This only confirms that his appearance in Britain was to solicit disorder. Indeed it was well known that Lenin and his comrades were plotting to take over a European country by violent insurgency. The failed assassination attempt on the Tsar’s life by Lenin’s brother occurring on the sixth anniversary of Alexander II’s murder by Jewish Bolsheviks (1st March 1887) and the first attempted seizure of Russia in 1905 is proof of this. Therefore, while it is plain that between 1902 and 1911 Lenin and his entourage were able to hold their meetings, six in all, in England what is inconceivable is that a Government put in place to protect its people allowed it. Thus, based on the evidence provided, the only conclusion that can be reached is treachery and alien infiltration.
Furthermore, in a telegram from New York to London, dated March 22th, 1917, an MI5 agent warned “An important movement has been started here among Socialists (Jewish Bolsheviks), with a view to getting back Revolutionary Socialists into Russia … with [the] object of establishing a Republic and…promoting Socialistic Revolutions in other countries, including the United States”. Thus this same MI5 agent ordered a ship containing Trotsky to be detained when it stopped at Halifax in Canada. Trotsky was subsequently arrested with five Bolshevik terrorists and there he would have remained, had it not been for the intervention of another Jewish MI6 officer William Wiseman.
This is unmistakable evidence that the British Government allowed the Jew Trotsky back into Russia. This decision was absolutely bizarre given the fact that Britain and the rest of Europe were perfectly aware of Jewish Bolshevik policy to remain out of WWI. Also critical is that Lenin, based in Switzerland, was absent from the beginnings of the Bolshevik takeover of Russia. Yet in hast the German Government smuggled him back into Russia by train. Therefore, the only interests served with the return of two leading Jewish Bolshevik figures-Trotsky and Lenin is the destruction of the old European order marked by the Jewish seizure of Russia and the murder of an ancient European royal line. Indeed history always reveals that the Jew is always at the crucial point to oversee his scheme. Furthermore 3 months prior to Trotsky’s detention on the 17th December 1916 British security services executed a plot with Oswald Rayner (another possibly Jewish agent) and transvestite and likely homosexual Count Felix Yusupova to assassinate Jewish Hollywood’s favourite scapegoat Rasputin.
In a final summery during 1845 there were 3 major Jews Disraeli, Rothschild and Marx in London and within two years two of the most disastrous decisions ever in British history had been made. It is critical to note that the insertion of the Jewish parasite into Parliament has usurped European Security in favour of Jewish global interests. Also particularly significant is the fact that within a few years of Marx’ 1845 episode he writes 2 major Jewish ideological platforms-the Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital and becomes a permanent resident in London. As early as 1871 Marx work is used as a formula in an attempt to seize France and by 1902-4 Prime Minister Balfour plays host to Jewish Zionist leader Theodor Herzl and shares the same city with with first and future President of Israel Chaim Weizmann and Bolshevik leaders Lenin and Trotsky, laying the seed for the Jewish Bolshevik first attempted seizure of Russia, WWI and the capture of Palestine. Following Russia’s actual seizure in 1917 it is the Jew Lenin who will enforce Marx’s Communist ideology that murdered in excess of 66 million Europeans. The foundation for this was laid when; in 1909 Melville recruited Reilly to the fledgling British Secret Service with Churchill’s support. During this period Churchill’s behaviour, whose accusation of homosexuality in 1896 was covertly settled out of court, can only be considered as suspicious with regard to his favourable Jewish political manoeuvring and bizarre presence during Jewish terrorist activity. In 2002 Jewish media through a poll voted Churchill the “Greatest Briton” later followed by a statue in Jerusalem only cementing the fact that Churchill was actually the “Greatest” Jewish shill.
