From the very beginning a referendum lead by Jewish Zio-Marxism was not going to have a desirable outcome for Europeans. The exit strategy itself was led by Jewish Prime Minister’s Cameron’s cousin Boris Johnson so even out of the Jewish construct (EU) we are still under the Jewish yoke. It is also vital to note that UKIP the party with apparent ‘nationalist’ leanings at the forefront of the Brexit farce is a product of the Jewish occupied Zio-Marxist Government. In a typical Jewish dialectic as the seemingly ‘lesser evil’ UKIP and Farage are paraded against the BNP, also a construct of the occupied government. In a further display of the dialectic Labour leader Corbyn, who not so long ago boasted a Jewish element in his family, opposed Brexit only proving that the Jew covers all sides of the debate. Thus, with the display for public and cameras all tied up this democratic ballot was nothing less than a false flag preordained by the Jews but how does it serve their agenda?
The initial response from the Jewish quarter is to blame the vote on Britain’s older generation. Already a plan exists to exterminate native Britain’s elderly via Pathways. With the help of a sobbing crypto-Jew now the tribe is fracturing ties between the old and young. Continuing along this vein Jews and criminals in Scotland are pushing for devolution and open negotiation with the Jewish construct (EU) leading to calls for the capital London to split from the British Union. While, this is hugely divisive for the European people as a whole in the short term it threatens to tear Great Britain apart part of the Jewish agenda since their agent the homosexual Winston Churchill destroyed Britain’s Empire in the Jewish engineered war.
In a wider context the mass echo Churchill’s quote “If Britain must choose between Europe and the open sea, she must always choose the open sea …” sadly confusing a Jewish structure with occupied European territory. This is a critical distinction for the European Union (EU) although labelled ‘European’ bears absolutely no relation to the European race. This situation has been deliberately engineered and is not new. The atmosphere that arose from Churchill’s quote was meant to drive Briton’s away from their European brethren and closer to America. While we have no wish to alienate our American European kin the notion that Brexit has placed in the European public consciousness i.e. that they are ‘out of Europe’ has the potential to create a monumental rift between European kinsfolk. It is also vital to note that Churchill met with mixed race Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, in 1939 and by 1946 was praising the man’s work in his speech. Known as the father of the EU and financed by Jewish bankers it was Kalergi who was striving to replace the nationalist German ideal of a European racial community with an ethnically heterogeneous (international miscegenation) society. This explains the Jewish Zio-Marxist importation of non-Europeans furthering the Kalergi plan the result being white genocide. Meanwhile, the ever more devolved and fractionalised as a people Europeans become the less likely they are to unite against the Jewish enemy.
It has also come to light that Brexit is being used as an excuse to impose further non-European imports on Britain by way of France. While this furthers the Kalergi plan it likewise fractures relationships between European Nations. Meanwhile, on the home front the Jewish Zio-Marxist media is reporting an upsurge in necessarily false flag ‘racist’ attacks that provide the Jewish occupied government a perfect excuse to execute a host of crippling new ‘hate crime’ laws against native Britons and cover for arrests and possible deaths of European Patriots fighting against Jewish terror and intimidation.
Therefore, while we are only in the early stages of Brexit no respite exists for the native Briton. He, just like his European brethren remains slated as ‘racists’ as the garden of England (Kent) is earmarked to become residence for Europeans tool of destruction. Those that complain about this fresh immigrant onslaught are sure to be criminalised in the newly introduced tightened ‘hate laws’ that the public are convinced Britain requires. If the truth be known it is impossible to predict the entire repercussions, but knowing that the enemy (Jew) holds all the cards why would they provide an open door (referendum) if the outcome no matter how complex that outcome appears was not predetermined? Consequently, there is one surety this move favours the Jew to the detriment of the European and to believe otherwise one would have to be a fool or a willing pawn.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL
Zionism markets itself as Jewish ‘Nationalism’. This is a perversion for Zionism is a parasite that pollutes and destroys. At the most fundamental level Zionist ideology must be understood as a community operating within another community for the good of the ‘guest’ nation not the host nation. Zionism has infected Europe for over 2,000 years though during the last 60 years it has been draining host country’s National wealth and funneling it into Israel. Without continual ‘support’ from external Nations Israel would not survive.