Consequently, Marx’s work was the blueprint for 150 years of European destabilisation culminating in the violent Jewish occupation of Eastern Europe. Even now Marx’s work has been reconstructed for a contrived ‘collapse’ of communism in the East. Now combined with Jewish psychology or ‘Freudianism’ it is delivered across the globe as cultural Marxism or Political Correctness a key dialectical tool driving us towards total subservience under a tyrannical Jewish One World Government. Therefore, it seems only fitting to remind Europe that by constantly submitting to alien Jewish manipulation she squandered a prime opportunity to fight this future. We now face the endgame and a final reckoning. When it arises it must be grasped with both hands for there will be no reprise for Europe.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Following a painstaking investigation conducted by businessman Russell Edwards the Jewish establishment has finally had to concede that the first known and most notorious modern serial killer ‘Jack the Ripper’ was in fact the Jewish immigrant from Poland Aaron Kosminski. What is noteworthy, however, is that this site has for some time held material dealing with the fact that the Jewish media and establishment had the power to trivialise the relevance of this particular suspect. This is of utmost relevance given the fact that a lot of the resources at the time of the murders were allocated to investigating specifically this Jewish suspect. A massive parallel can be made with Britain’s most notorious gangland criminals the Kray twins. Of Jewish heritage, mainstream has established that both twins were homosexual, in an incestuous relationship and heavily involved in the Paedophile scandal now being investigated. One had a boyfriend in prison and Reg was married for 8 weeks. The official story was that she committed suicide but Reg admitted on his death bed that Ronnie had murdered her through jealousy yet this debauched pair is glamorized for public consumption. Indeed the officer in charge had the Kosminski creature under 24 hour surveillance and was adamant all the way to his grave that he was the ripper. Nevertheless, decades of mainstream books, documentaries and even films sensationalising ‘Jack the Ripper’ and his horrific crimes, dismiss the Jew Kosminski or omit him altogether content to concentrate public opinion in another direction even at the British royal line.
The police actually had Kosminski in custody. He was identified in a police line-up by one of the most important witnesses, Israel Schwartz a Jewish immigrant from Hungary. Schwartz had seen and described the murderer. His statement is as follows-12.45 a.m. 30th. Israel Schwartz of 22 Helen Street, Backchurch Lane, stated that at this hour, on turning into Berner Street from Commercial Street and having got as far as the gateway where the murder was committed, he saw a man stop and speak to a woman, who was standing in the gateway. The man tried to pull the woman into the street, but he turned her round and threw her down on the footway and the woman screamed three times, but not loudly. On crossing to the opposite side of the street, he saw a second man standing lighting his pipe. The man who threw the woman down called out, apparently to the man on the opposite side of the road, ‘Lipski’, and then Schwartz walked away, but finding that he was followed by the second man, he ran so far as the railway arch, but the man did not follow so far. However, after discovering the man whom he identified in a police lineup was Jewish Schwartz refused to testify against him. He claimed because Kosminski was Jewish he wouldn’t have another Jew on his conscience. Yet he had no trouble knowing this creature was on the loose murdering European women.
Nevertheless, prior to his withdrawal Schwartz’ statement provided important information. The word ‘Lipski’ used here is not negligible. In 1887, a Jew named Israel Lipski was convicted and hanged for the murder of Miriam Angel at 22 Batty Street (parallel to Berner Street). The case was controversial due to the influx of Jewish immigrants to Britain during the 1880’s to the extent where it seems the term “Lipski” was used in the neighborhood to insult Jews. The police had hoped that perhaps “Lipski” was the name of the second man seen by Schwartz, so that he could be traced and questioned, but in the end both Anderson and Abberline agreed that the cry was more likely an insult than an appellation. Nevertheless, given that the police had issued via the media a pardon to a co-conspirator proving that they were convinced the ripper did not act alone, the cry of ‘Lipski’ could have been the killer indicating to his accomplice that another Jew was witness to their crimes. This utterance was more obscure than shouting ‘Jew’ and as hoped dismissed as a slight.
It must also be highlighted that during 1880’s British police were investigating subversive political activity specifically involving Jewish immigrants from Poland and Russia. Mainstream suggests that Kosminski immigrated to London with his family during Russian ‘pogroms’ in the early 1880’s. However, reports of ‘pogroms’ are greatly embellished and riots broke out due to unlawful Jewish terrorist activity cumulating in the assassination of Tsar Alexander II by a Jewish terrorist Vera Figner. Immigrants leaving Eastern Europe for Britain contained such terrorist types. Jewish Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli was still Prime Minister in 1880 and his own policy on race condoned this influx of Jewish terrorism and brought the monster Kosminski into Britain. In his book Endymion published in 1880 he wrote “no man will treat with indifference the principles of race. It is the key to history and why history is so often confused is that it has been written by men who were ignorant of this principle and all the knowledge it involves…Language and religion do not make a race-there is only one thing which makes a race, and that is blood” Disraeli (1804 – 1881) was contemporary with Karl Marx (1818 – 1883) and both times as Prime Minister shared the same city as the inventor of White man’s destruction-Communism. With regards to the investigation of political subversion the Great Synagogue and the Imperial Club were both just off Duke Street and were close to Mitre Square where Catharine Eddowes was murdered. Both these sites were potential meeting places for Jewish Communists. The Hebrew Socialist Union had been formed in Gun Street; Spitalfields in 1876 and in 1889, following a march from Berner Street to the Great Synagogue, a riot was to take place outside the International Workers’ Educational Club near where Elizabeth Stride’s body was found. Witness to the Elizabeth Stride murder another Jew Louis Diemschutz was a committed Communist and was listed as speaking at a club in Manchester in 1891, on the theme of the Paris Commune. In his witness testimony, Diemschutz claimed to have not noticed the position of Elizabeth’s hands and yet in a subsequent press interview, stated that “her hands were clenched, and when the doctor opened them I saw that she had been holding grapes in one hand and sweetmeats in the other” signifying a similar disregard for the truth established in his brethren Israel Schwartz. He, along with Isaac Kozebrodsky also witness to the murder scene, were arrested in March 1889 during the riot at the International Working Men’s Club and charged with assaulting a police officer. Diemschutz was sentenced to three months’ imprisonment with hard labour as well as paying £40 and producing two sureties of £20 each, to be forfeited if he failed to be of good behaviour for twelve months.
Now considering the subversive political atmosphere that Jewish immigrants had brought to Britain it is highly significant that the most infamous serial killer of all time, now known to be Jewish, was labelled Jack, the most popular English name. This instantly concealed the real origin of the atrocities and directed suspicion towards the Anglo community. The graffiti found at 108-119 Wentworth Model Dwellings, by PC Alfred Long on 30 Sunday 1888, shortly after the body of Catherine Eddowes, was located several streets away in Mitre Square has also been blamed on local people attempting to get the Jewish community in trouble. This is despite the fact that PC Long, the first officer on the scene, found a piece of Mrs Eddowes’s apron immediately below the cryptic message placing the murderer at the scene. Promoted in the modern mainstream press as a ‘misspelling’ it was obviously hoped that ill-educated natives would be blamed. Now knowing his heritage in actuality it was the Jewish killer Kosminski himself playing on our empathetic instinct. A modern parallel is the Jew who daubes the Swastika on his own property and capitalises on the effect. This chalk-written message, daubed “The Goulston Street Graffiti”, read “The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing.” In actual fact the graffiti is not a misspelling at all but a masonic reference and relates to a murder that took place in ancient times-the Jewish killers of the mason following the building of the temple. It is also intriguing that Met Police Commissioner Sir Charles Warren amidst protests from detectives ordered the message to be rubbed from the wall without any photographs being taken. The press of the time accused Warren of Masonry. Ironically not merely an enthusiastic Freemason, becoming the third District Grand Master of the Eastern Archipelago in Singapore and the founding Master of the Quatuor Coronati Lodge, Warren was one of the earliest European archaeologists of the Biblical Holy Land, and particularly of Temple Mount. The significance is that the killer obviously had connections with masonry and as a Freemason himself Warren’s instinct was to protect a brother Mason.