It was during the 19th century that Karl Marx developed Zionism’s most dangerous tool of deception-Communism. With considerable contribution from Moses Hess known as the philosophical father of Zionism Marx produced material that worked on 2 levels. On the face of it Das Capital promises the ‘worker’ a utopian equality through Communism. However, on a deeper level what he is offering is reduction to the lowest common denominator because only then can a mass be the same. Of course this comes at a price since true ‘equality’ does not exist in nature. Thus it was necessary for Communism to formulate mechanisms to enforce ‘equality’. For the Nationalist modern ‘multicult’ policy alive in Europe should provide some insight into the inner workings.
Traditionally, or more correctly idealistically, a Nation is organically grown from the families and communities indigenous to a particular land. The Nation state would be produced from these indigenous peoples and work for them. In modern Europe, however, our indigenous Nations, be that Britain, Germany, France etc have been colonised by innumerate foreign peoples. Even though these people no longer live in their own lands they remain a part of their own nations. We see this particularly at election times when the same face parties try to attract block votes from Muslims, Somali, and African voters. It is clear that these ‘newcomers’ have a solid community identity. They know what their community requires and use the community’s weight to achieve it. In a new land this all comes at the expense of the host community. Here we have a perfect example of the divide and conquer strategy used by Zionism. This is on a grand scale but history shows that the Zionist concept has been in use for centuries.
“The [Jewish] diaspora is commonly accepted to have begun with the 6th century BC conquest of the ancient Kingdom of Judah, destruction of the First Temple (c. 586 BC), and expulsion of the population…” Wikipedia
So the Jews are and have been a scattered people for a long time! To remain an identifiable people would suggest that they have learned to survive among ‘other’ nations without fully adapting to host cultures. This would mean that the ideology developed would have to be one of stealth and cunning. If one was working against the host one would not want to be found out. It may also be necessary to be some what unassuming, blend in. It is only once the underdog has gained a position of power that they can begin to show their true colours.
Though the term Zionism was actually coined by Nathan Birnbaum in 1890, it was Moses Hess who laid the foundation of what is considered as the philosophical base of Zionism with the book Rome and Jerusalem Published in 1862. However, it is clear that the parasitic communities have been by Zionist ideology for centuries prior to Birnbaum’s use of the term. In fact, while not wholly portrayed in the mainstream, it was William of Orange who gave Zionist Jews permission to set up their Bank of England. It was not until the late 1800’s that gentile’s become aware of Zionism. Perhaps now more confident of their power, this ideology is now less concerned of showing their true colours.
Stemming from Zionism Karl Marx, a student of Hess created Communism. His sole intention in producing this ideology was to dupe the masses. In essence Marx created the template for eternal upheaval. Again this can be seen in the original mass Jewish Bolshevik (Communist) revolution. The fundamental idea is to set each group against one another-the worker against employer, rich against poor, man against woman.
Following the initial success of the Bolshevik revolution the plan was to spread Marx’ Communism across Europe. The master plan was to dismantle and replace European culture with hollow, meaningless filth. Naturally the ideology behind this was Zionist as was the parasitic community that was to inherit power. However, Europe did not take to Communism as easily as Mother Russia so a different strategy had to be formed.
Generally speaking it was back to the academy. The Frankfurt School and its close associates the Fabian Socialists needed to redefine ‘Communism’ for a different audience. The politico-economic message of Marxism did not work in Europe so it was necessary to drive the divide and conquer method via European conduct. Thus Cultural Marxism was born and its allies political correctness and anti-Christianity. It is because of these dogmas that the divisive groups such as feminism and anti-Racism develop. The less cohesive White European society the more easily it is to corrupt and consequently control.
Follow us on twitter – http://twitter.com/TheAZL