The constant exploitation of these horrific atrocities as the work of an Englishman despite the fact that the Jew Kosminski was always the most credible suspect castes the English people in a false light. In fact only a week or two after the solving of one of the most notorious cases in history the ostensibly Jewish regime in Europe now find the Ripper tours in London to be rather distasteful according to a report in The Telegraph. Indeed now that the identity of the first modern serial killer has been exposed the Jewish propaganda machine is a lot less vocal in its indictment of the killer even to the point of forgetting to mention that the case has been solved. It is within this vein that again one must question why it has taken 126 years to correctly identify the murderer. The evidence that eventually revealed the Jew Kominski was in police custody when the murder took place. The shawl was found next to the body of Catherine Eddowes, soaked in blood by the first police officer on scene and removed by him from that scene. Yet this shawl, though drenched with blood was dismissed as evidence for its lack of ‘provenance’. Despite the tremendous strides in technology and the media attention surrounding this particular case in 126 years only one forensic test was ever carried out. This was conducted in 2006 for a British Channel 5 documentary. Given the particulars surrounding this case that the results were ‘inconclusive’ indicates a conspiracy of silence that allowed media to continue their smear campaign against a European community.
While it was DNA from the victim’s blood and killer’s semen, isolated on the shawl that identified Kosminski as the ‘Ripper’ the shawl has a much wider implication. It is patterned with Michaelmas daisies. Today the Christian feast of Michaelmas is archaic, but in Victorian times it was familiar as a quarter day, when rents and debts were due. There were two dates for it: one, September 29th, in the Western Christian church and the other, November 8th, in the Eastern Orthodox Church. The two dates coincided precisely with the nights of the last two murder dates. September 29th was the night on which Elizabeth Stride and Catherine Eddowes were killed, and November 8th was the night of the final, most horrific of the murders, that of Mary Jane Kelly. Therefore, it cannot be coincidence that the murder of Annie Chapman on September 8th coincided with Nativity of the Theotokos one of the Twelve Great Feasts of the Eastern Orthodox liturgical year celebrating the birth of Mary and Mary “Polly” Ann Nichols murdered on the 31st August the Feast day of Saint Aidan of Lindisfarne, known as the Apostle of the English. Aidan has been proposed as a possible patron saint of the United Kingdom. Incidentally 31st August is also Mediatrix or intercession of the Virgin Mary. The sequence he killed in appears as Catholic – Orthodox – Catholic – Orthodox confirming a murderous ritual punishment schedule meted out towards European Christian woman. So here we have a case of a Jew specifically choosing ethnic European Christian woman on Christian religious dates for the sole purpose of sexual violation, mutilation and murder. It is difficult to dismiss the charge of ritual murder particularly when one considers the historical impact.
William of Norwich (2 February 1132 – 22 March 1144) was an English boy whose death is attributed to the Jewish community of Norwich. It is the first known medieval case of Jewish ritual murder. The Catholic Encyclopedia states the facts of the case, as accounted by Thomas of Monmouth:
…a boy’s corpse showing signs of a violent death was found in Thorpe Wood near Norwich. It was not touched until Easter Monday, where it was buried without any ceremony where it lay. In the meantime a number of young men and boys had visited the spot and the Jews were suspected of the murder on account of the nature of the wounds … The body was recognized as that of William, a tanner’s apprentice, who with his master had been in the habit of frequenting the houses of certain Jews. The grave was opened by William’s uncle, the priest Godwin Stuart, the body recognized, the burial Office read, and the grave recovered. A few days later the diocesan synod met under the presidence of Bishop Eborard, and Stuart accused the Jews of the murder, and offered to prove his accusation by ordeal. But the Jews of the Norwich Jewry were the king’s men and under the protection of the sheriff, who pointed out that the bishop had no jurisdiction in the case. The failure to secure a condemnation against the Jews seems to have been largely due to the presence of this strong official who held the castle of Norwich. The only result of Sturt’s action at this time was to secure the translation of the body from Thorpe Wood to the monks’ cemetery on 24 April.
Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (1246 – 27 August 1255) also an English boy died by the hands of the Jews in Lincoln. While out playing with his friends, Hugh went missing. His friends told his mother that they had last seen him by the house of a Jew named Copin. Hugh’s mother Beatrice went to Copin’s house and later discovered the body of her murdered son in Copin’s well. Accused of the murder by the courts, Copin confessed to the crime and stated that it was the custom of the Jews to crucify a Christian child every year. Copin and eighteen other Jews were put to death for the murder as a consequence. It is said that a number of Jews had gathered at Copin’s house and tortured the child, scourged and crowned him with thorns and crucified him in mock of death of Jesus Christ.
Simon of Trent (1472 – March 21, 1475) this time a 2-year-old boy from the city of Trento, Italy. His body was found on Easter Sunday 1475 in the cellar of a Jewish family’s house in Trent, Italy. Town magistrates arrested eighteen Jewish men and five Jewish women on the charge of ritual murder.
Saint Gavril Belostoksky (1684- April 11, 1690) a six-year-old Belarussian boy from the village of Zverki, 13 km from Zabłudów, Grodno Uezd (now in Poland). He was kidnapped from his home during the Jewish Passover. Shutko, a Jewish arendator (lease holder) took the boy to Białystok, poked him with sharp objects and drained his blood for nine days, then brought the dead body back to Zverki and dumped it in a local field. When one relates this to the current climate, the amount of missing and or defiled children and the Jewish nature of the Paedophile scandal links are undeniable. One must also point out that the sexual depravity of the ‘Ripper’ murders clearly disturbed the police and during the investigation into Annie Chapman’s murder, the CID wanted to question a male hairdresser going by the name “Mary”; a known sex offender.
To reiterate Kosminski was always the most credible suspect having been in police custody and under 24 hour surveillance during case investigation. Identified as a Barber living in Whitechapel Kosminski joined the ranks of at least four or five other police suspects and several others connected with the Whitechapel murders who were Barbers, or in some way connected with the trade. The cut-throat razor had always been considered a formidable weapon. Incidentally the knife called a chalef used by the Jewish kosher butcher (shochet) to ritually slaughter animals was also examined by police surgeon Dr Gordon Brown to identify if it could produce the wound pattern on murdered victims. PC John Johnson was on duty in the Minories during the early hours of Tuesday 18th September 1888 when he heard a cry of `Murder!’ coming from the direction of a yard called Three Kings Court. He found a man with a woman named Elizabeth Burns. The man said he had done nothing and was sent on his way, but Elizabeth pleaded to be escorted away from the scene by the policeman. She told PC Johnson that the man had threatened her with a big knife but had been too frightened to say anything whith the man on the scene. The culprit was later identified as a barber called Charles Ludwig and was subsequently arrested that same evening by PC Gallagher after an incident at a coffee stall in Whitechapel High Street. Ludwig was described as “well dressed in a frock coat and top hat Dark, slight build, about 5ft 6ins tall, supporting a grizzled moustache and beard”. He was taken to Leman Street Police Station and when searched was found to be carrying a long-bladed knife, scissors and a collection of razors. On the evening of his arrest he had been drinking at a hotel in Finsbury and became annoyed when asked to leave, producing a number of razors and frightening many of the hotel guests. The landlord described Ludwig as follows: “He is a most extraordinary man, is always in a bad temper, grinds his teeth with rage at any little thing that puts him out. I believe he has some knowledge of anatomy, as he was for some time an assistant to some doctors in the German Army, and helped to dissect bodies. He always carries razors and a pair of scissors with him…”
During the 19th Century, and especially in Eastern European countries, the barber-surgeon or ‘feldscher’, a junior or assistant surgeon, were the poor man’s doctor. One such feldscher was Ripper suspect and condemned wife poisoner, Severin Klosowski, alias George Chapman. With a partiality to the pseudonym, in fact over the course of his lifetime Klosowski had presented four names Klosowski, Ludwig, Chapman, and “Smith”. He was found guilty of murder by poison of three women and was hanged on 7th April 1903. Klosowski arrived in England in 1887 a year prior to the Ripper murders having qualified as a junior barber-surgeon, studying in Poland. 1880-85 he was a student at the Hospital of Praga, in Warsaw, and in 1885-86 acted as an assistant feldscher at the same establishment. Kosminski had also once been employed in a hospital in Poland. In England, Klosowski first worked as an assistant barber in the West India Dock Road for Abraham Radin, and 1888-91 was living and working at 126 Cable Street. It is interesting to note that in 1936 there was a plan to brutally attack British ‘black shirts’ (Nationalists) by Jewish organised crime on this very street. Entitled the ‘Battle of Cable Street’ what took place was a Jewish Communist riot that injured many British police. The Jewish element transposed the facts to incriminate Britons indeed much like the propaganda surrounding the multiple fake ripper suspects. During the early part of 1890 Klosowski also worked in a barber’s shop beneath the White Hart Public House which still stands at the corner of Whitechapel High Street and Gunthorpe Street (then George Yard). He was interviewed multiple times by police when 35-year-old prostitute Martha Tabram—sometimes referred to as the first victim of Jack the Ripper—was stabbed thirty nine times in the early hours of the morning on August 6, 1888 only a few weeks prior to the first official Ripper victim. This incident was daubed the ‘bank holiday murder’ because it took place on a bank holiday and it is curious that following the instillation of the Bank Holidays Act 1871 The English people were so thankful that some called the first Bank Holidays St Lubbock’s Days. The murder occurred within a stone’s throw of Klosowski’s place of employment, and it was later proven that at the time, the twenty-two year old had taken up solitary rooms in George Yard Dwellings—the very building in which Tabram was murdered. Kosminski was trading as a Barber in Baker Street during the same period and given their Jewish heritage and mutual careers it is most likely that they knew each other.
Inspector Abberline had questioned a Jewish barber salesman by the name of Wolf Levisohn who said he had spoken to Klosowski in Yiddish and knew him as Klosowski and also by the name Ludwig. He assured Abberline that Klosowski was not the Ripper and urged him to investigate a gentile by the name of Dr Alexander Pedachenko. The 5 victims: Mary Ann Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, Catherine Eddowes and Mary Jane Kelly, initially identified with the ‘Ripper’ where all murdered between 31st August and 9th November 1888 although murders not specifically linked to ‘Jack the Ripper’ continued to occur. Klosowski left for America specifically Jersey City, New Jersey with his then wife, Lucy Baderski, in 1891 the same year that Kosminski was committed to the Colney Hatch Lunatic Asylum and the murders seemed to stopped abruptly. At which point New York was to experience a vicious murder that of an elderly prostitute named Carrie Brown or “Old Shakespeare” because of her affinity for quoting the author when drunk. She was murdered in a common lodging house in Jersey City, New Jersey on St George’s day Patron Saint of England 23rd April her body was discovered on the 24th, 1891. Incidentally William Shakespeare was born and died on 23rd April. The body was first strangled, savagely gutted and the pathologist reports an “X” carved on her left buttock. However, after this site established the Christian significance of the date it is logical to assert that it is a cross, an insulting indicator of the English Saint’s coat of arms (Cross of Saint George). This is not the first time that the killers had left their calling card. Leaving the shawl imprinted with St Michaelmas daisies at the Eddowes murder and a piece of her apron at the site of “The Goulston Street Graffiti” was deliberate incitement to law enforcement when one considers that investigators were cognisant of the killers and even had Kominski in custody. The question that should be posed is why the police investigation was obstructed. Meanwhile, Klosowski had found work in another barber’s shop in Jersey City, New Jersey. It is a remarkable coincidence that the activities of Jewish barber Klosowski coincided so well with Jewish Ripper Kosminski giving weight to the notion of an accomplice. It is also suspicious that Klosowski reappeared in England in 1891 and lived with a woman called Annie Chapman (no relation) and subsequently took her surname, taking the name George Chapman. Chapman/ Klosowski became another well-known Jewish serial killer.
He was committed for trial in February 1902 charged with poisoning Mrs Spink, Maud Marsh, and Bessie Taylor. Abberline himself believed that Klosowski had the potential to be the accomplice. As Abberline stated upon the arrest and trial of Klosowski in 1902, “I have been so struck with the remarkable coincidences in the two series of murders…that I cannot help feeling that this is the man we struggled so hard to capture fifteen years ago” Some 20 years later Deputy Commissioner Anderson was to write his memoirs in which he confirmed that Kosminski was indeed the killer. This was further consolidated by a copy of the book owned by Detective Swanson who had annotated notes in the margins to the same effect. That all involved were convinced of an accomplice going to the lengths of issuing a pardon via the press indicates that the case was not closed until the rope dropped on Klosowski.
Another most disturbing aspect to the ‘Ripper’ murders that rendered Kosminski a prime suspect was the removal and consumption of body parts. A letter was received containing part of a human kidney. The letter described how the killer had cooked and eaten the other half indicating cannibalism. It is a Jewish tradition to eat food representing the flesh of their enemies. At the festival of Purim triangular-shaped pastries meant to represent Haman’s ears (Hamentaschen) and ‘Kreplach’ dough pockets filled with ground beef symbolizing the beaten flesh of Haman are consumed. The kidneys appear to hold a great symbolic significance. In the Pentateuch they are cited 11 times in the detailed instructions given for the sacrificial offering. In five instances, they are mentioned as the organs examined by God to judge an individual and also as mirrors of the psyche of the person examined. There is also reference to the kidneys as the site of divine punishment for misdemeanours, committed or perceived, particularly in the book of Job, whose suffering and ailments are legendary. In the current climate kidneys make up 75% of the global illicit trade in organ trafficking and with ritual murder exposed as a prime motivation for Kosminski modern kidney trafficking maybe more than what it seems. It is also noteworthy that in cases of ritual murder the body is drained of blood for use in Jewish festivals specifically “to bake matzah”.
It is certain now that Kosminski was not a member of the British Royal Family, an eminent surgeon, English actor or politician. Serial killers rarely are. Instead, he was a perverted creature, a sadistic Jew who achieved sexual satisfaction from brutally defiling European women, slashing them to death and mutilating their bodies. One must also consider that Vasili Mikhailovich Blokhin (January 7, 1895 – February 3, 1955) Jewish Bolshevik Major-General who served as the chief executioner of the NKVD under the administrations of Genrikh Yagoda, Nikolai Yezhov and Lavrentiy Beria, was the most prolific hands-on mass murderer in recorded history. A former kosher butcher Blokhin wore his old leather apron from his trade to keep from getting splattered as he fired the pistol into the brains of his victims. Over a period of 25 years Blokhin probably personally killed at least 50,000 people, including about 7,000 Polish prisoners of war during the Katyn massacre in spring 1940. It is pertinent to note the Jewish heritage of both the first modern serial killer and the most prolific mass murderer as no racial consideration is ever given to ethnic Europeans during their racial cleansing. Indeed the Jew has no regard at all for any life other than the Jew. Speaking to Lubavitch Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburgh in the Jewish Week established exactly how the ethnic European can be treated-“If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value. There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life.”
While White Nationalism upholds protection and conservation of the white race on its native land it also recognises the right of other races to maintain their racial heritage within their territory. It is the total disregard for all life inherent in the Jewish mantra irrespective of the environment in which he finds himself that renders the Jew the single greatest threat to individual humanoid races. The further research uncovered by this site using Russell Edwards methodology only scratches the surface. This research has led to obvious conclusions but not being Ripper enthusiasts our efforts end here with the hope that it will inspire more vigorous investigation.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL